# data[].attributes.body
Paleolithic
I agree with fork and butter but to add on the peoleolithic found to be healthier than farmers, but like Jared Diamond said because the agriculture societies were crowded it led to spread of parasites and infectious diseases more faster causing them to die or be less healthy.

# data[].attributes.body
Paleolithic
I agree with Fork because even though the Paleolithics lived a less advanced simpler lifestyle, they were happy like that. They worked hard, but they always had time to appreciate and discover our world in their journeys. They were also one with nature working with it unlike the neolithics who began to take advantage of it and our planet until they damaged it beyond repair like it is today.

# data[].attributes.body
Spoon, while you do mention the evolution of technology (with the exception of iPads) and how agriculture helped, you neglected to write about anything specific.  Polished and sharpened tools were some of the many advancements at the time, and with these better tools came better harvests.
Better tools=less work and more resources obtained
Ex.) Hitting a tree with a dull stone ax will do nothing other than make scraps of bark fall to your feet, and even then will require a lot of work. However, with a sharpened, polished, more durable ax chopping a tree down would require a lot less work, and result in either a couple logs, or more bark for less effort.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree that if we were stuck in the Pale. Ways that were would never be civilized because again every gender was equal in the Pale. Ways. When slavery happened the white people wanted the blacks to pick the Cotton, serve them, and everything that they were too lazy to do. If we had stayed in the Pale. Ways we would stayed the same all throughout the years that were treated people unfairly and uncivilized. Done.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes those are all true and good points, but if the first humans had stuck to their Paleolithic ways we would have never become as civilized as we are. We would still be wandering around looking for food with no substantial households. Done.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes it may have created our advanced technology today it has also made people, again unhealthily. A lot of people today would rather sit at home on their computers or iPads and eat Cheetos and drink Coke ( Maybe a Diet Coke if they feel like it) instead of working. And the younger generations of people are affected by the advance technology and are not as active. Done.

# data[].attributes.body
Yeah, you're right people were treated poorly and it did lead to sexism and racism. But, without the evolution of agriculture the world would not be as advanced as it is. Without that evolution we wouldn't be able to sit here and debate on iPads. Agriculture may have created sexism and racism and things like that but it also lead to the creation of a ton of amazing technological advances. Done.

# data[].attributes.body
But agriculture has been used for many years and over the years people have made other people do the work for them so that they can do the things that they wanted to do like art, music, etc. And that has lead to people being treated unfairly of their color, sex, etc. A lot of people were forced to work and they did not get treated the same. Done.

# data[].attributes.body
Why would they be lazy? They still had to farm, but when they were done farming for the day they would make art, and music, and they would tell stories. Just like the Paleolithic society did. Done.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes they were able to do the leisure activities that they were able to do but this would make them lazy and they will not work. Obesity is our number one problem in America and if people were to move around and work then it would not have been a problem. Done.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, but the Neolithic society could do everything the Paleolithic society could do even though they had a shorter lifestyle. They were still able to take part in music, art, and storytelling just like the Paleolithic society could. Done.

# data[].attributes.body
They could have 5 people go off and explore but the Paleolitic people were more successful and had a long lifestyle then the people of agriculture and it cannot be solved once agriculture has failed. Done.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, that is true but who's to say that once the Neolithic society settles down and is able to have enough crops to be able to feed everyone that they can't go and explore the world and find more food sources. If in their groups they have 10 people who are able to farm then 5 of them could go and explore the surrounding area and come back with more food. Done.

# data[].attributes.body
But when they migrate to another place people will be able to expand their surroundings and they will be able to experience more of the world. They might even find more food sources to feed off of. Done.

# data[].attributes.body
While that can be true when they start to dwindle down on their supplies, but that can also be true for the Paleolithic society. When they finish off resources they have nothing to fall back on except for migrating to another place. When the Neolithic society runs out of crops they can go and gather more from the surrounding area. Done.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes the Neolithic society let people to stock pile their food and save up. But this also means that they will be expeceted to have the food saved for everyone and the population will grow and they will not have enough to for the growing population. Done.

# data[].attributes.body
The Neolithic society was a great advance for humans at the time. Now instead of having to go and hunt for their food they are now able to stock pile and save up their food. Done.

# data[].attributes.body
The Paleolitic society was much simpler for both men and women. They were both equally valued and it was peaceful. Done.

# data[].attributes.body
Paleolithic