# data[].attributes.headline
Interaktive Inhalte möglich? Diskussionsforen? Und wie dabei Qualität garantieren?

# data[].attributes.subject
Interaktive Inhalte möglich? Diskussionsforen? Und wie dabei Qualität garantieren?

# data[].attributes.body
Should each institution designate someone to control the metadata of each submission? In our Open Archive for scientific publications, publications are only visible after validation. Is such moderation envisaged/desired?

# data[].attributes.body
Is it possible to join at any time? Maybe not for 2023, but for 2024 or 2025? Would it have an influence on the cost of participation?

# data[].attributes.body
Unfortunately I do not have time to become proficient in OER repositories but have asked in the community and many colleagues around the world have responded (https://connect.oeglobal.org/t/input-sought-choosing-using-an-institutional-oer-repository/4317 ; https://kn-oer.de/ ;  https://encoreproject.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/PoC-key-features-of-OER-infrastructure_published.pdf ). It would be great if this new Swiss OER repository, which will probably inspire other initiatives in the future, could build on this knowledge and be documented thoroughly and collaboratively throughout the process, i.e. from the values behind it to the technical choices made.

# data[].attributes.body
Do we want only a common service (e.g. provided through switch)? Or do we want to build an active community that develops common activities, guidelines etc. Up to which degree, clients or members will/should be active whithin the community? How are common rules established?
Advantage of association: higher commitment of the members and clearer rules.

# data[].attributes.body
How is translation to french and italian organized (interface and help). How are this translations updated?

# data[].attributes.body
Around the repository, can we also plan events / trainings, etc. together ? The goal would be to engage our communities to upload their material, to get to know Creative Commons, etc.

# data[].attributes.body
http://www.gitta.info/website/en/html_reg/modules_overview.html this was an old project i partially contributed...
Teachers may share load and save time if there's a coordination...
I feel if we miss this "collaboration" we get out only 50% of the value of Open Education :-)
(Massimiliano Cannata, SUPSI)

# data[].attributes.body
In my experience it's already hard to get instructors to share their materials, so to get them to actually create course collaboratively would be even more challenging. The answer I usually get is: "would be great, but no time (plus I always prepare my courses in a hurry since research is more important)" (Jean Terrier, unibas)

# data[].attributes.body
How could the costs of participation be influenced by the number of participating institutions ?

# data[].attributes.headline
OER for primary school, secondary school, etc.

# data[].attributes.subject
OER for primary school, secondary school, etc.

# data[].attributes.body
In the case of Universities of Teacher Education, it would be interesting to expand the content scope with OER for primary school, secondary school etc. Do you think it could be done in the future ?

# data[].attributes.headline
Institution size / intensity of participation

# data[].attributes.subject
Institution size / intensity of participation

# data[].attributes.body
Would it be possible to consider adapted costs on the basis of the size of the institution or the intensity of contribution ?

# data[].attributes.body
OER als Teil unserer Studiengänge, welche auf individualisierte Lernwege und Selbstlernszenarien aufbauen

# data[].attributes.body
Probably the LTI functionality is not needed. If you can have the resource which is OER to include in your course in the LMS, give me a good reason why you wouldn't be cloning it.

# data[].attributes.headline
Collaborative creation of Body of Knowledge

# data[].attributes.subject
Collaborative creation of Body of Knowledge

# data[].attributes.body
I personally think one of the primary value of this platform would be not just share material, but collaboratively work to create first class material for teaching.

# data[].attributes.body
The solution to this is to integrate the OER repository with LMS platforms. I see no other way. Jean Terrier (unibas)

# data[].attributes.body
In the coffee break discussion a requirement for supporting a certain workflow and allowing students to collaboratively create and then submit OER was mentioned.
I think it would be fair to state this in the requirement document transparently (in the pillars), so it is not between the lines.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes Reanto - it is different.
Our newly developed study programmes that focus on individualised learning paths, self-learning scenarios - we NEED open educational materials.

# data[].attributes.body
2008 I (=Renato) started at SWITCH as a developer for an eLearning Repository which became SWITCHcollection. In about 2015 we closed the service and one of the biggest (non technical) problem was that everybody was eager to re-use material but not many were willing to actually upload content.

Is this different today?

# data[].attributes.headline
All Creative Commons Licenses (From CC0/CC BY to CC BY-NC-ND) 

# data[].attributes.subject
All Creative Commons Licenses (From CC0/CC BY to CC BY-NC-ND) 

# data[].attributes.headline
Co-operation of HEI, OER materials of HEI only

# data[].attributes.subject
Co-operation of HEI, OER materials of HEI only

# data[].attributes.headline
No login barrier for the OER search portal

# data[].attributes.subject
No login barrier for the OER search portal

# data[].attributes.headline
No duplication of other databases / content, but referral to external resources / technical interfaces

# data[].attributes.subject
No duplication of other databases / content, but referral to external resources / technical interfaces

# data[].attributes.headline
Teaching / Learning Ressources, no research data, no research publications

# data[].attributes.subject
Teaching / Learning Ressources, no research data, no research publications