# data[].attributes.body
In the globalisation, different people from different races are now living in the same environment. This acts as a precursor to a notion that growing business and cultural contact internationally is a positive development. From my point of view, I totally agree with this statement.

Conversely, a scholar of thought holds that there are more disadvantages than advantages of growing trade and cross-culture. First of all, the development of business enhances the importance of international language, as it plays an important role as a media for people from different countries to communicate. However, to be fluent in those international languages, people who didn’t originally speak that language have to practice the language almost everyday, which can results in the lost of some language spoken by a minority. Second, the cultural development of developed countries may surpasses that of developing and least developed countries. Cultural exchange between countries brings different culture from this country to another country. People from developing countries will acquire the different culture and forget about their culture.

On the other hand, I personally think the advantages of this controversial thought outweigh its disadvantages. Firstly, further business contributes to the development of a country. Because gross domestic product is one of the basic indicators to assess the economic development of a certain territory, business  has a vital determinant of deciding whether a country is developed, developing or underdeveloped. If global business is increased, less developed countries will have the opportunity to be helped by powerful countries in trade development and become better. Secondly, about the cultural aspect, distinct nations have a chance to introduce their rich culture to other nations. This is a precursor to cultural diversity. Moreover, evil customs can be eliminated by receiving better customs, which is a brilliant solution to this serious problem.

In conclusion, due to the fact that the disadvantages mentioned above can be reduced, I strongly subscribe to a view that increasing business and cultural contact is beneficial to not only individuals but also companies.

# data[].attributes.body
Nowadays, a school of thought holds that globalization has been a vital determinant of mankind, and thus the diverse exchange of companies and cultural contact among nations exerts a positive bearing on mankind. I fervently advocate the aforementioned statement due to its justifiableness.

First and foremost, the opponents of this view may hold a flaw that the rise of business and cultural connection between countries will take a toll on that nation since the inadequate institutions can bring about economic issues to one country. Nonetheless, this is a paradoxical belief since numerous exotic businesses appearing in one nation can be conducive to not only the citizens but also that country concerning the financial aspect. The ability to penetrate foreign markets enables the residents to have more lucrative chances to engage in many jobs. Hence, it diminishes the number of unemployed people of one country as well as generates a huge profit for that nation.

Secondly, this trend exerts beneficial outcomes on not only the economic side but also the cultural implication of one nation. Since a great number of distinct cultures will soon be integrated into the local country, the residents will be able to learn about the history and the way of life of many other peoples. This merit enables citizens to avoid the conflict of culture as well as to bridge the gap of culture among the citizens. The situation manifests itself starkly in the fact that the myriad citizens of Singapore confess that they have broadened their minds since they met people from other countries and have acquired knowledge regarding the overseas culture from these people. This is a testament to the globalization trigger to not only the economical enhancement but also the cultural implication across countries.

To sum up, there is no denying that globalization acts as an optimal tool in sharpening the economy of one country and broadening the citizens' mind of foreign cultures.

# data[].attributes.body
Nowadays, diverse exchanges between countries is a vital determinant in both economic growth and culture well-known. Theres a school thought that culture exchanging and business within countries brings much benefits. I wholeheartedly with the aforementioned statement due to countries not only be able to depend on each other at times but also could shake hands to a profitable future.
Conversely, some still say business country-wise and  cultural contact shouldn't be happening. However this thinking is flawed and deeply over-states the disadvantages it brings. Evidently, many exerts a fear of replacement in their own culture if others enters. To say that this is false is definitely wrong, but in order to embrace ones help, countries should at least pay some respect by learning their culture. Moreover, conducting colossal businesses  between nations would lead to the sealing of many holes in each government's way of leading a country. For instance, without the friendship of Vietnam's leader back then who was Ho Chi Minh and Fiden Castro, former president of Cuba, their would't be much supports between Vietnam and Cuba, or more than that, the help in war to defeat those big countries like America.
In addition,  countries shaking hands for a benefitable future will marginalise all the setback around it. The profits it would bring is unfathomable, not only the economic will grow constantly, but also generate a number of jobs, changing lives of civilians for the better. This is best demonstrated by the fact that since Vietnam has enrolled in numerous relationship whether its asean or individual deals between neighbor countries has spawn thousands of jobs which help financially a lot of civilians. Also by exchanging cultures, each country's convention would be well-known globally,thus, indirectly boosting the economy maybe through travel businesses. All in all, by taking. advantage of cultural, business exchange countries could development within the country by improving life-standards and outside the country by creating more relationships.
In conclusion, though creating relationship and exchanging culture could lead to some setback as many might say, I truly believe that the advantages of economic growth and prospered relations will outweigh all this disadvantages.

# data[].attributes.body
Nowadays, globalization has attracted a lot of public attention. A school of thought hold that the rising contact in commerce and cultural between countries has many benefits. Personally, I totally agree with this notion.

With the trend of globalization, we are approaching cultural from many countries.  Many people hold concerns that this will make inner cultural disappear more faster. However, this is a very negative way of thinking. By receiving other countries cultural, we can enrich our owns. We can renew old traditions and make it's easier to approach by young generation and people from other countries. Our ancesstors from the past also created our tradition with this method. Some of the traditions are originally from other nation.

Not just enrich our cultural, globalism also has more different possitive effects. Interacting with other countries give us more business opportunities and more experiences from them. These will make our economy develope faster. Moreover, people can study and find a job in other nations. Globalization also bring chances for a country to promote itself to the world. Many people will come to the country and this will help to preserve it's cultural like food, custumes, festivals,...

In conclusion, while there is drawback in contacting with other nations, we can not deny the enormous benefits this trend brings.

# data[].attributes.body
Nowadays, commercial tradings between different nations has always been a topic of debate. There is a school of thought that the increasing business between countries is a positive enhancement. While this thinking is still paradoxical to some extent, I strongly concur that its advantages outweigh the disadvantages.
It is understandable why some people contend that the globalisation, international trade and cultural exchanges might result in detrimental to a country’s own culture and tradition. With the dominance of affluent countries hastening the disappearance of others’ cultural specialities. The situation manifests itself starkly in Vietnamese young generation prefer American and Korean songs, films and TV shows rather than their traditional folksongs, dances and dramatics thanks to the process of integration. Consequently, costumes, foods and lifestyles have gradually assimilated into Vietnamese people’s daily life, dissipating the time-honored value. However, that view is extremely flawed and narrow-minded since the intersection of cultures may augment our knowledge of the world while upholding the wonderful aspect of our culture.
Globalization is the tendency in which countries are increasingly influencing each other, a priceless opportunity for an inferior culture to be diffused to the outside world. In the era of thriving international tourism, a country is given the ability to establish its images in others’ eyes. The cultural quintessence including costumes, food, and festivals can be advertised; therefore, the traditional value is preserved and brought into play. In addition, globalization impulse the development of global economy since many trades and compromises are made among countries to develop the commercial relations.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that the increasing business between nations is a positive development due to its beneficial to the world in general and inferior countries in particular.

# data[].attributes.body
In this day and age, globalization among different nations has become a noticeable trend. A school of thought holds that the rise in economic and cultural contact between countries brings many positive effects. In my opinion, I totally agree with this statement.

It is understandable why some people contend that international exchanges might create the possible danger of undermining a country’s national identity. In process of globalizing, indigenous cultures could be a victim of the dominance of affluent countries’ cultures. For example, Vietnamese youngsters could know many American or Korean songs or artists but only a few of them have knowledge about the country’s art culture such as Ca Tru, known as Vietnamese folk music treasure. However, that view is exceedingly flawed and short-sighted as it enriches our knowledge, allowing us to exchange information and absorb what is good for our society while maintaining the specific features of our culture.

On the other hand, the widening of cross-cultural exchanges has exerted positive influences on countries. The first justification is that international commerce and commodity trading have resulted in greater economic growth, especially with underdeveloped nations. Nowadays, many large multinational companies have been established in many parts of the world providing jobs to thousands of locals. Moreover, globalization is a precious and unprecedented opportunity to promote one’s culture to the outside of the world. It also can become a huge income source for a nation in the area of flourishing international tourism.

In conclusion, I believe that international integration is a positive development for any nation and its citizens.

# data[].attributes.body
As of late, collaboration between nations has been thriving and undoubtedly is a vital determinant regarding different aspects of the country. However, the impact that this has on their nations' development has aroused much controversy. A school of thought holds that the increase in the interaction on a global scale exerts a positive bearing to our economy. This essay is going to prove that the drawbacks of this are overshadowed by the tremendous benefits.

It is understandable why some people subscribe to the view that many problems have arisen as a result of global cooperation. Some firmly believe that if the transactions thrive between countries, this could get out of control due to agreements failure, which then ultimately leads to a considerable amount of loans. However, this thinking is flawed, since it is the business contact that benefits and enhance the economy of both by contributing to the rise of trust and help mitigate the each country weaknesses. Therefore, it is apparent that business contact do more good than harm.

Some people hold the view that when cultural connection exert an adverse bearing on other countries. This is mostly because cultural intergration might cause the younger generation to forget about their traditions. On the contrary, by making citizens learn more about other countries tradition can they apply them to their profession and collaboration with foreign partners. This is why cultural intergration is beneficial.

In conclusion, although some think that contact is negative, I acknowledge that this can do more good than harm.

# data[].attributes.body
In this day and age , globalization has garnered a great deal of attention . Some consider the growth of business and the exchange of cultures between nations is a welcome change. I wholeheartedly agree with said notion due to the tremendous benefits it can provide to  a nation's economy and it's citizens.

Conversely , there are still those who reckon that the downsides it brings outweigh the benefits. They think by embracing other countries traditions and cultures , their national identity may get replaced and slowly replaced by those of foreign countries. Moreover they also hold the idea that by loosening their nation's border in order to conduct business with other countries may open up the possibility of a flood of immigrants coming to their country and stripping the natives of their job prospects, which may bring the downfall of their nation .

However, that style of thinking is not necessarily wrong but it doesn't make it right either. Firstly , the introduction of other countries traditions may help enriches one's knowledge , helping them understand more of nations around the globe , in which may help them get one step closer to being a worldwide citizen. Secondly , the arrival of immigrants may help enhance one's country image to the outside world as a friendly and hospitable nation that is willing to lend a hand to those from countries ravaged by war and poverty, thus  boosting the tourism industry ,ultimately enhancing the living quality of said nation. Moreover , by accepting immigrants , one's country diplomacy towards other nations increase significantly, helping said nation to avoid the possibilities of war breaking out, providing it's citizens a peaceful and happy life .

In conclusion , opening up one's nation may have some cons , but we also have to consider it's tremendous benefits that it may bring .

# data[].attributes.body
Since time immemorial, different countries collaborate with each other for improving their social, political, and economic situations in the cities. Nobody can deny that such cooperation could lead to negative consequences as well. Whilst, I believe that there are strong arguments on both sides, I would suggest that development of international contacts has impact that is more positive.

It is understandable why some people subscribe to a view that the globalisation, international trade and cultural exchanges opines detrimental to a country’s own culture and tradition. many people think that national identity can disappear if cultural and business bonding among countries are strengthened because the constant stream of marketing campaigns by international firms has led to the dominance of foreign eating habits and fashion trends, whereas indigenous lifestyles and languages become less favorable among young generations. Therefore, they could try to imitate those foreign cultures and languages blindly and change their traditional ways of life.

However, that view is extremely flawed and narrow-minded. The overlapping of cultures may enriches our knowledge, allowing us to absorb what is good for our society while keeping the marvelous features of our culture. To be more specific, with the continuous progress of commerce people and getting in contact with distinct traditions and beliefs which assisted them to broaden their outlook. Moreover, it offers a great opportunity to exchange information, technology, positive thinking, knowledge and ideas. These factors will have a significant impact on the positive growth of a nation. To illustrate, the advent of computers in  Asian countries was possible because of the trading relationship with America. As a result of which it improves the quality of living considerably.

In conclusion, although there are some reasons why the increased of interactions in both business and cultural aspects between nations has brought concerns over its impact on the identity of each country, in my opinion the positive impact it brings to both individuals and companies in numerous aspects of the society is undeniable

# data[].attributes.body
In this day and age, the contacts and exchanges of cultures and businesses are on a continuously increasing trend. While a large sum of people believes that this is a positive development, some say otherwise.
There are a few reasons why people believe that the disadvantages of such occurrence outweigh the benefits. Firstly, many thought that by meeting and accepting the culture of different countries, our own cultural heritage would slowly be overtaken and vanishes due to taking in many foreign practices and traditions. In addition, these people also think that connections with other countries also allow immigrants to more easily access our country and become employed or build business ventures within our nation, stripping some of the native residents of work opportunities.
However, that view is extremely flawed and narrow-minded. The overlapping of cultures may enriches our knowledge, allowing us to absorb what is good for our society while keeping the marvelous features of our culture. Moreover, while it is true that we'll have more immigrants taking some of our working positions, the same can be said for our people. Doors of opportunities will open for workers to get a high paying job in a foreign country. Another profitable outcome of creating friendly relationships with other nations is the improvement of the quality of life. By establishing a stable trade with other countries, our wealth will also increases leading to better life expectancies. Furthermore, as our relationships continue to develop and deepen, chances of war are also significantly diminished.
In conclusion, while there might be some cons in contacting with other countries, we can't ignore the momentous benefits it also brings.

# data[].attributes.body
In this day and age,  in light of globalization, some individuals adopt a view that that the surge in the corporation, as well as a cultural connection between distinct nations, is a groundbreaking development. I am in accordance with the aforementioned statement to some extent.

To commence with, it is worth noting that this phenomenon will exert a beneficial bearing on the finance aspect of not only the individual but also his or her society. There is no denying that the myriad foreign corporation increasingly appears in one nation due to globalization. These companies seek potential employees in other countries who are more prolific and well-informed. Whereas these businesses can have more productive and valuable workers from these countries, the citizens being recruited in the foreign corporation are able to have more job chances and promotion opportunities in their careers. More employees engaging in these companies means that the number of jobless residents of one country will decline and thus it alleviates the alarming issue of so-called unemployment.

Yet, opponents of this enhancement of mankind may paradoxically argue that the increasing number of institutions and cultural connections may bring about unexpected conflict between countries. These people have this nonsensical belief since little do the citizens of one nation know about the culture of other overseas countries, they might likely trigger the misunderstanding to the exotic people. This is such a naive flaw as they ignore the fact that the more people contact overseas citizens from another country, the more they will understand the manners of that country.  This can be observed in the fact that the majority of workers in numerous foreign institutions harmonize with co-workers since they have been working with each other in such a long-run period. This is a testament to why the argument of the opponents regarding the aforementioned statement is an ignorant flaw.

Taking everything into account, I hold a strong view that the substantial increase of businesses and a cultural connection among nations have a vital determinant since it diminishes the burden of unemployment and sharpens the harmony of citizens from other countries.

# data[].attributes.body
Nowadays, with the enhancement of technology and globalization, worldwide bussiness and cutural contact have been developing dramatically.While some people have a notion that this kind of development is meaningless, I think it makes a tremendous and positive impact on the society.

It is understandable why some people belives that foreign interference can cause numerous issues to one's country as it can also bring social evils and failure to state-owned company. However, this way of thinking is not flawless. Bussiness contacts offer more jobs opportunities, this leads to the reduction of unemployment rate. This also make state-run company ameliorate to working condiotion if they do not want to be defeated by foreign company.

Contrary to the fore, accepting overseas cultural and commercial contacts  is much more beneficial than we ever thought. Having commerce with a different country enriches the cultural sources and knowledge about the world. This play and important role in globalizing citizen. For instance, the cutural contact enable Vietnamese to approach the bigger source about foreign languages like English and Spanish, making communication with difference country easier. Moreover, commercial interference intensifies the domestic diversity of career so that younster will be able to choose difference types of job, which improve many aspect of life.

In conclusion, I strongly belive that cultural and commercial contact between countries impacts positively to both individual and company in numerous field of the society.

# data[].attributes.body
Nowadays, commercial tradings between different nations has always been a great attraction to the public view. There are a school of thoughts maintained by certain individuals that the increase of cultural and business exchanges between different country is a notion of positive development. I fervently agree with the aforementioned statement due to the benefits it can provide to different companies and people in a certain country.

Firstly, it can be observed that there are specific countries that don't have the neccessary resources to improve their economic and financial states, and most likely exploitation of natural resources such as fossil fuels and minerals has made their contries' development halted. Therefore, countries like these require help from the more developed national friends of theirs to hasten their economic growth and soon make the country more habitable.

On the other hand, it is largely beneficial to acknowledge other cultures from a plethora of countries out there on the globe. Though some individuals might consider studying other culture as "losing their own to submit to foreign ones", this way of thinking is highly flawed. Evidently, studying different countries could help people with understanding the world better by knowing their traditions and cultural values, thus enhancing communications between different races and therefore creates strong bonds between different ethnicities.

All in all, I strongly submit to the notion of the increase of business and cultural interactions between several nations being a positive development due to the economic and cultural benefits that it could bring to certain individuals and companies.

# data[].attributes.body
In the modern era, many aspects of life have been globalized considerably. There is a notion that the growth of business and cultural interaction between nations is a beneficial enhancement. In my opinion, I totally agree with this statement.

It is comprehensible that many people do not accept the globalization of business and cultural integration as they think that the competitive rates on the market may be promoted, and national identity of many nations can be blurred. However, this idea is short-sighted and naïve. The increasing of competitive rates on the market puts a pressure on brands and manufacturers to develop their product quality and come up with marketing strategy. Thus, customers can be beneficial and advantageous. Besides, cultural integration is not synonymous with loosing national identity. Instead, the culture can be popular to many people around the world, and the beauty of countries can be advertised ubiquitously.

Furthermore, aside from the mentioned benefits, the globalization of business and culture also has other advantages. Firstly, it helps the economy develop more dramatically. As many companies cooperate with others globally, the exchange of commodity and service, as well as purchasing power, is promoted. Moreover, globalization also enables large companies to invest internationally in many fields, such as stocks, real estates, and factories, which can enhance the local and worldwide economy. Secondly, in terms of cultural contact, it can inspire creativity and innovation. If people coming from diverse cultures, nations, and ethnics worked together, they could have a variety of perspectives and viewpoints. Thus, individuals have the opportunity to enrich their knowledge and see the world distinctly.

In conclusion, I support the stance that the growth of international business and culture contact is a positive shift.

# data[].attributes.body
In the modern day and age, the business exchange between numerous nations has attracted great public attention. There is a school of thought that says the increasing business between countries is a positive development. I agree with the statement, due to the tremendous benefits it yields to companies and people of a particular nation.

Firstly, the increasing pace of countries exchanging business will exert positive impacts on the companies as well as individual’s state of finance. It is evident that for companies, when the frequency of exchanging commodities between countries increases, their chances of offering and finishing a deal will follow suit, which will help them sell more products. Soon, after a plethora of successful deals like that, they will make a significant amount of profit, that may help their corporation expand and make even more profit. Moreover, as a result, there are more job opportunities for individuals, due to the need of companies for various roles as the business expands. This means they will have a stable source of income and avoid being unemployed, which is a crux for some countries. All in all, the increasing business between countries is a positive development because of its merits on the companies and individual’s state of finance.

Secondly, certain people still subscribe to a view that the increasing business between countries is a negative development because of the problems it brings to the country from unqualified companies. However, it is short-sighted to hold such a belief as it must come to the government's responsibility to control and sort out quality businesses. It is obvious that the merits and the demerits will exist together within every aspect of life, from nature to human’s daily life. Taking the increasing phone usage for instance, while adults and other officers can communicate and work more efficaciously, children, especially young ones, will be harmed by unverified and adult content on the Internet. Thus, in business between countries, it is the government and the authorities’ duty to sort out and ban unqualified business for a better healthy competition between companies as well as the public’s life condition, which has been mentioned.

In conclusion, I strongly believe that the increasing business between nations is a positive development because of the economic benefits it brings to individuals and companies.

# data[].attributes.body
In globalization era, it is understandable to believe that developing commercial trade and exchange cultural can bring tremendous benefits for countries. While this thinking is still paradoxical to some extent, I strongly concur that its merits are prevail over the demerits.
Opponents of global integration state that corporation among different nations can spell serious troubles for these own countries' cultural legacy. However, this viewpoint is flawed due to several reasons I'm going to mention. First, cultural exchanging can enrich a region's cultural while keeping its marvelous features , not completely diminishes it. Additionally, in the history of humankind, there are  numerous circumstances that a traditional aspect is inspired by other one such as Lunar New Year in some Asia countries, Christmas,.. In light of this, it is unwise to put an extreme emphasis on domestic development and ignore  international exposure.
On the other hand, urging to corporate with other regions exerts immense positive bearing in terms of politic as well as economic. Regarding to the former, cross-cultural activities encourage people understand and eliminate unrealistic stereotype about other countries. For instance, due to aggressive war in the past, Vietnamese tend to prejudice their rival's national but as of late, the government of these countries compromise and implement policies to support each other. It acts as a precursor to chronic peace and political advancement. With respect to the later, thanks to modern technology, trading commodity is accessible with low taxes no matter where you are. For this reason, if transporting product among nations is promoted, the economy will witness an exponential growth and the shortage of particular product in a country can also be solved, such as food and water in developing countries
In conclusion, I hold the view that while there are some challenges we have to overcome, international integration in general is conducive and generate myriad of opportunities.

# data[].attributes.body
People have been arguing about whether or not increasing business and cultural contact between countries is a positive development. While there are some strong opinions against it's a good thing that countries are interacting more on an economic and cultural level, I still believe that the evolution of business and cultural contact in some countries is a positive development.
It is understandable why some people subscribe to a view that if business and cultural contact between countries rise is a positive development. The answer to this question is because it could broaden our knowledge about other countries cultures. As a result, the relationship between both sides could be improved.
On the other hand, when countries don't know much about others, it's hard to make deals with our partners, especially in trades. As today, many countries encourages their students to learn new languages to understand more about other countries culture and business. For example, in Vietnam, besides English, students are encouraged to learn other languages like Japanese, Chinese, French and many more languages. Therefore obviously may lead to the evolution of the country's economy.
In shorts, I believe that increasing business and cultural contact between countries is a good idea.

# data[].attributes.body
A sum of people believe that increasing commercial trade and exchange relations between countries contribute to positive development. While this thinking is justifiable to a certain extent, I contend that it would cause more harm than good.

It is understandable why some people emphasise trades and piplomacy between countries. The reason to why is because it could broaden individual’s knowledge of other cultural precursor to harmonization. As a result, the relationships and trust between two sides could be improved. However, I believe that it would be unwise to bypass the detriments of this act.

Conversely, cultural exchange and trades could dominate other countries cultural and lifestyle. The key rationale is that the progress of integrate pushes young generation to adapt into other countries culture, allowing another cultural dissapearence to occur. In addition, trades can be harm to the concord of countries. The dissident in deals between the two countries might triggers trade war. For instance, lately, Australia has cancelled a bussiness deal with France and transfer the parter of that into The United States of America, which have cause discord between the three countries and yet haven't found any remedy. Therefore, exchange in cultural and bussiness might causes enormous issues.

Taking everything into account, I subscribe to the view that it would not be ideal for countries to collaborate with each others too excessively in relations exchange.