# data[].attributes.body
-Good eye contact
-Stated problem
-Went over Characters

Criteria-- Must be alive, not exotic, not aggressive, and fit with lifestyles.

Dog, Cat, or Fish.

Tristan wast's a goldfish because they don't do anything and are trapped in a bowl or tank

Nathan wants a cat because they're easy to take care of and have many positives for feeling good

Sam wants a dog because they "cuddle"

# data[].attributes.body
referred to their articles

# data[].attributes.headline
bouncing ideas respectively, backing up idea with facts

# data[].attributes.subject
bouncing ideas respectively, backing up idea with facts

# data[].attributes.body
maysen krueger

# data[].attributes.body
defined problem
clearly stated criteria

# data[].attributes.body
-clearly stated rules and roles
-established criteria
-seems prepared
-conversation moves smoothly
-asks questions
-defends points
-Selected an option that fits all criteria

# data[].attributes.body
Clear and well-developed rules, specific criteria, strong solutions, good variety of solutions, could have better eye contact, state how solutions follow criteria, using sources, good with moving the conversation along and including other group members, most seem well prepared, good questions, following the steps well,

# data[].attributes.body
. Problem: What kind of pet to get

The Problem was clearly stated. The rules were stated. Possible solutions are said. Many people are referring to the text according to their articles to help explain/prove their idea.They ask each other questions to get engaged in the conversation and even deeper into the conversation. Good Eye contact between the group. Follow the steps of dewey. Good Job summarizing despite the limited amount of options with the partners gone. Good job being specific between animals. Found solution to fit criteria.

# data[].attributes.headline
good job clearly stating criteria, problem, and roles

# data[].attributes.subject
good job clearly stating criteria, problem, and roles

# data[].attributes.body
maysen krueger

# data[].attributes.body
good eye contact

# data[].attributes.body
The problem is well stated, the criteria is also defined. Everyone in the group has research and seems prepared with different ideas. Good eye contact, everyone seems comfortable discussing. The members are stating their ideas and them giving valid reasons to compromise. Everyone in the group challenges each other with well asked questions.  Discussion went very well even though they were missing two members.

# data[].attributes.body
-All want kind of similar criteria which makes it easy to come to consensus.
- Do a good job referring to their texts.
-Problem is well defined
-They are the good kind of critical of each other.
-They engage each other well.
-Made sure the answer fir the criteria.

# data[].attributes.body
Stated roles
Criteria clearly stated
Gave ideas for solution
Shared good research
Willing to adjust point of view.
Narrowed down solution

# data[].attributes.body
-States the rules and criteria
-Didn't interrupt each other
-go into detail with their own ideas
-Summarizes
-Get each other into the conversation
-They ask questions
-Challenge each others point of view
-Have many ideas
-went with the dog
Then narrowed it down to a pug
-Then go into the steps to get the dog then take care of it

# data[].attributes.body
Group rules were presented in a direction way. Also everyone's criteria was presented in an effective way. Solutions were all good and presented respectfully. They narrowed down their decisions very well. The dog was a good choice to make. The pug was also a good choice. They did a good job carrying out their idea and presenting their final plans.

# data[].attributes.body
What kind of pet? Fish, Dog, Cat. Described criteria good. Lacked eye contact. Lots of referring to text. Good questions. Solutions are all good. Moments of no talking for awhile. Agree to get a dog. Specifically they decide on a pug because it can be left alone long.

# data[].attributes.body
explained why they want a pet and good job on stating the criteria
defined problem
gave ideas for the pet
refers to articles and everyone's point of view

# data[].attributes.body
defined problem
rules for discussion defined
roles defined
criteria defined
suggesting possible solutions
referring to text
more referring to text
suggestions are possible and fit criteria
more referring to text
considered all points of view
asking questions
bringing others into conversation
referring to text
using criteria in solutions
narrowing down options based on criteria
decision reached based on criteria
taking steps to carry out solution

# data[].attributes.body
Stated rules
Stated Roles
Went over criteria
explained why they want each animal and how it would fit everyone's criteria. Refereed to their articles. Good eye contact and seem educated on their animal of choice. Came to an agreeable conclusion on buying a dog that fits everyone's criteria

# data[].attributes.body
this groups roles were defined clearly, and they all stated their claim quickly and efficiently while still getting their point across. criteria was established. they challenged each other with propelling questions, and were very polite and respectful while doing so. the entire group was able to fluently and freely refer back to their articles, clear and loose rules. sympathetic of groups needs.