# data[].attributes.headline
Changing slide 3 to menti (part 2) - allows greater participation

# data[].attributes.subject
Changing slide 3 to menti (part 2) - allows greater participation

# data[].attributes.body
Comprehension type questions may not be that suitable for our classes anymore. They are too easy. They are also more of Clarify questions. Maybe more of Sensitise questions can be given.

# data[].attributes.body
Include Menti for the 2 questions
Create word cloud.

# data[].attributes.body
Quite quiet class. Better responses through ICT tools

# data[].attributes.body
Clarify: Understanding the topic of discussion.
Sensitising: Perspective taking. (Ask students what will you feel if you are a disabled person who is asked to clear the table)
Influence: How will you influence people around you.

# data[].attributes.body
Slides 4 & 5

# data[].attributes.body
Would it be useful to add the rationale behind the change in policy at the start of the lesson?

# data[].attributes.body
Cleaners and hawkers' perspective are not included at the moment.  It would be good to have some videos (?) from Youtube etc that could show students' their view.

# data[].attributes.body
- We will not really change the slides but we will change the way of asking the students. Instead of just asking them to sift out the necessary information, we ask a more open ended question to get students to discuss and think abt why there are such rules. Eg. Ask them why only elderly, people with disabilities, children under 12 etc. are exempted? To get them to think of the rationales behind each rule.

# data[].attributes.body
F2F : Cognitive stimulus followed by role playing and perspective taking.
The group suggested to show a video/news clip showing people behaving in a hawker center - then ask students to take on different roles shown in the video (role play if the class is very dramatic) and discuss their perspectives based on the roles chosen (can share in mentimeter).

# data[].attributes.body
Slide 7 (line continuum) is kept to get the students' responses
Slide 8 (NEW) is showing a video of the mixed responses from the public (from youtube)
Slide 9 is modified to only 1 question "why do some people not clear their trays/plates/bowls?"

# data[].attributes.body
Slide 7 : Line Continuum
Assuming this lesson is conducted over Zoom, we could use other platform (eg padlet) to consolidate the responses of all the students, so that everyone can get their views heard.

Slide 8: Class Discussion
These questions should be discussed with the class before the "Line Continuum" so they have a bigger perspective before they make their stand.

# data[].attributes.body
Class Profile: Sec 1 Exp/NA

1. Have more CSI questions
Clarify Questions
i. What happened if someone does not clear the plates/trash on the table?
ii. When does the policy take place?
iii. What are the consequences of not returning your tray?

Sensitise Questions
i. How do you feel about the changes/policy?
ii. How will it affect you?
iii. What are some advantages/disadvantages of the policy?
iv. How do you think your other family members will react?

Influence Questions:
i. What can you do if you see the table is not cleared?
ii. Share an incident where you helped to clean the tables at hawker centres

2. If it is a quiet class, can consider using Padlet or Mentimeter to get their response instead

# data[].attributes.body
After slide 2, we will go straight to perspective taking on the policy.
- cleaner
- policy maker
- consumers
- hawkers

using CSI questioning techniques when the above groups present their perspectives to the rest of the class

# data[].attributes.body
Class profile: 1NA class

- Use e-Pedagogy to gather more responses to students (use mentimeter: first question: use poll function, second question: use word cloud so teachers don't have to manually synthesise responses)
- Change pet-peeves to something simpler
Questioning strategies to get students to elaborate on their responses, (CSI) particularly for the second question. Focus on sensitise.
- Why is this a problem?

Anticipate students who may ask challenging questions, but the slide won't result in students asking v challenging questions...?
However, they might get stuck on talking about mynahs and cockroaches (?) so we'll have to bring them back.

# data[].attributes.body
Class profile: 206 (2021)

Can use Mentimeter/ Padlet to gather students response.

(CSI) Sensitise Question:
How do you feel if they do not clear dirty trays, crockery and litter from their tables? (Mentimeter-use one word to describe yourself )

# data[].attributes.body
1. Select the slides you would like to edit and improve. Anticipate students' responses and consider the following tools:
- CSI questions
- ePedagogy features
- Consider your form class’ profile

2. Take a snapshot of your edited slide using the "Snipping tool".

3. Upload it on to Padlet

4. Explain the reasons for the change(s)

# data[].attributes.body
FIrst, we can elicit responses by asking students what they know about Tray Return.
We can use e-pedagogy to obtain more responses from students.
Based on their responses, we can show the videos