# data[].attributes.headline
A very good meeting  as a Level 3 IT Trainer. Understanding  units and Mapping tool.

# data[].attributes.subject
A very good meeting  as a Level 3 IT Trainer. Understanding  units and Mapping tool.

# data[].attributes.body
This session was very Level 4 focused. I did not receive an agenda, had i got this I probably would have attended the next one as I am solely level 3 focused.

# data[].attributes.headline
A very good meeting with lots of interaction, however going forward I feel either smaller groups or a bigger room due to the amount of staff that attended. I did feel this meeting was much more beneficial and covering more at level 4. It would be a good idea to cover trailblazers at level 3 and 4, especially for the staff that are not aware of the content, threshold, projects and exams. 

# data[].attributes.subject
A very good meeting with lots of interaction, however going forward I feel either smaller groups or a bigger room due to the amount of staff that attended. I did feel this meeting was much more beneficial and covering more at level 4. It would be a good idea to cover trailblazers at level 3 and 4, especially for the staff that are not aware of the content, threshold, projects and exams. 

# data[].attributes.headline
I think more interaction would have been better as the concentration levels towards the end started to fade. Also a larger room with smaller number such as cluster groups would possibly have been more suited.  

# data[].attributes.subject
I think more interaction would have been better as the concentration levels towards the end started to fade. Also a larger room with smaller number such as cluster groups would possibly have been more suited.  

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Infrastructure Technician L3 TB Overview

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Infrastructure Technician Level 3 Competence

# data[].attributes.body
It was widely mentioned that there needs to be three installations to complete unit 318. Where is this stipulated? I know it says a range but wanted to clarify why 3? Luckily my learners achieve this but would like clarification.

Thank you for your comment.  As the unit mentions a wide range, three is classed as a wide range, rather than a couple or few...

# data[].attributes.headline
For 425 - Could you upload some examples of different successful attempts with EQA commentary?

# data[].attributes.subject
For 425 - Could you upload some examples of different successful attempts with EQA commentary?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Unit 425 Web Design - File 47 -Additional evidence

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Unit 425 Web Design - File 46 -Additional evidence

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Unit 425 Web Design - File 48 -Additional evidence

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Unit 425 Web Design - File 49 -Additional evidence

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Pearson BTEC Level 3 Diploma in Professional Competence for IT and Telecoms Professionals (QCF)
425 has been sampled.
425 has been deferred.

File 28, 39, 40, 41 sampled


I am concerned as looking at the evidence it does not seem like the apprentice does web design for the company he works for as he talks about sites he has created for himself. The only mention of a company site is wavex. Is this the site the apprentice produced for the company they work for? If not then please replace all mention of evidence for wavex below to relate to a website the apprentice has created at work for the company they work for.

As this is a level 4 unit the amount of work submitted should be substantial. The answers to a lot of the apprentice's questions in file 28 are anything but. For example Q6 asks for the apprentice to explain the advantages and disadvantages of multimedia elements in different contexts. All he talks about is two imaging elements. What about audio and video. He needs to expand his answers for the following questions:
Q4 (does not talk about methodologies and only mentions one technology)
Q6 (needs to cover more multimedia types such as audio and video)
Q7 (barely counts as a description let alone the explanation required. He has not really answered the question)
Q8 (again a description, not an explanation: why was the W3C formed? How does its standards effect the design and development of websites)
Q9 (has not explained the W3C standards and how they are applied to web coding)
Q10 (needs more detail. This is barely a Level 3 answer. It is two statements, not a discussion)
Q14 (has not really gone into enough detail. No advantages mentioned and why is security or reliability a disadvantage)


With file 39 and AC2.3 the standards require the apprentice to write the source code for a web page (all he has provided is a snippet of code) to a specification. What is the specification for the web page? The apprentice needs to submit both the specification for the site he has produced and the code to it (at least one of the pages)

With file 40 a site map is usually a drawn map showing the connections between the pages of the web site, their content and any details from the specification. In the design phase this is what they are for. The sitemap.xml is code used by robots to add them to search engine databases and is generated at the creation stage of the website. Also how can you ensure the apprentice has identified design features for the website without the specification. Finally he is evaluating the software used not design models (such as Agile or Waterfall). I agree with your feedback that I do not agree with the evidence for the criteria file 40 is mapped to. The apprentice needs to submit the specification for the site. List in detail the key design features of the site from the spec and evaluate two design models

File 41 is unacceptable. The whole unit must relate to the design, development and testing of a website so all elements of the evidence must relate to the same website. The apprentice talks about a wavex website for work so this should be the one he tests. He should have a detailed test strategy on how he was going to test the various elements of the website and how he was going to test across multiple browsers and devices. State the expected results from each of the tests and document the actual results, then analyse these results and investigate and rectify any issues.


Actions to complete verification:
Apprentice to provide specification of the wavex website
Apprentice to create a proper drawn site map of the wavex website they created
Apprentice to provide full code (HTML and CSS) for one page of the wavex website.
Apprentice to provide more substantial answers to those questions listed above
Apprentice to submit testing strategy and test documentation and evidence for wavex website

# data[].attributes.body
Don't forget to add your questions too.

# data[].attributes.body
Feedback