# data[].attributes.body
There was no evidense at the scene which could proof her that she was the murderer.  From Lazza

# data[].attributes.body
We know she's guilty, but the evidence on the scene says other wise.

# data[].attributes.body
Mary Maloney is guilty because she killed her husband and try's to act as if someone else killed him and destroy's the murder weapon by feeding it the the cops.

# data[].attributes.body
There is no more proof she did it so she is innocent till proven guilty.

# data[].attributes.body
Mary Maloney is guilty because she killed her husband.

# data[].attributes.body
Mary Maloney is guilty because she killed her husband and try to act like she didnt do anything and tries to destory the murder weapon

# data[].attributes.body
Based on the evidence the police has she is clearly not guilty since they ate the evidence.

# data[].attributes.body
She is very guilty because she fueled by sadness and rage because he was leaving her and hit him in the head with a frozen leg of lamb, and it caused him to get killed. She also tried to get away with acting and everything, knowing the whole she was the real murderer, and the cops didn't even know.

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion, if you put it in a ' real life ' perspective, she isn't guilty. She is only one that knows she's guilty.  There was no evidence against her, therefore you can't blame her for murder or anything. But since we read the story and know how it went down ... then she is guilty for husbands death.

# data[].attributes.body
in my opinion this story went dark when she killed her husband but she is guilty.

# data[].attributes.body
Mary is guilty she had a plan for when the police came and at the end of the story she had destroyed all the evidence the could find on her by feeding the police the weapon she used to kill her husband .

# data[].attributes.body
Mary, is guilty because she killed her husband with a lamb just because he was leaving her. Then, she destroyed it by feeding it to the detectives, She was making them believe he was killed by piece of medal. Mary, had them searching for the wrong weapon when the entire time it's been right there in her kitchen.

# data[].attributes.body
She is not guilty because she convenience the police to eat the murder weapon that she killed her husband with so therefore the police doesn't have proof that she killed him and what she killed him with.

# data[].attributes.body
she is guilty she murdered her husband and even though her feelings where hurt doesn't mean he had to murder him.

# data[].attributes.body
Mary is guilty because she killed her husband only for the fact that he was leaving her. Mary could have handled the problem way easier if she would have thought of it. Also going into trouble and covering up the murder was putting her at risk of getting caught

# data[].attributes.body
I think she is guilty because she killed her husband just because he decided to leave her.

# data[].attributes.body
She may have lost her husband, was at risk of losing her child by a death sentence, and even cried for her husbands death, she still killed her husband for a weak reason, knew she killed him and felt nonchalant over, and even hides the murder weapon from the police, only only to have them consume it. Would that really define someone as innocent? Even if you put the term, Innocent until proven guilty in mind, if the person know's their guilty, no matter what others believe, she's guilty.

# data[].attributes.body
Based purely on evidence she is innocent because for one she has a solid alibi, and also because no murder weapon was found.