# data[].attributes.body
Contact America
To begin with, the trip was so wondrous, and I learned a lot of things about the American culture. For example, when I was in Marquette university union we had asked more than three students about what kind of power did they prefer? Soft power and traditional power?
Most of the student choose soft power because they think there is a better way to influence other people without killing or hurting anyone. What is more, they think Barack Obama is much better than  Donald Trump for more than one reason.Like Barack Obama when he uses to be the President of the United States he has the power, and he knows how to convince American people. On the other hand, Donald Trump has the ability, but he couldn't convince other people.
In my opinion, it is not essential to have the power to convince someone.Because if the people love you, they will do everything for you like Martin Luther King he doesn't have the ability, but he changes the community, and he stops the discrimination in the USA

# data[].attributes.body
From my survey, I found that most people prefer their to be innovative or visionary, but they also want leaders to follow laws, provide peaceful life for people and don't do decisions which is too innovative. Actually, people want a leader which is combination of ordinary, visionary and innovative leader.

The thing I learned is that not that much people want to fight against Trump. He do is more crazy, but people also respect his decision, try to consider the problems in their president's way, and make their country great again together.

Their views are same with mine. From my perspective, this is because this is not a era for war and countries don't have to use violence to get source and development. People prefer to get what they want through some peaceful ways like negotiation, proper competition and so on. Therefore, many people want their leader to be innovative but also traditional.

# data[].attributes.body
(1)The author think both scientists and political or military giants can be leaders.

(2)The author discusses five types of leadership which are direct leaders, indirect leaders, ordinary leaders, innovative leaders and visionary leaders.

(3)Visionary leaders is most appealing to me. From my perspective, under fierce competition between countries, vision is very important. Those leader who is visionary can lead their people get succeed easier. For example,  Elon Musk, who is the founder of Tesla, is very visionary. Over ten years ago, there is almost no electric vehicle and people did't recognize it, because people believed that oil could provide much more energy than electric vehicle. But Musk always believe this is a trend. Today, electric vehicle becomes more and more popular.

# data[].attributes.body
1.Deterrence is a way to use power make other people don't action or do something.
2.Commitment, Capability and credibility.
3.Because defender not properly signal a commitment to push or specify the precise retaliatory action.

# data[].attributes.body
Share your insights in a short paragraph from your Contact America adventure.

Did you learn anything about American culture and how Americans view leadership?

Were their views different from your own? Why might this be?

# data[].attributes.headline
Assignment #4 -  A Cognitive Approach to Leadership

# data[].attributes.subject
Assignment #4 -  A Cognitive Approach to Leadership

# data[].attributes.body
Answer these questions in a short paragraph.

Who are some people the author considers to be leaders?

How many kinds of leaders does he discuss?

Which of these leaders is most appealing to you?

# data[].attributes.body
（1）Situation:
Since 2006, North Korea is to deter from seizing from many other countries and attempt to do a series of nuclear test ,so it generates a series of diplomatic problem.

（2）Background:
Since the 1950s, North Korea has been interested in  nuclear power. From last century, North Korea has been sending their scientists to Moscow or Europe to study nuclear power.

(3) Explanation:
From my perspective, other countries' deterrence is not successful. Many countries including America want to stop North Korea doing unclear study and have made a lot of declaration, but the commitments are not clear and specific enough. Those declaration does't include violent solutions and just pure caution. Therefore, North Korea believe other countries will not make practical solutions.

# data[].attributes.body
I want to talk about the Empty Fort Strategy. The Empty Fort Strategy is coming from an event that has happened in the Three Kingdoms period. In the war, Zhuge Lian found that the enemy was very close to the his gate. However, he also knew that he only had a small group of people the protect the gate. The enemy is very big.  In this critical moment. Zhuge Lian used the Empty Fort Strategy. He ordered all the gates to be opened. And then, he began to play chinese traditional piano on the wall. When the enemy came the the gate. The leader though Zhuge Lian did it on purpose to lure us into the city. The leader of the enemy guessed there are a lot of soldiers in the city.  Because, everyone knew that  Zhuge Lian was a brilliant person.

In this situation, the enemy attempted to attack the Zhuge Lian ‘s city.

Zhuge Lian deterred the enemy to defend his city.

Zhuge Lian’ s deterrence was successful. His action had a good credibility. He successfully led the enemy thinking what he want.

# data[].attributes.body
Capability,Credibility,Commitment.
The USA has all of these things.To illustrate, the USA has the ability to do everything in any time and they also has strong military to defend the country. However, The US has also credibility with other countries like Saudi Arabia,Canada and Britain.
and the help USA and USA help them.
Lastly,the USA has Commitment with the people if the says the are going to do somethings the did.Also, if the promise to defend Kuwait and they really did until the win the war.
the USA has all the potential to defend any of has friendship at any time and in wore.

# data[].attributes.headline
Extra Credit #2 - Real World Deterrence Examples

# data[].attributes.subject
Extra Credit #2 - Real World Deterrence Examples

# data[].attributes.body
Research about a real world example of deterrence.  Then, complete the following in a short paragraph:

1) describe the situation in a sentence similar to the activity on page 122, using the vocabulary on 121 with an infinitive or gerund
2) explain the background of the situation
3) explain if this deterrence was successful or not.  Why is this so?  Explain using one of the three C's in the Deterrence essay on pages 119-120

# data[].attributes.body
In your own words, what is deterrence?

What are the three conditions of deterrence?

What is one reason why deterrence can fail?

# data[].attributes.body
In you own words, what is deterrence?

Deterrence is a super power that can help the someone or country get some benefit from the army or competitors who are reluctantly but haven't another better choice.

What are the three conditions of deterrence?

In my opinion, the three conditions of deterrence are commitment, capability, and credibility.

What is on reason why deterrence can fail?

Deterrence can fail because a challenger doubts the defender's commitment, capability to punish the aggressor.

# data[].attributes.body
In your own words, what is deterrence?

Deterrence is the prior way to defend selves from attacking.

What are the three conditions of deterrence?  The three conditions are communicate its commitment to punish the challenger, have capability to punish an attacker, demonstrate the willing to carry out its commitment.

What is one reason why deterrence can fail?

Because defender does not properly signal a commitment to punish or specify the precise retaliatory action.

# data[].attributes.body
1) I think that deterrence is kinda prevent someone to do something.
2) Commitment, Capability and credibility.
3) Because some defian could has doubts about the capability, commitment or credibility of some defender to penalize some aggressor. So it means that A don't believe in the promises of B.

# data[].attributes.body
1.- I think deterrence is the capacity of change someone's behavior, feelings or way of thinking.
2.- Define behavior (commitment) , possess the capability and demonstrate (credibility)
3.- Deterrence can fail because a challenger doubts the defender's commitment, capability or credibility to punish aggressor

# data[].attributes.body
.People study soft power today but not just use traditional power.

.Because of soft power, we have more knowledge about science. Stronger science cause stronger traditional power.

. Trade, sources.

# data[].attributes.body
1) Before just one country had the power (hegemony) but recently more countries are getting power (bipolarity/multipolarity).
2) It has been changed to a new way more attractive. Is called co-optive or soft power and it is not about ordering other countries to do what a country wants if not gets other countries want what it wants.
3) A mix of traditional and modern kinds of power... one that gets others what it wants but at same time let's command and
intervene on cultural, ideology and institutions.

# data[].attributes.body
For the old times, the power is arm. Right now. it is army, education financial, and culture.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Winston Churchill's "Iron Curtain speech" regarding USSR and Eastern Bloc, at Wes...HD Stock Footage

# data[].attributes.body
Power has been changing by possession of population,size,military forces and political stability.

Power was strength in war but, today the definition of power is losing it emphasis on military force and conquest that marked earlier eras.

Some trends in word politics suggest that it will be more difficult in the future for any great power to control the political environment .The problem for The USA will be less the rising challenge of anther major power than a general diffusion of power.

# data[].attributes.body
The power in the past was measured by the military strength in war. Now it's measured by a lot of thing like technology, education and economy. The army and the raw materials not that important anymore.Therefore
Soft power which is make country do what you want by commands only is one of the most effective powers. In the end the politics decides which power is important.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Proof of power lies not in resources but in the ability to change the behavior of states.
2. The power of all major states to gain their objectives will be diminished. Today, the distinction between power over other countries and power over outcomes must be clear.
3. More attractive way of exercising power than traditional means.
One country gets other countries to want what it wants.
Parents of teenagers have long known that if they have shaped their child's beliefs and preferences, their power will be greater and more enduring than if they rely only on active control.
Soft co-optive power is just as important as hard command power.

# data[].attributes.body
1.- Untangible things are becoming more important than tangibles.
2.-  Is obsolete because of the development of society and people beliefs. Nowadays we are living differents times.
3.-  Technology, education and economic growth.

# data[].attributes.body
Power is becoming less transferable, less coercive and less tangible.

The structure of power have changed. Power varies to many different spheres and it is not just limited in military and unclear as many years ago. The power in the world have become multipolar instead of bipolar.

Author suggested soft co-optive power like culture, ideology, and institution. It could make one country get what other countries to want what it wants. Also, will encounter less resistance to its withes at the same time. Moreover, the costly exercise of coercive or hard power may be spared.

# data[].attributes.body
Answer these questions in a short paragraph about the reading.

What is changing about power in the world?
What has happened to traditional power recently?
What new kind of power does the author suggest?  Briefly explain it.

# data[].attributes.body
1st Presentation

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The First Lady on the Importance of Studying Abroad

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
A practical way to help the homeless find work and safety | Richard J. Berry

# data[].attributes.body
Roosevelt inaugural address

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
President Franklin Roosevelt 1933 Inauguration

# data[].attributes.body
Post your speech here.

# data[].attributes.body
LS presentation 1

# data[].attributes.body
He had both power and influence. He is in army.

# data[].attributes.body
I won't because I will do beast choice for me first. Then, I decide do something good

# data[].attributes.headline
If I were in his place I would make a difference thinks I will not be nice for the first time but I well not going to kill any one but I will so strike but after period I will be careful with them, and I'm going to build schools, and I'm going to try to help them as much as I can.I think if I do that to people will follow me and they will do whatever I want.I think it will be better then I'd be nice out the first time, and then the people do not to do the same what I did.

# data[].attributes.subject
If I were in his place I would make a difference thinks I will not be nice for the first time but I well not going to kill any one but I will so strike but after period I will be careful with them, and I'm going to build schools, and I'm going to try to help them as much as I can.I think if I do that to people will follow me and they will do whatever I want.I think it will be better then I'd be nice out the first time, and then the people do not to do the same what I did.

# data[].attributes.body
i think i will make same choice, because peace is the best gift for citizen. the war just enrich the undertakers, so i will do same choice with General Sherman.

# data[].attributes.body
I'm agree with him because as Naomi Klein said in her book 'the Shock Doctrine' we work better under negative stimuli; he tried to be nice with people but they 'betray' him so he turns himself more evil.

# data[].attributes.body
From my perspective, I will make the same choice. In a war, violence could always be a choice or alternated choice to deal with problem. I don't mean that mass killing is a way to deal with any problems in wars. Violence is not just simple mass killing,  leaders need to make strategies which make violence effective. Also, conquered cities have many problems and to deal with the relationship with citizens, totally giving up violence is wrong. To manage people, reward and punishment should coexist.

The different thing is that it may be hard for me to make up my mind in a ruthless way like him, but I agree with him. He mentioned he burnt to the ground and just remained on house to mark the spot. Also, he function guerrillas as his men's target practice. I never thought to deal with a war in such a way, even a mass killing.

# data[].attributes.body
Despite the fact that he had the power as a military leader, he clearly misused it. Unfortunately, he used his authority to start unfinished wars where many soldiers died.

He also had an influence on people. We could see how the citizens believed him. Especially, after his safety proclamations, citizens started to build up the city and dreamed for a better life.

I disagree with his methods. Because being a leader is obviously a hard task. It requires the leader to deal with many people, citizens or soldiers, and leads them to the right path, the peaceful one, not to give them hope, then to destroy it. Consequently, he will lose his influence because of misusing his power or changing his ideology.

# data[].attributes.body
If i were General Sherman i wouldn't do the same he did because i think violence is not necessary for make people understand. Maybe i would try to speak with them and if that was not enough now i would use my power.

# data[].attributes.body
If I were in his place I would make a difference thinks I will not be nice for the first time but I well not going to kill any one but I will so strike but after period I will be careful with them, and I'm going to build schools, and I'm going to try to help them as much as I can.I think if I do that to people will follow me and they will do whatever I want.I think it will be better then I'd be nice out the first time, and then the people do not to do the same what I did.

# data[].attributes.body
Pretend you are General Sherman. Would you make the same choice? Why or why not? If not, what is another option you would choose?

# data[].attributes.body
I think he had both power and influence
Because he was admin of the militery, and he had influence because he changed peoples mineds by power

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion, Sherman only have power. Because he controlled the army and destroyed the enemy's infrastructure and food sources. Soldiers must obeyed him because he is the chief of the army.

However, his order was inhuman. Although he effectively attacked the enemy's resistance. So his orders were not convincing, could be enforced, and hadn’t second choice. I think it haven’t influence.
He ordered the village of Randolph burnt to the ground - all save one  house. He ordered  that every boat should be fired on. Something like that.

I agree with his actions or opinions. I think that every war are cruel and inhuman. Showing the strength of the army can effectively and quickly finished the war. In my opinion, Sherman did a good choice.

# data[].attributes.body
Sherman had both power and influence.
He mentioned that he had a army in the third paragraph and what he did in the fifth paragraph, so he is a powerful man.
This is a high-spirited man, I can see it from each words from his article. So this is his influence to me and his people.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that actually is mostly both because she was a military that has power but also and strategist that influenced people's mind.

# data[].attributes.body
he has both power and influence because he was in administrator and he try to use all his power to make it flourish. And the shows his influence by make people not agree with actions

# data[].attributes.body
He had power. He was in charge of a conquered town and he had his own troop. He could issue his policy.

At the beginning, he though tread the conquered city kindly is the way to restore the order, so he use kindness to show the influence. He influence something in this way such as schools and stores reopened. At last, he realized this policy didn't work. He used violence to govern the city. Violence became the way he show his power and influence.

In a certain degree, I agree with him, because we cannot give up choosing violence when we govern. Leaders should have both award and violence to process effective government.

# data[].attributes.body
I think he had both, because he was an administrator and changed people mind. He burnt the ground and expel families to show his power. change the people mind on order to finish war to show influence. I agree his actions and opinions, because war just can hurt the own people, enrich the undertakers, and prolong the killing on either side

# data[].attributes.body
Well i thiink he had both, power because he was the military administrator and he used that power to make the city blossomed and influence because he made change people mind by persuadingf fathers and religion leaders. And deffinitly i don´t agrree with his actions because they used weapons.

# data[].attributes.body
Welcome to Padlet!  Answer the following questions in a short paragraph about Sherman's March:

Did Sherman have power, influence, or both?  How do you know?
How did he use or show power or influence?
Do you agree or disagree with his actions and opinions?  Why?