# data[].attributes.body
e United States, also live in “historical schizophrenia?” In what ways
Historical schizo

# data[].attributes.body
1. The impact of a historical event is what makes a historical event important and worth remembering later.  How it affected people is what matters.
2. It should be symbolic and represent larger ideals because if it doesn't have a purpose and an end game goal then it doesn't matter and won't affect people.
3. Yes, the event should have noticeable consequences/effects, because if it didn't change anything, then it was pointless.
4. It would be preferred that the event brought people together rather than tearing them apart, but the divisive events are just as significant.  Plus, some events separate some people, but unite others.
5. The event doesn't necessarily have to affect the whole world, but it should affect at least one person/group of people in a major way.
6. Some important events that will matter 100 years from now, are the Women's March, and March For Our Lives.
_________________________________

1. The reason stated is that the Russians are too divided and celebrating will only widen the gap.  I suspect that Putin just wants to avoid revolution at any cost and doesn't want anyone celebrating any ruler being overthrown.
2. The Kremlin prefers the story written in a way that makes it seem as if other countries influenced Russians and pushed them to revolution.  Russia struggles with inequality and can't celebrate such a revolution without making themselves look bad.
3. I think living in "historical schizophrenia" means that the Russian government hasn't entirely straightened themselves out and they're almost paranoid that anything, like acknowledging their country's history, could ruin their setup. They're policing things that shouldn't be of concern because they feel unstable. I think it is an accurate description. Other countries definitely also live this way. For example, the U.S. chooses to ignore native american history and our interactions with them. For the most part, the bad parts of our first interactions with the native americans are ignored.

# data[].attributes.body
1. A historical event should be celebrating a victory and/or anything that is significant to our country/the world.
2. I think that as long as it impacts the people and as long as it has meaning then it should be symbolic.
3. Yes, the outcome of the even should be remembered by people, therefore it should have notable effects.
4. I think that i does not matter whether it is unifying or divisive as long as it has an impact on lots of people.
5. The event does not have to be a global event but I think it depends on how many people are affected by the event.
6. I think that it depends on the importance of the event. For example, the Holocaust will be remembered for an extremely long time. But I think that if the event does not involve many people that it will not get the recognition that it probably deserves.
------------------------------------------------
1. The official reason is that Russia is too divided from the past year to celebrate this holiday. However, the more likely reason is that President Vladimir V. Putin does not like the idea of a revolution as well as the thought of Russians

# data[].attributes.body
1. I think a historical event becomes important when it leaves a lasting impact. I also think different events have different meanings to different people
2.

# data[].attributes.body
1. A historical event is important and worthy of remembering when it is an example of a good change or an example of something that should never happen again, so we try not to repeat our mistakes throughout history.

2. I think the events in history should be symbolic because it reminds us of our past and how to better change our future, without repeating mistakes.

3. Yes, the event should have noteworthy consequences or effects because the outcome of an event is what we mainly remember.

4. The event can be unifying and divisive depending onion you were on the winning side or if you were on the losing side because there is either a good and unifying outcome or bad and divisive outcome.

5. The event does not need to have global repercussions because the event might not have effected everyone.

6. An event during the past twenty years that will be considered important 100 years from now is the Holocaust because so many innocent people died. It is an example of what never to repeat in history.
______________________________________
1. The Kremlin plan to “sit out the centenary of the Russian Revolution" because the official reason is that Russia is too divided from the last year and cannot have another revolution. However, according to the article, the more likely reason is that Putin does not want to be compared to a weak Nicholas II and the downfall of a ruler being celebrated.

2. The Kremlin’s preferred narrative of Russian history is that everyone gathered together and marched to greatness because this gives Russia a sense of nationalism and being very strong. And, But, the Russian Revolution does not fit neatly into that narrative because there was a revolution and a ruler was overthrown.

3. The phrase, “We live in historical schizophrenia,” means that right now everyone is confused. Other countries, such as the United States, also live in “historical schizophrenia” because so many peoples views and opinions differ from one another's, so everyone is caught in confusion and what the truth is and what is false.

# data[].attributes.body
1.* I think historical events should be remembered in order to celebrate our victories and for chances to teach and  and understand our mistakes so they don't happen in the future. All historical events should be remembered, including the ones where our country was in the wrong.
2.* I think they should be symbolic of our country's growth but I don't think all events should be treated as a symbol for our country itself. We should understand where we came from, but not worship our faults.
3.* I think that they should have noteworthy consequences and effects because otherwise we aren't going to learn from our faults or be able to understand what makes up our country and its history.
4.* I think that they should be unifying, but because there are differing sides in almost all events, there's always going to be some form of division based on opinion.
5.* I think it depends on the severity of the event. Historical events, like the holocaust needed to be broadcasted throughout the world so everyone knew that oppression in any form isn't okay. But not every event universally impacts the worlds ideals and values.
6.*Like I mentioned before, even though this is a fairly obvious example, I think the holocaust should and will be remembered a hundred years from now. It taught the entire world about treating people correctly and had a universal impact (if not all in the same way depending on world view).
-----------------------------------------------------------
1. The official reason is that Russia is too divided from the previous year and a revolution would only be detrimental. The more likely reason, however, is that Putin loathes the idea of revolution and people joining together, celebrating the downfall of any ruler.
2. The narrative is meant to implement nationalism and pride, and overthrowing a ruler doesn't fit this because it shows a state of unrest and unhappiness within the country.
3. I think "we live in a historical schizophrenia" means that there are many dated, new, and differing visions for the country that could potentially cause conflict. I agree with this statement for both Russia and the United States because doesn't every country have different people with different opinions on the past? I don't think there is any way to escape historical schizophrenia because everyone has a different world view, and opinions that come with it. What's important is that people learn for past historical mistakes, and continue to work toward a future that the world can be proud of.

# data[].attributes.body
1. I think that if a event is important enough to make us remember it decades later it should change the way think or change the world.  The event should also have a different importance to different people.
2. I think the event should be symbolic so it helps us remember that event if it was important.
3. Yes, the cause should have noteworthy effects  so that if it was a bad event it will help us remember to not do it again.
4. I think that the event should be unifying. If the creates unification it will show that the event is over and everyone can still be together no matter what happened.
5.

# data[].attributes.body
1. A historical even becomes important when the outcome creates such a large impact that it is remembered for years to come. It should only be celebrated if that impact was positive though.
2. I think that the event should be symbolic to remind us of our victories and failures that we have experienced in the past. It can tell us what actions we should not repeat and which ones we should. It will also help us keep in touch with history
3. Yes, the event should have noteworthy consequences and affects because that only helps our country learn and improve in the future.
4. It does not matter wether the event is unifying or divisive, as long as it made some sort of impact on the world.
5. The event does not have to affect the whole global population. In order to be remembered it can just affect a country or a certain group of people, although often that does end up affection more people.
6. An event that will probably be remembered 20 years from now is 9/11 because it had such a large impact on the US and helped unify us.
#########################
1. The article says that the official reason for the Kremlins sitting out the centenary of the Russian Revolution is that Russia is still too divided after their last year and that a revolution would mess things up more. The more likely explanation would be that the President Vladimir does not want anything to do with a revolution. He does not want the Russians celebrating the overthrow of a ruler.
2. Kremlins preferred narrative for Russian history is that he led a long "march to greatness"which gave the Russians a sense of national pride and purpose. This was not correct though because in the end the ruler was still overthrown and their was a revolution.
3. The phrase "We live in historical schizophrenia, with these monuments to Lenin, to all of them" means that our nation is still disorganized and has no order. Everyone has different points of view and their own thoughts.

# data[].attributes.body
1)  Historical events should have made an impact on a part of the world and have significance to a group of people.
2) No, the event does not have to be symbolic, but still needs to have meaning to people. It can, but historical events can be a small part in a larger change or certain ideal.
3) Yes, the event should have an outcome that affected something or people.
4) An important event can be both divisive and unifying. A historical event can be both good or bad for a country or the world.
5) No, the event does not need to affect the entire world. It can affect a small number of people and still be a historical event.
6) I believe the Killing of Osama Bin Laden will be important one hundred years from now because of the amount of tension and problems that were caused between countries due to his actions.

1) The Kremlin plans to sit out of the centenary of the Russian Revolution because the country is still too divided over the consequences, but that is the officials reason. Many people say it is because Vladimir Putin loathes the idea of another revolution and the idea of people dancing in the streets to celebrate the overthrow of a ruler.
2) The Kremlin's preferred narrative of Russia's history is that the country led with a "march of greatness". This gives the sense of the country's pride and how they are working to become better and stronger. This is not a correct representation though because there was The Russian revolution and their ruler was overthrown. This shows that they are not unified and are scared about it happening again.
3) The phrase "we live in a historical schizophrenia", means that there is a constant fear or nervousness because of what has happened in the past. The rulers or authorities in the country are afraid of another revolution or repetition that has happened before. Some countries also live in a historical schizophrenia including the United States. We are living in a historical schizophrenia because of it's past of racial inequality. The growth of social media is also causing many different views about the controversial president and different views to be argued constantly causing lots of tension.

# data[].attributes.body
1. A historical event should be celebrated if there was victory or a positive change. If there was loss, that country shouldn't necessarily celebrate it.
2. An event should be symbolic and display a theme that will help younger children carry through generations. Symbolic meanings help explain historic events better.
3. The outcome of an event is what is mainly remembered. This event in some way has affected a group of people and a place.
4. Most historic events celebrated should be positive events that will bring people together. Although, not all historic events are positive but they are not celebrated.
5. The historic event does not have to affect everyone in the world. It is whats important to that country that matters.
6. An event that affected the world negatively and positively was 9/11. Since this event had to different responses it is greatly remembered. We honor this day for the people who died. This event has strengthen the US protection but many still hang their heads low.
-------------------------------------------------------------
1. The reason behind the Kremlin plan is to "sit out the centenary". Russia is to divided to celebrate this holiday. Putin also doesn't want to celebrate overthrowing a ruler.
2. Kremlins narrative of Russian history is that the country led with "march to greatness." This is a very prideful comment which makes Russia very strong. This gives a sense of nationality because they are working to lead pridefully. This is a false representative because Russia's ruler was overthrown and that part was neglected.
3. The quote "We live in a historical schizophrenia" is described as a brutal truth. This describes our world as a place of confusion. These negative historical events cause division in our world. We cannot conclude to an agreeing and happy world. The US lives in one as well because many people are celebrating their differences to come to together with others. These differences bring people together and tear others apart causing hate and conflict in our country.

# data[].attributes.body
1. if a historical event affects a large amount of the human race, and introduces specific events or tendencies that we've never seen before, it is worth remembering

2. sometimes, if the event represents huge effects that are occurring within the human race, it should be remembered, and it can be symbolic of the things that many people are going through

3. it should have a lasting emotional effect and it could be pretty impactful on land or the people who live in the place where the event occurred

4. it could be unifying in that it hurt so many people that they all come together. it could also be divisive in that people have very different views on what happened.

5. maybe it should have global emotional repercussions, just so that it will be remembered because everyone felt something when it happened.

6. Pearl Harbor
------------------------------------------------------------
1. they plan to sit it out because they don't want to bring back the themes of uprising and revolution, and Putin doesn't want people to get ideas

2. They prefer to show the public that they have always been successful and prosperous, and bringing back themes of uprising and violence with overthrowing their leaders doesn't fit with that interpretation.

3. Historical schizophrenia is when people try to erase or reconstruct history to fit their interpretations or their aspirations for what they want history to be. I think that does apply to Russia, and I think that in some situations other countries use it to promote more propaganda.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Not all historical events should be celebrated but in order for it to be remembered a lot of people need to be involved. Most of the time it could be a lot of people were killed. However, if so many people were in some way effected then they will tell it to the next generation and it'll be passed down.
2. I think it should be symbolic because each country has a different story and it will mean a something different for everyone.
3.  I think that the event should have noteworthy effects because it could either effect our future positively or negatively and depending on that we will remember it. If there are greater consequences for a certain country they will remember that event more because it had a greater impact.
4. I like it could be both depending on what it is. It would be better if the event is unifying because we can grow stronger as a nation. But we can't really control how it affects everyone so sometimes it can be divisive.
5. I don't think it is necessary to have global repercussions.
6.  9/11 really effect a lot of people and changed the way are airports are operated. So many people remember the terror it brought their friends and family or even themselves. Even though as time goes on the people who experienced it first hand will have passed, people will still remember the fear it brought.

1.  Kremlin's plan it to sit out on the centenary of the Russian Revolution. Putin hated the idea of a revolutions and the civilians overthrowing the ruler. Kremlin also thinks that Russia it still too divided from the previous year and a revolution would make things worse.
2.  Kremlins preferred narrative of Russian History is to grow national pride throughout the country with a "march to greatness."  Therefore the Russian revolution wouldn't fit this because it would include the overthrowing of their ruler.
3.  I think “We live in historical schizophrenia,” means that everyone is going along with different ideas on how the world is changing and how historical events may be effecting us. So much is happening around us that I think that this includes the US because our minds are always busy. We are always trying to keep up and so much is going on that our views are constantly going back and forth between views.

# data[].attributes.body
1. If the event made a positive impact on something or if it helped a negative thing stop or if it changed something very important.
2. The event should be symbolic to the people in that country because it means a lot to celebrate it because it happened there.
3. Yes it should have both because the event you celebrate should be remembered and they should always remember what it did to the country. Even if the event was not a great impact everyone should still remember it.
4. I think the event should be unifying because it should bring together the country forever but if it divisive then it could bring a lot of issues but because they divisive it then the people should remember the reason why that they had to divid it.
5. It is not necessary to have global repercussions.
6. 9/11 will still be important twenty years from now it will always be remembered the event caused major destruction and brought major consequences.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1. Kremlin plans to sit out the centenary of the Russian Revolution because they are still too divided from last year. Putin didn't like the idea of the revolution over throwing the ruler.
2. Kremlin's version of Russian history was that the event was the unified march to greatness. The Russian's Revolution does not fit into this because the rest of them are about over throwing their ruler.
3. I think that "We live in historical schizophrenia" means everyone has their own few on past events and how they change. I think that all people have different ideas on how the world can change. I think that the US definitely lives in "historical schizophrenia" because everyone has their own views on past events and how they effect us now and how they helped or hurt us in every situation.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Something affects a group of people’s lives
2. Yes, I believe there should be a purpose before doing anything and it should be important/symbolic.
3. Yes, the event should be important and because it may affect/should affect people's lives.
4. Yes you should deliberately separate people into unneeded or wanted groups
5. Yes and no
6. Berlin Wall
*****&&(*^&^&*%*(%
1. 1. Why does the Kremlin plan to “sit out the centenary of the Russian Revolution?” What’s the official reason? What’s the “more likely explanation,” according to the article?
"proffered for ignoring the event is that Russia remains too divided over the consequences of that fateful year."

2. What is the Kremlin’s preferred narrative of Russian history? And, why doesn’t the Russian Revolution fit neatly into that narrative?
His preferred narrative of Russia's history is that the country led with a "march of greatness" and have pride/ nationalism

3. What does the phrase, “We live in historical schizophrenia,” mean? Do you agree with that characterization of Russia? Do other countries, such as the United States, also live in “historical schizophrenia?” In what ways
Quote from him and the article , “We live in historical schizophrenia, with these monuments to Lenin, to all of them,” he said, going on to denounce any street protesters as potential revolutionaries."

# data[].attributes.body
1. Certain historical events should and should not be celebrated. If the historical event made a change for the country and improved it whether it was the government of anything else, it should be celebrated.
2. I think that the event should be symbolic for the country because it should mean a lot for the country to celebrate each year.
3. I think that the event should have noteworthy effects and maybe consequences. The effects and consequences would remind countries of this event and how it effected the country. Whether the event was good or bad the consequences and effects would serve as a reminder for the country.
4. The event should be unifying, but I think it can also be divisive because there are examples like the Berlin Wall which was a divisive event. Now Germans are reminded of this wall and know not to allow something like this to happen again. The event can also be unifying because it shows the country's strengths.
5. I do not think that it is necessary for the event to have global repercussions.
3. An event that happened in the past twenty years that will still be remembered in 100 years is 9/11. 9/11 will be remembered in the next 100 years because it was an event that effected many people and an event that people want to never happen again.

1. Kremlin plans to sit out on the centenary of the Russian Revolution because Russia is still too divided from the consequences of that year. Another reason is that Vladimir V.Putin hated the idea of the revolution and overthrowing the ruler.
2. Kremlin's preferred narrative of Russian history is that this event was a "unified march to greatness" The Russian Revolution does not fit in this because it celebrates the overthrowing of a ruler.
3. I think that  “We live in historical schizophrenia" means that people's view on a certain historical event is always changing. I think that mostly every country lives in historical schizophrenia, including the US because many people's views are always changing.

# data[].attributes.body
1. A historical event is worth celebrating years later if it impacted the world greatly and changed society in years to come. If it is something that brought sadness among the world, then it shouldn't be celebrated every year. But if the event was an accomplishment for a certain country, then it should be celebrated.

2. The event should be symbolic of an accomplishment for the country, so that it shows the younger generations how they succeeded years in the past. The event should symbolize a success for the country.

3. The event should have noteworthy effects, but they should be important things that improved the country for future years. The effects should not be negative things that impacted people badly, because that will be a negative holiday that will upset people and bring back bad memories.

4. The event should bring together the country or community. If it divided, that would cause conflict and sadness that would divide the country completely. So, the event should have been a positive experience that would make everyone come together.

5. It is not necessary for the event to have global repercussions.

6. An event that should be celebrated in years to come is 9/11 or the 2015 terrioritst attacks in Paris. These events have separated certain countries, but should be a time to come together and remember the lives of those who were affected.
_______________________
1. The official reason for the Kremlin Plan to "sit out the centenary" is because Russia is too divided because of the Revolution to celebrate the holiday. They are struggling with division from the consequences of that year. The more likely reason for them to not participate in the celebration is because Putin does not want to celebrate the act of overthrowing a ruler. He believes that revolution is not necessary.
2. Kremlin's preferred narrative of Russian history is that it was a successful "march to greatness". This puts in a sense of pride for Russia, which spreads nationalism. This is not accurate because the Revolution greatly affected Russia in a negative way, and he is leaving out the part about the overthrow of the Czar.
3. "We live in a historical schizophrenia" means that our society is out of order and confusing. We have different ideas that cause conflict, and the ideas constantly change and are affecting ideas daily. The United States lives in a schizophrenia because we have various ideas on every topic, which causes conflict.