# data[].attributes.body
Ernesto Miranda

The Supreme court

# data[].attributes.body
Miranda was arrested in his house and brought to the police station where he was questioned by police officers in connection with a kidnapping. While Miranda was being interrogated the police failed to advise him of his right to have an attorney present during interrogation. Due to this they were able to get a signed confession out of him that they used in court against him.

# data[].attributes.body
The question that the court addressed was does the Fifth Amendment’s protection against self-incrimination extend to the police interrogation of a suspect?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
I have a question about this piece of code:

redirectUrl: ""

When I include this piece of code, all pictures on a website dont get loaded. But what does this encoder do?

Does it block pictures, hides them or just isn't loading them?

# data[].attributes.body
The Supreme Court of Arizona held that Miranda’s constitutional rights were not violated in obtaining the confession that landed him in prison for 20-30 years. This case led to the creation of the mandarin rights. These rights are granted to everyone . It was determined by a 5/4 vote that a diffident had the right to know their Rights before they are interrogated. This includes the right to remain silent, the right to an attorney regardless if they can afford one or not, and the right to answer or not answer any questions.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Facts and Case Summary - Miranda v. Arizona

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Facts The Supreme Court’s decision in Miranda v. Arizona addressed four different cases involving custodial interrogations. In each of these cases, the defendant was questioned by police officers, detectives, or a prosecuting attorney in a room in which he was cut off from the outside world. In none of these cases was the defendant given a full and effective warning of his rights at the outset of the interrogation process. In all the cases, the questioning elicited oral admissions and, in three of them, signed statements that were admitted at trial.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Customer Engagement Template | Created using Powtoon - The Visual Communication Platform

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Sign up for free to create engaging, inspiring, and converting videos with Powtoon. Make an Impact.