# data[].attributes.headline
Document H   Peter Gaskell, 1833 -Adrien         	So long as home education is not found for them, they are to some extent better situated when engaged in light labour, and the labour generally is light which falls to their share.  However, the bringing together numbers of the young of both sexes in factories has been a prolific source of moral delinquency.  The stimulus of a heated atmosphere, the contact of opposite exes, the example of license upon the animal passions--all have conspired to produce a very early development of sexual appetencies.

# data[].attributes.subject
Document H   Peter Gaskell, 1833 -Adrien         	So long as home education is not found for them, they are to some extent better situated when engaged in light labour, and the labour generally is light which falls to their share.  However, the bringing together numbers of the young of both sexes in factories has been a prolific source of moral delinquency.  The stimulus of a heated atmosphere, the contact of opposite exes, the example of license upon the animal passions--all have conspired to produce a very early development of sexual appetencies.

# data[].attributes.body
Historical Context:

What are the immediate historical events that shaped /triggered this document? The first Industrial revolution where children had to work in factories.

What is the environment of ideas, attitudes, + emotions behind the creation of the document? Mass production so needs of more people to work in factories, using children being efficient, and cheap. Also conservative America.

Audience:

For whom (specifically, generally, logically) was the document intended? For adults or factory owners who take in children to work for them or etc.

What details in the document help you attribute the audience?  “ So long as home education is not found for them, they are to some extent better situated when engaged in light labour, and the labour generally is light which falls to their share.  However, the bringing together numbers of the young of both sexes in factories have been a prolific source of moral delinquency.“ Those sentences must refer to people who could employ these children.

Point of View:

Who (specifically, generally, logically) wrote/produced the doc?Peter Gaskell

Is there a reference to the author’s POV (i.e. his/her professional, racial, gender, social background) in the document biline? If not, can you infer it? No, I’m guessing he is a middle-class man, who is conservative about either the IR, children or just sexual relations in general.

What details in the document reflect the author’s POV?   “ So long as home education is not found for them, they are to some extent better situated when engaged in light labour, and the labour generally is light which falls to their share.  However, the bringing together numbers of the young of both sexes in factories has been a prolific source of moral delinquency.“ The author is basically saying that children shouldn’t be exposed their sexual desires and that children should be schooled and disciplined.

Purpose

Why was the document created?Probably to discredit the mixture of boys and girls in factories or just child labour.

What elements in the document help you determine its purpose? The parts that talk about the fact that this mixture of sexes would be “moral delinquency”

How does the author’s point of view shape the document's purpose AND/ OR

How does the format of the document shape its purpose?  (e.g. Is a visual/ photo more emotional than an essay?) Because his wrote a book and he seems to be a conservative who is somewhat well educated, the purpose of this text would be to strike people and to get them alert/thinking.

‘Y’ is The Document Significant?

How does the document impact/shape/reflect popular arguments on the subject? This argument goes with the conservative view points on the life of a minor and how much should be tolerated and controlled by them and etc.

How does the document reflect ‘continuity or change over time’? Nowadays, even though there are some specifically unisex schools, minors go to school and do whatever and can be with other sexes.

What are the limitations of the document? (Is the document credible?)This text is limited as he is bias about the position the mixture of sexes.

# data[].attributes.body
Historical Context:

What are the immediate historical events that shaped /triggered this document?

The endangered child workers in the factories, specifically the textile industry, who were mistreated and exploited by factories. They were often dieing in the factories due to exhaustion or dangerous machines.

What is the environment of ideas, attitudes, + emotions behind the creation of the document?

The author makes the reader pity the girl and her father. There is almost an accusatory attitude towards the factories by exposing the conditions in which the girl is working in. There is also a solemn atmosphere to let the reader recognize what is happening because of the new capitalism.

Audience:

For whom (specifically, generally, logically) was the document intended?

The parliament; most specifically the factory owners.

What details in the document help you attribute the audience?

Firstly, the author is a member of the parliament. Also, the author mentions the conditions of the factories and the maltreatment, which are conditions that the factory workers would be able to change.

Point of View:

Who (specifically, generally, logically) wrote/produced the doc?

Michael Sadler, a member of  Parliament.

Is there a reference to the author’s POV (i.e. his/her professional, racial, gender, social background) in the document byline? If not, can you infer it?

The author was a member of parliament. I can infer that that he was fighting for worker’s rights, maybe specifically children’s rights, in the factories.

What details in the document reflect the author’s POV?

The author mentioned the early working hours, the low wages and the skinniness of the child, which were all rights the workers did not yet have.

Purpose

Why was the document created?

The document was created to raise awareness on what was happening in the factories by putting the leaders in a position of empathy towards the workers.

What elements in the document help you determine its purpose?

The element of the mother and brother’s death, and the little girl’s death, make the leaders feel empathy. The focus on the harsh machinery and long hours circulate the subject of the harsh factory.

How does the author’s point of view shape the document's purpose AND/ OR

How does the format of the document shape its purpose?  (e.g. Is a visual/ photo more emotional than an essay?)

The author’s viewpoint shapes the document towards views of human rights and their enforcement. Having the message communicated through a poem in this case is more effective than an image as the poem can describe the whole storyline, while an image might be more captivating for a single moment rather than the whole evolution of the situation.

‘Y’ is The Document Significant?

How does the document impact/shape/reflect popular arguments on the subject?

The document shapes the argument of needing labor unions and lowering the child working age around that time towards more liberal views by showing the conditions of the factory and how these affect the lives of the people working.

How does the document reflect ‘continuity or change over time’?

This document reflects how much the working conditions in western countries today have changed (at least legally). The child in question would not be allowed to work in today’s world, and today there are always adults at children’s sides, the child would not be alone with other children. Moreover, today working hours are decreased, and there are safety precautions for machines that the company has to take.

What are the limitations of the document? (Is the document credible?)

The document is credible as we now know that this is what often happened to families working in the factories. However, it might not be as credible as a diary entry for example as though it is based on the truth, it is a made up story.

# data[].attributes.headline
John Fielden , THE CURSE OF THE FACTORY SYSTEM, 1836 Brendan        Historical Context: This paragraph was written after the industrial revolution and farmers moved to work in factory and entire family, even the youth had to work in dangerous conditions. The fact that the document is talking about the premature deaths of many of John's companions is putting a bad light on the factory system. Audience: Because the piece was written in 1836, it is a plea against the factory system for other people working in it. It states facts about his work days over 10 hours and hazards in the working areas.Point of View: The author of the document was a child factory worker as a kid we can tell because he says “I remember being set to work in my father's mill when i was a little under ten” and is now writing about the effects several decades later. He is qualified to write about this because he experienced the harsh conditions and long working hours of the factory system.Purpose: The purpose is to warn people away from the factory system, his by isis on the document is against the system because of his hard experience in the system. He talks a lot about how his friends who worked are almost all dead and appeared much older than they really were. The format is a paragraph because it is serious and this is a simple form to put it in rather than a poem or painting.‘Y’ is The Document Significant? The document reflects on the time because there was a lot of struggle with harsh work hours and conditions in the factory system. The limitations is that the document does not highlight the strong side of the system and the benefits but just the harmful effects. Factory have changed in developed countries we have committees for making sure factories are safe and minimum wage laws are inforce 

# data[].attributes.subject
John Fielden , THE CURSE OF THE FACTORY SYSTEM, 1836 Brendan        Historical Context: This paragraph was written after the industrial revolution and farmers moved to work in factory and entire family, even the youth had to work in dangerous conditions. The fact that the document is talking about the premature deaths of many of John's companions is putting a bad light on the factory system. Audience: Because the piece was written in 1836, it is a plea against the factory system for other people working in it. It states facts about his work days over 10 hours and hazards in the working areas.Point of View: The author of the document was a child factory worker as a kid we can tell because he says “I remember being set to work in my father's mill when i was a little under ten” and is now writing about the effects several decades later. He is qualified to write about this because he experienced the harsh conditions and long working hours of the factory system.Purpose: The purpose is to warn people away from the factory system, his by isis on the document is against the system because of his hard experience in the system. He talks a lot about how his friends who worked are almost all dead and appeared much older than they really were. The format is a paragraph because it is serious and this is a simple form to put it in rather than a poem or painting.‘Y’ is The Document Significant? The document reflects on the time because there was a lot of struggle with harsh work hours and conditions in the factory system. The limitations is that the document does not highlight the strong side of the system and the benefits but just the harmful effects. Factory have changed in developed countries we have committees for making sure factories are safe and minimum wage laws are inforce 

# data[].attributes.body
Historical Context:

At the start of industrial revolution, children were often hired in factories to work. Probably because they were easy to control and manipulate.There were many scandals on this particular topic (ie; the mining boys, such as the breaker boys or the Lowell mill girls scandal).  This triggered more check ups to be done on factories to insure some level of upholding of rights; even though this was often corrupted or dismissed.

Since these questions were answered by a silk manufacturer in front of a parliament, the document, or more specifically the answers to the questions ask are biased. They aim to defend the factory’s  reputation and convince the parliament to believe that the children in the factory are well treated and even privileged.

Audience:

This document was specifically intended for a parliament logically on the topic of the working conditions of the workers of the factory, who were under eighteen. This can be identified in the document byline and also through the answer question-answer setup of the document. Additionally, the questions are obviously directed to the subject of the working conditions for the children. (ie. “Have you ever observed any inconvenience to the health of these very young children?”)

Point of View:

I think the person that originally created the document was against the silk manufacturer that answered the question. This is because of the way the questions are asked; As any journalist would know, these are called leading questions that aim to lead the question to a certain answer that is harder to negate than if it  was without bias. The author most likely felt strongly about the working conditions of the workers in factories. The rest of the discussion on the author's POV is stated in previous paragraphs.

Purpose

This document serves as physical proof of James Pattison's testimony (as usually done with testimonies). This can be determined through the document byline. The form of the document is formal. Since the author was most likely against James Pattison, the document probably aimed to get him in trouble with the law.

‘Y’ is The Document Significant?

This document is an example of the corruption or possible corruption that took place in factories. One cannot take this document and it's answers as they are presented. The person who answered these questions has a motif to lie: protecting his company. Because of scandals such as these, regulations and
rules started being implemented to protect workers (such as in the Lowell mill girls).

# data[].attributes.headline
HAPPY Doc Analysis Alejandro Montero Document E

# data[].attributes.subject
HAPPY Doc Analysis Alejandro Montero Document E

# data[].attributes.body
Historical Context: At this time in England, the Industrial Revolution was flourishing and there were poor conditions in the factories. The author of the document dislikes this and s against the poor conditions.

Audience: Because of the way the document is written, one can tell that it is written as a journal of the person’s life, and he is not directing it to a specific person, but instead is relating his story. Because of this, one can say that the document is directed to the public, and it’s purpose is to inform of the terrible conditions in factories.

Point of View: The person who wrote this document was a mill boy in the Industrial revolution. He probably came from a poor background, as richer people would not commonly be subject to such terrible conditions. One can say this, because in that time if families didn’t have money for school, boys would go work at mills to gain some money.

Purpose: This document was created to inform of how people were treated and what measures were taken in factories during this time. We can determine that this is the purpose of the document, as the author is constantly giving examples of his bad treatment.

“Y” is the Document Significant: Because it is a primary source on the subject, so it’s view on the document is more accurate. This document also helps us see how the conditions on the factory have evolved over time. However, if the author had personal opinions toward the factories since he was greatly affected by them, he might be biased towards a negative aspect on the topic.

# data[].attributes.headline
DOCUMENT M (Aidan) Historical Context: What are the immediate historical events that shaped /triggered this document? What is the environment of ideas, attitudes, + emotions behind the creation of the document?During the industrial revolution factories needed workers, nimble workers, so they made child workers. The conditions that these children worked in often subverted the public eye. Children were forced to work in unbearable conditions to earn miniscule amounts of CA$H for their families. Audience: For whom (specifically, generally, logically) was the document intended? What details in the document help you attribute the audience?To the middle and upper class people in england not running the factories. Clearly the factory owners would know that they have horrible working conditions, so it can't be to them, and it can't be to the workers, because they can't read. we can be sure that it is for the middle and upper class of England in the way the author describes the reaction of the people who do not know of how life is like in a factory.                   .Point of View: Who (specifically, generally, logically) wrote/produced the doc?Is there a reference to the author’s POV (i.e. his/her professional, racial, gender, social background) in the document biline? If not, can you infer it?What details in the document reflect the author’s POV?                                Francis Trollope was a writer who often wrote about the injustices that certain peoples faced. she and her family faced financial issues in her early life and this is more likely to make her wish to stop the system in use at the time.                Purpose Why was the document created?What elements in the document help you determine its purpose?How does the author’s point of view shape the document's purpose AND/ ORHow does the format of the document shape its purpose?  (e.g. Is a visual/ photo more emotional than an essay?)                         To make people see the horrors in a normal day in the life of a Child working in factories.               ‘Y’ is The Document Significant?How does the document impact/shape/reflect popular arguments on the subject?How does the document reflect ‘continuity or change over time’?What are the limitations of the document? (Is the document credible?)   

# data[].attributes.subject
DOCUMENT M (Aidan) Historical Context: What are the immediate historical events that shaped /triggered this document? What is the environment of ideas, attitudes, + emotions behind the creation of the document?During the industrial revolution factories needed workers, nimble workers, so they made child workers. The conditions that these children worked in often subverted the public eye. Children were forced to work in unbearable conditions to earn miniscule amounts of CA$H for their families. Audience: For whom (specifically, generally, logically) was the document intended? What details in the document help you attribute the audience?To the middle and upper class people in england not running the factories. Clearly the factory owners would know that they have horrible working conditions, so it can't be to them, and it can't be to the workers, because they can't read. we can be sure that it is for the middle and upper class of England in the way the author describes the reaction of the people who do not know of how life is like in a factory.                   .Point of View: Who (specifically, generally, logically) wrote/produced the doc?Is there a reference to the author’s POV (i.e. his/her professional, racial, gender, social background) in the document biline? If not, can you infer it?What details in the document reflect the author’s POV?                                Francis Trollope was a writer who often wrote about the injustices that certain peoples faced. she and her family faced financial issues in her early life and this is more likely to make her wish to stop the system in use at the time.                Purpose Why was the document created?What elements in the document help you determine its purpose?How does the author’s point of view shape the document's purpose AND/ ORHow does the format of the document shape its purpose?  (e.g. Is a visual/ photo more emotional than an essay?)                         To make people see the horrors in a normal day in the life of a Child working in factories.               ‘Y’ is The Document Significant?How does the document impact/shape/reflect popular arguments on the subject?How does the document reflect ‘continuity or change over time’?What are the limitations of the document? (Is the document credible?)   

# data[].attributes.body
The document is significant because it helped shape a growing opinion that the children should not work in the factories. her book helped shape the opinion because Francis Trollope was an known writer and had gained fame from her previous books like the "DOMESTIC MANNERS OF THE AMERICANS" or "BELGIUM AND WEST GERMANY". this document is not credible as a source because it

iaceb

# data[].attributes.headline
Document I.  Abraham Whitehead, clothier, Testimony to Parliament, 1832 -- OLIVIA

# data[].attributes.subject
Document I.  Abraham Whitehead, clothier, Testimony to Parliament, 1832 -- OLIVIA

# data[].attributes.body
Historical Context:

What are the immediate historical events that shaped /triggered this document?

During this time, 1832, there were bad working conditions for children working in factories and the Industrial Revolution was happening too.

What is the environment of ideas, attitudes, + emotions behind the creation of the document?

The clothier seems to be worried and wants attention brought to this situation because it isn’t normal that a child is going to bed at 11 o’clock at night and waking up at 2 in the morning to then walk 2 miles to work to then have to wait outside for the gatekeeper to let him in.

Audience:

For whom (specifically, generally, logically) was the document intended?

The document is intended to a Parliament

What details in the document help you attribute the audience?

Some details are that the clothier never mentions the neighbor's name nor the child's name so the person won't then be involved. It also mentions it in the document.

Point of View:

Who (specifically, generally, logically) wrote/produced the doc?

Abraham whitehead

Is there a reference to the author’s POV (i.e. his/her professional, racial, gender, social background) in the document biline? If not, can you infer it?

Ther person that wrote the document was a clothier, one can infer that the person is a man because in 1832, clothier’s were normally men not women.

What details in the document reflect the author’s POV (point of view)?

The fact that this person is speaking about his neighbours child’s daily routine to the parliament leads one to think that he wants attention brought to this situation and is concerned for this child

Purpose

Why was the document created?

To give an example of a young child’s working hours/conditions and his/her daily life

What elements in the document help you determine its purpose?

“her child works at a mill nearly two miles from home”

“child coming from its work this winter between 10 and 11 in the evening”

“the child had been up by two o'clock in the morning”

“then to go nearly two miles to the mill, where it had to stay at the door till the overlooker came to open it”

How does the author’s point of view shape the document's purpose

By using what the parents told him as a sort of backup to prove in a way that there are multiple witness

‘Y’ is The Document Significant?

How does the document impact/shape/reflect popular arguments on the subject?

The document is one example of many other child labour stories, and it was something that need awareness brought to it which is why the document was addressed to the parliament

How does the document reflect ‘continuity or change over time’?

It shows how much child labour has changed over time, back then there was child labour, now, it still exists but there are laws about it some that guarantee your safety and hygiene which is something they didn't have before. Also, in 1832 education was not compulsory so if there was no school, the only other thing you could do was work and get some money and that is clearly what this child is doing.

What are the limitations of the document? (Is the document credible?)

I would say this document could be bias because it is addressed to the parliament meaning he must have an objective therefor exaggerating the situation could benefit his case.

# data[].attributes.headline
Katie Kaiser: Document C  C. T. Thackrah, "The Effects of Arts, Trades and Professions, and of Civic States Habits of Living, on Health and Longevity.", 1844                     Historical Context:  What are the immediate historical events that shaped /triggered this document?  Industrial revolutionChild labour in factoriesFactory Act of 1844What is the environment of ideas, attitudes, + emotions behind the creation of the document?He has a negative attitude towards the conditions in the factory.   Audience: For whom (specifically, generally, logically) was the document intended? Logically, this is directed towards factory owners because he wants to get better working conditions for workers, especially children.What details in the document help you attribute the audience? The overall tone sounds like a complaint to factory owners for example, “No man of humanity can reflect without distress on the state of thousands of children roused from their beds at any early hour, hurried to the mills, and kept there till a late hour of night…kept in an atmosphere impure loaded with noxious (poisonous) dust. There is scarcely time for meals.”Point of View: Who (specifically, generally, logically) wrote/produced the doc? A parent, doctor, or  someone who generally cares alot about children and health issues.Is there a reference to the author’s POV (i.e. his/her professional, racial, gender, social background) in the document biline? If not, can you infer it?I can infer that the document is about the negative effects  What details in the document reflect the author’s POV? “No man of humanity can reflect without distress on the state of thousands of children roused from their beds at any early hour, hurried to the mills, and kept there till a late hour of night.” He clearly cares for children since he thinks no one can stand the fact that children have to work under these conditions. PurposeWhy was the document created? To spread awareness about the harms of child labour, in order to get working conditions to change.What elements in the document help you determine its purpose? “The children were almost universally ill-looking, small, sickly, barefoot, and ill-clad.” This shows he is spreading how the working children feel, so he wants to make others, especially factory owners aware of this. How does the author’s point of view shape the document's purpose AND/ ORHow does the format of the document shape its purpose?  (e.g. Is a visual/ photo more emotional than an essay?) This article is very descriptive to show how badly working conditions are. This persuades the readers because they have empathy for the workers. ‘Y’ is The Document Significant?How does the document impact/shape/reflect popular arguments on the subject? This document reflects how working conditions were at the time, and shows that people were concerned with it. This made an impact on making the Factory Act of 1844. How does the document reflect ‘continuity or change over time’? Now child labour is not very common because of laws that were passed. In some places working conditions are very poor because factories want to produce goods cheaply, therefore employees are of little concern. However, it is not seen as much as it was in the 1800s. What are the limitations of the document? (Is the document credible?) He is a little biased because it says “I stood in Oxford-row, Manchester, and observed”, so these facts are only coming from him. Also he only shows the negative side of the conditions and not positives of the argument. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Katie Kaiser: Document C  C. T. Thackrah, "The Effects of Arts, Trades and Professions, and of Civic States Habits of Living, on Health and Longevity.", 1844                     Historical Context:  What are the immediate historical events that shaped /triggered this document?  Industrial revolutionChild labour in factoriesFactory Act of 1844What is the environment of ideas, attitudes, + emotions behind the creation of the document?He has a negative attitude towards the conditions in the factory.   Audience: For whom (specifically, generally, logically) was the document intended? Logically, this is directed towards factory owners because he wants to get better working conditions for workers, especially children.What details in the document help you attribute the audience? The overall tone sounds like a complaint to factory owners for example, “No man of humanity can reflect without distress on the state of thousands of children roused from their beds at any early hour, hurried to the mills, and kept there till a late hour of night…kept in an atmosphere impure loaded with noxious (poisonous) dust. There is scarcely time for meals.”Point of View: Who (specifically, generally, logically) wrote/produced the doc? A parent, doctor, or  someone who generally cares alot about children and health issues.Is there a reference to the author’s POV (i.e. his/her professional, racial, gender, social background) in the document biline? If not, can you infer it?I can infer that the document is about the negative effects  What details in the document reflect the author’s POV? “No man of humanity can reflect without distress on the state of thousands of children roused from their beds at any early hour, hurried to the mills, and kept there till a late hour of night.” He clearly cares for children since he thinks no one can stand the fact that children have to work under these conditions. PurposeWhy was the document created? To spread awareness about the harms of child labour, in order to get working conditions to change.What elements in the document help you determine its purpose? “The children were almost universally ill-looking, small, sickly, barefoot, and ill-clad.” This shows he is spreading how the working children feel, so he wants to make others, especially factory owners aware of this. How does the author’s point of view shape the document's purpose AND/ ORHow does the format of the document shape its purpose?  (e.g. Is a visual/ photo more emotional than an essay?) This article is very descriptive to show how badly working conditions are. This persuades the readers because they have empathy for the workers. ‘Y’ is The Document Significant?How does the document impact/shape/reflect popular arguments on the subject? This document reflects how working conditions were at the time, and shows that people were concerned with it. This made an impact on making the Factory Act of 1844. How does the document reflect ‘continuity or change over time’? Now child labour is not very common because of laws that were passed. In some places working conditions are very poor because factories want to produce goods cheaply, therefore employees are of little concern. However, it is not seen as much as it was in the 1800s. What are the limitations of the document? (Is the document credible?) He is a little biased because it says “I stood in Oxford-row, Manchester, and observed”, so these facts are only coming from him. Also he only shows the negative side of the conditions and not positives of the argument. 

# data[].attributes.body
Historical background:

In 1947, the industrial revolution was going on with the new power “steam” revolutionize the factories because before the energy was produced by water and animal and needed a flat location next to a kennel but with steam energy the factories offers much more location possibility. Steam create new transport like trains and steamboat.The author have a negative opinion of the industrial revolution; he describe the sadness of the grey wall and the black smoke escaping from the huge brick chimney.

Audience:

The name of the documents is “the factory town”; the audience was probably in the Newspapers because they are different type of text in the newspapers than the audience was the general public.

Point of view:

This document has been written in  1847 by Ernest Jone; in fact, the authors think that the factory evolution and useful but it also change the state, the people , and

the sky. The author is sad and have a negative opinion of this situation.

Purpose:

The purpose is to show the sadness of factory; the misery of the children working and the aristocrate that made profit with this system. This document is in poem form because i think the author want to shared the emotion of this and a poem is the most suitable thing.

Significance of the document:

This document show the situation; they were a lot of complaint about he work condition.This document is not very credible because it is a poem.Poetry were not very serious way to point of the case.the factory are less in the cities in 2017 but less polluting than in the industrial revolution.

# data[].attributes.body
Document F   Nassau Senior,  Letters on the Factory Act , 1830

Historical Context:

In 1830, people in the United State worked in factories and people in the south usually worked in fields. Nassau senior compares these two types of workers, how much they make, how they look like, and there condition of work. “The girls, especially, are far more good-looking” “The wages earned per family are more than double those of the south….Parliament got up a frightful and an utterly unfounded picture of the ill-treatment of the children.”

Audience:

To the readers of this document , factories owners, and farm owners because this documents is comparing their workers.

Point of View:

Nassau William senior was an English lawyer known as an economist. He was also a government adviser over several decades on economic and social policy.

He is comparing how much a factory worker get to how much a field worker gets.

Purpose

This document is comparing workers in factories to workers in fields.

This document tries to compare how much the two makes and maybe raise attention about the field workers and since they work harder that they should maybe win more money.

‘Y’ is The Document Significant?

No that document did not change anything, field workers never got paid more than the factory workers even though their task was tougher and they did also probably work longer than the factories workers. But then since this is only a point of view this document is not really trustable.

# data[].attributes.body
Document K
"The Cotton Mill", John Jones, 1821

Now see the Cotton from the town convey'd

To Manchester, that glorious mart of trade:

Hail splendid scene! The Nurse of every art,

That glads the widow's and the orphan's heart!

Thy mills, like gorgeous palaces, arise,

And lift their useful turrets to the skies!

See Kennedy's stupendous structure join'd

To thine M'Connell--friends of human kind!

Whose ready doors for ever wide expand

To give employment to a numerous band,

Murray's behold! That well deserves a name,--

And Lee's and Houldsworth's our attention claim,--

And numerous others, scattered up and down,

The sole supporters of this ample town.

Historical Context:

What are the immediate historical events that shaped /triggered this document?

Creation of Mill

What is the environment of ideas, attitudes, + emotions behind the creation of the document?

The author was very excited when the Mill came out,

Audience:

For whom (specifically, generally, logically) was the document intended?

From the people from the town.

What details in the document help you attribute the audience?

“Thy mills, like gorgeous palaces, arise,”

Point of View:

Who (specifically, generally, logically) wrote/produced the doc?

John Jones

Is there a reference to the author’s POV (i.e. his/her professional, racial, gender, social background) in the document biline? If not, can you infer it?

He is an author due to the fact that he wrote the poem.

What details in the document reflect the author’s POV?

There is no detail on the poem that describes the author.

Purpose

Why was the document created?

The purpose of the document is not mentioned in the poem, however the author talks about how great the creation of the Mill was.

What elements in the document help you determine its purpose?

How does the author’s point of view shape the document's purpose AND/ OR

In the poem the author says, “Thy mills, like gorgeous palaces, arise,” Which shows the emotion(feeling) of the author.

How does the format of the document shape its purpose?  (e.g. Is a visual/ photo more emotional than an essay?)

The format of the document is a poem. I don’t think the format of the document would change the purpose of the document.

‘Y’ is The Document Significant?

How does the document impact/shape/reflect popular arguments on the subject?

This document can impact the arguments on the subject because it shows how technology changed at that time.

How does the document reflect ‘continuity or change over time’?

This shows how industrial revolution improved people's lives.

What are the limitations of the document? (Is the document credible?)

This is a credible document because it is a primary source. This makes the document reliable because the author lived in the that time which made him more easier to describe the invention of the mill.

# data[].attributes.headline
DOCUMENT N:         Max Saada              Historical Context: The industrial revolution – new factories. The satisfaction and excitement of discovering new opportunities. Audience: W.C Taylor made this tour for an investigation of the industry of Mr. Ashworth's Turton Mill maybe for the government. There were no details about who is the audience but I guessed that it was an investigation because the main character is making a tour of the factory and is judging it.           Point of View: W.C Taylor is the author of the document. The author’s POV about the factory is very positive, he describes all the advantages of the factories.Purpose: The following quotes show document was created to describe a factory and to show to the audience what are the advantages: “The conditions in the mill are exceedingly favorable”; “The working rooms are lofty, spacious, and well ventilated”; “the labor is executed by the steam-engine or water-wheel” (etc…)The authors is satisfied with the concept of factories which leads to a great description of the factories with many advantages and not a lot of defaults. The format of the document doesn’t really shape its purpose, they are three paragraphs which represents the tour of the factory and it’s really well described so I would say that three is the prefect numbers of paragraphs that we need for this Tour.‘       Y’ is The Document Significant? This document promotes the outcome of the Industrial revolution (1820-1840). The document was created in 1840 at the end of the Industrial revolution when factories appeared in all over the world. The document is credible because it’s based on the outcome of an important revolution.

# data[].attributes.subject
DOCUMENT N:         Max Saada              Historical Context: The industrial revolution – new factories. The satisfaction and excitement of discovering new opportunities. Audience: W.C Taylor made this tour for an investigation of the industry of Mr. Ashworth's Turton Mill maybe for the government. There were no details about who is the audience but I guessed that it was an investigation because the main character is making a tour of the factory and is judging it.           Point of View: W.C Taylor is the author of the document. The author’s POV about the factory is very positive, he describes all the advantages of the factories.Purpose: The following quotes show document was created to describe a factory and to show to the audience what are the advantages: “The conditions in the mill are exceedingly favorable”; “The working rooms are lofty, spacious, and well ventilated”; “the labor is executed by the steam-engine or water-wheel” (etc…)The authors is satisfied with the concept of factories which leads to a great description of the factories with many advantages and not a lot of defaults. The format of the document doesn’t really shape its purpose, they are three paragraphs which represents the tour of the factory and it’s really well described so I would say that three is the prefect numbers of paragraphs that we need for this Tour.‘       Y’ is The Document Significant? This document promotes the outcome of the Industrial revolution (1820-1840). The document was created in 1840 at the end of the Industrial revolution when factories appeared in all over the world. The document is credible because it’s based on the outcome of an important revolution.

# data[].attributes.body
Historical Context:

-> The Government passed a Factory Act to improve conditions for children working in factories and this document Is talking about the harsh conditions of the factory.

Audience:

-> This was a letter to parliament for children working  very long hours. "limiting the ages of children employed" from this part, I noticed that children also worked like normal adults

Point of View:

-> Workers of the factory wrote this doc and the letter is talking about the rights that were violated amongst children workers working in a harsh factory.

Purpose

-> It was created to maintain the right of children who worked very long hours. Strong words like 'violate', 'invasion' helped me determine the purpose. This document is shaped as a letter to Parliament about the working conditions. "This is perhaps the most cruel stroke" this quote inside the letter clarifies the problem of the factory

‘Y’ is The Document Significant?

-> Due to industrial revolution, rights of several people, including children, have been violated. This document is credible because it is based on the true story and it is a primary source. Now days, children less that 9 years old can't work in factories.