# data[].attributes.body
The case of Reginald Griffin proves that there are cases in which the death penalty is not justified. The evidence against him was suspect at best. His trial was contaminated by unreliable witnesses, hidden evidence, and mistaken identity. These factors resulted in an unfair trial and placed an innocent man on death row.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that in Bundy's case, the death penalty was justified. He murdered and raped not just one woman, but thirty-six, an immoral and unforgivable feat. Furthermore, there was a plethora of physical evidence that proved Bundy was the one who committed the crimes.

# data[].attributes.body
- Sentenced to death for murder of fellow inmate (had been in prison for assault related charges) in 1983
- Spent 30 years in prison on death row
- Conviction overturned in 2011 when state was revealed to have been withholding evidence
that murder weapon was found in hands of another inmate
- During trial, eath penalty won by citing prior conviction not committed by Griffin, but rather man with same name
- Jailhouse informants who testified against Griffin found to have been given benefits in exchange for their testimony

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Death row inmate exonerated after 30 years

# data[].attributes.body
Fibers from victim's clothing found in Bundy's car

# data[].attributes.body
Items below all found in Bundy's car

# data[].attributes.body
- Serial killer and rapist
- 36 killings of young women across several states in the 1970's
- Death by electric chair at Florida State Prison in 1989

# data[].attributes.body
The study of teeth and tooth marks, often used in criminal cases

# data[].attributes.body
Impressions of Bundy's teeth taken, structures matched postmortem bite marks found on victims