# data[].attributes.body
Would it be leveled by reading level? That would be essential.

# data[].attributes.body
Content slightly more up to date than Clairmont.  Government of Turkey was up to date and reflected recent change to the constitution.  I feel that this format is likely to stay up to date better than a traditional textbook.

Some of the writing is sloppy, though :/

# data[].attributes.body
Differentiation seems to always be geared towards lower learners rather than higher.

# data[].attributes.body
if the County is going to move to using more online resources in content areas, how do they plan to address the access in classroom to the online materials?

# data[].attributes.body
I would want to know what all was included in the adoption for the SS Weekly and Clairmont Press (which I would recommend).

# data[].attributes.body
I do not have this material

# data[].attributes.body
Are there any printed materials that support this adoption. We have students that do not have consistent access to online materials at home and/or have difficulty reading extended material online.

# data[].attributes.body
the best-looking graphically

# data[].attributes.body
I think I missed something! So there is not online version of this book?

# data[].attributes.body
Out of the 3, World Studies by Clairmont is my favorite. However, I do believe there need to be more options for differentiation and rigor for SWDs/ESOL/AC

# data[].attributes.body
Discover needs a physical book.

SS weekly needs more differentiated material... is it available?
Would the Clairmont adopotion come with their Mil;estones workbook that we have been using for years?

# data[].attributes.body
I love the online resources, very engaging. We need to move to one-to-one as a district to make the most of these new resources.

# data[].attributes.body
I like both of these. Our SPED teachers prefer Studies Weekly, while use more traditional folk give a slight edge to the Clairmont book. The Clairmont book is better organized with better writing and editing. Studies Weekly would seem to engage the low readers better.

# data[].attributes.body
These were the best materials in my opinion

# data[].attributes.body
Would we receive new copies each year?

# data[].attributes.body
It seems elementary, and it does not offer the extension advanced students need, but it would be helpful for co-taught students. The newspaper format might make it hard for some students to find the information, however.

# data[].attributes.body
The layout of the online platform and book

# data[].attributes.body
The online resources were great, I am concerned about students with limited access to tech outside of the classroom.

# data[].attributes.body
Dislike the strictly online format; difficult for classrooms with little to no access with I-pads

# data[].attributes.body
Is this consumable and do we get one for every student, every year?

# data[].attributes.body
Our school does not have one-to-one devices, so a completely online textbook would not work without more funding.

# data[].attributes.headline
How long will we get access to online resources

# data[].attributes.subject
How long will we get access to online resources

# data[].attributes.body
My students were disappointed when I told them this was a possibility because the said it was what they had in elementary school and they believed they were more advanced now.

# data[].attributes.body
Excellent & engaging activities online

# data[].attributes.body
Not always easy to integrate technology lessons

# data[].attributes.body
Both of these resources are clearly designed with our content in mind.  These are SOOO much better than previous offerings.  We are evenly split here on these.  Pros and cons of both formats, but either would be great.

# data[].attributes.body
Nice visuals

# data[].attributes.body
PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE let this be the winner!

# data[].attributes.body
not all schools have access to that much technology.

# data[].attributes.body
Would we get the workbook that was mentioned in it?

# data[].attributes.body
How many copies of the print materials would we receive.

# data[].attributes.body
Would any consumables come with this text, such as a workbook?

# data[].attributes.headline
I like the increased alignment to the standards, please continue to ensure that materials are directly aligned 

# data[].attributes.subject
I like the increased alignment to the standards, please continue to ensure that materials are directly aligned 

# data[].attributes.body
How long will we have access to online materials? Don't want to just be dropped like the last textbook.

# data[].attributes.body
Set uniform way or ideas for storage and implementation

# data[].attributes.body
not enough lessons based on the standards
not differentiated

# data[].attributes.body
The material is just too thin. It covers some standards, but not most.

# data[].attributes.headline
We really like that everything is aligned with the standards. It has been a long time since we have had a textbook that is!  The process has been fine, but would have preferred and in-service to review and evaluate all the materials  materials

# data[].attributes.subject
We really like that everything is aligned with the standards. It has been a long time since we have had a textbook that is!  The process has been fine, but would have preferred and in-service to review and evaluate all the materials  materials

# data[].attributes.body
Are they consumable with new copies every year updated

# data[].attributes.body
Like that it has online materials

# data[].attributes.body
LOVE having online access

# data[].attributes.body
Loved the book. Especially for new teachers and SPED classes.
Parents are constantly asking for a textbook to help students at home.

# data[].attributes.body
Would each child receive their own? Would the order of the editions mirror our curriculum map or would we have to reorganize the order ourselves?

# data[].attributes.body
basic information - does not offer more in-depth information
Students may struggle with the newspaper format

# data[].attributes.body
Reading level is too basic for AC classes. Some content accuracy is sacrificed for ease of reading.

# data[].attributes.headline
Will we get enough of the materials for all of our students. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Will we get enough of the materials for all of our students. 

# data[].attributes.body
Many things for students to look at but often out of alignment with scheduling of lessons

# data[].attributes.body
Would like more options for Gifted/SWDs/ESOL for online resources

# data[].attributes.body
not as aligned to the standards in my opinion

# data[].attributes.body
We (PMMS) LOVED this textbook. It is the most clearly standards-aligned resource, but that is not the main reason we are excited for it. We as a PLC have struggled with enrichment and the book provides excellent, student-directed enrichment activities for every chapter.
I have personally been using this book nearly every day since we got online access to it. It is the only resource provided that would get the 'bang for the buck' based on frequency of usage.

# data[].attributes.body
How many extra do we get ? Our school has a lot of student transfers

# data[].attributes.body
Worried that we won't be given enough books to accommodate students who need "take home" copies.

# data[].attributes.body
Costs associated with each resource.

# data[].attributes.body
Discover was not as thorough as the others. Not having a physical textbook is a problem for those without internet access.The Studies Weekly seemed a little too low level for AC classes. Clairmont is pretty good but I have used their products before and they do have some editing issues... hopefully those will not show up.

# data[].attributes.body
How long will the link be active? I am hoping to use it with my students again.

# data[].attributes.body
As with all textbooks it would be expensive and out of date by the time we get it.

# data[].attributes.body
I think for a new teacher with limited tools or a teacher new to social studies, this package is a great start. Especially since it is standard aligned, comes with an online resource and powerpoints.

# data[].attributes.headline
The newspaper type resources were nice, but we worried about having enough and whether they would be refreshed each year.

# data[].attributes.subject
The newspaper type resources were nice, but we worried about having enough and whether they would be refreshed each year.

# data[].attributes.body
The newspaper format makes it easy for it to be damaged.

# data[].attributes.body
well-organized and very connected to the standards - seemed very user-friendly
It is our favorite resource.

# data[].attributes.body
Liked that is was similar to what many students used in elementary school. Also it was concise and too the point.

# data[].attributes.body
Don't think a completely online text will work for my students/school.  We struggle with having enough technology for all.

# data[].attributes.body
This is an amazing resource and I love it, but I am concerned about my student who will not be able to access it at home.

# data[].attributes.body
Access to tech is an issue. If we only have computer access once in a while, it would make using the online resources difficult.

# data[].attributes.body
Unusual format may give some students trouble.  Also concerned that students will lose those sheets.

The week # order is not consistent with our pacing guide.

# data[].attributes.body
Textbook is organized very well and has great online resources as well as an easy access teacher edition

# data[].attributes.body
The availability of a text when students do not have online access.

# data[].attributes.body
I am a little worrisome because I really like the almanac section of the old textbook. It was a nice tool for kids to review literacy, doctors per people, life expectancy. etc.
This textbook's map section is very limited.

# data[].attributes.body
For AC Classes this is fitting, but due to reading level this is above the reading level of many low level learners.
Studies Weekly was better on a reading level and in line with standards

# data[].attributes.body
Studies Weekly: Easy to understand material, clear directions, engaging

Discovery Ed: Easy to access online materials, engaging use of technology

Clairmont: Thoroughly detailed material aligned directly to the standards

# data[].attributes.headline
Our  grade level team and entire department really love the Clairemont online resources. They are  super

# data[].attributes.subject
Our  grade level team and entire department really love the Clairemont online resources. They are  super

# data[].attributes.body
We are concerned that Social Studies Weekly is like Springboard, where each day is scripted and involves a lot of handouts. It seems very limiting to teachers, and we are concerned about the longevity of newspaper print with middle schoolers.

# data[].attributes.body
Will we get 1 year of studies weekly at a time? We start with SW Asia but I think studies weekly begins with Africa?

# data[].attributes.body
Unique format with accompanying online resources and activities

# data[].attributes.headline
Clairmont Press, Studies Weekly, Discover Ed

# data[].attributes.subject
Clairmont Press, Studies Weekly, Discover Ed

# data[].attributes.body
All 3 do a better job of addressing our standards than what we have currently. I found the Clairmont Press and Studies Weekly really addressed the standards more clearly.

# data[].attributes.body
The reading level looks like it will work really well with my low-reading ability students.

# data[].attributes.body
Love the colors and pictures. Its visually appealing.

# data[].attributes.body
I don't know about other schools, but mine does not have the technology infrastructure to use an entirely online text. We have access to computers and labs approx. 1 in 10 days realistically, so what use is a textbook that we can only use for 10% of the school year.