# data[].attributes.body
1. Both cases were similar in the fact that the parents saw their kids being mistreated due to their skin color, and we're upset with the Board of Education's "Separate but Equal" policy. They fought for their children to go to schools where their white neighborhood  friends went and where they wouldn't be treated as inferior because of their race.  One difference is that although the Mendez family were bribed with entry to the school when they threatened to get a lawsuit against them, they felt that they had to help the other children that couldn't enter, and followed through with the lawsuit. Meanwhile, when the Brown family tried to enroll their daughter into the school just 8 blocks away from their home, they were denied entry several times,  and with the help of other families sued the Board of Education for racial discrimination.

2. The Mendez case influenced the BvBoE case when African Americans saw that the Mendez family gained racial equality for their Latino students by court appeal. They then proceeded to plead the same case for their situation because the cases were similar in everything but race. Therefore, they pleaded their case to racial discrimination, and ended up getting their schools desegregated and integrated.

Grace Jones

# data[].attributes.body
SSQ1: Both cases were similar for their motivation to fight for integration and liberate segregation. In the 1900’s both Sylvia Mendez family and Oliver Brown family both went to enroll their kids at an all-white school and it didn’t turn out as planned. Both were denied admission to all-white schools where segregation was mandated. So, they took this problem into their own hands and fought vigorously to make a change. Only a couple years later in different time spans, both the Sylvia Mendez family and the Oliver Brown family brought forth the first steps leading towards desegregation. Sooner than later they both were able to have their kids in the family to enroll and have admission to attend the all-white schools. The differences between both cases was that the fight in Mendez v. Westminster case was for Hispanics and the fight in case Brown vs. Board of Education was for African Americans.

SSQ2: Mendez v. Westminister influenced the Brown vs. Board of education case since it happened years before it. Mendez v Westminster brought forth desegregation and could be used as evidence that schools like Sumner Elementary could be desegregated and integrated.

-Deja Nickerson

# data[].attributes.body
1. Both cases were similar in the fact that they wanted to give students who attended school the rights to be equal with everyone else. The goal was to desegregate schools in America for both of them. Although, the Brown v. Board of Education was focused more on integrating African Americans while Mendez v. Westminster was more focused on Hispanics.
2.  Mendez v Westminster influenced Brown v Board of Education by explaining that schools did not need to be segregated because of the race of oneself.

# data[].attributes.body
both Mendez v. Westminister and brown v. BOE were similar in a way. They both fought for integrating schools and giving all children the equal rights they deserved as society. The difference in both is that in the Mendez v. Westminister they were trying to integrate Latinos in schools with white children but on the other hand brown v. BOE were integrating African American children/students.
2. Mendez v. Westminister influenced brown v. BOE by demonstrating that segregation in schools is a big no no and that it’s unconstitutional.

# data[].attributes.body
Both of these cases were similar in the way they both fought to have equal, integrated schools for people of color- their main difference was the race of the community being fought for, seeing as Brown vs. Board of Education fought for blacks to be integrated, while mendez vs. Westminster fought for hispanics. Mendez vs Westminster probably influenced brown vs board of education because it proved that it was possible to get integrated schools for people of color.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Both Mendez v. Westminster and Brown v. BOE were similar in the way that they both fought to integrate schools and give children more equal rights. They differed in the fact that Mendez v. Westminster was trying to integrate Latinos students into the schools and Brown v. BOE was about integrating African American students.
2.Mendez v. Westminster influenced Brown v. BOE because it occurred a few years before and it demonstrated that the segregation of schools is not equal and unconstitutional. It also showed that it was possible to integrate schools.

# data[].attributes.body
1- Both cases were fighting for schools to be integrated.
2- Mendez V. Westminster influenced Brown v Boe because Mendez V. Westminster showed that separate schools weren't equal.

# data[].attributes.body
Comparing and

# data[].attributes.body
1.I say that both cases were fighting for being in a school for example different color people were aiming to be in white schools and to be together.
2.Brown v BOE wanted Latinos to go to white schools and both cases were fighting for integration and equal rights.

# data[].attributes.body
in both cases they their kids to go to schools that were equal and both cases helped fight against segragation and helped get colored people rights in the states they lived in also known as the southern states

# data[].attributes.body
1 both cases were fight to get in white school and give the right to people of color to get into those school Latinos aimed for white school while blacks aim for whites only

2 Mendez vs Westminster Influence black vs board the education because they saw how unfair color school  got it compared to white school the different items everything was a downgrade

# data[].attributes.body
Mendez v Westminster and Brown v BOE both pushed to integrate races in schools. They believed in equal rights for students all students. Especially those being isolated. The Mendez v Westminster worked for Latinos into school and Board v BOE tried to get African-Americans into schools.

Mendez v Westminster influenced Brown v BOR by demonstrating that segregation in schools is unconstitutional. Schools differentiated by race oppose equality.

# data[].attributes.body
1. both of these cases were fighting for equal rights for children who were black and latinos. Mendez Vs. Westminster was trying to get latinos into "white schools", while brown Vs board of educaton was trying to get into 'white only" schools also.
2. Mendez Vs Westminster influenced Brown Vs board of education because they were both fighting for that same issue that was happening in several states and wanted to show the unfair segregation of two different races and how they're impacting the economy mentally.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Both cases were fighting for integrated schools and were about equal rights for children, but Mendez V. Westminster was trying to get Latinos into the "whites only" schools while Brown V. BOE was trying to get African Americans into the "white only" schools.
2. Mendez V. Westminster influenced Brown V BOE because Mendez V. Westminster proved that the segregation of schools by race is unconstitutional and not equal.

# data[].attributes.headline
Mendez v Westminster and Brown v Boe - Eldeer Patino

# data[].attributes.subject
Mendez v Westminster and Brown v Boe - Eldeer Patino

# data[].attributes.body
Both Mendez v Westminster and Brown v Boe were fighting for integrated schools. The thing is that Mendez v Westminster was for latinos to get into schools for only whites, and Brown v Boe was mainly for African-Americans.

Mendez v Westminster influenced Brown v Boe because Mendez v Westminster happened just a few years before and showed how separate schools were not equal.

# data[].attributes.body
1. To compare and contrast the two, Brown V. Board and Mendez V. Westminster, they both were fighting for the same thing. But one had more impact.
2 Mendez V. Westminster was an influence for Brown V. Board, Mendez V. Westminster happened only a couple years before. It stated that segregated schools bye race was not fare, and that separate but equal is not equal, and that it is completely unconstitutional.

# data[].attributes.body
Brown v. Board differs from these two cases because instead of focusing on a single university, it declared that all segregated public schools were unconstitutional. This case made a bigger impact on history than the other two cases. In both Mendez v. Westminster, at the federal district court level, and Brown v. Board

# data[].attributes.headline
Mendez v Westminster and Brown v BOE -Nyalah Rolle

# data[].attributes.subject
Mendez v Westminster and Brown v BOE -Nyalah Rolle

# data[].attributes.body
1. To compare them, they were both about getting equal rights for school children i.e. integrating schools. They're different in the fact that Mendez v Westminster is trying to get Latinos into the "whites only" schools whilst Brown v BOE is advocating for African-American integration into schools.
2. Mendez v Westminster influenced Brown v BOE because Mendez v Westminster occurred a couple of years before Brown v BOE and it proved that the segregation of schools by race was unconstitutional. It proved that the separate schools are NOT equal, especially in these cases.

# data[].attributes.headline
how did Mendez v Westminster influence brown v Boe? Compare/ Contrast the two cases.

# data[].attributes.subject
how did Mendez v Westminster influence brown v Boe? Compare/ Contrast the two cases.

# data[].attributes.body
At the appellate level, Mendez wasn't decided on Constitutional grounds, but on the wording of the state statute that allowed for segregation--it specified segregated schools for various ethnic groups.
In both stories they Fought for equal rights. Mendez fought for the Latinos to attend the whites only school. Brown fought for all the races to attend school

# data[].attributes.headline
Compare/Contrast the two cases and the response to each.
How did Mendez v Westminster influence Brown v BOE? Ana Contreras period 7

# data[].attributes.subject
Compare/Contrast the two cases and the response to each.
How did Mendez v Westminster influence Brown v BOE? Ana Contreras period 7

# data[].attributes.body
Both cases each share the same characteristics of having equal rights. They also faced challenges. However Mendez was trying to fight for rights for Latinos being able to enroll in whites school. Brown was fighting for each race to be able to be in the same school. They each shared the eagerness to fight for education for everyone no mattter the race. Mendez influenced Brown by stating that “separate but equal” isn’t equality.

# data[].attributes.body
1.the both cases were fighting for the same thing the only difference was their race. brown v Boe was trying to get dark skins into the white schools. and Mendez was a Mexican family

2. I think Mendez influenced brown v. Boe because he showed it could be possible

# data[].attributes.body
Comparing and contrasting Mendez v. Westminster and Brown v. Board of Education
Both were fighting for integration of schools, just that Mendez was for California while Brown was for all schools to be desegregated. They were also for different races. Mendez was for latinos to integrate with white schools while Brown was for African Americans.
How Mendez v. Westminster influences Brown?
Mendez was a few years before Brown and showed that all races could be integrated. They saw that seperate but equal was not equal at all and decided to show it to obtain equal rights.

# data[].attributes.body
1.Mendez vs Westminster was fighting for the same thing for schools not to be separated.Brown and boe was do the same thing.
2.Brown vs boe was influenced because It made anything possible

# data[].attributes.body
1. In both cases they were pushing for their children's schools to be integrated. Though the difference was that in the Mendez v. Westminster case it involved the segregation of  Mexican- Americans whereas Brown v. BOE involved segregation of  African Americans.
2.  The way the Mendez v. Westminster influenced Brown v. BOE was by showing how it shouldn't be disregarded that they weren't being given full civil rights and that they should push for a change; to be treated as a normal US citizen.

# data[].attributes.body
By: Emilio plata
1.Both of the cases were fighting for the integration of schools. But in Brown vs BOE they were trying to integrate black children in a all white school but Mendez vs Westminster was about exactly the same as Brown vs BOE but instead they were Mexican American family
2.Mendez v Westminster influenced Brown v BOE because it showed that it was possible and that schools shouldn't be segregated because of race.

# data[].attributes.headline
1. Compare/Contrast the two cases and the response to each.                  2. How did Mendez v Westminster influence Brown v BOE? 

# data[].attributes.subject
1. Compare/Contrast the two cases and the response to each.                  2. How did Mendez v Westminster influence Brown v BOE? 

# data[].attributes.body
By : Israel Obahayujie

1. The Mendez v Westminster case happened first but both casses were fighting for the same thing... Intagrated schools. Another difference is Brown v. BOE was a black family trying to get there child in an all white school, while Mendez v. Westminster was a Mexican-American family.

2. I think the Mendez case influenced Brown because Mendez showed that it could be done. This gave Brown hope and paved the way for Brown v. Board of Education

# data[].attributes.body
1. Both of those cases wanted to end desegregated schools. Though Brown vs. BOE was aimed to help African American students while Mendez vs. Westminister was aimed for Mexican U.S citizens. Mendez vs. Westminister is an earlier case. The response to this case was that Mexican students were no longer in separate schools in California. In Brown vs. BOE about eight years later the same reason happened again except it was to help out African American children from segregated schools. The response to this case was that the segregated schools are not right. Making segregating schools for African Americans gone.
INFLUENCE
2. Mendez v Westiminister influenced Brown vs. BOE by giving Brown hope. It showed that schools can be equal and white, blacks and other races could learn in the same school. There is no need for segregated schools. Even though the Mendez vs. Westminister was approximately eight years before Brown vs. Board of education it still helped the case of Brown vs. Board of Education.

Jad Kahla

# data[].attributes.headline
Brown v. Board of Education and Mendez v. Westminster

# data[].attributes.subject
Brown v. Board of Education and Mendez v. Westminster

# data[].attributes.body
Both of these cases sought to desegregate schools and both cases also led to the desegregation of many other places. Both cases started out because their kids were denied enrollment into a white school. In contrast, the Mendez family were Latino and the Brown were African American. Also, Mendez v. Westminster was before Brown v. Board of Education.
How did Mendez v Westminster influence Brown v. Board of Education?
Before Brown v. Board of Education  the Mendez fought California's segregated schools. The case Mendez v Westminster, ended school segregation in California seven years before Brown v. Board of Education. Mendez v. Westminster already started to integrate schools, so it paved the way for Brown v. Board of Education.
-Kevin Madrid(3rd)

# data[].attributes.body
I feel like justice wasn’t completely served in Leo Frank’s case. Because I feel like they did not have enough evidence to accuse Leo of the murderer of Mary. They would’ve definitely needed more evidence/proof to decide that.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that justice was not done correctly in the court because a innocent man was lynched because he was accused of raping and murdering a Mary Phagen. There was another man that was present at the last time Phagen was seen and that man raped her in the basement and then murdered her.

# data[].attributes.body
Leo franks case was not well revised and they came to quick conclusions, whether is they had both sides of the story the hanging would've never happened "Frank’s lawyers argued that he did not receive a fair trial. His appeal was denied in April 1915. His sentence,"  they did not let him speak for himself, instead they sent him away leading him to his death. if they were to gather more evidence on this case his life could've been saved and justice served. what they did was rushed and misunderstood which just led to more misunderstandings and an injustice act.

# data[].attributes.body
I think justice has been served in the Mary Phagan case. People are finding evidence in this case all the time, and they have now found the keys which were used to take Leo Frank out of his cell and hang him. Finding the truth in such an unfair case provides justice, even if the truth is something people don't want to hear.

# data[].attributes.body
Leo Frank was wrongly accused, there was not enough evidence to prove him guilty. And of course they would wrongly arrest him due to his race.-crystal O.

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion, I believe that no justice was served but an innocent man was wrongfully killed. I say this because there wasn't enough evidence to convict Leo Frank for murder. Leo Frank was also accused due to his race and also because he was an industrialist. I believe that the people that killed Leo were driven by anger which is totally wrong. All of these reasons are factors which lead me to believe that justice wasn't served for Leo Frank.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that true justice was not served in the Mary Phagan case. Leo Frank was an innocent man who was wrongfully convicted of murder and killed. His conviction was based solely on the testimony of Jim Conley who was a suspect himself and his story would constantly be changing. There was no concrete evidence that actually pointed towards Leo Frank. At the time of the case there was a lot of change happening in the South. Many white southerners did not like it and feared it even, they did not like northern investment and the fact that young girls were working. They took out their hate on Leo Frank and he was the "convenient target". There was a lot of hate and bias surrounding the case which sadly caused Frank's death in the end. Not only that but there was no justice for Mary Phagan either who's actual killer was let out free. The entire case just shows how bias and hate can truly cause terrible and wrong things to happen.

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion, I conclude that the Leo frank case was never fully resolved and that Mary Phagan never received full justice. When Mary Phagan was murdered, Frank was immediately accused and sent of to jail in 1913. While there was no evidence, people had a hidden hatred for the Jews which meant it did not matter if he was guilty or not. Antisemitism was the hatred to Jews and everyone who acted like one as well. After two years in jail, Frank was hanged for everyone to see. Phagan's death was not avenged for, and the real murderer had gotten away with what he did. That's why I believe true justice was not served to Mary Phagan's death.

# data[].attributes.body
in my opinion i think true justice was not served because leo frank died an innocent man. I also believe that it was justice wasn't served because since the case was closed after leos hanging the real culprit was still somewhere. In the leo frank case there was not enough evidence to support that leo was guilty i think the mob that hung leo jumped to conclusions because they wanted to believe what they wanted to be real.

# data[].attributes.body
I think justice was not served because they have killed an innocent man. Not only that, the case was very quick and there wasn't enough evidence to conclude that it was him who killed Mary Phagan. -Dennise Segura

# data[].attributes.body
Was justice served in the Leo Frank case? Nope Leo Frank died a man who was innocent. There was not enough evidence introduced for Leo frank to be guilty which was not fair for Frank. A guilty verdict was announced on August 25. Frank and his lawyers made a series of unsuccessful appeals; their final appeal to the Supreme Court of the United States failed in April 1915. Considering arguments from both sides as well as evidence not available at trial, Governor John M.

# data[].attributes.body
True justice was not served because there was not enough evidence that Leo Frank was guilty even thought there was other man saying he was guilty Leo frank still was taken to jail and hanged by a group of people

# data[].attributes.body
There was no justice served in this case. Even though there was very little evidence that Leo Frank committed the murder they still sentenced him to death for the murder of Mary Phagan. He had almost no say in the case. As much as he told the court that he didn't receive a fair trial they still ignored him. Still accusing him of the murder. They didn't spend any time actually looking into the case and seeing that the evidence they had of Leo Frank didn't match with the death of Mary Phagan. It truly shows how little justice there was in this case when their main reasons for accusing Leo Frank was because he was jewish and because they resented Northern industrialists like franks. As their misinformation lead to the death of Leo Frank who was wrongly accused.

# data[].attributes.body
Personally I believe that justice was not served what so ever in the case of Leo Frank. Leo Frank was vert wrongfully accused of murdering Mary just because he was Jewish. They had no evidence of him murdering her, therefore you cannot say he did the crime.

# data[].attributes.body
Was justice served for the Leo Frank case? The answer is ..... No. Leo Frank was wrongly convicted of a murder he had not committed.  Leo Frank was also subjected to vigilante justice when he was kidnapped from prison and lynched in 1915.  Frank was Jewish and accused him of a murder he didn't do because of race and because he was from the North. The case was rushed with tons of unfair misinformation. A lot of evidence was not used in the case. Many wanted Frank to be represented as guilty, but eventually, years later the murderer was caught (John Conley the Janitor).  Hopefully, everyone is alright. Stay safe. I wish I could contact you guys, but some of you guys know how that went( Disney )! See ya'll later! 😄

-Deja Nickerson

# data[].attributes.body
Justice was not served at all in the Leo frank case
In the case there was not enough reasonable evidence to accuse him of the crime. Years after there was a man who had confessed and said that he saw someone else carrying the body of mary phangan. No there was not justice.
(BTW someone txt me I'm bored 😐)

# data[].attributes.body
I believe justice was not served because there were a few potholes in the case which could have helped find the real culprit. In addition, Leo Frank was charged with several crimes against him and it seemed that people just wanted to have someone to blame and also change others perspectives of Jews; knowing that Leo Frank was also one.

# data[].attributes.body
I personally believe that Leo Frank did not get justice. He was as stated an innocent man that did not convict murder. He was sentence to death. The case was rushed and not enough evidence was gather. Life’s unfair but it’s shouldn’t be. The whole world seem to be turned against him. Where has humanity been. Just because of his religion he was murder and because of the court errors of not gathering enough evidence. Hope everybody is ok even if we’re not together and we’re not graduating together. Let’s not lose hope. I hope to see all of y’all  soon!

# data[].attributes.body
i do not think the mary phagan case was served justice because leo frank got charged with many crimes he did not committ to mary i feel they should have kept investigating and looking for the person who did the crime to mary

# data[].attributes.headline
Leo frank case Nayeli Hernandez(6th Period)

# data[].attributes.subject
Leo frank case Nayeli Hernandez(6th Period)

# data[].attributes.body
I belive that no justice was served because Leo Franck was blamed for something he didn't do. He was a Jew and he was blamed for that. Not much evidence was found. Jim Conley was the one who killed Mary.

# data[].attributes.body
In the case true justice wasn't severed. The reason is that he was hanged. The video said near the end that the janitor could be lying about the case. The janitor convinced the people that Leo frank killed the girl.

# data[].attributes.body
I think everyone in the class agrees that the case was not fair at all. The case was rushed, and not a good amount of concrete evidence was found. Everyone wanted to find the person responsible, and that lead to blaming anyone, even if they were innocent. Frank was not a good speaker, and that did not help him at all. A lot of evidence found was not used, like Mary's clothes that got washed. There was enough evidence to find the killer, but the investigators did not do a good job as well. Everyone was also reading the newspaper and the jury probably already has bias toward convicting Leo when he didn't do anything. To conclude, there were many faults in the trial and justice was not found.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that Leo Frank did not get justice. Leo Frank an innocent man was  convicted of murder and then proceeded to be lynched with his death sentence. Which then got changed to a life sentence by the Georgia governor. Leo Frank was accused to the murder, but there wasn’t a lot of evidence. Everyone just wanted him to be found guilty.  People saw him as a Jewish man coming from the north to kill little girls. When Leo Frank was in prison he got kidnapped and then later hanged by a group of people.

# data[].attributes.body
This case inspired soooooooo much abhorrence in me. It's insane. The Leo Frank case was anything but fair justice. Due to a man's religion, he had been convicted of the wrong thing. How shallow can society be? Justice was not served at all. Without evidence, Leo Frank was served as an unjustifiable sentence that he did not commit. Period point-blank.

# data[].attributes.body
True justice wasn't served. There was barley any evidence to say that Leo Frank did it and the the trial wasn't even fair.

# data[].attributes.headline
Do you think true justice wasserved in the Mary Phagan case? Explain why? Israel Obahayujie

# data[].attributes.subject
Do you think true justice wasserved in the Mary Phagan case? Explain why? Israel Obahayujie

# data[].attributes.body
Justace was not searved. the artical said there was barily any evidance but every one still got leo.

# data[].attributes.body
true justice was of course not served in the mary phagan case. It was certainly a trial that shook the whole community in a whole lots of different ways especially Jew community. Leo Frank was accused to the murder but there wasn’t a lot of evidence. Everyone just wanted him to be found guilty. Besides the people not liking Jewish people Leo Frank had a very hard problem or anxiety and gets nervous easily making him seem suspicious when in reality he’s just gets like that. People saw him as a Jewish man coming from the north to kill little girls. Leo Frank was a scapegoat and that’s what people focused on. They wanted an easy target. There was no justice because he got lynched and that wasn’t fair because they didn’t investigate enough when Conley was changing up his stories many times making frank seem even more guilty when he was the guilty one. Leo frank and Mary phagan became symbols of what really was wrong with the south.

# data[].attributes.body
Analyze and explain the relationship between the cotton gin, the introduction of railroads, and a booming economy in Georgia. Use evidence from the videos to support your response.

# data[].attributes.body
The introduction of  the cotton gin and railroad both caused a massive growth in the economy of Georgia. Before the cotton gin was created only one or two pounds of cotton were cleaned per day. After the cotton gin was created 50 pounds of cotton were being cleaned per day. The cotton gin made it faster to clean cotton, but it also affected slavery. For example, the cotton gin increased the need for cheap labor which made the demand for slavery to rise.  Railroads were a good way of transportation for people and goods. in one of the video it states that "as the towns increased transportation for people and goods also increased. the railroads was affordable and made it easy to transport goods. As a result, the economy increased massively due to the cotton gin making it faster and easier to clean cotton and the railroads making it easier to transport goods. -

# data[].attributes.body
As an alternative to tobacco, the state was looking for ways to make growing cotton profitable.Until that point, cotton had to be, for lack of a better word, “deseeded” by hand. The idea for the cotton gin was invented by Eli Whitney, a northerner who moved to Georgia in 1793. This led to westward expansion as farmers began to seek out land capable of producing the crop. The first Georgia railroad was created to provide a better way to transport cotton to Augusta due to poor road conditions. Which let to a booming economy in Georgia. - Ja'Nareah

# data[].attributes.body
These two inventions had a very important role in the advancement of the Georgia economy. The railroads helped transport cotton faster and the Cotton Gin was used to produce cotton at a faster rate than human labor. The impacts of  the invention of the railroads can be seen in "The Railroads: Economic Boom". A negative side effect of the railroads can be seen in the reactions of Augusta and Savannah. The narrator says "...everyone was cheering except the city of Savannah." "This would interfere with freight traffic on the Savannah river. In no time the South Carolina train was transporting Georgia cotton to Charleston taking away business that used to go down river from Augusta to Savannah." This evidence shows that the impact of the railroads were harmful to small cities such as Augusta and Savannah economically. The good impact is that the city of Atlanta wouldn't have been very important without the invention of the railroad. "The city of Atlanta wouldn't have existed at all without the railroad." And now it is the most profitable city in all of Georgia. Next, the cotton gin had both negative and positive after effects. A positive effect of the cotton gin is that it produced cotton at a faster rate than ever before because it dealt with cotton faster and more efficient than any human could. In "Bill Nye's Greatest Inventions: The Cotton Gin" the narrator says "This machine could clean 50 pounds of cotton in one day." which tells me that it is much ore effective than 1 pound of cotton in 1-2 days. The negative effect of the cotton gin is that it required more slave labor since production doubled. Intertwining both inventions, they helped Georgia's economy flourish because they made everything run more efficiently and therefore, they made money faster.

# data[].attributes.body
-Nyalah

# data[].attributes.body
The impacts and relationships of the cotton gin and the increase and railroads on Georgia’s economy include the ability to transport the cotton quicker, increasing trade between the states. The railroads also helped with transporting people between places, allowing the economy to grow from the use of the trains. In 1835, when the railroads first came to Georgia, the transportation of cotton became more reliable, in comparison to the boats, carriages, and walking traders. The cotton gin, however, allowed for the transported cotton to be available. Though the cotton gin influenced the growth of slavery, it helped for the economy to grow much faster than it already was. According to "Georgia stories, The Railroads: Economic Boom," the economy began to boom due to the increased transportation of tradable goods. However, the rail lines going through the state of South Carolina took away from Georgian businesses, which normally profited from the transportation of their goods. Eventually, the railroads built in Georgia helped to move business people, their goods and services, and any other people who could be of any benefit to the economy. According to Bill Nye, the creation of the cotton gin helped to make cotton the most popular textile market in America, and even the world.
-Erin Root

# data[].attributes.body
The introduction of the cotton gin and the railroads together caused there to be a massive growth in the economy of Georgia. In the video Bill Nye explains that the demand for cotton is still very high to this day as it was back then too. The cotton gin dramatically impacted the production of cotton back then and consequently now because it increased the amount of cotton that could be cleaned to 50 pounds a day, which was a big jump from one pound a day. The cotton gin also affected the use of slavery. Bill Nye says, "Slavery had been losing favor because it was becoming less profitable for southern farmers." The cotton gin though, increased the need for cheap labor so the demand for slavery rose again. The railroads also "began a revolution in transportation" in the South. The narrator explains that, "As towns and farm were growing, so was the need for dependable transportation of people and goods." The railroad was a dependable and affordable solution to the problems people had. The second narrator also says, "The city of Atlanta would not have existed without the railroads." Atlanta is easily one of the most economically important cities in Georgia to this day and back then. The railroads made it so that things that seemed impossible, now seemed reachable and possible. As the cotton gin increased the production of cotton and the railroads were able to easily transport goods, like cotton, it caused the economy of Georgia to experience a massive growth. -Denisse Galvan

# data[].attributes.body
The cotton gin helped the economy in the us and in India by making it easier to pull the cotton from the seeds and because of that they could produce more cotton. The railroads helped the economy by making a suitable passage way from different states to another and it wasn't effected by anything.-Kaidance Sanchez

# data[].attributes.body
Great Responses thus far! Please make sure you add your name at the bottom of the response!

# data[].attributes.body
Both of these inventions had tremendous effect on all of Georgia. The cotton gin helped boost the economy, and bring more slaves to Georgia. "Bill Nye's Greatest Inventions: The Cotton Gin" states that "slaves were becoming less profitable for southern farmers." This changed dramatically when the cotton gin was invented because it increased the demand for human labor, therefore causing slavery to increase in popularity. The video continues, "This machine could clean 50 pounds of cotton in one day, which allowed cotton to surpass wool and flax in the textile market." This clearly shows that the cotton gin was an important factor in boosting Georgia's economy because cotton was able to pass wool and flax, which were probably both also gaining a lot of money. Railroads also were important in boosting Georgia's economy because most of Georgia's major cities were located along bodies of water, yet when Atlanta started becoming a huge city no one really saw it coming because the video "The Railroads: Economic Boom" says, "Many people at the time did not think that would happen, they thought it was impossible." Atlanta changed everyone's perspective of railroads because it brought a lot of money, which boosted Georgia's economy. No one thought Atlanta could possible make so much money, yet it did. -Susan Portillo

# data[].attributes.body
The economy was impacted by the cottong gin because it made farming quicker and it made money for farmers    alainah moore

# data[].attributes.body
slavery impacted the economy by letting slave owners  make money off of slaves by making them work or selling them     alainah moore

# data[].attributes.body
All of these had an impact on the Georgia economy, whether it impacts the economy in a positive or negative way. For example, from the video, “The invention of the cotton gin, 1793,” the author states, “The cotton gin had impacted millions of people in Georgia.” By this, it impacted the slaves negatively but the whites positively. Also, for the railroads, savannah didn’t really feel confident about the rail road but in the end the rail road made the economy better by transporting goods easier. As it was stated in the article, “The railroads: Economic Boost,” the author states, “ Every one was happy about the rail road except Savannah.” It impacted the economy in a positive way. By Jad Kahla

# data[].attributes.body
the cotton gin helped the economy by being able to mass produce cotton at a rate that wasn't done before and for the railroads it gave a solid form of transportation because the weather didn't effect it also it made trade must faster.- Farrell suber

# data[].attributes.headline
the cotton gin made work easy and quicker so they could produce cotton quicker. this helped the economy greatly. The railroad made transportation much easier. the weather didn't affect anything either. this helped the economy so they could go longer distance and makes it faster.-cheyenne slaughter

# data[].attributes.subject
the cotton gin made work easy and quicker so they could produce cotton quicker. this helped the economy greatly. The railroad made transportation much easier. the weather didn't affect anything either. this helped the economy so they could go longer distance and makes it faster.-cheyenne slaughter

# data[].attributes.body
These things were able to help Georgia's economy grow. As it affected many in Georgia. In the video "Bill Nye’s Greatest Inventions: The Cotton Gin" the author states "The cotton gin dramatically effected the structure of American society." The cotton gin took a lot less time and didn't need people to pick out the seeds of the cotton by hand. With this new creation by Eli Whitney which was able to make 50 pounds of cotton a day. It was able to keep up with the high demand that it had. As in  "Bill Nye’s Greatest Inventions: The Cotton Gin" the author states "increased the need for laborers" So as much as it did do great for the economy it also increased the numbers of slavery. Also the railroads that were then built were able to be a reliable way of transportation. This can be supported in "The Railroads - Economic Boom" when the author states "At last a road that was good in al kinds of weather, dependable, affordable transportation. Impacting Georgia's economy and its people. Then said in "The Railroads - Economic Boom" it is stated "Made it the major railroad center of the south. That made Atlanta busy and prosperous." As here it explains that railroads grew Georgia's economy specifically Atlanta. As these two inventions were able to impact the economy of Georgia.
-Jimena Rivera

# data[].attributes.body
The Cotton Gin and Railroads were economic tremendous boosts to the economy. However, they also negatively impacted their surroundings as well.

The Cotton Gin was a mechanism that benefited the speed of production. According to "Bill Nye's Greatest Inventions: The Cotton Gin" it states that "This machine could clean 50 pounds of cotton in one day." Comparing that to the 1-2 pounds a day is a dramatic alteration in money. SO much income was acquired through this invention alone.  Subsequently, "The cotton gin dramatically affected the structure of American society." Less time and work were consumed allowing slaves to be able to do less. However, it accumulated the demand for slaves. This was a negative impact on African-Americans and other minorities.

The Railroad is an efficient and easier way of transportation. It provided a way for items and people to travel easier and with much comfort. It gave Atlanta much income. Although, Savannah was skeptical about the idea at first. They soon accommodated as necessary. Atlanta built its foundation and its economic power from the Railroad.

These both produced a massive economic growth for Georgia, with negative factors. Overall, it manifested the power of Georgia.

# data[].attributes.body
The cotton Gin helped the economy a lot. And its made in our clothing

# data[].attributes.body
The impact of the cotton grin helped create relationships between the railroads, and increasing the economy. Once the cotton grid was invented by Eli Whitney, there was a positive side and a negative side. Negative because more slaves were needed to help run these new machines. Positive because "This machine could clean 50 pounds of cotton in one day" comparing to 1 pound a day by hand. How does this affect the railroads? Well railroads are an easier way to transport goods which means it helped transfer cotton. More money was made. Though it took awhile to build but the income was great and worth it. With the cotton being made faster and being transfer faster this helped increase our economy. Industries and cities were being build. However each good thing must have bad factors. Georgia is on the trail of becoming a great and powerful state.

# data[].attributes.body
emely s.
the relationship between the cotton gin and railroads is that it shaped Georgia in a good way. Not just Georgia but worldwide. Modern clothing would be completely different without the invention of the cotton gin revolutionary. Cotton gave difficult times to people trying to remove the seeds, and that was the major issue. It took one day to remove seeds from one pound of cotton. Just imagine all that work. Since the gin from India did not adopt well to the British colonies because of short fiber seeds had to continue to be taken out by hand sadly. During the industrial revolution in the 18th century Europeans transformed the textile in industry with serious inventions that sped up, spinned, weaved the cotton. As it increased workers couldn’t manually clean cotton fast enough to keep up with new demand. Luckily an american inventor Eli Whitney developed the cotton gin in 1793 that changed everything. The machine cleaned 50 pounds of cotton in one day compared to by hand. It allowed to surpass in the textile market and dramatically effected american society. However it needed needed an increase in slaves and cotton fields. That was good for economy. Today the modern cotton gin cleans, dries, vails cotton. What a transformation. The demand for cotton is high. Even though cotton production has changed considerably during the years the invention of the cotton gin in the 1700s it allowed the cotton to style industries to flourish. It has made an impact so much over the years making economy boost. Now cotton grows in warm climates around the world in large quantities thanks to the cotton gin. But not just the cotton gin improved economy so did railroads. In the early 1800s travel was terrible. Realiable transportation came to Georgia in 1835 and it proved to be very good for business and in fact it still is. Towns, homes, farms were in need for dependable transportation.  Muels, horses, wagons was the only thing.  Roads were awful and was full of mud 5ft deep. Water ways was the easiest transportation and the most important early cities were along rivers. But rivers had its own problems and steamboasts were invented to fixed that. Meanwhile someone figured out how to use a steam engine to pull cars on rail and it began the revolution of transportation. Georgia decided to build railroads from Augusta to Athens since South Carolina trains was exporting cotton from Georgia. Even though it was loud and noisy people used it and it kept improving over the years. Georgia most famous railroad town is Atlanta. The city wouldn’t exist without railroads. It became very busy and and marked a change in Georgia’s history. The more busy it got the more it boosted economy. Railroads and cotton gin changed history. Both leads to better wealthy opportunities, etc. Without it everything would’ve been different. It gets exported and provide jobs.

# data[].attributes.body
What caused the economic boom in Georgia? Well there are a lot of factors for the economic boom like the introduction to the cotton gin. Let’s start in India. India had created the first and their very own version of the cotton gin. India’s cotton gin was made with a hand crank to help draw the fibers through two rollers separating seed from lent. Using this method, India became a leader in the cotton trade over thousands of years later. Then later, the British adopted the cotton gin discovering the pots, cons, and what could later be a better version of the cotton gin. In 1793, Elie Whitney created the new and improved cotton gin. The cotton gin did wonders for the economy as well as its workers. Using the cotton gin itself could get more seeds out of the cotton in a day than 50 people doing the job by hand. The cotton gin increased the amount of raw material available to make textiles. Which made for more diverse products in the long run. For example, clothing production increased the industrial cities to find steady work. Cotton greatly became the most important product of the southern  states. Cotton launched industries as well as keeping   slavery. As cotton became a product of interest the more slaves were bought and put to work. The more slaves on the cotton planation picking cotton the more cotton production there would be. With that,  more money would be made. The cotton needed to be transported homes, towns, cities, and farms safely. During this time we had roads, but they were muddy and bumpy and could possibly be a safety hazard for the product as well as the person delivering the product. Georgia decided to make railroads from Augusta to Athens since South Carolina already exported cotton from Georgia. Railroads paved the way for the most revolutionary transportation that was dependable and durable. The cotton gin, slavery, and transportation all played  a part in the wide spread economic boom in Georgia.

-Deja Nickerson

# data[].attributes.body
Henry Grady and Tom Watson were both important figures during the New South Era. They brought a lot of history but both were very different, although there were a few similarities here and there. Henry Grady was a Democrat and became known when he published an article called, "The New South". He gained attention, so much that Atlanta Constitution offered him part ownership in their company. The Atlanta Constitution thrived under Grady and served as a way for him to post his political views. He also was a part of the Atlanta Ring, which included the Bourbon Triumvirate, also important figures in Georgia history. He helped many of the ring get elected into important positions, such as the Senate, and governor. He got the name "Spokesman of the New South" because of the speech he gave to the prestigious 'New England Society'. Grady brought industrialism and with that brought many jobs and a lot of money. Of course, he also had his low moments, such as lying about African Americans getting fair treatment to bring industrialism. To continue, Tom Watson was also a Democrat, but soon switched over to being a Populist when he became a part of the Farmers Alliance that grew to become a political party called Populist. The Farmers Alliance called for better schools and roads, and tax laws that benefited farmers. Watson did not believe in the New South, he preferred the old way of living which is a contrast to Grady that very heavily wanted a New South. Watson also brought Rural Free Delivery (RFD) of mail. This helped deliver mail to farmers that would have to walk long distances to get their mail. Soon Watson would keep running for roles such as vice president, and for the Senate. Watson became a white supremacist but before he died he got a seat on the U.S Senate. Both Watson and Grady had different views but played big roles in the New South Era.

# data[].attributes.body
Grady used his office and influence to promote a New South program of northern investment, southern industrial growth, diversified farming, and white supremacy. Tom Watson supported poor farmers as a leader of the Populist Party, articulating an agrarian political viewpoint while attacking business, bankers, railroads, Democratic President Grover Cleveland, and the Democratic Party.

# data[].attributes.body
Henry Grady and Tom Watson had their own views of Georgia, but were both put down in Georgia History. Henry Grady was a journalist. He Graduated from Georgia State University. Henry Grady was an amazing writer. He was talented at his job. So talented that the Atlanta Constitution gave him a $20,000 dollar offer to join their team. He immediately accepted the offer and the Atlanta Constitution made him their managing editor. Henry Grady was also a part of the Atlanta Ring. While he was in this group he helped give people in that group an important role in Georgia. Henry Grady has helped many lives. Anyways Henry Grady believed for a “New South.” The “New South” is the south building railroads, trying to boost their economy, and to make technology. Henry Grady was also a Democratic. Tom Watson on the other hand mainly supported farmers. Tom Watson, for the most of his life, was a Politest, he was a Democratic but switched. Knowing this information, we could inform that he is racist. Tom Watson did not support Blacks. Tom Watson did not want a New South. He believed that everything should stay the way it is. He like keeping everything original. He mainly just focused on helping farmers out. Tom Watson was the House of representative in 1890. He later ran for Congress again but lost.

# data[].attributes.body
The cotton gin made cotton production easier and faster. Railroads made the transportation of cotton faster and easier. The sale of cotton made Georgia's economy boom.

# data[].attributes.body
Tom Watson championed poor farmers as a leader of the Populist Party, articulating an agrarian political viewpoint. Watson established "Rural Free Delivery" (RFD) of the mail. Henry Grady was a member of the Atlanta Ring of Democratic political leaders, Grady used his office and influence to promote a New South program of northern investment in the South and southern industrial growth. Grady was the spokesman for the New South, was an editor of the Atlanta Constitution and brought the cotton expositions to Atlanta. Henry Grady was more industrial and Tom Watson was a farmer and populist. Their ideas shaped the New South.

# data[].attributes.body
Both of these men have made great strides for Georgia in American history, and although they have both done some amazing things, their accomplishments are on two different sides of the spectrum. To start off, I'll write about their accomplishments. Tom Watson was a Democrat then, switched over to join the Farmers Alliance which then became the Populist party. Tom Watson established the "Rural Free Delivery Act" or RFD. This allowed people that lived in areas like farms or somewhere rural, to get mail directly delivered to them compared to them having to travel to get their mail. Tom did support African Americans but eventually, Tom became a White Supremacist and actively tried to stop African Americans from voting. He attempted to run for president and lost with only about 1% of votes. Although he lost the presidential run, he did become a U.S. Senator for Georgia and passed away 2 years after he became the Georgia Senator. On the other hand, Henry Grady was a Democrat like Watson but he never changed parties. Grady became well known for the man writing an article named, "The New South". In that article he basically wanted the mainly agricultural South to become more like the industrious North and wanted Northern industrial investment in the South. Many people saw this article and gained a lot of attention. The attention he gained lead to him gaining part of the Atlanta Constitution (the newspaper he worked for). Under his partial ownership, the Constitution thrived and he found an outlet for his political views. He also became part of the Atlanta Ring and he was given the name "The Spokesman of the New South" because of the article that made him famous. Henry thought that Atlanta would be a great place for industry which lead to his biggest achievement. His greatest accomplishment of all was him getting the Cotton Exposition to come down to Atlanta. This helped introduced Atlanta to its industrial start. Henry Grady passed at a very young age, 39. In conclusion, Henry Grady and Tom Watson do have their fair share of commonalities such as being White Supremacists (Henry was suspected of being one), being Democrats, and caring about the people that they supported. But, we can never forget their differences. Henry advocated industrialization while Tom advocated for agricultural work.

# data[].attributes.body
Henry Grady and Tom Watson were both writers that influenced the movements to shape the New South. While Grady was a member of the Atlanta Ring of Democratic political leaders, Watson was a Senator and Populist farmer who had the belief that farmers should have more opportunities and better services. For example, Watson pushed to establish an act that allowed farmers that would usually have to travel to pick up their mail to get their mail delivered to their homes called the "Rural Free Delivery Act." He also supported black enfranchisement throughout the South, due his populist philosophy, but converted to white supremacy. Meanwhile, Henry Grady was an American journalist, and public speaker who helped convert the states of the Confederacy into the Union after the American Civil War. During his time in office, Grady was a spokesperson for the New South, and also pushed for program to improve southern industrial growth. Grady industrialized cotton in Georgia, and like Tom Watson, was a white supremacist that diversified farming.

# data[].attributes.body
Henry Grady was a journalist in the Atlanta Journal. The Atlanta constitution was really impressed with Grady's writing they offered him part ownership of the paper. Grady wrote about the New South and was known as the spokesperson of the new south. Tom Watson was part of the populist party. Watson focused more on farmers since he was born on a plantation. He became part of the farmer's alliance. He liked to be known as the founder of the RFD. Watson won a seat as a U.S senate but it was short because he died two years into office.

# data[].attributes.body
Tom Watson was a supporter of the farmers alliance. The alliance wanted tighter laws of rail roads because they had to travel to get their mail. The farmers alliance helped Watson into the united states house of representative. He established an experimental program in rural free delivery of the mail. Now the farmers get their mail delivered to them. Henry Grady Was a spokesperson of the New South he gave a speech of his ideas about Southern Industrial growth with Atlanta being the place. It brought millions of dollars and created thousands of jobs. The south's had a good recovery after the civil war because Henry Grady’s plan.

# data[].attributes.body
Henry W. Grady:  Grady turned his attention toward promoting the city's economic development. Invited to speak at the 1886 meeting of the New England Society in New York City, Grady preached the promises of a New South. Thomas E. Watson: The Farmers' Alliance itself was not well received by proponents of the New South. Atlanta Constitution managing editor Henry W. Grady and the powerful Bourbon Triumvirate, which included Joseph E. Brown, Alfred H. Colquitt, and John B. Gordon, opposed much of its platform. Watson presented the platform in terms of an idyllic pastoral country life contrasted with the evils of industrialization and urbanization.

# data[].attributes.body
Henry W. Grady had his attention toward the economic development of the city. he gave speech and talked about he northern investment in the south and southern industrial growth. he mentioned Atlanta being a location for industry and investment. He brought  the cotton exposition to Atlanta in the 1800-1900. Tom Watson put his attention toward the political things. He was considered one of the best trial lawyers in the state. He established the rural free delivery (RFD). He helped find the populist party and ran for president.

# data[].attributes.body
Henry W. Grady mostly focused on the economic growth of the New South.He was a journalist.Henry was the spokesmen of the New South.He was the leader of the ring.Atlanta being a location for industry and investment.Henry also brought the cotton expositions to Atlanta.Tom Watson mainly focused on the political things.He helped find the populist party.

# data[].attributes.headline
Henry Grady and tom Watson by Hugo cordova

# data[].attributes.subject
Henry Grady and tom Watson by Hugo cordova

# data[].attributes.body
tom Watson was a supporter of the farmers alliance. he believed that the farmers should be treated better. the farmers alliance wanted stricter laws on railroads which is what he was reaching for. Henry Grady was an American journalist and orator who helped bring back  the states of the Confederacy into the Union after the Civil War. As managing editor Grady quickly turned the Constitution into a platform for endorsing his own political views. Grady died on December 23 1889. and now has a county, college and hospital named after him in his memory.

# data[].attributes.body
Tom Watson liked the old ways. He wanted to keep thing the way they were, but Henry Grady thought otherwise. Henry was very influental and with his newspaper skills, he coined the "New South" and brought the Internatinal Cotton Exposition. Tom Watson was for the farmers. He founded the Populus Party and created the Rural Delivery System. There veiws on the political system were divided, but they both were good people.

# data[].attributes.headline
Henry Grady vs Tom Watson -Tolani Muyiwa-Ojo

# data[].attributes.subject
Henry Grady vs Tom Watson -Tolani Muyiwa-Ojo

# data[].attributes.body
Henry Grady was named the spokesmen of the South for his accomplishments while alive. He worked in journalism and was very popular with his readers. The Atlanta Constitution thrived as he helped Atlanta boom into an ideal area for industry. On the Contrary, Tom Watson was the voice of the Populous Party. He was also an advocate for farmers since he believed that Atlanta should stick with tradition. He won a seat in the House of Representatives in 1890 and pushed to bring rural free delivery to the state. Soon he became a White Supremacist that targeted other races like the blacks or the Jews. When he ran for presidency with his ideals, he only earned 1% of the national vote. Although, he won a seat in the senate in 1920. In summary, both leaders had their own views on the future of Atlanta. Grady's point of view was more accepted than Watson's view, but both helped shift the state of Georgia which affects everyone today.

# data[].attributes.body
Henry Grady was the person who brought tons and tons of investment to the south through his efforts of newspapers and being the spokesmen person for the "New South". Tom Watson mostly wanted things to stay the same while also being an advocate for farmers. Tom Watson also established the Rural Free Delivery or the RFD. Henry Grady was a American journalist and orator who helped reintegrate the states of the Confederacy into the Union after the American Civil War by advocating for the Northern investors to invest in the south which caused major industrial growth in the south. Both men had huge impacts on Georgia.

# data[].attributes.body
Tom Watson was the voice of the populist party and a supporter of the farmers alliances. During his office, he lobbied hold for the needs of poor farmers and sharecroppers. He wanted to make the schools and roads better. He then  established the "Rural Free Delivery Act" or RFD. This allowed people that lived in rural areas to get mail directly delivered to them compared to them having to travel to get their mail. Henry Grady argued for industrial development and for economic growth. After publishing "The New South" he was known as spokesman of "The New South" and became managing editor. He also made Atlanta an ideal location for industry and investment. Atlanta then became a host of the cotton expositions. Although, they are different and had different views they both did great things.

# data[].attributes.body
Henry Grady was argued and pushed for industrialization in the south and during his career that’s what he did, bringing millions of dollars and thousands of jobs. But on the other Hand Tom Watson pushed for the old ways of racism and tryed to fund farmers and sharecroppers.

# data[].attributes.body
Henry Grady and Tom Watson both had different political views. Tom Watson wanted to go back and live life how it was with slavery. He also wanted to give more help out to the farmers. Henry Grady was a journalist and wanted the opposite of Tom Watson. Henry Grady mostly wrote about giving people equal rights and worked on improving the school system for better learning. Henry Grady also brought a lot of investment to the south through his writing in newspapers.

# data[].attributes.body
Henry Grady and Tom Watson were different in a few ways. Henry Grady pushed for industrial and a renewed South. Grady was lenient towards the economic growth for the South. He supported the ideas of the North and embraced a new beginning for the South. He did this through his writing and diverse ideas. Tom Watson wanted to remain the South how it previously was. He was a supporter of the Farmer's Alliance. Watson was the founder of the (RFD). Tom Watson worked along side with blacks until later on his career. He became a White Supremacist. Both wanted the best for the south, but in different ways.

# data[].attributes.body
Although, they had different political views both Tom Watson and Henry Grady played significant roles in the New South Era. Henry Grady used persuasive articles in the Atlanta constitution newspaper to convince citizens that Georgia need to become more industrialized and modern. Grady persuaded northerners to invest in southern businesses, which enhanced Georgia's economy and later Atlanta became one of the largest cities in the south. On the contrary, Tom Watson was elected to the Georgia House of Representatives and later elected to congress in 1890. In 1891, Watson joined the populist party and set up the publication of an Atlanta weekly. Shortly after losing a campaign, Watson retired from politics temporarily. In the early 1900's Tom Watson agreed to run as the populist candidate for president under the people's party banner. Despite his former efforts to win over African American voters , his racial views evolved. Watson openly supported lynching and disenfranchisement of African Americans, Catholics, and Jews.

-De'Rayah H.

# data[].attributes.body
Henry Grady and Thomas E Watson both had a very important role In the New south era, even though they had very different political views. Henry Grady wrote articles that persuaded northerners to invest in southern business to expand industries in Georgia. While Tom Watson was elected into the Georgia house of Representatives. Tom Watson was then elected into congress in 1890. A year later Tom Watson joined the populist party in 1891.  Tom Watson also represented the Democratic Party.

# data[].attributes.body
Thomas Watson and Henry Grady impacted the south by what they did best. Henry Grady was a influential editor for Atlanta and Thomas Watson was the voice of the populist party but later on was known as the racist politician. Henry Grady made the south recover due to the civil war. he posted countless articles of Atlanta ideal industry, which later on brought the cotton expositions and fairs which created millions of dollars. overall he was a spokes man for the south and helped improve it with a "one man campaign". Thomas Watson was the voice of the populist party and helped find the populist party. he also established the "RFD" (Rural Free Delivery) of the mail. he ran for president in 1904 threw 1908. though he didn't win he became senator in 1920. overall they both were different people but impacted the south era.