# data[].attributes.body
In Washington D.C., the District Department of Transportation extended permit applications for outdoor dining. While not part of a permanent program, it allows for restaurants to continue to offer outdoor dining, although barriers which were previously provided and installed by the department for free will now cost between $250 and $800. It allows the city to embrace the outdoors to make dining more enjoyable, but it is missing a lasting plan to keep and potentially expand the program.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
DC Extends Application Window for Outdoor Dining Permits

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
District restaurants will have until the end of November to apply, but businesses with permits in rush hour parking lanes must end operations on July 31.

# data[].attributes.body
This is a bit of an article, but more of a government page listing acceptable applications of outdoor dining. It explains that businesses are allowed to apply "To serve patrons on sidewalks, in parklets and intermittently in alleys." This is less restrictive than the full ban in Boston, but still requires a permit. Essentially, a business requires permission to use a public space, or even to set up facilities to allow patrons to fully enjoy their services. This can suppress businesses that may not know about the program or cannot afford to submit a permit application.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Los Angeles County currently offers Outdoor Dining for restaurants within unincorporated areas by permit. Los Angeles County Departments are currently developing a Permanent Outdoor Dining Program that will continue to benefit both businesses and patrons.

# data[].attributes.body
I found this Reddit post about Boston restricting outdoor dining in the North End. It is not part of the requirements but I thought some of the comments were interesting (Warning for some explicit language). Reddit posts/comments are never thought to be reputable as an academic source of information, but the insight they provide into general public opinion could be very helpful to an urban planner. A lot of people seem to be complaining that businesses are unfairly trying to use public space for profit, and that outdoor dining is taking away parking and creating a lot of traffic. This can reflect the greed of business owners trying to get whatever they can get for nothing, but I feel that it highlights the larger issue at hand which is the lack of space in an overly dense city. People are upset that the restaurants are moving into the street/sidewalk to create outdoor dining spaces - which is valid - but if the city was designed to have more recreational space this would not be a problem.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
From the boston community on Reddit: On-street outdoor dining begins in Boston -- except city’s North End

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Explore this post and more from the boston community

# data[].attributes.body
This was an interesting video that I found about a Boston judge ruling against the business owners that were trying to fight the North End outdoor dining bans (referenced in the included Reddit post). While the ruling makes sense in the context of the current system, it highlights the systemics issue with the city and how regulations can suppress quality of life. As detailed in the Reddit post explanation, the lack of public space is what resulted in the ban in the first place. We have learned in this course how sidewalk culture can be important in the livability of a city, and this makes it seem like governments can control who has a better quality of life by managing access to sidewalks and public spaces through outdoor dining restrictions. The ruling makes it clear that a priority is placed on cars and private transportation, not gathering in common spaces such as the street or sidewalk.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
BREAKING: Judge Rules AGAINST North End Outdoor Dining

# data[].attributes.body
Outdoor dining is an important concept to me because I feel that food is something that is at the center of everyone's lives, a common thread or experience that ties us all together. However, being confined to within a small cramped restaurant in over-densified cities can make this experience a lot worse. I see dining outdoors as very closely related to some of the topics we have talked about, including redlining and sidewalk culture. When we dine outdoors, we can socialize more freely without having to worry as much that a conversation might echo around an enclosed dining space. Dining outdoors can also help us feel more connected to nature and the green spaces that are so important to cities and the well-being of its inhabitants. The different articles on the map show specific instances of cities deciding how to manage outdoor dining and how these are relevant to a discussion about urban planning. While not explicitly mentioned in any of the articles or the video, I imagine that the same principles at play in redlining can be applied to outdoor dining restrictions, where government agencies can restrict what communities can legally utilize public spaces for the purpose of outdoor dining.

# data[].attributes.body
First of all, I want to say how I really liked the layout of your Padlet, it is very original. As for the actual contents, after reviewing the material, I can see why this topic may be controversial to some. The first article I read, DC Extends Application Window for Outdoor Dining Permits, mentioned how it would go against the historic character of the area. Even though the second article, It’s time to Dine Out, was more of a government page listing about information, it was very informative as to what permits are needed and who is eligible. The reddit post was a nice touch, as I could actually read what the public opinion on this topic was and how some people really cared about the topic and others did not care much about it. Seeing how controversial this topic is even in an online forum was pretty interesting since as you stated, public opinion over a public space should really be considered for urban planners. The video you chose really talked about how the fight for outdoor dining affected small businesses, and how the new policies only really affected a few areas and how it was unfair as it wasn't a widespread policy. Overall, I agree with you that outdoor dining is important especially in dense areas as it makes the experience of eating out with friends and/ or family more enjoyable as you have more room. As you stated, outdoor dining can have more of an impact than we thought as it would connect us more to nature and restaurants who were previously just indoors could possibly have green spaces, which is nice to experience in dense cities. This course along with your articles and other resources just emphasized how important it is for urban planners to consider public opinion as new policies affect the public, especially this topic as business owners are trying to find solutions for the growing population in their cities.