# data[].attributes.body
The course was very illogical in structure
Not all different types of media were used
I was very unlucky with my group

# data[].attributes.body
Distance between group members making the group work non-efficient

Platform failure, not a stable learning platform, making engagement lost

Students are not prepared, making the course build on non-existent knowledge

//emil H

# data[].attributes.headline
Course was too dependent on group work of randomly assigned groups

# data[].attributes.subject
Course was too dependent on group work of randomly assigned groups

# data[].attributes.body
- time-zone mismatches complicated group meetings
- too many group meetings required, creating a burden for students needing a flexible on-line course.
- some group members don't contribute enough, increasing the burden on others
- as group members work asynchronously, some group meetings are ineffective, as not everyone has the same progress
- grading depends almost entirely on group work, regardless of having otherwise met the learning objectives

# data[].attributes.body
The course failed to attract an interesting group of people to make up the cohort. Students were boring, disengaged and uncollaborative in group work, had no interesting experiences to share, and spread a demotivated, pessimistic attitude from one cohort to the next.
;-)

# data[].attributes.headline
There could be potentially many reasons for failure.

# data[].attributes.subject
There could be potentially many reasons for failure.

# data[].attributes.body
The course did not strike the right balance between theory & practice.
The course was heavy leaving less time for students to engage and cross learn.

# data[].attributes.body
-The learning resources and material was not organised.
- The instructions on activities were not clear.
-Mini video lectures were not enough and were not compelling.
-Tasks and Assignments were not clear.
-The grading is not evenly distributed, such as,  the final assignment 75% is the highly contributing element.
-Simulations were not interactive

Asif Sardar

# data[].attributes.body
Students were not able to absorb information and found the course boring and uninspiring. This led to students voluntarily withdrawal from classes and complaints to ESMT GOMBA Office.

# data[].attributes.body
I had a million other things on my mind, and I just did the bare minimum to get through the course. As a result, I just didn't get nearly as much out of the course as I might have.

# data[].attributes.body
Due to high flexibility expectations some students fail to manage their worklife balance together with a demanding student calendar.

# data[].attributes.headline
Too complex course program, which is designed for full involvement and which cannot be combined with work. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Too complex course program, which is designed for full involvement and which cannot be combined with work. 

# data[].attributes.body
- Students clicked through, not engaging enough in the content
- Course did not capture the content that the students needed in their course work

# data[].attributes.body
-In effective teaching methods that leads to students not grasping the course materials.
-Technological issues such as frequent platform crashes.
-Lack of students engagements with no interactive elements.
Irene W.

# data[].attributes.body
The course contents were not inclusive or culturally sensitive. As students are admitted around the world, cultural insensitivity might become a barrier of understanding or even a reason for backlashes.

# data[].attributes.body
I see attention as the most precious gift you can get from your audience. We are in some way a diverse group of people, meaning that undivided attention is not easy to get from all of us. As it is an elective, we can choose it! I love when I can make a choice, thus I might love this course. It must be very different than advertised in terms of learning outcomes, time estimations, level of engagement so to make it different in a bad was, i.e. a failure. As humans, we need an experience, so if the course is giving us less of experience that other courses we have already took, we will be disappointed, thus the course will be a failure.

# data[].attributes.body
- it is just a traditional course posted online. No real digital interaction and students struggle to follow
- no clear calendar has been set from the begging and the course proceeds chaotically
- Digital tools are not enhanced and they are not used effectively to support the student learning journey
- The platform is really basic and not stable
- Value delivered is not according course cost

-- Daniele --

# data[].attributes.body
Students boycott the class as a pushback for some sort towards institutional drama, completely outside the control of the class itself, but within the control of the school.

# data[].attributes.body
Student engagement and buy-in was at an all time low due to the fact that most student just recently took an entrepreneurship class and the similarities between the two are too great.

Patrick

# data[].attributes.headline
-there is no single methodology for the entire course                                     - materials are complex and incomprehensible                                   - biased assessment of time spent   - no project office and effective coordination                                              - all group members are indifferent to the result                                                   -weak communication between teachers and students (Viktoriia)

# data[].attributes.subject
-there is no single methodology for the entire course                                     - materials are complex and incomprehensible                                   - biased assessment of time spent   - no project office and effective coordination                                              - all group members are indifferent to the result                                                   -weak communication between teachers and students (Viktoriia)

# data[].attributes.body
-Recurrent system break down
-Failure to engage students in the online program
-Delivery of the courses are dry and not designed for virtual training environment

# data[].attributes.body
The course failed to offer the experience a regular full time MBA provides, including events and networking, this can be caused by the time zone differences, lack of enough face to face meetings and wrong profile during student selection.

# data[].attributes.body
- A lack of collaboration caused by time zone differences and students being too busy
- Technological issues
- Students not committing to readings and internalizing the information
- The course building on knowledge that may not be there
- Regional differences causing the practical day to day issues of creating a business can't be addressed.

# data[].attributes.body
- Due to technological dependence
- Failure of study platform and tools
- Lack of engagement
- Lack of recognition by the market or employers

~ Gaurav

# data[].attributes.body
The format and content of the course failed to keep engagement and motivation among the students, which caused a very high churn rate.

# data[].attributes.body
Lots of Jargon used throughout the course with no clear illustrations or examples and limited time allocation.

# data[].attributes.body
The user interface and content weren't up to scratch to provide a satisfying learning experience.

Website reliabilitiy was also a massive issue as it would often crash or simply be completely unreachable at times.