# data[].attributes.body
Bad peer review example:

# data[].attributes.body
4a: Is the grammar correct? Is the language formal or informal? How do I make this better? How can I add more detail?
4b: It's getting feedback in a casual setting whereby the other person understands the same work process as you because they've been assigned the same task. It's to help the other person build on their writing. It should not be a comparison of work or but rather to help the person with the content of their writing as opposed to skim read and do grammar checks.
4G, 4E, 4I: Peer evaluation is good when the peer knows you better because they understand your work and thinking process better. Some peers will not try very hard to review work well. Instructor feedback is very formal and is direct.
4J: This will alter depending on the assignment. More often than not, if the assignment does not require you to incorporate this into your work, it is unlikely that this is included in the work process.

# data[].attributes.body
1)Does my writing include deductive and inductive reasoning as well as a coherent flow?
2) Peer review should be a fresh second opinion as well as a review of grammatical errors. A good peer review should allow the writer to build off or edit from the peer's opinion. A bad peer review would include commentary without explanation or advice. (one word phrases: Good work!) https://assets.teenvogue.com/photos/5c291fadca876b2cc1879bee/master/w_775,c_limit/IMG_3391.jpg
3) We use feedback as a flexible tool for improvement or argument. Peers write about what they think will help, while instructors write feedback that will aim to improve your writing as a whole and not just this one text.
4) If visuals/ media/ design is a requirement of the text, then it is immediately included in the writing. However, all of these tools should contribute to your thesis and flow.

# data[].attributes.body
4a. Am I answering the prompt? Did I include enough information? Does this make sense? Is this not concise?
4b. To get multiple perspectives to help you catch errors that might make your writing less fluid. Peer review should include constructive criticism, positive feedback, areas with potential. Feedback shouldn't be...
https://www.amazon.com/CHEERSON-Christmas-Easy-Assembly-Artificial-Evergreen/product-reviews/B075D6KM4N/ref=cm_cr_dp_d_hist_1?ie=UTF8&filterByStar=one_star&reviewerType=all_reviews#reviews-filter-bar
4e,g,i. Feedback is influential and we feel we value it the most when it is given from people we trust (family, credible friends,and instructors). It easier to take your instructor's feedback more seriously than your peers.
4j.

# data[].attributes.body
1. How can I make this flow better , Does this make sense. Does my writing end at a cliff hanger or is it resolved.
2. Peer review should not be putting others down it should instead be constructive criticism from people with similar experiences and knowledge.
3. Feedback from my instructor is significantly more important, generally I find my peers don't actually care about what they are reading.
4. I decide based on my audience, the content of my writing and if the design is informative, not distracting.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Is my point getting across? Is this spelled correctly? Does this have correct grammar? Is it comprehensive? Does it get off topic? WHY NOW? I'm usually tired when I talk to myself about my writing. When I go back I look a little more critically at my work.

2. Have a different set of eyes to catch mistakes or make suggestions that you may not have considered before. It is an exercise to get you out of your own head. Good example of bad peer review (see below.)

3. Personally, I prefer when my peers and instructors destroy my writing. Praise is a writer's worst enemy. Praise let's you accept mediocracy.

4. Uh.... Unless it's specifically asked for... I find myself rarely including visual media. I let my audiences have imagination (aka I work for a storefront with no budget. #TTS #OnFoodStampsInThreeYears)

# data[].attributes.body
1) 4a. ask ourselves if the thesis makes sense and the ideas flow correctly. We make sure we aren't repetitive with certain words or phrases. The grammar is all correct.
2) The purpose of peer review is to give feedback and it also helps the person giving feedback to improve as well. Peer review should be helpful and respectful. It shouldn't be rude. (https://media.sproutsocial.com/uploads/2015/11/Trolls-Examples_1-Dont-Stoop-To-Their-Level-REV.png
3) We both use feedback to fix certain aspects of the piece we're writing. Also, we both take instructor feedback more seriously since they are probably more experienced with critiquing and fixing essays.
4) Usually will not include visuals, media or design unless told to.

# data[].attributes.body
1. We often ask ourselves if the paper flows well with proper punctuation and sentence structure. We also check to make sure we aren't repeating the same words and include variety.
The self talk that goes through our mind is basically reading the words out loud, but not really out loud. Just to see if it sounds correct.

2. Peer review should be used to offer a different perspective on one's writing. It can help point out issues that can be lost by the author when they've been staring at the same work for hours.
Peer review should not be used as a way to feel superior to someone else. It should be critical, but not in a mean way.

3. We use feedback in altering word choice, structuring paragraphs, and making sure our ideas are presented well. If a fresh reader can't understand what your paper is trying to say, it's probably not written the best it can be.

Instructor feedback is more heavily weighed versus peer feedback. It really comes down to the fact that the instructor is grading your work and is accredited in what you're learning.

4. If the project requires the implementation of media besides an essay, it willbe included. Otherwise, it takes focus away from the writing.

# data[].attributes.body
1. If I were the reader would I enjoy this?, Does this make sense?
2. It's use should be to get constructive feedback to improve your writing https://www.redroll.com/2018/12/02/an-xxxtentacion-tv-show-no-thanks/
3. We take instructor feedback more seriously and actually make the change and we take peer review more lightly
4. Only if it is included in the project, otherwise we wouldn't want to get points deducted for something we didn't need.