# data[].attributes.body
Thank you so much!

# data[].attributes.body
Terrific work, Naomi!  Really well done!

# data[].attributes.body
Yes! As a music minor and music scholarship student I've been hearing a lot about its development over the past few years. I'm very excited it's finally happening!

# data[].attributes.body
Thank you.  Fascinating topic. Excellent work. I'm sure you know about the Sound Studies program, just started this year? (B. O'Donnell)

# data[].attributes.body
Thank you! Couldn't have done it without you!

# data[].attributes.body
Good work Naomi! (from Maria Maust-Mohl)

# data[].attributes.body
Actually, there are! There are number of music education and performance institutions around the world looking at this theory and the conductors there advocate for 432Hz tuning. These ensembles and groups are concentrated in Germany and Italy but there are a number of groups in the US that prefer to perform at lower tuning frequencies, however, most of them focus on medieval/renaissance period music which is when this tuning standard was often implemented

# data[].attributes.body
I'm curious--are there conductors who advocate 432Hz tuning? (B. O'Donnell)

# data[].attributes.body
Thank you so much!

# data[].attributes.body
This is really interesting!I don't have any questions, but it was great to read.

# data[].attributes.body
Hi! I think the most rewarding thing was actually finding statistically significant results. I know that sounds very generic and the first thing researchers look for after analyzing their results but, as a musician, this debate has been floating around the world of music performance and music theory for ages. If you look online there are so many people analyzing the formation of sound waves and shapes that these frequencies create in nature but none have ever been absolute or conclusive. To be able to contribute even a small finding such as this to such a lengthy yet niche debate was extremely rewarding!

# data[].attributes.body
Very interesting! Thank you!

# data[].attributes.body
Hey! What was the most rewarding fro, your research findings?

# data[].attributes.body
Of course! So as you can see from the poster, we can't say that participants had a preference for either frequency but the results of 2 ANOVA's show that the 432 Hz tuning frequency elicited faster heart rates and more emotional arousal. Since the emotional valence rates were inconsistent, we can not determine if this greater rate of arousal was created by a positive or negative emotion but it implies that 432 Hz incites a stronger emotional and physiological response nonetheless.

# data[].attributes.body
Can you briefly explain what implications your study may have?

# data[].attributes.body
Thank you!