# data[].attributes.body
Overall, i feel it depends whether looking at the firm of consumer side to determine if it is undesirable. It tends to be desirable to firms whereas can to undesirable to consumers-especially in the 3rd degree.

# data[].attributes.body
Price discrimination is often undesirable for consumers but good for producers and those consumers willing to take risks or that don't need as much choice in the product they buy.

# data[].attributes.body
Price discrimination is largely undesirable due to the overall fall in consumer surplus. However, some consumers will benefit from the price changes.

# data[].attributes.body
Price discrimination can be both desirable and undesirable. It is good for the consumers that have an elastic demand resulting in cheaper prices for them. However, it is undesirable when smaller firms are on the receiving end of 'predatory pricing'.

# data[].attributes.body
Ultimately, it really depends upon who you are. If you are the monopolist, then fairly obviously ; price discrimination is always desirable, however if your are the consumer with inelastic demand, then in that instance it would be undesirable.

# data[].attributes.body
Price discrimination isn’t always undesirable as firms are able to exploit inelastic demand from consumers e.g. train tickets at peak times. However, the minority of customers may find price discrimination desirable during times where the firm set prices the lowest which coincidentally suits the consumer.

# data[].attributes.body
Price Discrimination is not always undesirable as it would depend on many factors such as the elasticity of demand for the consumers which in some cases would allow a firm to exploit the consumers, in addition to the degree of price discrimination the firm may use as some degrees may be more desirable than others.

# data[].attributes.body
In conclusion price discrimation is not always undesirable as there are many factors that can benefit both consumers and firms in maxisingeconomic welfare

# data[].attributes.body
Price discrimination is not always undesirable because in some cases such as when it is used to reduce the level of competition in the market it is undesirable and in other cases it can be desirable as the case when it leads to lower prices for customers with an elastic demand.

# data[].attributes.body
Price discrimination is not always desirable as allocative efficiency does not exist in some degrees of price discrimination.

# data[].attributes.body
Price discrimination can be undesirable but not necessarily always, c
onsumers who are being exploited and suffering from a lower consumer surplus in a peak market would find it undesirable, but consumers benefiting from lower prices in the non-peak market and revenue maximising firms would find it desirable.

# data[].attributes.body
Price discrimination is desirable for firms due to them being able to take advantage of those with an inelastic demand; allowing them to maximise revenue. However, for consumers it isn’t the same case as it depends on the elasticity of their demand.

# data[].attributes.body
In Conclusion, I believe that price discrimination against consumers that face a lower consumer surplus is very undesirable compared to consumers with an elastic demand. For example, Off-peak travellers. However, it's not always undesirable as the producers have the power of 'predatory pricing'.

# data[].attributes.body
To conclude, the effects of price discrimination on consumers and producers can be both desirable and undesirable. It's undesirable when firms engage in predatory pricing that may force competitors out of the market and possibly in  X-inefficiency, government intervention and competition regulation may be needed to resolve the issue.

# data[].attributes.body
In summary, price discrimination is desirable for those who benefit, usually producers and some consumers but undesirable for the consumers experiencing a lower consumer surplus and lack of economic welfare.

# data[].attributes.body
Overall, the given interpretation(that price discrimination is always undesirable) can only be supported to a certain extent, depending on how you perceive it. Its undesirable to the exploited consumers and the smaller firms who are victims to "predatory pricing", however it is desirable to the big firms who'll benefit, as well as the section of consumers who'll receive a better deal when price is discriminated.

# data[].attributes.body
Price discrimination is mostly but not always undesirable as 2nd degree price discrimination in fact increases consumer welfare as price falls which is desirable but it could be said that price discrimination is quite undesirable as there is no allocation efficiency in some degrees of price discrimination as P>MC.

# data[].attributes.body
Price discrimination may not always be undesirable as producers can benefit from exploiting their power of being able to charge different consumers different prices, but it may be undesirable for consumers depending on what segment of the market they belong to and therefore what price they pay.

# data[].attributes.body
Price discrimination is always desirably for firms as they sell during peak and off peak times however, it is only undesirable for consumers depending on when they make a purchase

# data[].attributes.body
It is desirable for the producer as they sell more but not for the consumer