# data[].attributes.body
Siping Dong & Jiaqi Liu
States are main actors in IGOs,IGOs are an entity built by a treaty that involves two or more countries and works in good faith on issues of common concern.
NGOs connect countries and industries across countries and build a world-wide organization similar to the General Conference, which has accelerated the process of globalization in various fields.
The examples of IGO:United Nations, Organization of American States, North Atlantic Treaty Organization, World Health Organization.
The examples of  NGO: Greenpeace, Amnesty International.Mercy Corps,Doctors Without Borders,International Rescue Committee,Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

# data[].attributes.body
Qinuo Meng & Jiaqi Shen
IGOs are an entity established by a treaty that involves two or more countries and works in good faith on issues of common concern.
NGOs are a non-profit organization that functions independently of any government.

The main purpose of intergovernmental organizations is to establish a mechanism that will enable the inhabitants of the world to work together more successfully in the field of peace and security and to address economic and social problems. Since the establishment of the United Nations and NATO, intergovernmental organizations have become indispensable players in the international community.

In both ways, NGOs contribute to global democracy. NGOs have greatly enhanced the flow of information in global governance.
They report information about domestic politics to the world outside a country and, in the opposite direction, bring global concerns and ideas to the national and local levels.

The IGOs and NGOs  do have implications for national sovereignty. The controversial aspects of large development NGOs related to State sovereignty arise in the context of the provision of services by NGOs that have traditionally been seen as a role for the State. This is not controversial in some cases, such as in developing countries that have experienced major natural disasters, where immediate relief is urgently needed. In other cases, however, where non-governmental organizations are involved in longer term service delivery, their impact on national sovereignty is considered problematic. Perhaps the main reason for this is that they undermine the relationship between the State and its citizens and often the sovereignty of political institutions

# data[].attributes.body
Lisen He & Weiliang Shi

From the perspective of us,intergovernmental Organizations (IGOs) are formed by states.However, Nongovernmental Organizations (NGOs) are generally private, voluntary organizations whose members are individuals or a group of people. Usually, NGOs are created to solve specific issue.
The examples of IGO:United Nations, Organization of American States, North Atlantic Treaty Organization, World Health Organization.
The examples of  NGO: Greenpeace,Amnesty International.Mercy Corps,Doctors Without Borders,International Rescue Committee,Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Both NGO and IGO have an influential impact on state sovereignty.IGO makes and enforces policy.However,NGO doesn't make and enforce policy,which makes them play a diverse role in state sovereignty.

In terms of IGO, it has both positive and negative impacts on state sovereignty. In the views of positive Globalists,as for developed states which involved in IGO groups,such as US, their state sovereignty would be promoted, and their influence would be widen in this way.When it comes to NGO,some organizations are good to state sovereignty.However, in the views of negative Globalists,for those countries which are not very powerful，such as The Somalia Democratic Republictheir,state sovereignties may be declined through being controlled by powerful states of IGO.Meanwhile,some organizations involved in economic activities,may widen the gap between the rich and poor to decline the state sovereignty.

In the views of Internationalists,IGO can't replace the soverergnty of the states.For example,although the Asia-Pacific organization is an alliance,it is actually in charge of each other.
When it comes to NGO,some organizations have nothing to do with state sovereignty,such as Greenpeace.
In the views of  Transformationalists,it stands on the midway.State soveignty will not be improved or declined.The state sovereignty would be remained but transformed into a new form to interactive

# data[].attributes.body
Yi Wang & Renjie Zhang
The power of IGOs comes from the state endowed, these rights belong to the scope of the sovereign rights of the state.

And the governance power of NGOs does not come from national sovereignty. For example, some transnational corporations, as the main form of for-profit NGOs, are both the participants of governance in globalization and the objects of governance.

In today's globalized world, global governance is in vogue. The direction of international organizations, non-governmental organizations, and States is not entirely consistent. International organizations have strong behaviors in some areas, while NGOs have a considerable voice in other areas. This is both contradictory and reasonable, depending on the balance of power.

Unlike international organizations, NGOs often take a different position from their own government on many issue, in the process of globalization, some non-profit NGOs can not only provide valuable advice and opinions to the United Nations, influence its decision-making, but also enhance the representativeness and democracy of the United Nations. For example, some governments may make decisions for the overall interests of their own country at the expense of the interests of some groups, which will be opposed many non-governmental organizations. the recent decision by Japan to dump nuclear wastewater in the Pacific Ocean, is the decision by the government to ensure its own overall interests, and this move has been opposed by many NGOs around the world.

# data[].attributes.body
Jiaming Zhang
IGOs express their opinions on behalf of various countries in terms of political, economic and cultural aspects, and avoiding the interference of strong countries in weak internal affairs. The power of the general assembly, the secretariat, and the council is usually checked and balanced, and international decision-making is carried out by a voting system, which strengthens the fairness to countries in the process of globalization.
NGOs connect countries and industries across countries and establish a world-wide organization similar to the General Conference, which has accelerated the process of globalization in various fields. The inter-industry international exchanges and cooperation of multinational governments can avoid the participation of the country's internal affairs and diplomacy and prevent the loss of sovereignty.

The Communist International, a well-known IGO established by internationalists in the last century. The Asian, African, and Latin American national liberation movement under its leadership is an important reason for the backward countries and regions in Asia, Africa and Latin America to get rid of slavery, feudalism and colonies and join the process of globalization.

# data[].attributes.body
Jianing Cong & Zhengyi He

There was an explosion in the number of intergovernmental and non-governmental organizations (IGOs) as the number of new countries increased after World War II.Most interactions between countries are no longer bilateral, or one-to-one; On the contrary, many issues are dealt with on a multilateral basis.In addition, the State is no longer the main channel for international interaction, with individuals and groups often bypassing State institutions and cooperating with each other through non-governmental and intergovernmental organizations. In most cases, NGOs have never directly challenged the sovereignty of States, but because of their contributions on a variety of issues, they have gradually eroded the role of States in many areas.In some cases, too, it can be seen that NGos sometimes directly challenge the power of the State through the provision of certain services and their sheer size and capacity. Intergovernmental organizations are composed of sovereign states, and one of the rules is that member states have to respect each other's sovereignty, but when one member becomes too powerful, it can also affect the sovereignty of other member states, like NATO, one of its member states, the United States, has troops in all the other member states,The aim is to ensure that it can influence the domestic, diplomatic and military affairs of other member states.

# data[].attributes.body
Yupeng Wang & Sheng Zhu

IGOs founded by states,organized by same purpose.So IGOs can strengthen the power of states,as a national association, it can help international cooperation or peace talks.Such as European Union benefits all Europe countries.
NGOs founded by individuals and NGOs spread voices from the masses, making their own appeals, have their own goals, generally voluntary actions, such as the Red Cross, the Animal Protection Association,to help people and world.

For positive Globalist,NGOs and IGOs are both positive for globalization,it decreased the differences between countries.
For negative Globalist,NGOs and IGOs are harmful to the process of global economy,they made more seperations.
For internationalists,cooperation between countries, equal dialogue, and expanded scope of cooperation inter--Teamwork in the interest of national sovereignty that essentially aimed at enhancing their power,but IGOs are challenging the place of states.
For transformationalist,
transformationalists will take into account the obstacles to national sovereignty of these global organizations, which inconsistencies external voices and leads to inter-State restraint.In some level,the existence of IGOs and NGOs are the evidence of new participants of globalization.

# data[].attributes.body
Qianyi Li ＆ Gaoming Chen

From the point of view of intergovernmental organisations, IGOs offer both healthy competition and the threat of fragmentation of globalisation.

First, many of the new regional institutions have been created or led by emerging economies, such as China's Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank or the New Development Bank of the BRICS group.They hope that more countries can participate in international affairs and enjoy equal treatment.But intergovernmental organizations need not mean a destructive split.They can develop strategies that ensure compatibility with the core principles of global institutions and encourage constructive development of global governance.

IGOs is the organization made up and funded by multi countries which is authoritative and powerful. They can directly influent the decision and choice of region by giving international pressure while NGOs cannot. NGOs is formed by massive volunteers which is free from government control and work for the welfare of societies as non-profit governmental bodies. Therefore, they could only improve the global context they focused by social media, materials and financial offering and conversation with states or IGOs. For example, Red Cross Society always focus on helping people suffering from disasters, diseases, and poverty which is always in the news. It provides massive goods and money for these people to improve their life condition. Also, it asks medias to report the situation and demand to the world to seek for more help from the people. Because the pressure of medias and people, states have to reply to the problems posed by Red Cross and finally solve questions furtherly. It is the way NGOs deal with the problems and the way they influence the sovereignty.