# data[].attributes.body
It was kind of easy for my group to pick we just were stuck on "oh they are younger they have so much more of their life to live" We just got stuck on ages and professions.
Everyone was contributing equally because we all wanted to have the best lifeboat.
I value age, their job and education.

# data[].attributes.body
1 - It was very easy for our group to make decisions. We agreed on most choices.

2- Everyone was contributing their reasons why to save someone.

3 - Some values were importance, age, what they are doing, how they can help, etc. These were our primary factors in choosing who to save and who not to save.

# data[].attributes.body
1. It wasn't hard we had a small disagreement at some points but it went smoothly
2. Yes we all wanted our voices heard in this activity
3. We cared about skills even if that meant bringing a criminal on the lifeboat.

# data[].attributes.body
1. we had a few disagreements, but overall came to a fair agreement
2. yes, everyone contributed well
3. some cared more about age, some about status, some about jobs, and some about helpfulness. These values contributed to the final decision.

# data[].attributes.body
It was easy
yes
we learned how to make decisions. Worked on decision making

# data[].attributes.body
1. It was semi-difficult for our team, we all had diffrent opinions on really what type of people we should take, like should we take the people wjho will help us survive, or the people who deserve to survive.
2.Yes, I think everyone contributed equally, and we all got our thoughts in.
3. we valued age, how they can help us survie was the big one, we just focused on gettin all the neccecary people to survive first, then we went after people who helped others. or were young.

# data[].attributes.body
1. For the most part it was not that bad making decisions, but there were a couple disagreements that we got around easily

2. We were all contributing, if we agreed we would share it, and if not we would do the same, and we all took turns contributing on the slides as well.

3. Collaboration was very important for this so we could hear different sides of the opinion to get good ideas on why or why not

# data[].attributes.body
1. It was not too difficult because we all pretty much agreed on everything
2. Everyone contributed an equal amount
3. We valued age and ability to help us survive

# data[].attributes.body
1. It was slightly hard to decide who the most important people were
2.Yes because we all had different opinions
3. Empathy was involved a lot and just thinking about the furture

# data[].attributes.body
1. It was very easy we all agreed on everything
2. everyone put in at least the answers so yes
3. mostly what they did and age

# data[].attributes.body
1. Not very difficult
2. Yes, everyone was
3. collaboration (thinking together to come up with an answer), engagement (knowing what everyone was saying and contributing), and organization (organizing the slides) were the main values in my opinion

# data[].attributes.body
1) It wasn't super difficult for our group to make decisions. We all kind of agreed on a system of who to eliminate at the beginning, and everyone pretty much agreed on who to save and who to kill.

2) Everyone contributed during our discussion and process of elimination.

3) We mainly focused on age and the importance of their occupation. We prioritized youth and the criminal, doctor working on cancer, and women running a homeless shelter were at the end.

# data[].attributes.body
1. It was not hard because we agreed on most things
2. I feel that we contributed kind of equally but some people did contribute more then others
3. Some people in my group though that we should save the millionaire while some didn't because it did not say that they would do something helpful with their money

# data[].attributes.body
1. It was difficult because we sometimes had different opinions on who should be saved and it took a lot of persuading
2. Everyone contributed equally because everyone wanted to get there thoughts out so everyone got a turn to go.
3. We thought about a lot of things but we usually ended up coming to petty

# data[].attributes.body
1 - We had a little trouble making decisions.
2 - I think that everyone was contributing pretty much equally because some people focused on writing our discussion down and some were more active in the conversation.
3 - When deciding who to save some values that came up were kindness (who had helped the most people or who would if they were saved) and helpfulness (who would help the most on the boat).

# data[].attributes.body
1. not very difficult
2. Sort of, everyone did have things to talk about
3. Collaboration came a up a lot because we had to work in a group

# data[].attributes.body
1. How difficult was it for your team to make decisions?
2. Was everyone contributing equally?  Why or why not?
3. Which and how did different values come up during the activity?

# data[].attributes.body
We were quick and effective at making decisions.

We all contributed because we wanted our opinions to be heard I think.

We cared about survival just in case, so nurse, farmer, and criminal, were all saved.

# data[].attributes.body
It was very difficult to decide whether to bring the old lady who helps out at a homeless shelter. Even though she was old, some of us thought she was already useful enough and didn't need to be brought along, while others thought that she deserved a chance because of her good heart. Yes everyone was contributing equally. Max had a few tech issues but he still helped out. Oh I answered that in the first question. I valued who was the good person rather than who was young or old. I tried not to take pity on people who unfortunately I could not pick. :)

# data[].attributes.body
1. It was pretty easy. We all understood each others ideas and thoughts. We did debate about some of the people but overall, we agreed.

2. Everyone helped out about equally. We all shared individual ideas and opinions equally as well.

3. Some people said we should prioritize saving young people because the old people were not going to live much longer and the young people can help the group more. Some others also wanted to save people with skills or abilities like a nurse or doctor that can help the group with illnesses.

# data[].attributes.body
1 Not difficult
2 everyone added equally
We came up with how useful someone would be to us. For example would we need a principal more or a nurse?