# data[].attributes.body
AOK's: History, Mathematics, the Arts, Religious Knowledge Systems
History: History can be a big factor of bias as people's views on events or leaders can always be different. Some may belive a certain elader was influential, and others may say this person is the reason the country fell. (For example, Donald Trump and Joe Biden. There is bias as people of color, class, citizenship (all these factors - and more) all say one person or the other, with their own reason and perspective - which can all be bias).
Art: Paintings in art, for one, are always "up to interpretation" this, although unique in its field, can be very bias as each person will think of different things - and what makes the most "sense to them"

# data[].attributes.body
1. Mathematics and Natural Science:
Mathematics can be used in all fields of science (Chemistry, Biology, Physics, ESS...) to discover or unveil new things, or things underdeveloped but are trying to be further established in the world. Mathematics for scientists could be like the "evidence" or keys to figuring out something.
2. Religious Knowledge Systems and History:
Although many religious systems are regarded through beliefs and for some, culture, history can help us today understand the development or a religion and it's undergoing, growth, or how it even started and where
3. Religious Knowledge Systems and Human Science:
Like the one before, religious knowledge systems could help us understand human science and their development through time and events affecting it or influencing it

# data[].attributes.body
AOK's: Natural Science, Human Science and History
Natural science could be a possible AOK as factors or implications behind a certain scientific finding or graph could always be identified or talked about in different views, perspectives or biases. Statistics sometimes in science only show the data received, but not the methods, by who or when, hiding some factors that would benefit others.
History would fit perfectly into statistics concealing and revealing. For example, artifacts, skeletons and locations can always help historians find  or reveal new things not known about a past event, although they can give us answers, they can still hide a lot of what happened in the place or why.
Political standings and beliefs could also be history, and be statistics that both conceal and reveal. For example, in a presidential run, a president may promise one thing, but once elected do another.
Human science can also be one of them as humans and human interaction are always bias and can always be incorrect. Meeting a person and assuming one thing because they're too "concealing" or too "revealing" can be something.

# data[].attributes.body
Terms like, "labels", "organization" and "constrain" are all terms/ synonyms of "boundaries". This essay title basically talks about setting boundaries or areas of specific focus to better our understanding about one specific topic at once instead of studying or learning about a topic all together. "Constrain our understanding" with things like labels are used in books under 'Table of Contents' or like graphs in the X-Axis and Y-Axis. These are just some basic examples of "labels" in a bigger topic that can help a person study one topic or main idea specifically.

AOK's: Mathematics, Natural Science, Human Science, History, Religious Knowledge Systems

# data[].attributes.body
AOK: History, natural science, human science and art

These could all be factors that help us differentiate between change and progress. History for example as, looking through artifacts, beliefs and religious change through time and how perspective of wars, countries and religion have either developed or evolved throughout time. Another thing history can help with, is looking through histography.
Another example could be, human science. The way humans have developed

# data[].attributes.body
Trust is something everyone has, but everyone to different extents and aspects. Meaning, in order for a person to be able to accept a knowledge claim, there should already be a level of trust amongst the text, claim or person speaking on the topic.
AOK's:
Human science, natural science, history and possibly religious knowledge systems.

These could all be a factor of accepting knowledge claims with a certain degree of truth.

# data[].attributes.body
in order to accept knowledge claims, one must be able to trust pre existing knowledge.

one example is present in history. in order to understand and gain history knowledge, we must hacve trust that the event happened in the first place.

As someone who has never experienced the holocaust, I need to trust that this even actually happened.

# data[].attributes.body
For this title, I will explore it with different AOKs to show successful case where a field of knowledge is enriched with combination of AOKs and an unsuccessful case where the combination AOKs led to unclear or mistaken knowledge.

(1) Mathematics & Natural Sciences, this successful combination is often used. As mathematical tools can help establish facts in the field of natural sciences.
(2) Religious knowledge system & Mathematics, this combination is not useful, as in religious knowledge system many ideas are based entirely on faith, which are knowledges that are not provable via mathematics, further, mathematics perhaps could even prove otherwise. Hence, this combination is not useful.
(3)Language & History, this combination is also often used. As language is an effective mean to help convey historical truth.

# data[].attributes.body
In this essay title, the key terms are "label", "organization of knowledge" and "constrain understanding". Hence, I would begin the essay by defining what "label" means, which the readers of this essay would be able to have a clear boundaries of this essay. Next, I would explain what "organization knowledge" means, lastly, the conclusion of how "labels" helps "organize knowledge", yet "constrain understanding" would be written.

(1) Mathematics, in mathematics, labels refers to symbols such as +, - , etc. Hence, while these symbols allow us to have clear understand math functions at ease, since it provides an uniformed knowledge for all, yet it limits users' understanding towards mathematical ideas, where when one sees +, they would only be thinking about plus or add, hence the ability to imagine is limited and thus, constrain understanding.
(2)Human Sciences, the results of experiments can be measured and outlined using labels, which not only supports the organization of knowledge, yet limits our understanding to the labels.
(3) Religious knowledge system, in this knowledge, having labels allow other people to identify them easily, however, stereotypes are often produced under such label and thus constrain our understanding.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe the scientific method itself is flawless - however, the way it was created in the first place is through different people's experiment, therefore can't really be answered, however, personally I believe the method is flawless but the factors of random and systematic errors make the experiment wrong

# data[].attributes.body
- Math: Some statistics can be biased, but it is important to notice the bias and understand why. This can improve our knowledge on it.
- History: Interpretations and explanations on history can be biased, it can affect how people view history events/ people, but understanding the bias and learn to view things through different perspective can be very important.
Arts: A lot of time, judgments on art can be biased. However, it also helps us to interpret arts in different ways.

# data[].attributes.body
For this essay prompt, I will first define "statistics", and the types of information and concepts it conveys. Then, I will address both the terms "conceal" and "reveal", and also further discuss examples shown as arguments and counter arguments, through the specific use of AOKs on how they are involved in shaping overall knowledge and understanding.

[AOKs]:
1) History
2) Natural Sciences
3) Mathematics
4) Ethics

History can explore how examples of past historical Totalitarian government often conceal data and statistics about the wealth and economic growth in a country, with the purpose of only to distract the people's attention on to other things, and to not interrupt with the leaders in maintaining their power and position. Moreover, natural sciences as in making transcending discoveries through experimentations, the data graphs may often be modified to only show the successful trials, which therefore, will both conceal and reveal facts. The same can go for mathematical graphs, as well as all relating towards the ethics (how morally correct) behind such actions.

# data[].attributes.body
For this topic, I will all define conceal and reveal as these are the two important terms in this statement. After defining these two terms, I will relate to statistics in order to first substantiate this statement. Furthermore, I will also provide examples to support this statement by using AOKs. For instance, I can use math as one of them as math clearly connects to statistics. In addition to math, I can also use natural science as an AOK because natural science considers lots of data and statistics. These statistics also relate to the conclusions or results of certain experiments, which can show the statement that statistics conceal as much as they reveal. Moreover, the AOK of human science can also do the same thing and purpose, the only difference will be one connects to human, while another one did not relate to human (their concepts and ways of doing are quite similar). The last AOK is history as history also has lots to connect with statistics and data because these things can somehow show a phenomenon. For example, historians can understand the success of certain economic policy by looking at the statistics of grain domestic products.

# data[].attributes.body
I will approach this essay in different ways. I will first define what labels actually includes, and explain the necessity of labels in the organization of knowledge. Later on, I will connect this explanation to the understanding of people in order to state and reveal the relationship between labels and how it constrains people’s understanding.

AOKs: Math (pattern of it can be recorded), Human sciences (results from experiments on things that related to human can be labelled out, which can help to conclude to a certain statement that support people to constrain the knowledge),  history (timeline can be a way to label it out; this can substantiate the statement that labels are a necessity in the organization of knowledge), and ethics (logic, process, and ideas can be listed out)

# data[].attributes.body
To say it's a combination, I feel more like a relation that requires to prove and publish the knowledge of each AOK that we've known today. Since the TOK reveals how we understand, and how do we know the knowledge, which the most important point for to prove it and understand it. AOK that can be link and relate such as MATH & HISTORY; NATURAL SCIENCE & HISTORY; MATHEMATIC & SCIENCE; Literature & History, etc. These AOK can all be "combine" through the concept of proving and the factor of the passing of time.

# data[].attributes.body
I will start by highlighting that this question disucsses a combination of two areas of knowledge, and explore examples of different AOEs interacting with each other.

AOEs:
1). The Arts
2). Natural Science
3). History
4). Religion

These AOKs can all easily be discussed together. For example, art is usually largely based on historical events and religion, as art can be versatile to depict important things. Natural science on the other hand sometimes does not require a different AOE to discover new knoeledge, however it can also be talked about alongside religion when the example of the renaissance is given.

# data[].attributes.body
I will approach this essay prompt by firstly, defining what the meaning of  "labels" are, then I will elaborate and explain the meaning behind "organization of knowledge". Finally, I will put forward arguments concerning how labels can both "constrain our understanding", but also how they may conversely "help us expand our understanding".

[AOKs]:
1) History
2) Human Sciences
3) Religious Knowledge Systems
4) Ethics

The above AOKs all show examples relating to the "necessity", "the constraint" and "benefit" of labels. History can be used to discuss dating back into the past, due to the history of black men being taken as slaves for white men, how that contributed to the effect of how black men are never treated with their expected respect in nowadays society. This constrains humans' mass majority capability to treat black men equally, despite the necessity of identifying skin color to differentiate. Human sciences will explain how people possess stereotypical views, as an influence due to "social conformity", and how often the truth of understanding is hindered by the view created by society. Finally, Religious knowledge systems and ethics allow scope of discussion for how beliefs, morality can both show the use of labels.

# data[].attributes.body
I will approach this topic by first defining labels and then discussing their purposes in areas of knowledge such as natural sciences and art.
In natural sciences, labels play an important role as they help scientists classify things for easier understanding without constraining their understanding too much. If anything, it helps them better understand things, such as in biology where organisms are classified by their species.
However, in AOEs such as art, labels would often limit people's imagination and therefore their understanding.

# data[].attributes.body
Defining change and progress will be crucial - change has one knowledge claim to some extent differ from its original claim, and progress can be defined as adding more information to the original claim. I will then compare how progress and change differs in AOKs.

AOKs: history, natural-human science, arts.

History can progress with findings of more artifacts, and can change views through different beliefs and perspective. Natural + human sciences can progress and change with equipment. Arts can progress and change mainly their creative expression and trend.

# data[].attributes.body
In this topic, the combination of areas of knowledge is the key point to achieve new knowledge. In this situation, the combination of history and art could work. When we are analyzing art, especially classic art, it is important to consider the influence of historical background and events on the artist. When combining history with art, it could help unlock more knowledge.
We can also combine ethics with human science, a lot of human science experiments have overlap with the area of ethics. When looking at both aspects, you are able to gain more knowledge which can be used in real life situations.

# data[].attributes.body
I will start by investigating the nature of trust: is it equivalent to the idea of persuasiveness and reliability? What does it take for a person to trust a piece of knowledge? How would you define "accept"? Can someone unconsciously accept information? Then the following AOEs will be used to discuss the claims and counterclaims.

AOK: Language, mathematics, history

# data[].attributes.body
In the area history,  labels plays an important role in learning and analyzing history. When learning history, people often categorize history/ events/ people in different categories and give them a label. For example, when approaching people such as Stalin, Mao, Hitler, people label them as "authoritarian" leaders. This certainly helps learning, it helps people to organize the knowledge and have a brief knowledge on who these people are, what they do. As a result, people have a stronger memory on these "authoritarian leaders". However, this labeling in history also constrain our understanding. People's knowledge on the leaders, for example, will be constrain to the understanding of "authoritarian" and not able to understand other perspectives or gain a deeper understading.

In the area of religious knowledge systems, people also label ideas and contents. For example, while people interpret the Bible, names mentioned in the Bible are labelled as "good" or "bad" or "what kind of person this character is" this allows the Bible to be understand by more people and makes it easier to understand, but this also makes the interpretation limited. People can get stuck by the labels given and not able to interpret in other ways.

Labeling is an important part of the natural science. In one of the area, biology, scientists label animals,  they found as reptiles, mammals, etc. This gives people a good idea on a specific animal even if they have zero knowledge on it, we only need to know what label/ category does it belong to. But this also limits people's chances to discover new characteristic or new traits of animals because labels limit our knowledge.

In the area of arts, people also label different art styles. For example, impressionism, fauvism, etc. This gives people a good idea on some values the artist may have, what time may the art be produced, but it allows less possibility of explorations on art.

# data[].attributes.body
I will begin my essay by exploring what an element of trust in accepting knowledge claims means. I will explore this topic mainly in the context of different WOKs in whether trust is required to gain knowledge through those WOKs.

The AOKs I would link this question to are history, mathematics and religion. The three AOKs differ in their primary WOKs (for example, mathematics is more connected to reason while religion is connected to faith) and through the differences I will explain whether trust is vital in the process of gaining knowledge in these fields.

Extra AOK: Natural Sciences- the various ways one can gain knowledge in this field and whether the WOK (i.e., through sense perception or through language) requires more trust than the other.

# data[].attributes.body
This Change and progress is kind of vague, these two might be link together because without a progress, nothing will change. Well, of course there are some example of foundation that only with a progress but without a change, these can be differentiate, however, general speaking, I think the concepts of change and progress are link together. AOK that can be link including the Mathematic since the progress of proving the equation, using a new numerical fact to solve for the unknown value, these are all the progress that can be involve. and some of these progress will cause changes to the whole theory or concept that people believe. Similarly, Science can also be involve into this question since the progress of proving and exploring also involve in the foundation of science. Like the cell theory for example, it is build up by many biologist's progress of foundation, and some progress will lead to a change to the whole theory. Notice that these two all related to AOK of history, which means history can also be involve in, since historians were being study the different case in the past, and find out the most agreeable reason that contains lots of evidence and sources to prove, these are the progress. The progress of exploring the source will some times give a result of change in the whole historical fact. BUT REMEMBER, there are not historical fact exist in the past, only a fact that haven't been prove to be wrong. Since the question is vague, we can also switch the meaning of change in order to connect with the literature AOK, since the progress of writing a text for whatever text type it is, it will change people's thought or understanding towards the world, through the message from the author can be able to express the idea that can change the whole world, whatever the context is.

# data[].attributes.body
I will approach this topic with the AOK of knowledge and arts. Within this two areas, people often compare and contrast different bias either from those who wrote the primary resource for history, or those who compare the artist's intention with the public's response. In these two areas, you can see the value of bias in the pursuit of knowledge. Through exploring the "idea of bias" and the action of "how bias helps us gain knowledge" this topic will help discover more aspects and the need of bias in our real life.
Language and human science can also be the key to pursuit knowledge about bias.

# data[].attributes.body
I will begin my exploration by defining what is meant by labels, through giving examples of how people will respond to labels differently, then expand upon what is meant by the orgaisation of knowledge, finally criticise that this question discusses how labels can both help and constrain our scope of knowledge, therefore counterclaims can be discussed when either labels fails to be a necessity in knowledge, or that it does not constrain our understanding.

AOKs:
1). Human science
2). History
3). Ethics
4). Language

All of the AOEs use labels to organise knowledge and therefore would be good exaples to discuss in the essay. Human science can be applied to discuss real examples of labels being put on people, for example gender stereotypes or racism. History can be used as an AOK to discuss how human knowledge and historians have in the past used labels that could hinder with our understanding of history. Ethics through the different types of ethiacal theories that could divide people and cause a constrain on our understanding of what is right and what is wrong. Language because the usage of literary devices can help us understand the core puerpose of using a particular method to convey authorial intention.

# data[].attributes.body
I will approach this title by firstly defining what "labels" involve - types of labels, how people respond to it regarding knowledge.  I will also explain the use of labels in organizing knowledge - group and categorizing ...etc. In these scenarios, I will then analyze and discuss the extent that human understanding of knowledge can be limited by it. To some extent maybe labels are like biases and preconceptions.

AOKs: Human Sciences, Ethics and Language

# data[].attributes.body
As no one can be an expert in all fields of study, trust is an inherent aspect in accepting knowledge claims. I would explore the power of ethos and tie in trust in multiple fields.

AOKs: History, Human + natural sciences, religious knowledge.

History involves artifacts and expert's knowledge on when, where and what they represent. Human and natural sciences require extensive experimentation that would require less trust, but trust still might be needed in the methodology and consensus. Religious knowledge is more similar to history but has less physical evidence, and faith closely ties in with trust.

# data[].attributes.body
I will began my essay by defining organization of knowledge and containing of understanding. I will need to explore the meaning of labels and the many forms it can take.

The three AOKs I would link this to are History, Human Science and Religion as all three of them requires organization within the knowledge systems that can lead either to better understanding of knowledge or barriers that prevent communication of knowledge between categories.

Extra AOK: The arts. Many arts disciplines overlap with each other. Through this AOK I will explore how the categorization of the arts subjects limit understanding of knowledge in art.

# data[].attributes.body
I will explore the instances on how different AOKs interact with each other to enrich the knowledge of a community.

AOK:
Mathematics Mathematics are often used in combination with lanauge and natural sciences in order to convey numerical data accurately.
Language Language is used to convey information in all areas of knowledge, specifically history and sciences in order to convey information.
history: History is often used in combination with language in order to best convey information that rely on the built up of knowledge.
Natural sciences: Natural sciences are often used in combination with human sciences. For instance, Chemistry is can b e used in psychology to explain certain human behavior.

# data[].attributes.body
I will approach this topic by defining statistics and how they convey information and ideas. Then I will link the use of statistics and the AOKs too discuss how it affects the formation and reception of knowledge.
Mathematics: Statistics is formed using mathematics, hence
History: Statistics are used to describe events in history, and the ways statistics are used creates bias in the narrative
Natural sciences: Statistics are also used to show results in natural sciences.
Human sciences: Statistics are often used in human sciences to support a hypothesis or idea. Hence, statistics also simplifies results which help the pursuit of knowledge in this field.

# data[].attributes.body
There has recently been multiple scandals regarding the reproducibility of lab experiments, due to the fact that as competition increases among researchers, they are rewarded for making eye-catching discovery quickly, meaning that little to no time is placed in checking the validity of their experiments. As it might cost them time or grants for research.

From this we can see that when we open ourselves up to receiving the thoughts or ideas of others, we naturally believe that it is correct unless proven otherwise. This only occurs on the bases of an established trust that is given with the benefit of the doubt.

1) History
2) Natural sciences
3) Human sciences
4) Religious knowledge system

All of these fields require an establishment of uncertain trust between the source of where the knowledge come from and yourself. If this trust is ever broken or questioned it leads to the destroyed reputation of those that propagated the lies or misinformation.

# data[].attributes.body
About this topic, I will be starting by introducing the cause of biases in the pursuit of knowledge, explaining how biases are formed and the effects of it towards people's understanding of knowledge. Then I will be talking about how sometimes bias can also be positive in the explorations of knowledge. The biases seen in claims can be useful to understand the perspectives of the person, and some methods they are using to approach this knowledge. After I discuss upon how sometimes biases can be positive, I will provide a real life example on how the biases of knowledge supported peoples understanding. A TOK I will be referencing would be history. I can talk about how the biases are shaped while viewing historical events, and how do these biases improve our scope towards understanding the entire picture of the event. Moreover, arts can also be explored. I can talk about how different people's viewpoints on one art piece are due to bias, and how that helps us on looking at different people's thoughts.

# data[].attributes.body
I would begin by stating the importance of creating boundaries or defining terms and limits when creating an argument or exploring knowledge, as it helps to narrow the focus of discussion to a more manageable task and keeps you from straying past the bounds of your original goal. Furthermore, not all knowledge or statements are applicable to everything, thus limiting its range keeps it more specific and easier to support and defend.

1) Human Sciences
2) Natural Sciences
3) Ethics
4) History

As they are all domains of study that require precision when positing axioms, as they often come under intense scrutiny. History, in addition, due to the fact that historians assign labels and terms to people and decisions in the past that, while it can help you organize information and for making judgements, may hinder your understanding.

# data[].attributes.body
Hi I'm Steven. I'm going to score a 7 on my history exam.

# data[].attributes.body
I will approach this topic by giving examples of statistics concealing or acting in a misleading manner first, then offer counter claims to how statistics are actually objective and does not provide any room for error. By doing so, I am able to offer perspectives on both side of the argument. Personally, I lean towards the belief that statistics reveal more then they conceal, but an argument may be made on the contrary as well. Major AOKs that are related to this question includes math, human/natural science, and ethics.

# data[].attributes.body
In the beginning, I will be discussing the purpose of AOKs in the field of TOK, which is about how they narrow down knowledge into smaller sections, so that it is organized to make it easier to approach. The two AOKs I might use are human sciences and history. I will be talking human sciences and showing the content of this AOK, how human studies are involved and how people are analyzed through their behaviors and actions. Furthermore, the understanding of the society will be explored. After talking about this, I will connect AOK history to it. Here I will be providing cases on how historical cases are used as a reference to study human sciences. This will become evidence on how the combination of two different AOKs can be used together to become more useful to us.

# data[].attributes.body
I will approach this topic by exploring what causes bias, and how bias is not always bad as a primary text source. I will give examples of how in historical documents, for example, bias may be important in offering "perspective" and "points of views" of the author during his/her time period. During my exploration, I will also point out that the majority of biases, however, are bad. Because if compromises the source's accuracy and reliability in offered contents. AOKs that relate to this includes history, human sciences, ethics.

# data[].attributes.body
Defining terms such as “change” and “progress” are crucial. I might also criticize the limited scope that only focuses on “change” and “progress”. AOK natural science fits naturally under this topic. Discussing the evolution of theories can be critically evaluated. AOK Math also suitably fit under this topic. The discussion can include ways to define the emergence of mathematic laws and theories. AOK History concerning historiography can be lead to a discussion regarding its impact on human’s understanding of historical events.

# data[].attributes.body
I will first define the terms from the essay prompt, such as “conceal” and “reveal”. I will discuss the targeted aim for statistics and how concealing data affect its objectivity. One possible AOK will be natural science. Discussing the implication behind the scientific graph will indeed open a meaningful conversation regarding its method for data presentation. AOK History also applies to this topic. The graphs from historiographies may include bias inclining toward certain political beliefs. AOK social science is suitable for this prompt too. Discussion on the assumption like “ceteris paribus” behind economic graphs will lead to a thoughtful discussion regarding the vague distinction between truth and theoretical assumption.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that the scientific method itself will never be considered as "flawless", it is a holistic methological approach, that has been taken as an average from many trials of experimentation over the years, and shown as the perhaps best possible representation which would refrain from too much of bias. However, it would never reach the state of perfectness. Some reasons causing problems could be due to the experimenter, producing possible random errors, or else having systematic errors coming from the experiment equipment itself.

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion, the scientific method is not flawless because different scientists will interpret the data differently. Even though a scientific method may be substantiated after doing lots of experiment and support, each experiments may also have errors, bias, repeated ways of doing the experiment. In this case, lots of successful experiments cannot stand for the flawless of scientific methods.

# data[].attributes.body
The role of reason is quite significant in the process of knowledge acquisition in natural sciences because people can notice whether the conclusion or data are accurate, which means people can identify the problem easier by noticing if it’s reasonable or not.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the element of data collection and reasoning are the most important two things in natural sciences. People usually say hypothesis before doing the experiment. In this case, the data can either help to prove or overthrow the statement. If it did prove, then it may become the theoretical reasoning. Furthermore, natural sciences connect to reasoning a lot because quantitative data often can substantiate statement in the field of natural sciences.

# data[].attributes.body
The scientific method itself is a method that is flawless. However, it is the experimenter creating flaws to the scientific methods. It is clear that there are bad sciences as discussed during class. It is crucial for the experimenter to ensure the fact that their result is not bias.

# data[].attributes.body
I will not say the scientific method is flawless because there are still things that we can not test in a scientific method. Furthermore, there are a lot of limitations on the technology we have nowadays. This means that there are still things that we couldn’t prove or be test by the scientific method. Also, there might still be human error through out the experiment. Therefore, I don’t believe that the scientific method is flawless.

# data[].attributes.body
No, it is possible that the scientific method could produce results that are inaccurate due to the people conducting the experiment. For instance, when we conducted an experiment regarding the yeasts in 10th grade, as our measurement was faulty, despite using the scientific method, we were not able to gain flawless results.

# data[].attributes.body
Reason can be obtained from conducting experiments. This will provide us scientific reason from scientific procedures. This is crucial as it allow human to present scientific claims in a organized, logical way.

# data[].attributes.body
No, because sometimes the conductors make mistakes, and they can't guarantee that all of his knowledge is totally accurate.

# data[].attributes.body
The role of reason is highly vital to gaining knowledge in the natural sciences, as reason helps us identify the logic behind our observations and hypotheses, and give us the ability to validate new findings.

# data[].attributes.body
Scientific methods are not without flaws because biases and errors can occur during a presentation. For example, in chemistry class, even if you follow an instruction step for step you might still not get the results that you expected because random errors can occur that is not within your control.

# data[].attributes.body
The role of reason is extremely important because it takes reason to be able to interpret and try to understand what is going on around you.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that observation and reason is the most crucial aspect when acquiring knowledge in the natural science. Being able to observe or to conduct experiment will help human to establish certain scientific claims. Experiment also provide people with reason to explain natural phenomenon.

# data[].attributes.body
Observation is likely the most important element in natural science as only through observing, can we gain the information crucial to understanding the environment and phenomenons around us.

# data[].attributes.body
No, because there will always be something that scientists are unable to observe, so it can never tell the truth with 100 percent accuracy.

# data[].attributes.body
The element of acquisition of knowledge in the natural science that is the most important is observation/sense and reason. This is because it is important to do trials and use senses to perceive the results but it takes reasons to analyze and understand what results mean.

# data[].attributes.body
The role of reasoning is crucial in the process of knowledge acquisition, since any new findings would not be valid or seen to be believable without the backup of reasoning to explicate the truth behind any result that is conducted from, for example, any experiments made.

# data[].attributes.body
Observation, because a big part of science is based on empiricism, and also observation helps convince someone that something is true.

# data[].attributes.body
Comprehension and reasoning. Anyone can repeat an experiment with the right instructions, but not all can understand the purpose of it. In the natural sciences the most important thing is why do things occur the way they do, and to achieve that requires a high level of processing information and critical thinking.

# data[].attributes.body
I am unreasonable and my intelligence is slightly questionable.

# data[].attributes.body
the role of reason played one of the most important role in the process of knowledge. without reason all observations would simply be observations, and no knowledge would be discovered

# data[].attributes.body
I believe inquisition is the most important thing in natural science. For a person to obtain knowledge in the field of natural sciences, doubts and questioning are necessary while maintaining a skeptical mindset. This way the scientist can only view the most holistic view of science.

# data[].attributes.body
The scientific method can be flaw even now due to the lack of observation materials or special situation occurs. The scientific method can only help us to build up a temporary answer, but these answers can be changeable as the scientist discover more about this particular experiment.

# data[].attributes.body
Reason takes an important role in the process of knowledge acquisition in the natural science. Without reason, the knowledge you acquire in natural science won't make any sense, and won't become a part of your understanding.

# data[].attributes.body
No, it is not flawless. People make wrong conclusions and interpret data based on their knowledge and reason, and a lot of time they can be wrong.

# data[].attributes.body
Most of the time experiments don’t give us a black or white conclusion, which makes reason an important part of processing information into knowledge. Natural sciences also requires people to hypothesize and explain their findings, and if there isn’t a prior theory, one would need to use reason to explain.

# data[].attributes.body
I think skepticism and observations are two vital aspects of the acquisition of knowledge in natural sciences. Since, any new invention needs to be thoroughly investigated throughout, for instance, the creation of artificial intelligence may have possible potential to control humanity in the future society, therefore, we would need to reevaluate and be skeptical about experimentations in science. Also, observe deeply to ensure results of testing.

# data[].attributes.body
No, the scientific method is not flawless. For instance, scientific conclusion might be biased with what the scientist believe.

# data[].attributes.body
Reasoning is very important in the process of knowledge acquisition in the natural science. Reasoning helps to find new answers. Also it helps unlock new methods of finding a solution

# data[].attributes.body
Reasons in science are the abilities to draw a conclusion through experimenting. It's the only way to obtain knowledge from our everyday life hence it is important in the process of knowledge acquisition in the natural sciences.

# data[].attributes.body
Logical deduction is the basis of, and the refining process for, axoims and theories. Without reason, evidence and observations become flawed and incomplete, as they lose their inherent value.

# data[].attributes.body
the element observation is the most important in the natural sciences sue to the fact that without observation there would be nothing else. For example, without observing the matter, no experiments would start in the first place. without observation there wouldn't be reasoning since there wouldnt be anything to reason about

# data[].attributes.body
I think observation in the knowledge of natural science is the most important. Natural science is all about seeing what us happening around you and discover the changes that is happening. Without observations, you wouldn't be able to gain the knowledge of observations through your experiments and tests.

# data[].attributes.body
The role of reason in the process of knowledge acquisition in the natural sciences is very important since reason allow us to make different hypothesis, conclusions, andmake connection between things.

# data[].attributes.body
Scientific method calls for a repeatable, controlled, relevant experiment. The first problem is how different people can have different actions, and even if everyone were trying to be as controlled as possible, there is always some human error. Until all of the experiments are done using robots who have much higher precision than us, it will always be flawed.

# data[].attributes.body
No the scientific method is not flawless. In the example we've seen in class, scientists are able to present their own biases though the conclusion may not be fully scientifically supported.

# data[].attributes.body
Reason plays the role of rationalizing what we observe. It plays a crucial role during the process of knowledge acquisition.

# data[].attributes.body
Reasoning can be see as the key to open the new door of discovery in the circumstance of natural science. Everything in scientific field requires of reasoning in order to explain in the right way to the next generation. Such as Newton's discovery of gravity explains why we're standing on the ground but not floating on the space.

# data[].attributes.body
I think observation and reasoning are the most important elements because people need to observe different things happening in order to notice and discover anything. Moreover, we need to be able to reason and make hypothesis to explain our observations.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the elements in observation and collecting the data are the most important in the acquisition. This is due to without observation you couldn’t spot the changes through out the experiment. Furthermore, collection of data for the natural science is also important because it can helps you to draw conclusions. Without these it will be hard to find any results.

# data[].attributes.body
The scientific method is flawed because it's not something we have but something we humans have to do ourselves. We have to test things ourselves, and that means that we can't do it to everything around us, and about everything we don't know, therefore it does have a flaw because it's out of our capabilities.

# data[].attributes.body
Researchers have personal biases and agendas they want to prove through science. The scientific method is flawed in the sense that data may be interpreted in a biased method, and even ignored if the data goes against the agendas and interests of the researchers.

# data[].attributes.body
Very because we can't just guess everything and hope for things. We have to base scientific things off of reason and everything we know.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the empirical observation data and theoretical reasoning will be the most important since the knowledge from the natural science even now contain some uncertainty and mystery, we use the theory from the past epic scientist to explain everything on the earth. But theories can be change through the empirical observation and collecting data. These two can be seen as the most significant elements in the knowledge acquisition of natural science

# data[].attributes.body
the scientific method is not flawless. scientists could bend the experiment due to their own biases. scientist often only use evidence that supports their case and leave out ones that doesn't.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that observation is the most important when it comes to the acquisition of knowledge in the natural sciences. That is because observation allow us to acquire knowledge through the use of WOKs.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that comprehension is the most significant ability or trait in the acquisition of knowledge. This is true two-fold because learning and understanding something are two very different criterias of knowledge. Secondly, a high capability of comprehension is often corrolated with higher fluid IQ and may predict future potential.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that reason and inquisition are the two most important as you need inquisition to get you to look and be curious, and reason to make everything understandable and as it means, reasonable.

# data[].attributes.body
The role of reason is of upmost importance in the acquisition of knowledge in the natural sciences. That is because reason allows people to reach sensible conclusions, and cipher data sets that are relevant and data sets that should be disregarded.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that the inquisition is the most important in acquiring knowledge, because the thirst for knowledge is the one thing that fuels our want to discover new things in the natural sciences.

# data[].attributes.body
The elements of reason and observation are the most important in the acquisition of knowledge in natural sciences. That is because our sensory observation allows us to interact with the experimental subjects in questions. The WOK of reason also allows conclusions to be rationally met.

# data[].attributes.body
Since the latent powers are already in you, therefore, just keep reminding yourself to use it and you will get good at using this power.

# data[].attributes.body
The different lens to look at the world allows us to approach issues with different perspectives, however, the different perspectives might also alter decisions.

# data[].attributes.body
TOK makes our thinking deeper, however, it also narrows our thinking down to the scope of tok.

# data[].attributes.body
Mathematics is related to language to a great extent. For instance, numbers are conveyed using language. Furthermore, mathematical problems are shared using language.

# data[].attributes.body
To an extent, yes. You can complete mathematical questions by simply mimicking the way someone else had solved a similar problem. However, without a solid understanding in math, one may not be able to solve questions effectively.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Math is a way of describing something. For example when the number 0.1 appears, it is like the language saying: there’s a few, small amount
2. Math is another way of communication as like language. It gives you a certain amount of thing. For example: it’s 12 o’clock then you know that it’s noon

# data[].attributes.body
To a certain extent you can do questions without understanding it, however when the knowledge and skills required is more than what you can imagine, you will not be able to solve it without understanding it.