# data[].attributes.body
1 point because there is no reasoning tic

# data[].attributes.body
1 point because there is no reasoning behind it

# data[].attributes.body
1 point because there is no reasonion

# data[].attributes.body
1 point because there is no reasonion

# data[].attributes.body
Points: 2/2
Gave good examples that were related back to the thesis and prompt

# data[].attributes.body
1 point because the evi

# data[].attributes.body
Points: 1/2
Wasnt very specific with the evidence. Gave broad examples

# data[].attributes.body
1 point, very broad examples

# data[].attributes.body
1 point, because they related to first and third world countries

# data[].attributes.body
1 point because the person only provided some evidence of historical examples referring to World War II and did not put into context

# data[].attributes.body
1 point, they use historical reasoning but it isnt very well explained and doesnt further the information given in the prompt.

# data[].attributes.body
1 point because they responded to the prompt

# data[].attributes.body
1 point because the person responded to the prompt instead of restating the question.

# data[].attributes.body
1/2
because he does use reasoning to explain his crappy examples, but even his reasoning isn’t very complex

# data[].attributes.body
1 point,

# data[].attributes.body
1 point.

# data[].attributes.body
1 point, the historical context is relevant to the thesis and the prompt.

# data[].attributes.body
1 pt,

# data[].attributes.body
1 point, they use one historical example

# data[].attributes.body
1 point. we’re not supportive ofthe  content

# data[].attributes.body
1pt. showed development of economies and causes and effects

# data[].attributes.body
0/2
his examples are horribly repetitive and so broad

# data[].attributes.body
0
General statement about Its effects

# data[].attributes.body
1 pt, a claim is made that gives a response to the prompt.

# data[].attributes.body
2. he knows what he’s talking about and we can clearly see he has the right idea

# data[].attributes.body
1 point, gave insight on a broader scale that related to their initial claim.

# data[].attributes.body
1 point, he made a claim that responds to the prompt

# data[].attributes.body
1 point
They described an historical event even though it was broad

# data[].attributes.body
1 point, gave a clear thesis and gave an overview of key topics

# data[].attributes.body
0. Doesn’t include specific enough examples, all broad

# data[].attributes.body
1 point, they describe broad historical events that relate to the prompt.

# data[].attributes.body
1. They do a good job describing a broader historical event

# data[].attributes.body
1 point, they answered the prompt

# data[].attributes.body
Points: 1/1
Guves good examples relating to the different regions and bring up historical events

# data[].attributes.body
1/1
because he does list stuff that is relavent to the prompt, even though it is ridiculously broad

# data[].attributes.body
1 point since they had a thesis

# data[].attributes.body
1. They have a good thesis

# data[].attributes.body
1 point, they respond to the prompt and establish the basis for their essay.

# data[].attributes.body
1/1 because they had one

# data[].attributes.body
1. Restated and responded to the prompt

# data[].attributes.body
Points: 1/1
Inculdes good examples/factors to how globalization occured in that period