# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Discover & share this Queen Elizabeth GIF with everyone you know. GIPHY is how you search, share, discover, and create GIFs.

# data[].attributes.body
Queen Elizabeth I was not a tyrant. She was not a tyrant because she had help reigning England. The author states,    "... many Catholics wanted to protect their customs and practices. Queen Elizabeth I helped resolve some of those differences, "(par.11-12). This proves that she cares about her people, and if she was a tyrant then she wouldn't have cared to make it a religion. In paragraph 6, it says, " The queen also had help Parliament, a legislative body that acted as a council for the monarchy." This explains that  she didn't make all the decisions herself, and she cared about other people's thoughts. Therefore, Queen Elizabeth I cares about the feelings of her people, and did not make decisions for herself. She is not a tyrant.

# data[].attributes.body
In our opinion queen Elizabeth is not a tyrant and runs a democracy. We think this because on paragraph ten in the article Queen Elizabeth l of England it states, "Instead, by not marrying, Elizabeth l was able to present herself as a selfless woman who sacrificed herself for the good of the nation." That proves that Queen Elizabeth l cared moalso in the article "Aristotle and Democracy", the author states, "For Tyranny is a type of monarchy  which has the intrest in the monarch only..."  That shows that if Queen Elizabeth l was a tyrant she would only care about herself and not the nation.  Thats why Queen Elizabeth l  was not a tyrant. 👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑

# data[].attributes.body
Our opinion is that Queen Elizabeth l is not a tyrant, and is a democracy.  We think this because  on page 16 paragraph 10 in the article "The unmarried Queen"  it states," Instead, b not marrying, Elizabeth l was able to present herself as a selfless woman who sacrificed her happiness for the good of the nation." Which proves that Queen Elizabeth l cares more about her nation than herself. Also in the article, "Aristotle and Democracy", the author states, "For tyranny is a kind of Monarch which has in view the interest of the monarch only." That shows that if Queen Elizabeth was if she was a tyrant she would only care about herself and not the nation. That's why Queen Elizabeth l was not a tyranny.

# data[].attributes.body
Was Queen Elizabeth a tyrant or was she a fair monarch?  She was a fair absolute monarch and went by the heart of the country and acted for the greater good of it. She also went by a parliament. One example of this is in paragraph 2, She spent 5 million dollars in today's money on her coronation. That shows that she wanted her people to have a good coronation and that she cared about her people. "Instead, by not marrying, Elizabeth I was able to present herself as a selfless woman who sacrificed her happiness for the good of the nation" (paragraph 10). That says that Queen Elizabeth I would give up her own happiness for the United Kingdom. To sum it up Queen elizabeth was a fair and even ruler . She listened to her citizens and followed a parliament and was great.

# data[].attributes.body
We think that Queen Elizabeth the  first was not tyrant because on page 5 par 7 it states 'is monarchy exercising the rule of a master over the political society.' meaning that they would be abusing their power.But Queen Elizabeth did not abuse her power . On pg 13, par 4 " Queen Elizabeth first reigned for forty five years and became one of the greatest monarchs in England's history." this proves that Queen Elizabeth the first was respected and well liked. In a tranny the ruler is usually disliked but during Queen Elizabeth's reign people liked her as it states on page 13 par 4 " She would prove to be a very popular and powerful leader." so to sum it up Queen Elizabeth the first was not a tyrant due to our evidence. Our evidence proves this much.

# data[].attributes.body
There is a big debate on which Queen Elizabeth is more of a tyranny or a democracy.In my opinion I think Queen Elizabeth is more of a democracy.An example from  "Aristotle and Democracy" states "....people not just citizens were equal and should be allowed to vote."(par 2)This example cites what a democracy is and how it works.Another example from "Aristotle and Democracy" is 'For tyranny is a kind of monarchy which has in view the interest of the monarch only; oligarchy has in view the interest of the wealthy; democracy,of the needy:none of them in the common good of all ....' (par 7)This explains how tyranny cares only about themselves and not the people,Queen Elizabeth I cares for the people.The last example  is "......prove to be a very popular, and powerful leader."(Par 4).This explains how how people liked her and if she was a tyranny people would not like her,but people for sure loved Queen Elizabeth I.From all of this evidence I believe that Queen Elizabeth I was more of a democracy than a tyranny.

# data[].attributes.body
R:Was Queen Elizabeth I a tyrant?A:Yes she is a tyrant.C:The author of "Aristotle and Democracy"Michael K. Smith includes a quote from Aristotle's book The Politics. It states, "For tyranny is a kind of monarchy..." (par.7).E: This means that since Great Britain was a absolute monarchy at the time.C ':..An absolute monarch.She was the ultimate authority in the country with final say in all matters.She governed everyone and everything in England...".Tyranny is monarchy exercising the rule of a master over the political society.E:This shows that she is an absolute monarch or a tyranny.S: Therefore, we feel that Queen Elizabeth I was a tyrant.

# data[].attributes.body
Q:Was Queen Elizibeth 1 a tyrannt?
A: No.Dude, She is innocent.Tyranny is when the king or queen makes choices herself or for her own good. I have some evidence to prove it, so a tyrannt makes choices for themselves and Queen Elizabeth I made choices she thought was best for England,"Instead, by not marrying, Elizabeth I was able to present herself as a selfless woman who sacriaficed her happieness for the good of the nation," (par. 10). This shows that Queen Elizabeth sacaificed personal things for the good of the nation.On pg 14-15,it says how Queen Elizibeth 1 allowed for opinions for choses. 👑

# data[].attributes.body
Queen Elizabeth I of England was not a tyrant, in our opnion.I feel that Queen Elizabeth I was not a tyrant because in the article "Queen Elizabeth I", "Queen Elizabeth I knew that what her people wanted was a good show,so her coronation was quite elaborate"(par. 2). This shows that she cared about what her people wanted to see, a tyrant, or dictator, would not care about that.  Also, in "Aristotle and Democracy," the article says, " For tyrany is a kind of monarchy which has in veiw of the intrest of the monarchy only..."(par. 7). This explains that

# data[].attributes.body
In our opinion, we think that Queen Elizabeth I was a tyrant. In the article "Aristotle and Democracy" the text states "For tyranny, is a type of monarchy, which has in the view of the monarch only" (par. 7). This supports our opinion because Queen Elizabeth is a Absolute Monarch, so she could be a tyrant. In the article "Queen Elizabeth I of England" the text says " Her word was law, and her subjects had to obey." The text also says, "Official advisors, known as ministers, aided the queen in her, but final decisions were hers. This proves that it was always Queen Elizabeth I's choice and if she disagrees then it wont pass.

# data[].attributes.body
We think that Queen Elizabeth I ruled more like a democracy than tyranny. Queen Elizabeth I was a selfless woman who made a lot of sacrifices for her country. In the article, "Aristotle  and  Democracy" it says, " For tyranny is a kind of monarchy which has in view the interest of the monarch only..." (par 7). This shows that she was not a tyrant because a tyrant only cares about themselves, while she cared for her country. In "Queen Elizabeth I of England" the article states