# data[].attributes.body
Like feels like its fake at this point. Like fate has been manufactured by the state. Everything is simply what they want it to be, and you have to their in their plastic barrier.

# data[].attributes.body
2100 × 1181

Blender + Procreate

I am depicting Uncle Sam's boot crushing a beautiful untouched environment. A common problem with statism is that it can use its funds to deforest at a rate the market did not desire. The government causes market events that would have never happened and can only be reduced via more government. It is a subjective hopeless matter.

This forest contextually would've gone untouched without government funding, but because of this, businesses have the leverage to do things that the market, or the people, would've never wanted, and in return causes much faster dilapidation of the environment outside the needs and wants of the people.

# data[].attributes.body
Time Lapse of Project 4

# data[].attributes.body
Possibly people versus the systems the state have forced us under

# data[].attributes.body
I was told to define lines more because it's harder to see further away

# data[].attributes.body
Statism is never the answer. It never has been, and never will be. Statism is neo-nihilism, expecting an outcome to occur no matter what state you have. If the state is minimal it will be the same every single time. You expect a change but never get there. It is monotonous, helpless, people will die at your hands in some way due to the state you endorse.

# data[].attributes.body
782 × 1869

Procreate

# data[].attributes.body
I first wanted to just talk about subjectivity with an oceanic theme, but now I think I am more into a people versus business type of deal. When I say business I mean rather state businesses, i.e. corporatism and corporate welfare. The main way I have developed my style however is requesting that artists let me watch them do art in real-time and then I take notes and replicate it in my own special way.

# data[].attributes.body
How can I visually critique statism as methodically as possible and how can I make it also as specific as possible? This mainly pertains to issues with oversized governments controlling media and subverting individuality. I am doing this to express my distaste with large government and especially collectivism in favor of a more decentralized "minarchal" society.

# data[].attributes.body
2420 × 1870

Procreate

Workers are abused by Communism. I am tried of hearing "Capitalism is imperfect, and so is Communism, the difference is one enslaves one and the other liberates one." They're almost always taking about Communism liberating people, but that is never the case. Ideological collectivism has never freed anybody ever. Ideologies built in altruism have always been authoritative and forceful. The idea that man must live for another man, so that the state can provide, is Communism. Communism is the epitome of collectivism and altruism. You cannot be communist without being an altruist, and you cannot be an altruist without expressing communist "philosophy" if you can even call it that. Communalism, collectivism, Communism, socialism, Syndicalism, Nazism, Fascism, economic nationalism, Social Democracy, social conservatism, whatever it may be, is all collectivist and will destroy the world as they have been for a very long time. Collectivism has proven itself again and again that it is only made to and only works to destroy, and ultimately abuse the workers they're trying to liberate. Capitalism is the liberator, the "capitalism" people think they were born into in the USA isn't Capitalism, it is statism. We live under a corporatic oligarchal democracy, no where near Capitalism. Don't get it confused, freedom is about Capitalism, Mutualism, Individualism, Ethical Egosim, voluntary association, not Socialism.

# data[].attributes.body
1800 × 1200

Procreate

Democracy is a failed god. This is a reference to a book written by Hans-Hermann Hoppe. I do not like all that he says, but his opinions on Democracy in a lot of ways I find to be very accurate. Democracy as a system and as a mindset is corrupt and coercive. It forces 49% to do the thing the 51% want. Why is that fair to an individual to have to do the things that other wants? In reality, you have no right to tell someone how they are to live your life. There is no postulation or fact from nature that says you must do the thing that people say, nor can you make people do the things that you want others to do. If they are not aggressing you, then what they do really isn't your business. Democracy thereby invalidates that principle, giving the people control over the outcome of my life, money, and talents. I actually have no obligation to other people, but the altruists believe I am simply a slave to the cause and must sacrifice for the greater good.

# data[].attributes.body
1870 × 1870

Procreate

My idea of the future isn't super technologically advanced, but due to unnatural corporate lobbying, major cities would be underwater. What I mean is that the climate crisis wouldn't be as bad if businesses had to adjust to it, but since the government gives polluting businesses a lot of money, they don't have to care about what the market wants. If the earth was melting under a free market, people would stop buying from those businesses now, but since there is next to no real competition, they don't care about saving the world because they don't need to, to keep making money. All the businesses need to do is support the current thing and the progressives of society won't care what they do, and the conservatives of society are okay with it because 'it makes jobs.' It is disgusting irrational subjectivity and will kill us all, all by the government's hands, and especially, democracy.