# data[].attributes.body
Our group chose the question of "How many hours a week do you workout," for several different reasons. The first, main reason we chose this question is because we knew that many people would probably be able to relate to this question because pretty much everyone has had an experience with working out. We knew that this trait would allow for many different people to answer the question effectively. We also chose this specific question because we knew we would receive a variety of different answers, considering the range of varying fitness levels our target audience would have. We found this question to be simple, yet appropriate for this project.
The average number of hours those surveyed worked out was not what we originally expected. Our group expected the average amount of hours spent working out to be about 2 hours, but instead the average was 3.78 hours. This shocked us a little as the actual average was a bit higher than we had thought it would be. To find the average, we took all of the data points and added them together before dividing them by the number of data points. This is the same calculations done to find the mean. The median was 4. This number is the middle value and helped to give us a rough approximation of what the average would be like. The mode was 5 hours. 5 hours of exercise got 14 votes in our study, and was by far the most common. We would say that the mode best describes our data because most of the people surveyed fell into the 4-5 hour range, and the mode is representation of that.
Our peak was at our 4-5 column with 18 being the highest number. There were no gaps, and we can see this in the histogram. 10 and 12 were our outlier because we only had 1 of each of them and it skewed our average. Most people fell into our 4-5 hours per week column making that our cluster. We found the range by finding the difference of our maximum number (12), and our minimum number (0). The range is 12.  Our data results were not very spread out. This shows in our standard deviation it being: 2.75. The frequency distribution is very near to what we expected. For example, we did not expect for individuals to work out 10+ hours. In our frequency chart, only 2 people work out 10+ hours. Also, we expected individuals to work out perhaps 2-4 hours per week. Our results show that most people work out about 4-5 hours per week. This shows that our prediction was close to the result.
We could have changed the way our numbers looked on the frequency distribution chart to be misleading by distributing the results differently. Some of the graphs show how many people responded within the number of hours they worked out. We can tell with the most of the graphs that 4-5 hours was the most people worked out a week. One graph demonstrates examples of people who worked out to people who do not. The bar graph illustrates the best data for a couple reasons. It is easy to compare and read the number of hours students worked out each week. It is very organized and has an x-axis and y-axis. It explains it very well.

# data[].attributes.body
Hours Working Out Per Week

# data[].attributes.body
Mean: 3.78
Median: 4
Mode:5
Max:12
Min: 0
Midrange: 6
Range: 12
Sample Standard Deviation: 2.75006493

# data[].attributes.body
0-1=11
2-3=12
4-5 =18
6-7=5
8-9=2
10-11=1
12-13=1