# data[].attributes.body
PE - P2
On SLS, students will watch video clips of soccer players kicking the ball into goal. Students will identify the basic cues, by answering SLS ITT.
Using the knowledge gained, students will demonstrate their learning by showing the various ways to kick the ball into goal.

ART - P6
Padlet was used to do Compare and Contrast Thinking Routine and Peer evaluation.

We could include guiding questions to scaffold SS feedback to one another.

# data[].attributes.body
1) Use of screen recording as an alternative mode of assessment -> get peers to evaluate the videos' accuracy
--> screen recording can be used as a group work to facilitate DI during lessons
2) Students can pose their self-created questions on ITT and get their peers to solve/provide feedback
3) Use of in-built rubrics in the ITT to facilitate self/peer assessment

# data[].attributes.body
Allowing students to represent what they know in different mode. Need not have to be in text form.

E.g., the students are to draw based on the 2 different paragraphs. Then, they compared the 2 drawings in terms of how vivid the writing is.

To draw digitally may be a challenge. Could allow the children to draw on whiteboard / paper. Teacher can then take a snapshot of the drawing using ipad, which can then link up to the screen.

The use of nearpod is effective in providing immediate feedback. It also allows the teacher to control the pace of the slides, so the students can focus on what is at hand.

# data[].attributes.body
At the initial plan, the teacher did not check the understanding of the students and that was the first AFG. Thus, the lesson did not go as planned. The students were at different starting points but yet the teacher assumed what the students knew.
There were not many opportunities to elicit students' responses either.

After review, the teacher was able to share the students' responses and ascertain what the students understood. He addressed the misconceptions before progressing with the lesson. In addition, he also included the peer feedback component and provided immediate feedback after each activity. Thus, students could improve their answers. He also concluded the lesson with a quiz with automated feedback.

# data[].attributes.body
AfL : The teacher is able to capture all the input from students and assess their learning via technology.

Student's thinking is made visible. This helps to inform teachers on the students' progress, allowing them to identify areas where they need to intervene. It also helps motivate students to learn, as they can see and understand the progress they have made (Use SLS ITT, Google Doc) This can help to create a more positive learning environment.

1) Use of MCQ to elicit responses from all students
2) Explore the use of Google Doc where teacher can track changes made by the students

# data[].attributes.body
Before:
1) Mr Wong did not explain the success criteria for writing a personal recount.
2) Selected students  presented their answers, but not the rest.
3) Not engaging

After:
1) Use of SLS features language features and sensory detail can make writing vivid.
> Activate Prior knowledge ( self- directed learning on monologue, dialogue,adverb,adjective & verb thro games)
2) Students are given the choice  to represent their understanding of a text in a different mode (write or draw on their personal account) to activate their learning.
3) Interactive thinking tool> AfL
Individual work & group work with success criteria stated clearly.
4) Use of google document with guiding questions to do group editing> make thinking visible

# data[].attributes.body
Checklist, mini whiteboards, padlets, peer assessment, nearpod, kahoot quiz

# data[].attributes.body
mini whiteboard
polls
checklist

# data[].attributes.body
Quizzes, PQP, peer tester

# data[].attributes.body
Exit cards, polls

# data[].attributes.body
Exit cards, self & peer assements

# data[].attributes.body
mini white board, quiz, game, kahoots, SLS

# data[].attributes.body
mini-whiteboards
self and peer assessment + focused feedback
questioning
quizzes
traffic light checkpt

# data[].attributes.body
mini-whiteboard

# data[].attributes.body
Peer evaluation - mid point check

# data[].attributes.body
Checklist. Peer assessment

# data[].attributes.body
Peer feedback
Self check
Whiteboard
traffic light

# data[].attributes.body
- Self-checklist
- Entrance/ Exit ticket
- Comments to improve

# data[].attributes.body
Team Sport Assessment Procedure - Scoresheet to track competency in defensive & attacking play

Targetboard - to test accuracy of throws

# data[].attributes.body
Mid-point checklist to understand where the ss are at when learning a new skill

# data[].attributes.body
Whiteboarding

# data[].attributes.body
1. using of pre-flight check list for students to self-assess themselves
2. co-generation of success criteria
3. peer-assessment

# data[].attributes.body
Nearpod Quiz
SLS exit ticket
Mini whiteboard
Fingers

# data[].attributes.body
Carry out mini milestone checks containing conceptual questions. This ensures the students have internalise the concept so that the teacher can progress to the next concept.

Possible AFL format:
- Peer checks
- Mini quiz
- Concept map
- Science Talk