# data[].attributes.body
To sacrifice a life would be selfish but, I believe that loosing four lives wouldn't serve anyone. I would much rather sacrifice myself than any body else but given the circumstance it is much more logical to prioritize those who are "able" to increase the chance of survival

# data[].attributes.body
I am in between A and B because I don’t think it would be morally right for me to make the decision of his death even if it was the logical thing to do. I’d think far too much about how that man is someone’s son, potentially someone’s father or husband/boyfriend the point being that person is loved by somebody and who am i to take him away to ensure my own survival.

# data[].attributes.body
I chose B. At this moment, it is logical to let the man die as he will anyway. Despite that, the individual's death should still be viewed as a benefit despite the times it gives. Immediately, I came up with questions about whether this would be more moral if the individual dying were a parent, if they had the potential to cure a disease in the future, or if it is strictly moral to strip them of any potential future they have. Although it would be beneficial for them to pass, that does not mean it is right.

# data[].attributes.body
I chose C, because majority of the people could be saved. While it isn't pretty, in those instances, I know that if I was the one bleeding, I would be taking one for the team and making sure the three can survive. It will be the worst day of all those people's lives, regardless of the outcome, but at least the majority can be saved. This situation also isn't representative of most utilitarian dilemmas, since this is purely a life and death situation. Most of my non-utilitarian opinions are when oppression of the few is chosen to favor the enrichment and the evaluation of the majority in situations where other options were available. This particular situation didn't have a third of fourth option, and also a huge lack of time that ends in death on all sides.

# data[].attributes.body
I chose A, I am not utilitarian at all. I would never be able to take away the chance of that injured crew member. I personally can understand the viewpoints of the other groups, but there is no way I would be able to make that decision myself, and live with that decision. So I would always choose to do everything in my power to save that person.

# data[].attributes.body
I chose A because it would be vile to strip someone of their fighting chance, although it increases my chances of survival. The guilt that would come after would be unbearable.

# data[].attributes.body
I don't feel like its my decision to make, I couldn't live with myself if I were to make that decision with out consent of the injured person. If the injured person was the one requesting we quit giving him medical care I would be more okay with the decision, but I would stay with him to the end.

# data[].attributes.body
I choose A, knowing my personal ethics and belief system run too deep to allow greed to take over my actions. Nobody should be left to die, even if there’s a chance of not making it yourself. There’s always a chance to live. People should help people, even if the options seem slim. Not following through with proper medical care would be negligence. Saying my life is more important than someone else’s is self-centered. If I were the one hurt, I wouldn’t want everyone to leave me to doom.

# data[].attributes.headline
I'm in between B and C. This may be selfish but it would really depend on my relationship with the person and how much I care  for them. It would also depend on if they have a children. I would look at all pros and cons and debate them. I take situations and look at them from all angles.

# data[].attributes.subject
I'm in between B and C. This may be selfish but it would really depend on my relationship with the person and how much I care  for them. It would also depend on if they have a children. I would look at all pros and cons and debate them. I take situations and look at them from all angles.

# data[].attributes.body
I chose C, because if I was the one bleeding, I wouldn't want the others to risk their lives for me unless they were willing to by their own decision. Prioritizing the people in already good condition is the smartest thing to do, obviously all resources should be exhausted to help our crew member, but unless someone else chooses to risk their life for the injured person, we should worry about keeping ourselves safe.

# data[].attributes.headline
I chose A because it is morally wrong to chose someone’s fate when you could do your best to save them. I don’t feel that it is right to give up on someone though in the situation it may be more logical. It feels morally wrong to let someone die in benefit of yourself. 

# data[].attributes.subject
I chose A because it is morally wrong to chose someone’s fate when you could do your best to save them. I don’t feel that it is right to give up on someone though in the situation it may be more logical. It feels morally wrong to let someone die in benefit of yourself. 

# data[].attributes.body
I chose (b) because I believe that allowing someone to die, even if it would save more lives, is morally wrong. While it might improve the chances of survival for the rest of the group, I strongly feel that compassion and empathy should guide our decisions more than pure logic. If I were in the injured person’s position, I would hope the others wouldn’t give up on me just because I was the weakest link.

# data[].attributes.body
It's hard to say. I know my first instinct would be to help them, but if the rest of the group detests, then I wouldn't necessarily disagree with them and would probably end up not helping them. But it's possible my opinion could change if I were actually in that life-or-death situation.

# data[].attributes.body
I chose b because although I wouldn't want to die I also wouldn't be able to live with myself for letting someone die when they had a chance to be saved.

# data[].attributes.body
I chose option A, because I believe that not taking action is equal to making a negative action, i.e, by not giving the other person medical attention, you are choosing to let them die, which in my opinion is equal to murder.

# data[].attributes.body
I chose B, even though it might not save me, i dont think i could let somobody die without at least trying to save them. The other three are not more important than the one member already bleeding.

# data[].attributes.body
I had initially chose D as I know it is unethical to leave someone helpless, but there should be no reason for everyone to die if it means someone who is already on their death bed, left to die a couple hours early. That being said the only reason I changed my answer to C was because I asked myself, what if I was the guy dying? I certainly would want someone to fight for me, but at the same time it would be selfish to risk the lives of others for the inevitability of my death.

# data[].attributes.body
Originally I had picked C, but after thinking about it some more changed to B, I do not think that I would be able to force myself to withdraw medical attention from someone in a situation like this, though if he were to offer to sacrifice himself (on his own volition, no pressure from anyone else) it would make a bit easier.

# data[].attributes.body
I chose A because I think it's too immoral to let someone die when you have the chance to save him/her. None of the three people deserves more to live than this fourth person.

# data[].attributes.body
I chose C, with the logic that the bleeding man will die regardless (either from blood loss or lack of oxygen), but by letting him die, it will ensure that at least some make it out alive compared to everyone dying.

# data[].attributes.body
I chose C, I am untalitarian. I believe in benefiting the majority of the people to a certain extent.

# data[].attributes.body
I chose B because I'd rather try and help someone else than help myself, even if it's not 100% sound logic.