# data[].attributes.body
Committees of Correspondence were created in 1764 by patriot Samuel Adams. The Committees were initially formed to communicate the opposition of the new British customs laws and their ban of American paper money in Boston.  By 1773, committees had spread throughout the colonies.  The Committees of Correspondence were one of the main reasons for the formation of the First Continental Congress in 1774.

# data[].attributes.body
The Association was created by the First Continental Congress. The Association was conducted trade boycotts with Great Britain. The Association attempted to reach an agreement with the British, but this agreement was never reached.(https://sites.hks.harvard.edu/fs/phall/15.%20Sons%20of%20Liberty.pdf)

# data[].attributes.body
The daughter os liberty were a resistance organization that served to assist the colonies in boycotting Brhtisj goods. They would knit textiles and cloth to help reduce the the colonies' dependence on British textiles. Since at the time were the main consumers of home goods like tea and cloth, it was essential to have women boycott British Tea and imports.

# data[].attributes.body
The sons of Liberty were a resistance organization responsible for the Boston Tea Party. They consisted of Lawyers, shopkeepers, merchants, and tradesmen.

# data[].attributes.body
"A Letter from a Farmer in Pennsylvania" is a series of letters written by Pennsylvania lawyer John Dickinson.  Dickinson aimed to protest the growing authority of Parliament.  These letters spread rapidly throughout the colonies.  These letters criticized nearly all British legislature, such as the Quartering Act, Stamp Act, and the Intolerable Acts.

"If the BRITISH PARLIAMENT has a legal authority to order, that we shall fur|nish a single article for the troops here, and to compel obedience to that order; they have the same right to order us to supply those troops with arms, cloaths, and every necessary, and to compel obedience to that order also; in short, to lay any burdens they please upon us. What is this but taxing us at a certain sum, and leaving to us only the manner of raising it? How is this mode more tolerable than the STAMP ACT? Would that act have appeared more pleasing to AMERICANS, if being ordered thereby to raise the sum total of the taxes, the mighty privilege had been left to them, of saying how much should be paid for an instrument of writing on paper, and how much for another on parchment?"
(https://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/evans/N08506.0001.001/1:3.1?rgn=div2;view=fulltext)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
if you are a fan of Michael please like the Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/MRaymondJame... and/or follow on twitter: https://twitter.com/MRJFanpage HISTORY's official logline for Sons of Liberty: "Calling themselves the Sons of Liberty, they light the spark that ignited a revolution. Though their names have become American legend, this group of young rebels didn't start off as noble patriots in powdered wigs.