# data[].attributes.body
or the third year in a row, the ultra-low cost carrier had the lowest score in the travel report from the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI). Spirit scored a 61 on a 100-point scale.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
When it comes to customer satisfaction among airline passengers, Spirit Airlines ranks dead last.

For the third year in a row, the ultra-low cost carrier had the lowest score in the travel report from the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI). Spirit scored a 61 on a 100-point scale.

Spirit is known for its "bare fares" -- cheap tickets that are stripped of any additional amenities. That means passengers will pay for things like printing a boarding pass at the airport or beverages during a flight.

Spirit said it's made substantial strides in the past year.

"Spirit's committed to improve its operations and customer service," a company spokesman told CNNMoney. "Beginning last spring, Spirit initiated a number of programs that have led to major improvements in on-time performance and a 64% reduction in complaints year over year."

Coming in just ahead of Spirit was ultra-low cost carrier Frontier Airlines with a score of 63. They were the only two airlines to see their scores drop this year.

Related: Trump's travel policies hurting 'U.S. brand' and discouraging tourists, experts say

Overall, passenger satisfaction across the airline industry is up 4.2% in the last year, climbing to a score of 75, up from 72 in 2016.

JetBlue Airways is the passenger favorite, improving around 2% thanks in part to its lowticket prices and upgraded cabins.

Southwest Airlines came in second place, with the same score as last year.

While low ticket prices do play a key role in customer satisfaction, there's a fine line with what passengers will put up with.

"JetBlue and Southwest have found the sweet spot when it comes to discounting to a certain extent to make passengers appreciative of the lower cost and cutting back on some of the amenities that aren't particular pain points for fliers," said David VanAmburg, managing director at ACSI.

Legacy carriers saw big improvements as they work to better compete with the low-cost carriers by offering basic economy tickets and bringing back amenities like free snacks and in-flight entertainment.

Related: Delta will pay you up to $10,000 to give up your seat

American has spent around $20 billion on new aircraft in the last four years, according to the report. During that time, its passenger satisfaction has increased by 15%.

United Airlines, fresh off a PR disaster after a passenger was forcibly removed from a plane, saw the least improvement of the legacy carriers with a score of 70.

The report is based on customer interviews over a 12-month period that ended in March, so responses didn't capture recent high-profile incidents like United's, or Delta's awful weekend of massive flight cancellations brought on by bad weather.

"We expect Delta to be hurt more than United , if for no other reason than the Delta cancellations impacted thousands of passengers, while United, while obviously a very horrific incident, was with one passenger," said VanAmburg.

Here's how the airlines ranked, according to the report:

JetBlue: 82, +2%

Southwest: 80, 0%

Alaska: 78, +1%

American: 76, +6%

Delta: 76, +7%

All Others: 74, 0%

Allegiant: 71, +9%

United: 70, 3%

Frontier: 63, -5%

Spirit: 61, -2%

CNNMoney (New York) First published April 25, 2017: 12:13 PM ET

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
This is America's least favorite airline (hint: it's not United)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
For the third year in a row, the ultra-low cost carrier had the lowest score in the travel report from the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI). Spirit scored a 61 on a 100-point scale. Spirit is known for its "bare fares" -- cheap tickets that are stripped of any additional amenities.

# data[].attributes.body
A British tourist was left fearing for his life when he was detained in Egypt for carrying a common electronics device-- an iPod amplifier.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
A British tourist was left fearing for his life when he was detained in Egypt for carrying a common electronics device-- an iPod amplifier.

Robert Lapham, 54, and his wife Julie, were returning to their home in Kent, England, when Lapham-- a father of three-- was stopped by Egyptian security forces at Marsa Alam airport, who reportedly suspected the homemade amplifier was a bomb.

The couple, who are regular visitors to Egypt, were enjoying a week-long diving trip in Marsa Alam when the holiday turned into the nightmare experience which left Lapham detained in a small cell for 75 hours.

"We knew the new airport legislation had come into force and it was the first flight back to the UK to have the new security arrangements so we put in everything with a screen in our suitcases," Lapham told his local newspaper, Kent Live.
WORLD'S SHORTEST FLIGHT IS COMING TO AN END
"We were going through security as normal when my headphone amplifier was picked up by security, they wanted to know what it was. I plugged it in, showed them how it worked and tried to explain."

But the explanation wasn't enough and Lapham was escorted out of the airport by what he described as "national security forces."

"When they stopped my mind went numb, I was told nothing and they would not speak to me," he recounted to Kent Live.

"I was absolutely terrified. It started me thinking I could possibly be shot."

But the van continued on to a police station where papers were exchanged before driving further to El Quseir, where a state prosecutor held a hearing.

The prosecutor agreed the device could be used to detonate a bomb but was satisfied that was not the case in this situation. However, Lapham was then detained in a holding cell until he could purchase departure tickets.

"He heard evidence from security forces and I answered what questions I was asked (via translator)," Lapham said.

"I thought we would be heading back to the hotel but we went to the original police station and I was put into a holding cell."

Lapham's wife, however, was escorted back to the hotel.
FOLLOW US ON FACEBOOK FOR MORE FOX LIFESTYLE NEWS
Lapham, who suffers with arthritis, was forced to stand in the tiny cell which didn't even have a toilet. After three days, he was finally released and allowed to fly home.

But even after the whole terrifying ordeal, the couple said they would still travel back to Egypt.

"We love the country, the snorkelling and diving and the people are great. This incident was something unfortunate," Lapham said.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Traveler detained in Egypt after iPod amplifier mistaken for bomb

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
A British tourist was left fearing for his life when he was detained in Egypt for carrying a common electronics device-- an iPod amplifier. Robert Lapham, 54, and his wife Julie, were returning to their home in Kent, England, when Lapham-- a father of three-- was stopped by Egyptian security forces at Marsa Alam airport, who reportedly suspected the homemade amplifier was a bomb.

# data[].attributes.body
The Royals have lost there second game.

# data[].attributes.headline
danaya vann -Man wrongfully convicted in coldest murder case wants name cleared

# data[].attributes.subject
danaya vann -Man wrongfully convicted in coldest murder case wants name cleared

# data[].attributes.body
A man wrongfully convicted of the 1957 murder of a little girl returns to a courtroom in his childhood hometown Thursday to ask a judge to clear his name for good.

# data[].attributes.body
Senate Dems filibuster Gorsuch, teeing up ‘nuclear’ showdown

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Senate Republicans deployed the so-called "nuclear option" Thursday in their drive to confirm Judge Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court, dramatically changing the way the Senate does business in order to overcome a Democratic filibuster.

In a fast-paced chain of events that clears the way for Gorsuch to be confirmed by Friday morning, majority Republicans changed Senate precedent so that a high court nominee can advance to a final vote with a simple majority of 51 senators, as opposed to 60.

By Senate standards, this was ground-shaking.

Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., declared he did so to "restore norms" and get past what he called an "unprecedented" Democratic filibuster.

Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., countered that the changes could send the Senate and the nomination process "over the cliff."

Republicans succeeded in making the change on a party-line vote Thursday afternoon. The body then swiftly took another, 55-45 vote to end debate and tee up a final confirmation vote expected at 11:30 a.m. ET Friday.

This was after Democrats initially blocked Gorsuch in a filibuster earlier in the day. Four Democrats broke ranks -- Sens. Michael Bennet, D-Colo.; Heidi Heitkamp, D-N.D.; Joe Donnelly, D-Ind.; and Joe Manchin, D-W.Va. - but Republicans still fell short of the 60 votes needed to proceed, prompting McConnell to overhaul the way the Senate works.

He said he did so "for the sake of our country."

Bennet later opposed Gorsuch on the do-over vote.

While congressional Republicans and President Trump are now virtually guaranteed to get Gorsuch on the high court, the impact of the events that played out Thursday could be felt for years, if not decades, to come. Each party blamed the other for the escalation and the breakdown in the Senate's parliamentary decorum.

Indeed, McConnell's predecessor as Senate majority leader Harry Reid, now retired, took the first step down the "nuclear" road by lowering the threshold for other nominees in 2013 - a controversial move Republicans frequently brought up on the road to Thursday's proceedings.

But lowering the threshold for a Supreme Court pick is a more significant step. It means for the foreseeable future, the minority party will have significantly less leverage to oppose any nominee to the highest court in the land, no matter who is president.

Schumer said there will be "less faith in the Supreme Court" going forward.

McConnell, kicking off Thursday's session, blasted Democrats for the filibuster attempt and accused them of driving the upper chamber to this point. He said their opposition to Gorsuch isn't about the nominee but "the man who nominated him" - and part of an "extreme escalation in the left's never-ending drive to politicize the courts and the confirmation process."

Republicans say Democrats have been unfair to an otherwise eminently qualified nominee and have wrongly cast him as an ideologue.

However, despite exhaustive confirmation hearings where Gorsuch, like many nominees before him, declined to take clear stances on hot-button issues, Democrats largely are convinced he would be a staunch conservative in the mold of the late Antonin Scalia, whose seat he would fill on the nine-member court. They pointed to past rulings on cases where he sided with businesses against workers, though his allies maintain he was merely applying the law as written. Democrats also are still furious over Republicans' refusal to consider former President Barack Obama's nominee, Merrick Garland.

Democrats, meanwhile, howled over the GOP majority's move to deploy the "nuclear option" to get Gorsuch approved in the end. They warn it will drastically change the way the Senate operates for the worse.

"It doesn't have to be this way," Schumer said. "The answer is not to change the rules, it's to change the nominee."

He also said Gorsuch "may very well turn out to be one of the most conservative justices on the bench."

The actual deployment of the nuclear option was cloaked in obscure parliamentary-speak.

McConnell, after the initial Democratic filibuster, asked for a simple majority vote "on all nominations."

The presiding officer said the point of order was not sustained. McConnell, with seven fateful words, said: "I appeal the ruling of the chair."

His party backed him, eliminating the 60-vote requirement for Supreme Court nominees.
Fox News' Chad Pergram contributed to this report.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Republicans go 'nuclear,' bust through Democratic filibuster on Gorsuch

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Senate Republicans deployed the so-called "nuclear option" Thursday in their drive to confirm Judge Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court, dramatically changing the way the Senate does business in order to overcome a Democratic filibuster.

# data[].attributes.body
Delta buys pizza for passengers after canceling 300 flights

# data[].attributes.body
the royals have lost two games

# data[].attributes.body
It is now illegal to share pictures of Putin as a gay clown in Russia.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
The Justice Ministry in Moscow has included one of them among a registry of "extremist materials," along with others such as anti-Semitic and racist pictures and slogans.

The punishment for offenders who distribute, retweet or share the image is 15 days in prison or a fine of 3,000 rubles ($53).

Images of Putin, often with rouged cheeks and eye shadow, have been online since 2011 -- and have had much wider circulation since 2013 in protest over what became known as Russia's gay propaganda law. They are widely known online as the "gay clown" meme -- although not all the images resemble clowns.

The law, which describes homosexuality as "non-traditional sexual relations," bars the public discussion of gay rights and relationships anywhere children might hear it. It has been fiercely opposed by gay rights groups in Russia and beyond as well as by other human rights groups and the political opposition in Russia.

The circulation of the images first came before the courts last year in Tver, a city northwest of Moscow.

A man called Alexander Tsvetkov was charged with incitement of hatred or enmity for sharing several images on his VK social media page. VK is the Russian equivalent of Facebook.

The images featured hostile postings about immigrants and soldiers in Nazi uniform. But they also included what the court described as "a poster with the image of a man resembling the president of the Russian Federation V.V. Putin, wearing face makeup -- painted eyelashes and lips."

The court added that, according to Tsvetkov, the image hints at "an allegedly non-standard sexual orientation of the Russian president."

Tsvetkov was convicted but wasn't ordered to pay a fine or do time in prison. Instead, he was committed to a psychiatric institution, and it's unknown whether he has since been released.

Referring to the Justice Ministry's inclusion of the image in its registry, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said this week: "You know how such things might hurt somebody's feelings, but the President is quite resistant to such obscenity and learned how to not pay attention."

It was only in 1993 and the collapse of the Soviet Union that Russia relaxed laws that banned homosexuality.

But it wasn't until six years later that homosexuality was dropped from a list of psychiatric disorders in Russia.

CNN's Mary Ilyushina wrote and reported from Moscow and Tim Lister from St. Petersburg, Russia.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.keywords[]
russia bans images of putin linked to 'gay clown' meme - cnn

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Russia bans images of Putin linked to 'gay clown' meme

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The Justice Ministry in Moscow has included one of them among a registry of "extremist materials," along with others such as anti-Semitic and racist pictures and slogans. The punishment for offenders who distribute, retweet or share the image is 15 days in prison or a fine of 3,000 rubles ($53).

# data[].attributes.headline
Jai Bullock  a woman fell off a 60 feet Foresthill bridge while taking a selfie in california  on tuesday this is the highest bridge in california 

# data[].attributes.subject
Jai Bullock  a woman fell off a 60 feet Foresthill bridge while taking a selfie in california  on tuesday this is the highest bridge in california 

# data[].attributes.body
More than 8,000 Uber and Lyft drivers fail Massachusetts background check

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
More than 8,000 current and recent Uber and Lyft drivers in Massachusetts have been banned from driving in the state under new, stricter background check regulations.

In November, the ride-sharing companies agreed to let the state run its own background checks as part of a deal that would let Lyft and Uber drivers service Logan Airport.

More than 70,000 drivers applied for the checks. The results of the state's first screening were announced on Wednesday, and more than 10% of applicants did not pass.

The most common reason for rejecting drivers was a previous suspended license. More than 1,500 drivers were rejected for a violent crime charge. Other reasons for denial included various driving offenses, felony convictions, and sex, abuse and exploitation. The state also identified 51 sex offenders.

Not all the rejections were for legal reasons. Many drivers had not held a license long enough to qualify under the new rules. Others had an inactive license.

In a statement, governor Charlie Baker said Massachusetts has "set a national standard for driver safety."

Uber and Lyft typically rely on their own background checks, looking for disqualifying offenses in the past seven years. Massachusetts checks are different in a few key ways, according to Massachusetts criminal defense attorney Johanna Griffiths.

They look at a drivers' entire lifetime instead of just the past seven years. They also include people who had a "continuance without a finding" on their record. Also called a CWOF, it's a type of plea deal that lets defendants avoid a guilty conviction.

Related: Pittsburgh's rocky relationship with Uber takes another turn

One of Griffith's clients is a pediatric nurse at a Boston hospital who drives for ride-hailing companies on the side. He did not pass the state background check because of a 25-year-old CWOF for assault and battery he received after a fight with a family member.

Lyft says the seven-year cap is why it did not find the same drivers in its own checks.

"Under Massachusetts law, Lyft's commercial background check provider, like all consumer reporting agencies, is legally prevented from looking back further than seven years into driver applicants' histories. The state does not face the same limitation, which likely explains why a small percentage of our drivers failed the state's background check while passing ours," said Lyft in a statement.

Even though it previously agreed to the background checks, Uber is not happy with the results.

"The new screening includes an unfair and unjust indefinite lookback period that has caused thousands of people in Massachusetts to lose access to economic opportunities," said Uber in a statement. "We have a chance to repair the current system in the rules process so that people who deserve to work are not denied the opportunity."

Massachusetts passed legislation last summer that included a number of new rules for companies like Uber, such as inspection and insurance requirements. Ride-hailing companies have until 2018 to comply with the law, so there may still time to change the rules. Public hearings are scheduled for May.

CNNMoney (San Francisco) First published April 5, 2017: 7:58 PM ET

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
More than 8,000 Uber and Lyft drivers fail Massachusetts background check

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
In November, the ride-sharing companies agreed to let the state run its own background checks as part of a deal that would let Lyft and Uber drivers service Logan Airport. More than 70,000 drivers applied for the checks. The results of the state's first screening were announced on Wednesday, and more than 10% of applicants did not pass.

# data[].attributes.body
a man who was at a city council meeting in Portland approached Mayor Ted Wheeler with a can of Pepsi causing a brief moment of panic on Wednesday.

# data[].attributes.body
Florida Prepares to Apologize for Horrors at Boys’ School

# data[].attributes.body
Donald Trump Blasted ‘Celebrity Apprentice’ Because Schwarzenegger Did Not Vote For Him, Star Says

# data[].attributes.body
Russell Westbrook broke the record for the most triple-doubles.

# data[].attributes.body
Woman falls off Northern California bridge while taking selfie

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Yesterday afternoon, a female and a group of her friends from the Sacramento area were walking on the girders underneath the Foresthill Bridge in violation of Placer County Code 12.04.190 and Penal Code 602. The female attempted to take a selfie and fell from the girders landing on the trail approximately 60 feet below.

# data[].attributes.body
Woman falls off californias highest bridge while taking a selfie

# data[].attributes.body
Pepsi’s Tone-Deaf Kendall Jenner Ad Co-opting the Resistance Is Getting Clobbered

# data[].attributes.body
Tony Romo announced his retirement

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
No one has passed for more yardage or more touchdowns in a Dallas Cowboys uniform than Tony Romo. Not Troy Aikman, Roger Staubach, Danny White or Don Meredith.

But Romo has apparently completed his last pass for the team. After losing his starting job last season, he is retiring as a player to become the lead football analyst for CBS Sports, replacing Phil Simms.

CBS announced the hiring on Tuesday and said that Romo would join the play-by-play man Jim Nantz and the sideline reporter Tracy Wolfson on the lead announcing team. "We know Tony will quickly develop into a terrific analyst," the news release said.

On Tuesday afternoon, Romo posted on Twitter a photograph of himself in a CBS blazer with the message, "I guess it's time to start dressing up."

CBS's announcement acknowledged Simms, who has been its lead N.F.L. analyst for 20 years. "We are discussing with Phil his future role with CBS Sports," it said.

Romo played for the Cowboys for 13 seasons and compiled a 78-49 record as a starter, but, unlike Aikman and Staubach, he never won a Super Bowl. In fact, he was never on a team that produced a decent playoff run, going 2-4 in his career. As a result, he will probably always sit just below the top quarterbacks in the Cowboys pantheon.

But playoff failures are not the reason the Cowboys cut him. They had plenty of other reasons. Chief among them was the emergence of Dak Prescott, the rookie who stepped in last season when Romo was injured and put up huge numbers for the 13-3 Cowboys.

Romo will be 37 at the start of next season, and he has struggled to stay on the field of late, managing only four games in 2015 and only four passes in 2016. After missing the first 10 weeks of last season with a back injury, he returned, but Prescott had been so impressive that Romo did not get his job back.

Nonetheless, there were some suitors who had hoped to get something out of Romo's twilight years. Romo was a four-time Pro Bowl selection and could have provided veteran leadership to a young team or been the final piece of the puzzle for a team close to the top prize. Most of the speculation recently centered on the Broncos and the Texans.

Denver, which struggled with Trevor Siemian last season, and Houston, whose big-money signing of Brock Osweiler was a bust, will now have to look elsewhere.

Still, Romo has been good enough recently enough that some wondered if he would return, if the offer was right. Starting quarterbacks get injured, and teams have been known to have midseason quarterback crises. Veteran players are also known to have second thoughts about retirement - ask Brett Favre.

Romo has certainly been the most speculated-about player in this off-season, linked with a dozen or more teams at one time or another. The Browns, the Redskins, the Chiefs, the Jets and the 49ers were all linked with him. It seemed likely that there would be a job for him somewhere.

Instead, he retires ranked 21st in career passing touchdowns, with 248, sandwiched between the standouts Drew Bledsoe and Boomer Esiason. But like them, he will be remembered for never winning a Super Bowl as a starter.

Romo played college football at Eastern Illinois. In a year in which quarterbacks Carson Palmer, Byron Leftwich, Kyle Boller and Rex Grossman were all taken in the first round of the draft, Romo was bypassed by every team through all seven rounds in 2003.

The Cowboys signed him to a free-agent contract, and he sat on the bench for three years behind Quincy Carter, Vinny Testaverde and Drew Bledsoe before finally taking over as starter in 2006. His elevation led to a reversal of fortune for the Cowboys. They had made the playoffs just once in the previous six seasons. Under Romo, they made it in three of four years, including in 13- and 11-win seasons. But they won just one playoff game.

After a fallow period, Romo had a last hurrah in 2014, making the Pro Bowl and leading the Cowboys to a 12-4 record. But the team tripped up in the playoffs again, losing to the Packers in the divisional round.

A version of this article appears in print on , on Page B8 of the New York edition with the headline: Romo Retires to Join CBS as an Analyst. Order Reprints | Today's Paper | Subscribe

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Tony Romo Retires From N.F.L. and Heads to CBS, Replacing Simms

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
No one has passed for more yardage or more touchdowns in a Dallas Cowboys uniform than Tony Romo. Not Troy Aikman, Roger Staubach, Danny White or Don Meredith. But Romo has apparently completed his last pass for the team.

# data[].attributes.body
McDonald's is considering the return of the Szechuan sauce that was introduced in 1998 thanks to Rick and Morty

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
CLOSE

McDonald's says, "We can never say never" when it comes to bringing back their special Szechuan sauce.

The fast food chain's discontinued sauce became a topic of conversation this week, after it was highlighted in a surprise April 1 episode of Adult Swim's Rick and Morty. In the show, time-traveling scientist Rick Sanchez admitted that his sole motivation in life is "finding that McNugget sauce."

"Nine more seasons until I get that dipping Szechuan sauce, or 97 more years, Morty!" Sanchez said, foaming at the mouth.

Though the sauce in question hasn't been available at McDonald's since it was a promotional item for the animated Mulan, Rick and Morty fans are petitioning for the sauce to come back, watching tutorials about how to make it and tweeting at McDonald's to consider adding the dip back to the menu. The move would be especially well-timed with a live-action Mulan coming to theaters in 2018.

So, will fans be satiated?

Terri Hickey, a spokesperson for McDonald's, said in a statement to USA TODAY that revisiting the sauce wasn't out of the question.

"We never say never, because when our customers speak, we listen," Hickey said, before making a Rick and Morty reference. "And to paraphrase some of our most enthusiastic fans, our sauce is so good that it would be worth waiting 9 seasons or 97 years for."

The McDonald's Twitter also featured a reply to the Rick and Morty writers' account, with a show pun that made some people uncomfortable.

Corporate McDonald's chef Mike Haracz (who appears in the restaurant's recent April Fools' Day video) said on Twitter, "I'll see what I can do" about sharing the recipe.

Read or Share this story: http://usat.ly/2nVj6J9

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
McDonald's listens to 'Rick and Morty' fans who want the Szechuan sauce back

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
CLOSE McDonald's says, "We can never say never" when it comes to bringing back their special Szechuan sauce. The fast food chain's discontinued sauce became a topic of conversation this week, after it was highlighted in a surprise April 1 episode of Adult Swim's Rick and Morty.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
A Dutch retailer has been forced to apologise after it unwittingly sold a colour-by-numbers book featuring Adolf Hitler.

The dictator was pictured making a Nazi salute and wearing a Swastika armband.

Kruidvat, the Dutch drugstore chain stocking it, said they "deeply regretted the incident" and immediately withdrew the product.

The book was produced in India and it is remains unclear why Hitler was included.

"My suspicion is that the man who created the colouring book got a book of famous people out of the closet and selected a pair, which unfortunately included Adolf Hitler. Maybe he did not recognize him," a spokesperson for the Belgian publisher Trifora told local media.

The publisher explained the book, Kleuren op Code, included significant historical figures such as Nelson Mandela, Albert Einstein and Abraham Lincoln.
India Hitler shop to change name
"It is a nasty combination of circumstances. We check the book on translations, but do not check all the colouring pictures," the spokesperson said.

The Dutch retailer was only alerted after the book had gone on sale and shocked parents began posting comments on social media.

One parent posted an image of the page with the caption: "Nice, your colouring book!"

Another customer called it a "disgrace" on the company's Facebook page.

Kruidvat said it was only on sale for half a day and was immediately removed from shelves when the problem came to light.

The company said it was investigating how the image ended up in the book and was offering full refunds to customers who bought copies.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
A Dutch retailer has been forced to apologise after it unwittingly sold a colour-by-numbers book featuring Adolf Hitler. The dictator was pictured making a Nazi salute and wearing a Swastika armband. Kruidvat, the Dutch drugstore chain stocking it, said they "deeply regretted the incident" and immediately withdrew the product.

# data[].attributes.body
woman falls off of Californians highest bridge and had to be lifted off in a helicopter and she suffered from she was knocked unconscious a deep gash in her arm and fractured bones which will have to have sugary she fell off of a 60 ft bridge

# data[].attributes.body
Trump meets Xi: What's at stake

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
President Donald Trump and China's President Xi Jinping meet for the first time Thursday and will seek to forge a connection and to stabilize the world's most important diplomatic relationship, despite a gulf between them in experience, temperament and global outlook.

Both have a long way to come to meet in the middle.

Trump, the brash, outspoken, political novice who seems to give little mind to policy details, anchored his campaign on China bashing. He once warned that China had committed "rape" against the US economy and tweeted that global warming was a Chinese ruse to damage US manufacturing.

Xi, though more prone to depart from his talking points than his predecessor Hu Jintao, spent decades navigating treacherous Communist Party politics, and speaks in the formal diction of Chinese statesmanship, where words and linguistic formulae for defining diplomatic relationships matter above all.

Xi is the most powerful Chinese leader in decades, and is flexing Chinese power in Asia on behalf of a nation still on the ascent.

Trump's political position is far more precarious. He's the most unpopular new American president since pollsters began assessing approval ratings. He took office at a time when US power in Asia is seen to be ebbing, to China's advantage. And the President's decision to pull the United States out of the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal might have been seen as a win by his supporters, but was seen in Asia as a harbinger of a US retreat.

But despite their differences, when the two leaders sit down at Trump's luxury club at Mar-a-Lago they will have share one thing that might help them forge common experience -- the summit requires both to navigate delicate domestic politics.

What Xi needs

Xi, despite establishing a firm grip on his country during his first five-year mandate, is maneuvering ahead of the next Communist Party Congress in the fall, that he hopes to use to solidify his power for his second five-year term.

He therefore needs a smooth summit that will avoid rocking the international system or the markets in a way that could threaten political stability back home -- where despite China's growing power in its own right, management of the relationship with Washington is still one of the most important legacy items for Chinese leaders. And Xi, his strong political position notwithstanding, is not without enemies, partly due to the ferocity of his anti-corruption campaign targeting bloated Communist Party cadres.

He has little room for missteps in his summit with Trump so may have an interest in accommodating the US leader.

Xi must at all costs head off a destabilizing trade war -- one possibility if Trump follows through on his threats to impose tariffs on Chinese goods.

Yet should Trump come out with guns blazing on issues like the economy and China's failure to do more to rein in North Korea, Xi will also be under pressure to respond in kind, making the mood of the summit difficult to predict.

"He would want to avoid any sense that he had been humiliated," said Gideon Rachman, chief foreign affairs columnist of the Financial Times and author of a new book "Easternization" about Asia's rise and the ebbing of power to the region from America and the West.

"Xi's whole shtick ... is that he is the man who is going to deliver the great rejuvenation of the Chinese people. China under him has clearly become tougher in its outlook to the rest of the world," Rachman added. "If he were to appear to have been faced down by Trump ... that would be difficult for him."

What Trump needs

Trump has his own reasons to hope for a successful summit. Seventy plus days in, his presidency is in a state of crisis -- often because of the actions, comments and tweets of the President himself. The world is deeply curious about how he will lead, and foreign leaders are on alert for any signs of weakness or indications that he is not up to the job of President.

Trump has also created a political box for himself. He's under pressure to make good on his own campaign trail promises to turn the US trading relationship with China on its head. And he warned ahead of the summit that it could be a rocky one because of what he sees as disparities in the economic relationship.

"The meeting next week with China will be a very difficult one in that we can no longer have massive trade deficits," Trump wrote on Twitter.

Trump is meanwhile warning that if China doesn't crack down on its ally North Korea of its ballistic missile and nuclear program, Washington will take unspecified steps that Beijing might oppose.

But in other areas, Trump has already significantly softened his approach towards the Asian giant. He for example failed to honor his vow to designate Beijing a currency manipulator on day one of his administration and has taken no significant steps to reorient an imbalance in trading flows.

The President has already bowed to Chinese demands that he agree to abide by the "One China" policy, after he suggested he could use the status of US relations with Taiwan as a bargaining chip in trade talks with Beijing.

Washington has also softened its rhetoric on China's territorial muscling in the South China Sea -- there has been no repeat of Secretary of State Rex Tillerson's warning in his confirmation hearing that China might need to be blocked from artificial islands it has built in the region.

Will Trump's unpredictability help him?

In fact, there is some confusion around the world as to exactly what US policy towards China actually is.

"I think it's a mess, I think they are all over the place. Maybe the significance of this summit is that we will finally get a steer as to which way they are heading," said Rachman.

In one sense, that uncertainty over Trump's intentions, as well as his inexperience and lack of a long-term grounding in US-China relations, may give the US leader a paradoxical advantage, in that the Chinese side cannot be sure exactly what approach he will take and how he will behave and whether he will stick to the diplomatic frameworks that have defined US-China relations for decades.

Americans who have spent time in Beijing says that the Chinese leadership -- like much of the rest of the world -- is still trying to figure Trump out.

To begin with, these analysts say, China viewed Trump as the kind of Republican who talked tough on the campaign trail but would settle into conventional behavior towards Beijing once he recognized the stakes, as president. His history as a businessman furthered an impression that the new US leader was someone who would look to bargain and seek deals.

But Trump's decision to accept a telephone call from Taiwanese President Tsai Ing-wen -- becoming the first president or president-elect to do so -- shook Chinese leaders and led them to question their initial assumptions and to game out the potential for a more adversarial relationship with the United States.

"From the Chinese point of view, there is real uncertainty about what to expect from Trump. They are not sure," said Aaron Friedberg, a professor of politics and international affairs at Princeton University, who formerly worked in the office of Vice President Dick Cheney.

"I think they worry that the new administration could be tougher and/or less predictable than its predecessor. At the same time, they do continue to talk about Trump as a deal maker, Trump as a pragmatist, they see him as more potentially more flexible, less ideological and therefore someone with whom they can make a deal," he said.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.keywords[]
donald trump and xi jinping: what's at stake - cnnpolitics

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
President Donald Trump and China's President Xi Jinping meet for the first time Thursday and will seek to forge a connection and to stabilize the world's most important diplomatic relationship, despite a gulf between them in experience, temperament and global outlook. Both have a long way to come to meet in the middle.

# data[].attributes.headline
Mr. Kohl-  Yesterday, US Soccer shook on a new deal to give the US women’s national team better pay and benefits. Last year, the US women’s team filed a complaint against US Soccer for seriously shortchanging them compared to the men’s team.

# data[].attributes.subject
Mr. Kohl-  Yesterday, US Soccer shook on a new deal to give the US women’s national team better pay and benefits. Last year, the US women’s team filed a complaint against US Soccer for seriously shortchanging them compared to the men’s team.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
"We tried to completely change the methodology for how to define our value, and we made progress in that regard, and it changes the equation for the future," said Becca Roux, the union's executive director.

Sunil Gulati, the president of U.S. Soccer, portrayed the agreement as a shared victory, an "equitable" deal that he said recognized the team's achievements and kept U.S. Soccer at the forefront of the continuing fight for gender equity in soccer worldwide.

"We've always had the most highly compensated women's team in the world, and this puts them at even higher level," Gulati said. "Their performance over all over the last quarter-century has put them at the top of their game. Financially the agreement gives the players security in a way that they haven't had before and adds a number of other things that were very important to them.

"So we're very pleased to continue being at the forefront of the women's game internationally."

Happy an agreement has been reached. https://t.co/roXWP5YInh
- Carli Lloyd (@CarliLloyd) April 5, 2017

pic.twitter.com/G941W08UC8
- Sunil Gulati (@sunilgulati) April 5, 2017

Gulati noted that the deal's five-year term, through 2021, ensured that the next negotiation would not become an issue for the team in its next major competitions, the 2019 World Cup in France and the 2020 Tokyo Olympics. He also revealed that U.S. Soccer had agreed to pay the players for two years' worth of unequal per-diem payments, the result of improvements in the men's C.B.A. that were not accounted for in the women's version.

But while the deal was completed this week, it was forged over the past four months, during which the players took active control of their side of the negotiations with a team of U.S. Soccer negotiators - including Gulati - who had long been eager to do what they called an equitable deal but had bristled at the way the union went about it.

Initially, the talks had been framed as a simple equal-pay debate, a powerful wedge issue that hung over the talks from the start. It resulted in a lawsuit against the players' union by the federation to enforce the old collective bargaining agreement but also in a federal wage-discrimination complaint signed by five top players that will continue even with the new C.B.A. complete.

Those legal fights were the most public salvos in what the top women's players had come to view as a yearslong fight for respect and equal treatment. After the United States won the Women's World Cup in 2015, in the richest year in team history, a group of players fueled by simmering resentments - artificial turf fields, travel in coach class, unequal per-diem payments - demanded that the union fight to win the richer contracts the group felt the players had earned.

The cause of equal pay seemed a successful strategy; it put U.S. Soccer in the awkward position of defending what was effectively unequal pay for the same work, and it received wide news media coverage as well as the support of athletes and celebrities and even Hillary Clinton, who tweeted her support during the 2016 presidential campaign. But the tactic also proved divisive, forcing fans of the national teams to take sides in an increasingly nasty fight, and it hurt feelings inside the close-knit world of U.S. Soccer, especially after some women's players - riding high after their World Cup title - denigrated the on-field record of the men's team while pushing their cause.

With the union's negotiators and U.S. Soccer barely on speaking terms late last year, the women's players fired their lawyer and restructured the union's leadership. The goal was to change the tone of the talks and, with the players more involved, to pivot toward a solution that veteran voices on the team soon came to call "equitable and fair" pay - a subtle but important shift.

Gulati, in a telephone interview on Wednesday morning, said the change in leadership, and in tone, had quickly opened the door to the discussions that produced a deal.

An amazing photo on multiple levels: inside the USWNT labor talks Saturday (from team's since deleted Instagram story): pic.twitter.com/hjU5QPJ9Uf
- Andrew Das (@AndrewDasNYT) April 5, 2017

In addition to seeking improved, but not necessarily equal, pay, the players began to press for changes that they saw as vital to the long-term growth of their game. Those changes, they argued in detailed slide presentations during increasingly frequent negotiating sessions, would improve the game outside the narrow ecosystem of the national team and also establish a structure to support both their careers and those of the next generation of American women.

As a result, the new agreement includes commitments from U.S. Soccer for its continued support of the domestic professional league, the N.W.S.L., as well as requirements that the federation improve standards in the league and - through sizable increases in camp and roster bonuses for players not under contract with U.S. Soccer - transfer money to players who exist on the periphery of the more established national team pool.

The agreement also reinforces the national team players' commitment to the N.W.S.L. through their league salaries, while at the same time establishing a mechanism for them to pursue opportunities abroad, as players like Carli Lloyd and Crystal Dunn (in England) and Morgan (in France) have done in recent months.

The final breakthrough came last weekend in Dallas, when as many as 16 players - dressed in matching team gear in a row of chairs only feet from the negotiating table - took part in two days of marathon discussions with Gulati and U.S. Soccer representatives. Helpful timing - the players were together in camp ahead of two friendlies against Russia this week - and the looming start of the N.W.S.L. season provided another needed nudge.

On Tuesday night, the players gathered in a drab conference room to hear the details of the agreement from their lawyers, including some benefits that had come to pass only in the final days. "Oh, we got that, too," one player remarked, according to Roux. Then the completed document was shared electronically with all 22 voting members for ratification, while U.S. Soccer's board met on a conference call to give its assent.

"I am incredibly proud of this team and the commitment we have shown through this entire process," Rapinoe, a player and a member of the union's C.B.A. committee, said in a statement provided by the union. "While I think there is still much progress to be made for us and for women more broadly, I think the W.N.T.P.A. should be very proud of this deal and feel empowered moving forward."

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.keywords[]
united states women's national soccer team

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Long Days, Google Docs and Anonymous Surveys: How the U.S. Soccer Team Forged a Deal

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
"We tried to completely change the methodology for how to define our value, and we made progress in that regard, and it changes the equation for the future," said Becca Roux, the union's executive director. Sunil Gulati, the president of U.S.