# data[].attributes.body
GLOW:
Nicolette's oral presentation was clear and descriptive. Her tone was enthusiastic but appropriately contrasted to the text. Her use of the visual format in terms of attractiveness, was visually appealing.

GROW:
Although the presentation made great use of appealing characteristics, elements which could have enhanced her project, would be to first lengthen the presentation a bit more. Lastly, to condense the information into bullet points or shorter sentences rather than extended paragraphs.

# data[].attributes.body
GLOW:
Myles' oral presentation was very clear. He is a great speaker and was entertaining to listen to.

GROW:
The presentation could have been enhanced in a few ways. Firstly, extending the overall time and presentation to meet the requirements would have been more suitable. Additionally, the usage of further text components would have been the presentation more comprehensive and informative.

# data[].attributes.body
GLOW:
I thought that Matt presented really interesting points and brought about an innovative perspective regarding elements. I especially liked his points for example regarding social media and how even our technology is keeping us informed and self-aware of the effects through settings like ScreenTime built into the phone itself.

GROW:
Matt discussed really interesting opinions about the course content, however the visual medium was difficult to attend to. It would have been more appealing to break down his reflective essay into the format of key features discussed and also include an exciting background, corresponding images, and text enhancers to even further emphasize key points.

# data[].attributes.body
GLOW:
Lauren's oral component was really strong. She was very clear and her tone made it easy to follow along as a listener. She made a good use of range and it was reflective of her points and the information being presented.

GROW:
Because her oral component was so strong, it was not necessary to add lengthy text components and the presentation would have been better served relying on this strong oral part, and condensing into key bullet points to emphasize critical elements like expressed in the TEDTalk.

# data[].attributes.body
GLOW:
Kasey's presentation was beautifully designed. Her use of visual components were complementary not overwhelming. She also discussed how creativity related to many aspects of her life and relayed excellent points for each of these contexts.

GROW:
The format and presentation of the information was a bit overwhelming. Although the presentation itself was beautiful and engaging, the text needed to be condensed into bullet points to enhance to reader's interpretation. The paragraph format was too lengthy and included information which would have been more suitable to elaborate on using the oral medium.

# data[].attributes.body
GLOW:
Alexandria's presentation was informative and interesting. Engaging the audience at the end of her presentation was a great way to grab the listener's attention and consider her points discussed throughout. I really served the 'reflective' component of the presentation.

GROW:
Although the presentation was informative and her own notions were interesting, it would have been helpful to elaborate on specific elements. Some of the transitions seemed a bit abrupt.

# data[].attributes.body
GLOW:
I thought that Mitva's presentation was incredibly thorough and informative. Each component from the requirements was described, and her connection to personal experiences was clear. The information was presented clearly with corresponding bullet points with the oral descriptions.

GROW:
Although we have learned in this course that utilizing a plain background with minimal distractions is key in order to keep the listeners' attention during a presentation, it would have been helpful to have a bit more color or some images (there were some!) to enhance the presentation since the project excluded an actual human presence.

# data[].attributes.body
GLOW:
Cherise made great use of the visual format, using really creative backgrounds and colorful images. They were not distracting, but adding an element of appeal in addition to her verbal components. Additionally, I was very interested by her relevance of creativity as it relates to her experience here at SHU.

GROW:
The oral presentation could have been expanded upon. Perhaps supplementing personal notions with actual textual information could have been useful in doing so.

# data[].attributes.body
GLOW:
I really enjoyed how Jenna formatted her presentation. The usage of the content to her own experiences and relevance made it easy to establish the parallels. She did an excellent job at creating a visual aid which was not distracting, but instead served as its intended usage as an aid. Her slides were key summaries of the information she orally discussed, making it easy to attend to her presentation.

GROW:
Jenna's presentation was excellent. On her presentation however an introduction and conclusion slide were absent. In addition to providing the information acquired in her survey, it would have been helpful to also have some of these in text form in the presentation. Overall, I really enjoyed her presentation!

# data[].attributes.body
GLOW:
Patrick's information and his perspectives were clearly incredibly reflective and intelligent. His points were emphasized clearly the format was also easy to follow along as the reader. He made insightful comments and everything was very original.

GROW:
Although his content was so insightful, the visual delivery of such was lacking. Because Patrick utilized his paper itself, and read word by word, it was hard to pay attention to his oral discussion, because I found myself instead reading his text myself. It would have been more suitable to utilize emphasized elements from each component, which would have complemented the content more efficiently.