# data[].attributes.body
1. Please ensure you write your name in the title before posting.

2. After reading the answers in SLS, listen and observe the facilitation of the questioning done by the facilitator.

3. Write down your observations according to the questions:
- How were human connections made?
- Did the facilitator listen and ask probing questions?
- How were participants encouraged to voice their opinions, thoughts and feelings?
- Did the facilitator avoid short-circuiting the process by NOT zooming in on the "correct answer"? If so, how?

4. After you have done that, write down some ideas you have on how you will adapt this strategy for your own class.

# data[].attributes.body
Students were given a chance to comment on each others' responses using the comment function on SLS before facilitator select some of the comments to zoom in for further clarifications.

# data[].attributes.body
Giving students a chance to clarify with peers on their points. Asking students to elaborate.

# data[].attributes.body
Ask probing questions for students to come out with the answers. Draw students to conclusions.

# data[].attributes.body
She did not cut short. Instead she asked clarifying questions and does not pressure for correct/ model answers

# data[].attributes.body
Asking students how they feel about certain remarks.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, facilitator prompted the students to clarify and share their experiences in greater detail. She also get other students to provide feedback on the technique used in terms of dealing/reacting to such racist remarks.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, she did.

# data[].attributes.body
Students given enough time to input their thoughts before the teacher get students to share more about their details through questioning

# data[].attributes.body
Students were asked to share more about their personal experiences, and other students were given a chance to seek clarification regarding any of their friends’ experiences

# data[].attributes.body
yes, good questions.

# data[].attributes.body
validate students' remark. there is no wrong or right ans.

# data[].attributes.headline
Qu: students were given chances to speak out their own opinions on others' responses

# data[].attributes.subject
Qu: students were given chances to speak out their own opinions on others' responses

# data[].attributes.body
No. Facilitator is very brave to ask sensitive questions calmly.

# data[].attributes.body
Teacher gives wait time. Giving chance for others to repeat or clarify/paraphrase their point.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes

# data[].attributes.body
asking for comments and feelings

# data[].attributes.headline
Students discuss their views with each other.

# data[].attributes.subject
Students discuss their views with each other.

# data[].attributes.body
Get students' opinions and views

# data[].attributes.body
Teacher skillfully bring back students' discussion to the main point.

# data[].attributes.body
Calling on individual students to share more about their ideas.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes. She even asked other students to comment/give feedback on other students' comments, without making "statements" nor "opinions"

# data[].attributes.body
1. Giving students time to think about their opinions first.

2. Creating a safe environment where comments were not judged, but clarified.

# data[].attributes.body
Using poll features / menti to get students to share comments respectfully since majority of class aren't too keen on vocalising their opinions.

Using current happenings / social media posts (after carefully curating it) to help students be aware.

# data[].attributes.body
Involving students in clarifying the response given by the classmates.