# data[].attributes.headline
Land Tax is also something we did not talk about but as a I steward a group which practices Forest Therapy and Foraging, preserving wild foods, and restoring relationship with the land, animals, plants, water, etc. on Wabanaki, Wawenock land that was stolen, I have included a "land tax" into the plan of our organization. A portion of the money that I collect from students this summer is going to support a Native Re-matriation project, straight from income, before expenses. Susan B.

# data[].attributes.subject
Land Tax is also something we did not talk about but as a I steward a group which practices Forest Therapy and Foraging, preserving wild foods, and restoring relationship with the land, animals, plants, water, etc. on Wabanaki, Wawenock land that was stolen, I have included a "land tax" into the plan of our organization. A portion of the money that I collect from students this summer is going to support a Native Re-matriation project, straight from income, before expenses. Susan B.

# data[].attributes.body
https://sogoreate-landtrust.org/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
THE EAST BAY IS TRADITIONAL LISJAN OHLONE LAND.

Sogorea Te' Land Trust cultivates rematriation.
Sogorea Te' calls on us all to heal and transform the legacies of colonization, genocide, and patriarchy and to do the work our ancestors and future generations are calling us to do.

Shuumi Means Gift in Chochenyo.
The Shuumi Land Tax is an invitation to support the vital work of the Sogorea Te' Land Trust, a small step towards acknowledging the history of genocide on this land and contributing to its healing. GIVE SHUUMI

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Sogorea Te' Land Trust cultivates rematriation.Sogorea Te' calls on us all to heal and transform the legacies of colonization, genocide, and patriarchy and to do the work our ancestors and future generations are calling us to do. Shuumi Means Gift in Chochenyo.

# data[].attributes.headline
Amy, Susan, Alivia, Fiona, and Freedom, and Sarah (not sure if we're group 7?!) 

# data[].attributes.subject
Amy, Susan, Alivia, Fiona, and Freedom, and Sarah (not sure if we're group 7?!) 

# data[].attributes.body
We talked a little about the 2 examples of land re-matriation that Alivia mentioned: Pine Island and the 765 acres given back from Elliotsville Foundation (important to mention that the Elliotsville Foundation owns something like 1 million acres of land.....so why not more?)

Symbolic gesture vs. meaningful change

Mention of land donated in Westbrook for a memorial to Chief Polin-----Alivia pointed out, though, that having a memorial to a chief is replication of a settler colonial view because chiefs were spokes people for a matralinial governance structure.

Example of un-damming of rivers as, perhaps, a part of re-matriation. Complicated by the fact that alewife runs are owned by towns and can be leased to private LLCs by towns to enrich town coffers. . . ugh.

We didn't talk about this, but just adding it anyway, right to harvest sweet grass in Acadia National Park

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
A recent Supreme court ruling has given Native Americans in Oklahoma renewed sovereignty over their tribal lands - an area of roughly 19 million acres.

The land in question marked the end of the Trail of Tears for the five tribes that underwent forced relocation in the mid-1800s: the Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Seminole, and Muscogee Creek. They built a new life in eastern Oklahoma, only to have their land stripped away, bit by bit, over the next century and a half.

But this past summer, in a historic 5-4 decision for which Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote the majority opinion, the Supreme Court reaffirmed in McGirt v. Oklahoma that the boundaries of Muscogee (Creek) Nation still exist - meaning the tribe, not the state of Oklahoma, holds some key jurisdictional powers.

"The simplest way to say what happened is that prior to this ruling, Oklahoma was exerting criminal jurisdiction over us, and Oklahoma no longer has that criminal jurisdiction."

"The simplest way to say what happened is that prior to this ruling, Oklahoma was exerting criminal jurisdiction over us, and Oklahoma no longer has that criminal jurisdiction," explains Rebecca Nagle, a member of Cherokee Nation and host of the podcast "This Land," which tracks the pair of cases that led to the Supreme Court ruling.

"It never actually had it in the first place; it was exercising it illegally," she says. "Now, the Supreme Court has basically told them that they have to stop. So now, crimes committed against Native Americans or by Native Americans will have to be prosecuted either by the tribe or by the federal government."
Related: US-Mexico border wall threatens sacred Native lands
Gorsuch's decision wasn't new law, Nagle notes. "He didn't set a new precedent at all. All he did was follow the law. But he followed it in a way that was very plain."

Nagle says there is one "amazing paragraph" in Gorsuch's opinion in which he declares that there is no other area of American life in which courts would say that a law passed by Congress but not followed by a state should no longer be enforced simply because the state failed to apply the law properly for so long.

"He basically [said], 'We would do that nowhere else, but we do it within federal Indian law all the time,'" Nagle explains. "So, he kind of drew this line in the sand in the way he wrote the decision, [saying], 'We reject this thinking - that because treaty rights have been violated for so long they're no longer valid.' And that is actually is a big deal. Even though it shouldn't be, it's a big deal."

Practically speaking, the decision asserts that the boundaries established by the 1866 Treaty between the Native American people and the US government have been intact since then, even though Oklahoma has not recognized them.

For a lot of Oklahomans, not much will change, Nagle says. Tribal jurisdiction over non-American Indians and non-American Indians on what's called fee land - that is, reservation land owned by non-Indians - is limited. "The people directly affected by the ruling are tribal citizens living on the reservations," she says.

Much of Native American land in Oklahoma was originally lost through a process called an allotment - a federal act based on the misguided notion that Native American people would be better off if their lands were privatized and held by individuals rather than communally. "So, the federal government came in and basically divided up Indian territory in eastern Oklahoma, and assigned individual plots of land to individual tribal citizens - and the net impact was devastating for tribal citizens," Nagle says.

"The Indian landowners were really preyed upon by white settlers and grafters. It's a really dark chapter in history for our tribe. ... We have still been losing restricted land and land that's considered tribal land in the century since. This decision...sort of puts a pause on that process and lets us strengthen our sovereignty."

"Most of the land quickly passed to white ownership through sale, through swindle, and often through outright theft and even violence," she explains. "The Indian landowners were really preyed upon by white settlers and grafters. It's a really dark chapter in history for our tribe. ... We have still been losing restricted land and land that's considered tribal land in the century since. This decision...sort of puts a pause on that process and lets us strengthen our sovereignty."

The Supreme Court decision does not mean that land currently held by non-tribal, non-Native owners in the boundaries of the Muscogee Creek Reservation will be taken away from them and transferred to the tribes. But it does raise the question of how laws and regulations, such as environmental statutes, will now be applied within tribal jurisdictions. Native tribes have struggled to exert authority over polluting industries, for example, and Nagle is concerned that will remain a problem.
Related: Keystone oil spill casts doubt on the safety of proposed Keystone XL pipeline
Some environmental protection laws, like the Clean Water Act and the Clean Air Act, give tribes the same regulatory authority as states. But the oil and gas industry has a lot of power in Oklahoma, and about 15 years ago, one of the state's senators, James Inhofe, snuck a rider into a transportation bill that "blocks the EPA from recognizing the sovereignty of Oklahoma tribes without the state's approval," according to the website indianz.com. "No other tribe in the nation has to meet this requirement."

Now, in the wake of the recent Supreme Court decision, Oklahoma's governor Kevin Stitt formed a "commission" to "chart a path forward," Nagle says.

"There's still this effort afoot in Oklahoma to limit tribal jurisdiction and to sort of tip the [scales] in the favor of the oil industry."

"It's basically a bunch of cronies from the oil industry and [has], I think, one seat to represent tribes," Nagle says. "So there's still this effort afoot in Oklahoma to limit tribal jurisdiction and to sort of tip the [scales] in the favor of the oil industry."

Nevertheless, Nagle believes Gorsuch's opinion will be a powerful legal tool for tribes in cases in which states claim that the consequences of following the terms of an old treaty are too great and that 100 years of neglecting a treaty entitles them to continue to neglect it.

"The Supreme Court, in their opinion, rejected that thinking," she says. "It's a huge victory, obviously, for Muscogee Creek Nation. It has very powerful implications for all five tribes here in Oklahoma. But I think overall, it's a huge victory for all of Indian country."
This article is based on an interview by Jenni Doering that aired on Living on Earth from PRX.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Supreme Court recognizes Native sovereignty in much of Oklahoma

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
A recent Supreme court ruling has given Native Americans in Oklahoma renewed sovereignty over their tribal lands - an area of roughly 19 million acres. The land in question marked the end of the Trail of Tears for the five tribes that underwent forced relocation in the mid-1800s: the Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Seminole, and Muscogee Creek.

# data[].attributes.body
Know of land tax campaign led by the Massachuset tribe and launching in the Boston area, based on East Bay Shuumi land tax project

# data[].attributes.headline
Begin Conversations and raise awareness of land use

# data[].attributes.subject
Begin Conversations and raise awareness of land use

# data[].attributes.body
Highlight relationships with land and responsibility of land use

# data[].attributes.headline
In some areas (northeast) we're only hearing about it but not necessarily through mainstream media. "The audacity of colonizers to ask for money for stolen land." 

# data[].attributes.subject
In some areas (northeast) we're only hearing about it but not necessarily through mainstream media. "The audacity of colonizers to ask for money for stolen land." 

# data[].attributes.body
First Light coalition

# data[].attributes.headline
In some areas (northeast) we hearing about it but not necessarily through mainstream media...but examples and acceptance seems to be growing.

# data[].attributes.subject
In some areas (northeast) we hearing about it but not necessarily through mainstream media...but examples and acceptance seems to be growing.

# data[].attributes.body
"The audacity of colonizers to ask for money for stolen land."

https://crosscut.com/focus/2021/04/wenatchi-designers-plan-buy-back-native-lands

"It's not about control, it is about stewardship and caring for the land."

# data[].attributes.headline
Elliotsville Plantation-700+ acres returned to the Penobscot Nation- Quimby family and First Light

# data[].attributes.subject
Elliotsville Plantation-700+ acres returned to the Penobscot Nation- Quimby family and First Light

# data[].attributes.body
First Light Learning Journey
https://firstlightlearningjourney.net/calendar/

# data[].attributes.body
Katahdin Woods and Waters and some other Maine land trusts are starting to work together.

# data[].attributes.headline
"Heritage Park" - St Mary's Residential School

# data[].attributes.subject
"Heritage Park" - St Mary's Residential School

# data[].attributes.body
I can see a movement to have this space reclaimed at some point.  They have started to do analysis of the site to look for grave sites.

# data[].attributes.body
what about schools paying land tax as a way to educate students?

# data[].attributes.headline
-There as been some back and forth about conservation land on Martha's Vineyard, and the Wompanoag did keep the land.

# data[].attributes.subject
-There as been some back and forth about conservation land on Martha's Vineyard, and the Wompanoag did keep the land.

# data[].attributes.body
-Sometimes these agreements are not always what they seem.
-Asking a tribe to pay market value to get their land bag.
-Manipulating land agreements and give backs to suite colonizers purposes even after agreements are made
-Giving back lands and then saying now we will not give you a portion of the billions of dollars we owe the tribe.
-Calling the tribes "investors" and then going in and exploiting the land
-In Maine an issue that continues regarding land is water and ownership of the waterways
-In Easter Washington State unknown about land give backs but the Spokane Tribe was payed for some damage to their land that occurred.
-Corporations influencing government decisions in their own best interest
-Some riverways purchased back by the tribe in Maine have begun to flourish again.