# data[].attributes.body
No, he shouldn't accede to the creature request due to his

# data[].attributes.body
Frankenstein encounters an ethical dilemma; either to condemn his creation to solitude, or fulfil his creations needs, but possibly risk a stronger negative force to cause harm and destruction to humanity. I don't think he should, I think that Victor could be a sufficient companion to the monster.

# data[].attributes.headline
Yes, he clearly didn't want to take care of his creation and he owes something to the creature

# data[].attributes.subject
Yes, he clearly didn't want to take care of his creation and he owes something to the creature

# data[].attributes.body
Frankenstein taking the role of God has already resulted in the death of 2 people. Frankenstein must learn from these experiences and not commit this sin again

# data[].attributes.body
He created the monster and didn't take care of him early on in his life meaning that he should try and make it up to him by accepting his demands

# data[].attributes.body
Frankenstein ShOuLD create a monster mate for the creature as the creature is lonely and has no friends. The creature will continue to cause havoc across humans until he has a mate to express feeling too!

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, he should accede to the creatures request because the amount of pain that the monster has been through looking for a partner should stimulate feelings of guilt and sorrow for the monster so should create him a partner so hes not lonley anymore.

# data[].attributes.body
I think he should because then the monster would feel some happiness and some purpose to live. But on the other hand the monster is untrusted and could go on a mass kill streak.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe he shouldn't give in to the creatures request because the monster he created wronged him. The monster killed William, and although his actions were fuelled from the actions dealt against him, murder can not be justified as revenge.

# data[].attributes.body
A female monster would be similar to the monster. A murderer. This would then lead to children monsters. This would lead to worldwide death similar to a plague.

# data[].attributes.body
The creature has so much power over Frankenstein and denying him this request would end up in more people dead.

# data[].attributes.body
Frankenstein should not give the monster a companion due to the fact that, one's intentions (the monster) was at first benevolent though the natural, social rejection that it faced has caused it to turn into a malicious creature. As well as this the murder of both Justine and (Frankenstein's own brother) William is not justified, due to the fact that it was an act of violence.

On the other hand a companion might be the right way forward for the monster. One perspective that can be seen is that of a sense of a guilt on Victor's behalf. Victor, its father, its creator neglected him after bringing the monster into this world, the monster deserves something from his Father. He needs an explanation justifying the actions of Victor. Therefore a companion might be the solution wanted by the Monster.

# data[].attributes.body
Think about how low the chances of them meeting, then liking each other, then falling in love are.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that Frankenstein should give into the monster's demands as he owes it to his creation, of whom he has abandoned to the world to be taught the duality of human ways, but there is also the threat of further harm being done against Frankenstein mentally and his family members physically by way of murder. However, a reason that Frankenstein should not give into the monster's demands is that if he created a mate for him the two could either not get along at all and so two angry monsters would be a problem, or they could get along too well and produce a whole race of creatures that could conquer the Earth.

# data[].attributes.body
whether or no Frankenstein should create another monster is up to debate,but in my opinion i dont think it is morally right to create another creature as all the begging to god and asking for forgiveness and feeling guilty about what he had done would be undone .

# data[].attributes.body
Yes i think that Frankenstein should create the creatue a mate. This could result in the creature beinng less violent an aggresive as he would have an other person to talk and spend his time with on a day-to-day basis. Another reason would be as it would be that he would be driven away from his violent thoughts and placed into a more calmer place

# data[].attributes.body
Yes Frankenstein should accede to the creature's request to create a mate for him due to the fact that he has essentially abandoned the monster and hung him out to dry. A mate for the monster would lighten his mood a bit, and he could have somebody, who is just as ugly as him, to talk and laugh with. If the monster looked normal, then Frankenstein should not create a mate, however, due to the monster's distinct looks and the fact that he has been shunted from society, yes, Frankenstein should create a mate for the monster.

# data[].attributes.body
I think he should, because then the monster would be able to become happy, and not miserable all the time. It would also stop the monster murdering more people. However, maybe he should not, since the creation of the 1st monster cost a lot of Frankenstein's mental health, and another monster would further deteriorate his mind.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Victor should create another monster since he did desert the monster and leave him alone. But you wouldn't know how the creation would turn out. This creation could be bad and kill others people.

# data[].attributes.body
On one hand, Frankenstein owes the creature a mate due to the fact that he abandoned the creature when he created it. This would also stop the trail of destruction the monster has left.

However, the monster is clearly hideous and loathed by humanity which is a reason that he should not be able to reproduce, especially because of all the deaths he has caused when he murdered William and framed Justine.

In conclusion NO

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that it is Victor's duty to accept the request of the monster as his foolish and neglectful actions have directly lead to the monsters unhappiness by leaving him at birth and letting him be corrupted by mankind.

# data[].attributes.body
The 2nd mosnter may be worst than the first one, but if not both the monsters can help Frankentesin with new scientific advances which cannot be done with humans.

# data[].attributes.body
YES
Frankenstein should create a friend for the monster as Victor has treated him badly - neglecting him when he was born and leaving him to fend for himself so he kind of owes him.
NO
Frankenstein shouldn't as he is very ugly the monster has murdered people.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes he should. As a couple of years have passed and Victor has mainly gotten over his troubles he should be in the right place and time to get over this one. He sits with the guilt of Williams and Justine's death so solving this problem would get a large weight of his chest and allow him to progress with his own life.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that he should help and fulfil the monster's request. I think this because the monster would want a partner, like all animals do, and if brought up properly, the mate should come to have the mindset of a human, so then it would be just as dangerous as bringing up a child, so I don't see any reason not to.

# data[].attributes.headline
Yes he should because he created the monster, and just left it on its own to thrive. He should have a sense of a responsibility and care for bringing the being into the world.

# data[].attributes.subject
Yes he should because he created the monster, and just left it on its own to thrive. He should have a sense of a responsibility and care for bringing the being into the world.

# data[].attributes.body
RAHEEM

# data[].attributes.body
Whether or not Frankenstein should give in to the creature's request depends on what he is trying to accomplish. Creating another companion for the desolate beast could provide a means of pacification. Throughout the novel, all of the creature's shortcomings have been due to his search for happiness. Whether it be Felix's vicious attack after stalking the cottagers, or Frankenstein sticking his hand into the seemingly warm fire only to experience pain. All of these issues could have been prevented had the creature been content. To prevent further problems from arising, the only logical approach is to satisfy the creature's demands. Maybe you should negotiate with terrorists.

On the other hand, it doesn't take much analysis to see why Frankenstein would want to remain firm against the monster's wishes. After all, the monster murdered close members of Frankenstein's family. Why on Earth would Frankenstein want to further his own suffering. It seems all the creature has done is bring pain to him, so what good would another one do?