# data[].attributes.body
think if you were the king would you like to lose your job? probably not i imagine youd feel realy bad.

# data[].attributes.body
our opion is that it was unfair why did James cook took it from him self.

# data[].attributes.body
We think that

# data[].attributes.body
I think it would be the aboriginal`s that have right away  to clam  the land.

# data[].attributes.body
I do not think it was ok to just walk into Austalia and take over. I don't think they even asked.I'm wondering how the aborigines felt when they just took over. It was not fair to do that becaus it was already inhabited by the aborigines, not by england.They probably felt offended ond mad or sad.

# data[].attributes.body
We don't think that it was fair for Cook to claim the land when there were Natives in the area, and to lie to the whole of Britan and all of the English people.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that it was wrong to claim the land as the orders clearly state that they should claim it if the inhabitants agree that he can.
Picture of British attacking inhabitants:James Cook wanted to claim it for England and didn't want

# data[].attributes.body
that means

# data[].attributes.body
My group thinks that Captian Cook should have gone onto the island to see if anyone had claimed the land becuase

# data[].attributes.body
My opinion of the matter is simple. Cook had no right to claim the land on which there was inhabitants. It was clearly written in his instructions that he was to only claim it if it was unoccupied. Even though they both did not speak the same languge, Cook had no right to steal the land of peaceful people. Also many people thought it was good because they could just send covicts they should. His expidition also did bring fame but that was unnessesery for the matter.

# data[].attributes.body
Captain James Cook definitely didn't have the rights to claim the island due to reasons. James Cook

# data[].attributes.body
we decided that it wasn't appropriate because he went to claim a land that was already inhabited by the local aboriginals!
they shouldn't of claimed the land because it wasn't theirs and they didn't have the right to own it.
Also it is

# data[].attributes.body
I think he did not have the right to say that there was no one at Australia because the Aboriginies already had claimed the land

# data[].attributes.body
I think that he was wrong because he was told by the KING not to claim it so technically he should be a convict to!!!
p.s  they were very strict back then so even the king could be a convict if he got in trouble plus the king would lose his job.

# data[].attributes.body
we think that it was not the right thing to do because he had seen other people there (the Aboriginal natives)on the land that Cook claimed to be his/England's because

# data[].attributes.body
No! because. It is not fair that the natives were there first. And first of all it is the aboriginals feeding grounds and where there personal  and private home is. He should have not come and stolen their land and worst of all they were there first

# data[].attributes.body
WE THINK IT WAS NOT WIRTE IT WAS VERY MEAN AND HE  SHOULED OF BEEN SENT TO JAIL FOR LIFE AND I NOW SEE WHY THEY WERE SO MAD

# data[].attributes.body
We think that it is wrong to claim Australia for the English because it was already inhabited by humans and it shouldn't be use as dumping ground for convicts and criminals although, not all of the English people on Australia were convicts. A few of them were actually completely fine people that traveled the 3 year voyage by choice.
P.S. Cook also lied to the government about Australia being Uninhabited.