# data[].attributes.body
Stop: decoding, it takes a long time and it isn't something we'll have to do in practice so it isn't realistic

start: giving answers or more specific feedback on what the best treatment plan would be for each patient at the end of session 2 so we have a clearer idea on what you would actually do for each patient

continue: good group size, good length of tutorials, good amount of time between session 1 and 2, clinicians are helpful

# data[].attributes.body
Start - ask groups to have history decoded beforehand as helps to speed up the first session and makes easier to get the work started, I also think it would be good to get a model answer at the end so we can compare with our treatment plan, even though it may not be 100% as there are different ways to do things it would be a good indication
Continue - I think the tutorial times are sufficient if the history is decoded prior to the session

# data[].attributes.body
Stop- decoding the medical history, I dont think it adds anything and just takes up time
Start: groups should create a presentation or google doc collaboratively to go through in the 2nd session and then can be asked questions
continue: groups sizes were good

# data[].attributes.body
STOP- 45 minutes sometimes too short for 2nd session hour would be better
START- Decoding history or have it written out beforehand
Answers would be useful afterwards or even just somewhere to view what other treatment plans were made
Continue- good group size and time between sessions

# data[].attributes.body
STOP: the decoding is a bit frustrating especially with the way the codes are laid out like '1 b x i e j' it makes it really difficult to find. I understand it is to simulate taking a history but this could be replaced with us asking the member of staff the questions and taking the history ourselves which would probably be quicker and more beneficial. The staff member could also pick up if we missed anything out  which would be constructive for us as we can see deficiencies in our medical history taking

START: create model answers that can be released after the tutorial as I felt that I still wasn't quite sure of what the treatment plan was in both tutorials and if our group got it right or not. Also would be good to see other groups notes that the scribe took to see what other viewpoints were.

Continue: I'd say the time was enough  and groups were perfect size

# data[].attributes.body
START: do the decoding prior to the first tutorial as this up a lot of the tutorial time that would probably be better spent discussing the case and potential questions. model answers for the treatment plan would be helpful once the PBL was complete

CONTINUE: small enough groups (~8 people) meant everyone was involved. enough time to get through the points in enough detail so it allowed understanding of the topics

# data[].attributes.body
STOP: Nothing.

START: decoding the history off of zoom as it takes quite a long time (sometimes longer than the allocated time due to charting etc). It may be easier for everyone to prepare before the first PBL and then there would be more time to discuss potential questions and split these up in the group.

CONTINUE: The tutorial time is adequate for discussion and is helpful in our understanding of the topics.

# data[].attributes.body
STOP: Decoding the history during the PBL session. It takes too much time that could be used to discuss the case and come up with questions. It may be better to have the history decoded in our own time before the PBL or have the patient history stated included under case description.

START: Create an online document/presentation that all group members can access and edit (e.g., Google Docs, Google Slides). Group members can add their findings onto these prior to the second PBL session so all members can easily view everyone’s findings (and won’t get lost if they suddenly lose connection or have trouble keeping up with zoom discussions due to poor internet connection). This would also help out the scribe person a lot.

CONTINUE:
Coming up with questions and discussing them in relation to a patient case helps better our understanding of the topics.

# data[].attributes.body
Please consider putting down your thoughts to help us improve teaching.
Thinking about the Intellectual Impairment PBL you have just completed, please think of things we should STOP doing, START doing and CONTINUE doing for next year. Your colleagues will then vote on your anonymous comments!

# data[].attributes.body
STOP: 45 minutes per tutorial is too short.

START: Have groups create a power point in part 2 to present their findings.

CONTINUE: I enjoy decoding the history.