# data[].attributes.body
https://www.brightnetwork.co.uk/dashboard/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Cookies - it's your choice

At Bright Network we use cookies and similar technologies to help deliver you the best possible experience. Some are necessary to help our website work properly and can't be switched off, and some are optional but support Bright Network in building and running the service that we provide to you.

Data we store

Essential cookies to make this website work

Third party cookies used for personalised ads and content

You can find out more in our privacy policy at any time by going to the link in our footer.

With your free membership, you'll get access to:

The best internships and graduate jobs, personalised to you

Expert-led online career courses with recognised certifications

World-leading employers at events and internship experiences

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Bright Network has a range of graduate careers available. Whatever the sector you want to go into Bright Network will help you find your dream job.

# data[].attributes.body
-       Sign up to Bright Network. It is free

o   Once you’ve signed up, navigate your homepage, where you will find resources for your chosen career, live job alerts, events, advice, and networking opportunities

o   Go to the tabs along the top. Under ‘choose a career’, look at ‘career profiles’ – is your possible chosen career on here? Read the profile to check your understanding of what people with different job titles actually do

o   Under ‘career’ look at ‘career path guides’ – this might help you to understand what steps to take to get the career you want

o   Explore internships

o   Explore career advice – check how to write a good CV/how to perform well in interviews /good core career skills

o   Take the career path test

# data[].attributes.body
-       From your time exploring this page, note down:

o   Something you’ve learned about your future possible job from this website, perhaps something about the responsibilities, the day to day life of someone working in this field, the possible career path you might take to get there..

o   An event you might be interested to go to from the events section – a networking event for example, or a lecture

o   Your results from the career path test!

# data[].attributes.headline
Making your own paper summary table on this topic

# data[].attributes.subject
Making your own paper summary table on this topic

# data[].attributes.body
-skim read the papers/chapters - read the abstract or introduction, the conclusion, the results, and scan the rest of the text, highlighting key areas that might be of interest to you, or relevant to your task
-go back to those areas you highlighted and read them in detail.
-when you have finished, paraphrase important information in your own words, and copy this onto your notes or a table, with page numbers so that you can find it again
-Write a summary in your own words of this text in 3 or 4 sentences

# data[].attributes.body
Second Affirmative Speaker Debating Roles - Notes

General information:

Use team line and know part of the team split

Prepare main arguments

Rebut the opposing team

Outline of speech:

Redefine the definition (If needed)

Consider the definitions discussed so far, explain why your definition is the better alternative

Focus on the definition as a whole rather than as individual words

Aim to clear up definitional problems

Rebuttal

Attack arguments made by the opposing team

Use evidence, logic and reason to prove their argument wrong

Remain professional

Plan for rebuttal to be ⅓ of your speech

Main Arguments

Your part of team split

Research before the debate and practice

Use TEEL (Topic, Explanation, Evidence, Link) as a guide when presenting and speaking

Remember Manner (40%), Matter (40%)  and Method (20%) when organising and structuring ideas

Final Advice:

Know your content and practice

Organise team split early by communicating with the team leader

Prepare for the rebuttals (Put yourself in the other team shoes)

Edit and improve arguments and evidence

Use key words/information on cue cards

# data[].attributes.body
Brainstorm:

Work on the definition

complete a detailed initial brainstorm

identify areas that need to be researched

use resources around me

Creating the arguments:

Effective arguments are theme based

Consider all elements of ur topic

SHEEP

Social

Historical

Environmental

Economic

Political

Technological

Dividing the team split:

2 arguments to the first speaker

2 arguments to the second speaker

1st speaker:

1st to speak

can prepare fully before the speech

needs to know the 2nd speaker’s plan

must be confident with the team line and team split

Outline of speech:

Define key terms

Introduce the team line

Outline the teamsplit

Elaborate and present your arguments

Defining the topic:

Define it as a whole - rather than as individual words

Focus on the specifics which may be contentious

Some keywords may need to be defined

The most logical definition is the best line to take

Introduce the team line

A contention or argument that all team members will argue

not the same sentence or phrasing

logical in basis

Introduce the team split

-Thematically dividing the arguments between the first 2 speakers

logical and equitable distribution of arguments

Present the main argument:

TEEL

use matter, method and manner(impt to have lots of info and present in an interesting and logical way)

Logos, Pathos and Ethos - use them in structuring/presenting

Know ur content

Prepare for rebuttals, know the weak spots in our arguments, and have rebuttals prepared for ur, next speakers

keep editing - make ur arguments watertight

avoid full sentences on cue card - include only topic sentences, statistics, names, and other crucial facts

# data[].attributes.body
1. Defining the topic

-it is very important that you focus on specific which maybe take attention agree with.

1. Team line

-a contention or argument all team members will argue.

-not the same sentence or phrasing

-logical in basis

-Overall argument

1. Team split

-thematically dividing the argument between the first two speakers.

-focus on rebuttal (do not worry)

-know what each other going to say.

1. Main arguments

-guide

-matter, method, manner

-logos, ethos, pathos.

1. Final advice

-practice

-rebuttals

-keep editing

-avoid full sentence

# data[].attributes.body
For negative speakers:

First speaker (not completely prepare)

First  to speak for the negative team

First one to respond the affirmative team

Know the team line and team split

Outline of speech

First affirmative speaker’s definition and than Rebuttal

# data[].attributes.body
1. Brainstorm (definition/ detail/ research/resources)

2. Creating argument  (theme based/ consider elements/ analyze )

3. Team split  (first /second/ third speaker)

# data[].attributes.body
Brainstorm

Work on the definition, Identify ideas needed to research on, Use resources

Creating the Arguments

SHEEPT → Helps to consider all elements of your topic

Social, Historical, Environmental, Economic, Political, Technological

Dividing the Team Split

Two arguments for First speaker

Two arguments for Second Speaker

# data[].attributes.body
outline of speech
- define key terms
- introduce the team line
- outline the team split (thematically divide arguments between the first 2 speakers)
- elaborate and present your arguments

# data[].attributes.body
Respond to the definition

Rebuttal

Introduce the team line

Introduce the team split

Present the main arguments

# data[].attributes.body
Second speaker to respond to the affirmative team

1 respond the definition

Consider the definition of our argument

Focus whole rather than individual words

Explain Why our argument is better

2 rebuttal

Attack the first affirmative speaker’s argument by using evidence or logic. Need professional.

3 introduce the time line

A contention or argument that all team members will present

Not same need logical reasoning

4 introduce team split

Thematically dividing the argument between the first two speakers.

Third people Focus 100percent for rebuttal

5 present main argument

Use TEEL as a guide

# data[].attributes.body
Definition

You know what you gonna working

Complete a brainstorm

Doing the research

Using different resources that surround us

Having discuss with your friends and teachers

Creating the Argument

Building the effective argument

SHEEPT—

Social

Historical

Environmental

Economic

Political

Technological

Analyzing different arguments

How to split two arguments to different speaker

The third speaker did not need build any argument, they need to rebuttal and conclusion our point

# data[].attributes.headline
NEGATIVE video - all negative teams please watch

# data[].attributes.subject
NEGATIVE video - all negative teams please watch

# data[].attributes.body
First video:

The first step when given a debating topic is to work on the definition to ensure everyone on the team has the same understanding.

Complete a detailed brainstorm to identify the different aspects of the topic and areas that require research.

Consider passion and avoid similar arguments when dividing the team split.

The second video

The first affirmative speaker is the first person to speak from either team and can fully prepare before the speech.

it is crucial to know what the second speaker is planning to say.

Communication is essential, and the first speaker needs to be confident with what the team is going to say

# data[].attributes.body
Figure out the definition and area you doing research

2 Arguments fro 1st and 2nd speaker

Divide Clearly do not make it similar

Social

Historical

Environmental

Economic

Political

Technological

# data[].attributes.body
Outline your speech

Respond to the definition

Introduce the team line

Introduce the team split

Present main arguments

Attack the argument made by your opponent

Defend your debate when attacked

# data[].attributes.body
Define your topic

Analyze you topic

Shape your analysis

Divide your teem split

# data[].attributes.body
The first step is to brainstorm ideas
Secondly we need to create an argument for guidance we could use sheept
Social historical enviormental economical political technological factors for our argument then 2 of debaters will select two arguments each leaving the third’s job for rebuttals

# data[].attributes.body
In this tutorial on how to debate and they explore how to create arguments between team members in a debate This is also called developing the team splits.
They talked about brainstorm to think about what are the different aspects of this topic to wrap your head around just the general information of the topic.

# data[].attributes.headline
Vocab for debates/how to make good rebuttals

# data[].attributes.subject
Vocab for debates/how to make good rebuttals

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
21:03:2023 debate vocab and video notes exercises

# data[].attributes.headline
AFFIRMATIVE video - all affirmative teams please watch

# data[].attributes.subject
AFFIRMATIVE video - all affirmative teams please watch

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
First Affirmative Speaker - Debating Roles

# data[].attributes.body
Academic Debate:

a debate conducted under the auspices of an educational institution aimed at providing educational opportunities for its students.

Applied Debate:

Applied debate is conducted on propositions in which the advocates have a special interest and the debate is presented before a judge or audience with power to render a binding decision on the proposition.

Judicial Debate:

a debate that often centers around the proper means of interpreting federal statutes or the Constitution.

Mock Debate:

Mock Debates promote active, participatory learning and research, critical thinking, debate, and speech skills. Mock debates work best when teachers/facilitators help students prepare by providing contextual information about the topic and reliable sources for deeper research.

Moot court Debate:

Mooting is the oral presentation of a legal issue or problem against an opposing counsel and before a judge.

Special debate:

A special debate is a debate in the House that is allocated to non-legislative business. Examples of non-legislative business include petitions, inquiries, and local issues.

Applied parliamentary Debate:

In parliaments and other legislatures, members debate proposals regarding legislation, before voting on resolutions which become laws. Debates are usually conducted by proposing a law, or changes to a law known as amendments.

Non-Formal Debate:

A non-formal debate lacks the rules of the other styles mentioned. In many ways, any form of disagreeing that does not have a structure for how to present one's argument can fall under the category of non-formal.

# data[].attributes.body
1.Ethos logos and pathos
2.yes Pathos is mainly for persuasion
3. Is my argument logical
4.

# data[].attributes.body
1. What are Aristotle's '3 pillars' of persuasive speaking? (discover task)

ethos，logos，pathos

2. Look at the adverts on the link above. Which of the 3 pillars do you think they use to be convincing? What else do they use to convice?

ethos，doctor

3. What 2 questions should you ask yourself to decide if you have achieved logos? (discover task)

Is my argument logical?

Does the evidence support my claims?

4. Share your answers as to how we can you will use and build ethos, logos and pathos in your debate for this module.

using source and reachers the professional knowledge to support it — ethos

# data[].attributes.body
1. What are Aristotle's '3 pillars' of persuasive speaking? (discover task)
1.Ethos 2.Logos 3.Pathos

2. Look at the adverts on the link above. Which of the 3 pillars do you think they use to be convincing? What else do they use to convice?
1. I think the Logos let our convinced because It has a lot of date to support. I think that we can use some examples to persuade somebody to covinced.

3. What 2 questions should you ask yourself to decide if you have achieved logos? (discover task)
Is my argument logical?
Does the evidence support my claims?

4. Share your answers as to how we can you will use and build ethos, logos and pathos in your debate for this module.
For example, if I am a professional, my expertise can be used to convince someone of my point of view, and I can cite a lot of data to support my point of view, and then finally use empathy to make people empathise with me

# data[].attributes.body
1. What are Aristotle's '3 pillars' of persuasive speaking? Ethos, Logos and Pathos

2. Look at the adverts on the link above. Which of the 3 pillars do you think they use to be convincing? What else do they use to convince?

Dogs Trust – Pathos seems to be used in this ad, as they use humour and emotionally charged words.

WWF – There is a lot of ethos used, as they try use sources of authority.

Barnardo’s – Pathos is the key element used in this ad, as there is a lot of emotional appeal.

3. What 2 questions should you ask yourself to decide if you have achieved logos?

Is my argument logical?

Does the evidence support my claims?

4. Share your answers as to how we can you will use and build ethos, logos and pathos in your debate for this module

I could create ethos by finding sources with authority. Logos by addressing the opposing view and I could also include a story for pathos.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Ethos, Logos and Pathos

2. Pathos is mainly for persuasion.

3. “Is my argument logical?” and “Does the evidence support my claims?”

4. I could create ethos by referencing my academic sources, logos by following the structure of a valid argument using the Toulmin method and pathos by talking about the social effects of a problem in my debate.

# data[].attributes.body
1- logos, ethos and pathos
2- they’re using logos

4- we would use pathos because pathos is Pictures and emotional language are often used in advertising to influence people to take action and giving the message a personal and relatable touch.

# data[].attributes.body
1. What are Aristotle's '3 pillars' of persuasive speaking? (discover task)

-Ethos/Logos /Pathos

2. Look at the adverts on the link above. Which of the 3 pillars do you think they use to be convincing? What else do they use to convice?

-Dogs Trust-Pathos ; WWF-Logos ;  Barnardo’s- Pathos  ; British Heart Foundation-ethos : Peta-Pathos ; Stonewall- Pathos  ;Mom’s Demand Action-Pathos

3. What 2 questions should you ask yourself to decide if you have achieved logos? (discover task)

Is my argument logical?

Does the evidence support your claims?

4. Share your answers as to how we can you will use and build ethos, logos and pathos in your debate for this module.

-profession and credibility

-valid evidence

-share emotion

# data[].attributes.body
1. What are Aristotle's '3 pillars' of persuasive speaking? (discover task)

Answer : logos, pathos, and ethos.

2. Look at the adverts on the link above. Which of the 3 pillars do you think they use to be convincing? What else do they use to convice?

Answer : they’re mostly using Logos , they are using empathy which I don’t like seeing in advertising

3. What 2 questions should you ask yourself to decide if you have achieved logos? (discover task)

Answer : do I have correct facts ? / do i showcase and represent my points as required ?

4. Share your answers as to how we can you will use and build ethos, logos and pathos in your debate for this module.

Answer : i would use Ethos because I believe its the most attention grabbing method .

# data[].attributes.body
https://inkandsocial.co.uk/charity-print/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Over the years, charities have had to employ more and more shocking techniques that cut through the noise and demand attention. Print is traditionally a massively successful form of marketing for charities, and continues to push boundaries in ground-breaking campaigns.

Each of these incredible charities used print to send a powerful message that not only generated much needed awareness, but entirely changed the way we think in modern culture.
Dogs Trust
Who hasn't heard the slogan 'A dog is for life, not just for Christmas'? It's something that is now instilled in our collective vocab, and it's all thanks to Dogs Trust and their genius sticker campaign. Coined by former Chief Executive Clarissa Baldwin in 1978 and sent out to 200,000 motorists at the time, it all started as a way to make the nation think twice about impulsively purchasing puppies as Christmas presents. It's now a phrase displayed proudly on roughly three million cars. Fair to say it stuck - literally!
image: theguardian.com WWF
Well known for their attacks at the indifference of humans to environmental issues, the WWF didn't disappoint with this brutally honest poster campaign. It managed to convey the very complicated damage to the ecosystem that we are inflicting on the planet in simple, ruthless terms. The message is clear; carry on the way we are and these extraordinary species will soon be gone forever.

The poster turns the common fear of sharks entirely on its head, making our phobias seem trivial when contrasted with the potential extinction of an entire species. The simple poster campaign by DDB & Co Turkey won numerous awards when it surfaced in 2010, and has continued to generate awareness around the globe, firmly placing the precariousness of the ecosystem on the map.
image: buzzfeed.com
In a similar thread, this poster from the World Wildlife Fund is one of three which employ a different metaphor to convey the impending issue of extinction. The "Extinction Can't be Fixed" poster series shows endangered animals including a Rhino, Tiger and Polar bear being inspected by "mechanics" in a workshop.

BBDO Spain are behind the thought-provoking posters, which highlight how there is no quick-fix to solve the issue, however much the human race wants to believe it.
image: buzzfeed.com Barnardo's
Barnardo's use some of the most controversial imagery ever seen in charity advertising, and their hard-hitting shock tactics shook the world and demanded attention. Back in 1999, the children's charity stirred the media by depicting children placed in troubling adult situations to show what future awaits the children they are trying to help. These include injecting heroin and preparing to commit suicide.

Agency Bartle Bogle Hegarty were behind the poster series, which all photographed by Nick Georghiou. Giving Children Back Their Future shows in raw, unadulterated imagery, the vulnerability of the children they work with. Although the copy of each poster states the name and age of the adults that the children are meant to represent, by using children instead the poster undeniably evokes a stronger emotional response.

Brand Marketing Manager Kate Sloan said the campaign was also designed to reach towards a younger audience. "We had two specific 'business' aims of the campaign: first, to attract a younger subscriber base and, second, to build engagement with new and existing supporters to increase our regular donor base", Sloan told Third Sector.
image: pinterest.com
Being no strangers of hard-to-swallow content, Barnardo's furthered their influence in the charity sector in 2003 with a campaign which broke the record for the most complained about advertisement ever made according to the Advertising Standards Authority. The "Silver Spoon" posters show a happy baby happily lying on a comfy bed, eating with a silver spoon. The image is almost redundant however, as the eye is automatically drawn to the horrifying images of babies swallowing needles, acid and a cockroach crawling from its mouth.

The posters force the idea on the viewer that not all children get a privileged start in life, and the reality of hardships some infants face is too gruesome to comprehend. It may have received plenty of complaints, but the repercussions only generated more awareness for the charity.
image: theguardian.com British Heart Foundation
This image was part of the British Heart Foundation's campaign to raise awareness of the link between clogged arteries and smoking. The billboards force people to recognise that smoking endangers your health beyond your lungs. By showing an actual tube of fat within the cigarettes, it materialises a concept that can be difficult to picture when simply told it. The fat filled cigarette poster accompanied a shocking TV advert which encouraged 14,000 smokers to kick the habit!
image: theguardian.com Peta
Peta conducted one of the most memorable campaigns of the 90's with their infamous "Naked" posters. In a bid to diverge the public from buying fur products, they gathered some of the world's most recognisable and influential models to pose naked underneath the phrase; "We rather go naked than wear fur". The celebrity status of Emma Sjoberg, Tatjana Patitz, Heather Stewart Whyte, Fabienne Terwinghe and Naomi Campbell helped propel the poster into the public eye, and emphasise how fur is neither fashionable, nor desirable.

Ironically, Campbell ended up angering activists 15 years later by becoming the face of a furrier firm, undermining her efforts decades before!
image: theguardian.com Stonewall
"Get Over It!" is Stonewall's ground-breaking 2007 campaign which was developed with school pupils and teachers to tackle homophobic bullying in schools. The plain speaking poster packs attitude and directly tells pupils, in their own language, that being gay, trans or bi is never a reason to be bullied. The message has since appeared in languages across the world in order to stamp out homophobic bullying once and for all and remains one of the pinnacle images in the global fight against homophobic discrimination.
image: pinterest.com image: stonewall.com Mom's Demand Action
Addressing the issue of guns in America is always a divisive subject. The "Gun Sense" campaign is a movement which tries to address the seemingly nonsensical ironies that surround gun law in the states. Mom's Demand Action researched some surprising objects which have been banned in the US in order to "protect" their children. The first shows a child holding a Kinder Surprise Egg, which is banned in America due to a 1938 law which prohibited any candy with embedded toys.

The second is the famous fairy tale of Little Red Riding Hood, which is banned in two California School Districts for containing a reference to alcohol (Little Red Riding Hood carries a bottle of wine in her basket). By placing these two harmless objects in stark contrast to killing machines, Mom's Demand Action encourages America to think reasonably about its laws, and recognise the immense danger that gun ownership poses.
image: boredpanda.com image: boredpanda.com To inspire action from the viewer, each one of these print campaigns successfully instilled a sense of fear, shock and emotion. No matter what the outcome may have been or may be, their impact will be remembered for years to come.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Charity print campaigns that impacted the world

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Over the years, charities have had to employ more and more shocking techniques that cut through the noise and demand attention. Print is traditionally a massively successful form of marketing for charities, and continues to push boundaries in ground-breaking campaigns.

# data[].attributes.body
1. What are Aristotle's '3 pillars' of persuasive speaking? (discover task)
2. Look at the adverts on the link above. Which of the 3 pillars do you think they use to be convincing? What else do they use to convice?
3. What 2 questions should you ask yourself to decide if you have achieved logos? (discover task)
4. Share your answers as to how we can you will use and build ethos, logos and pathos in your debate for this module.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
DEBATE GROUPS GJAN1 - DANIELA'S REGISTER

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
formative structured debate (1) answered 

# data[].attributes.body
Salman Alfarsi p345809

# data[].attributes.body
Team 3

# data[].attributes.body
General:
https://www.versusarthritis.org/news/2020/october/how-do-you-know-if-research-evidence-is-trustworthy/

https://www.eaie.org/blog/8-ways-determine-credibility-research-reports.html

Vested interest: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/352017695_What_is_a_vested_interest

Neutrality:
https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_326#:~:text=Value%2Dneutral%20research%20is%20conceived,but%20just%20produces%20objective%20facts.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
How do you know if research evidence is trustworthy?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Learn how to know whether research evidence is trustworthy by understanding the five different types of evidence, according to their source and reliability.

# data[].attributes.body
Instructions:

1. DOWNLOAD this document onto your computer
2. type up your answers to the questions
3. upload your document to the padlet page with your group's names

(if you cannot download the document, just make a new document, type your answers and upload that here)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
critical thinking 6 revision worksheet with answers

# data[].attributes.headline
Summary - what is a fallacy and what is relevance

# data[].attributes.subject
Summary - what is a fallacy and what is relevance

# data[].attributes.headline
Summary - types of fallacies of relevance 

# data[].attributes.subject
Summary - types of fallacies of relevance 

# data[].attributes.headline
Summary - what is fallacy of insufficient evidence 

# data[].attributes.subject
Summary - what is fallacy of insufficient evidence 

# data[].attributes.headline
Summary - types of fallacies of insufficient evidence 

# data[].attributes.subject
Summary - types of fallacies of insufficient evidence 

# data[].attributes.body
Strategy - stay

1. small axe
2. pistol
3. clothes
4. chocolate
5. compass
6. heavy duty canvas

# data[].attributes.body
Strategy - to leave

1. axe to cut trees
2. cigarette lighter
3. extra clothes for warmth
4. compass
5. and map to direct
6. canvas to make a shelter or tent

# data[].attributes.body
Strategy - leaving - heading for the town
1. heavy duty canvas - build a tent
2. small axe - safety and to cut down wood
3. cigarette lighter
4. chocolate for fuel
5. pilot air map
6. compass

# data[].attributes.body
Strategy  - to stay

1. extra clothes - to keep warm
2. small axe - to cut wood to make a fire
3. chocolate bar - energy
4. loaded pistol - loud so it can attract attention and it could be for self defence
5. cigarette lighter
6. wool - wool is flammable so it can act as lighter fuel

# data[].attributes.body
Strategy

staying and waiting for rescue

1. small axe becuse it can cut wood and light fire
2. pistol - self protection and hunting
3. extra shirts and trousers to provide warmth and also to attract attention
4. heavy duty canvas to make a tent or to make shelter
5. jar of shortening
6. cigarette lighter

(use 5 and 6 together to make fire)

# data[].attributes.body
Strategy - leave - find town

1. oil - for calories
2. Axe to cut trees/defend yourselves against people
3. Compass
4. cigarette lighter - use the oil to fuel the lighter
5. map
to find the town
6.. shirts and trousers so you don't freeze

# data[].attributes.body
Strategy - to move, to find the town.

Ojbects
compass
axe
lighter
clothes
chocolate
pistol

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Decision making based on valid reasoning. teacher (1)

# data[].attributes.headline
Names: Tim Wu, Julie Wu, Jingwei Hou, Linlin Wang

# data[].attributes.subject
Names: Tim Wu, Julie Wu, Jingwei Hou, Linlin Wang

# data[].attributes.headline
Names:Jojo Zhang, Xinxin Zhang, Yvonne Yang, xinya Wang

# data[].attributes.subject
Names:Jojo Zhang, Xinxin Zhang, Yvonne Yang, xinya Wang

# data[].attributes.headline
For more summaries please check the 'summary' sections at the end of chapters 5 and 6. These give an excellent overview of fallacies of relevance and fallacies of insufficient evidence, and all the different types of these fallacies with examples

# data[].attributes.subject
For more summaries please check the 'summary' sections at the end of chapters 5 and 6. These give an excellent overview of fallacies of relevance and fallacies of insufficient evidence, and all the different types of these fallacies with examples

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Element of argument worksheet with answers