# data[].attributes.body
Focus is on the core subjects, while hitting all subjects.

# data[].attributes.body
High amount of student-centered learning activities.

# data[].attributes.body
Only a third of walkthroughs observed tech usage

# data[].attributes.body
Surprised at low amount of technology use being observed.

# data[].attributes.body
Technology use is not necessary for student-centered learning opportunities.

# data[].attributes.body
Engagement is relatively high

# data[].attributes.body
3/4 of lessons observed allowed students to take control of their own learning

# data[].attributes.body
The core subjects are the majority of the observations.

# data[].attributes.body
We are curious to know more about "rigor relevance" and the categories therein

# data[].attributes.body
How can teachers personalize their lessons to match their teaching style while maintaining commitment to the school's scep and dcip targets?

# data[].attributes.body
Student centered lessons is likely correlated with high engagement.

# data[].attributes.headline
surprised at level of technology being used - seemed low

# data[].attributes.subject
surprised at level of technology being used - seemed low

# data[].attributes.body
Almost half of the observations were for grades 9 & 10.

# data[].attributes.body
Other aspects of rigor/relevance far outweigh adaptation

# data[].attributes.body
+LTs consistently used

-Minimal personalization seen

+lots of different kinds of instruction

# data[].attributes.body
We are incorporating real-life connections into our lessons about as often as we are doing nothing to access relevance

# data[].attributes.body
Shockingly low disengagement

# data[].attributes.body
Lack of technology in use

# data[].attributes.body
Observations are heavy on 9th and 10th grade

# data[].attributes.body
Most lessons had learning targets.

# data[].attributes.body
less of the first 10 minutes, not a lot of 11-12, 2/3 no technology used

# data[].attributes.body
How do you expect us to personalize a lesson?

# data[].attributes.body
Is personalization necessary for engagment?

# data[].attributes.body
Students were engaged in the majority of lessons observed

# data[].attributes.body
Is the level of rigor possibly an indicator of where the class is in regards to introducing or completing a topic?

# data[].attributes.body
Good balance between different portions of the class periods were observed

# data[].attributes.body
the vast majority of lessons observed were student-centered

# data[].attributes.headline
Pair turn and talk in less than half of classes

# data[].attributes.subject
Pair turn and talk in less than half of classes

# data[].attributes.body
Student centered learning was almost 75%.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Nearly 70% engagement as compared to 27%compliant

2. Instructional effort--> 73% of (s)

3. 80% No personalization

# data[].attributes.body
A high percentage of students seems to be on task.

# data[].attributes.body
Why are so many more 9-10th grade classes observed than the other grade bands?

# data[].attributes.body
lack of student choice and voice possible connected to lack of engagement

# data[].attributes.body
1. What is ''personalization?"

# data[].attributes.headline
Low focus with learning content through lens of diverse cultures at 2%

# data[].attributes.subject
Low focus with learning content through lens of diverse cultures at 2%

# data[].attributes.headline
Even split between which portion of the lesson is observed. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Even split between which portion of the lesson is observed. 

# data[].attributes.body
Some disciplines are underrepresented as far as observations.

# data[].attributes.headline
personalization - still a good amount of teacher centered learning- low use of tech

# data[].attributes.subject
personalization - still a good amount of teacher centered learning- low use of tech

# data[].attributes.body
A low percentage of personalization - teacher centered learning - low use of tech

# data[].attributes.body
Alternate seating arrangements can produce novel learning experiences

# data[].attributes.body
How do you personalize lessons with passing a state test as the end goal.

# data[].attributes.headline
Student engagement & student centered seems to be the norm

# data[].attributes.subject
Student engagement & student centered seems to be the norm

# data[].attributes.body
Very little technology being used

# data[].attributes.body
Student centered learning , and technology use is high. Labs are not done as often.

# data[].attributes.body
Staff is working hard to shift from teacher centered to student centered.

# data[].attributes.body
I think teachers are purposefully planning their lesson to engage students!

# data[].attributes.body
learning content through the diverse lens of cultures... has a very low number- is this something that is mapped out in the curriculum, teachers don´t have the opportunity to find materials or they don´t align to the curriculum map.

# data[].attributes.body
Most looking at 9th - 10th

# data[].attributes.body
Rigor seems to be mostly acquisition.

# data[].attributes.body
Mixed Grades and 9 +10 were mostly observed

# data[].attributes.body
What is Rigor Relevance, ABCD?

# data[].attributes.body
If mostly student centered and little technology use, how is acquisition (rigor) being observed? How are the students acquiring the knowledge?

# data[].attributes.body
Are labs and projects helping to assist with engagement of students? Class discussions seem to have a higher number of percentage. Unless the discussions occur after labs and projects have culminated to assess learning.