# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
This Is How Social Media Is Destroying Your Life - The Fake Reality

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
There are more than 32,000 broadcast radio and TV stations in the U.S.,* along with hundreds of cable TV and satellite radio stations. On top of that, we have daily newspapers, magazines targeting all kinds of readers, and, of course, the immeasurable breadth of the internet. All told, we have more ways to reach more people than we've ever had in the history of humankind. But is this a good thing?

Those involved in multimedia studies have been answering this question in different ways for many years. In short, the effect of mass media's influence is complicated. Which is to say, mass media simultaneously benefits us and creates new problems. Here are a few of the pros and cons.

The Pros of Mass Media

It Can Keep Us Connected

Before mass media, you could live your entire life knowing nothing about the world outside of your village. Now, we are all connected. And this can be a very good thing. For instance, when a tsunami strikes, people all over the world hear about it within moments and can mobilize immediately to help. Without mass media, we would have far less ability to understand how we're all connected and how we all need each another.

It Can Spur Business

Where would business be without advertising and marketing? Thanks to the business communication made possible by mass media, businesses can reach potential consumers faster and easier than ever before. This helps keep our economy going.

It Can Spread Art and Culture

On the internet, you can see all of the world's artistic masterpieces or learn about the particularities of a culture far removed from your own. In addition, numerous TV and radio programs devote themselves to exploring the world, offering us the chance to discover new things and new ideas, and enlighten ourselves in the process.

It Can Give Voice to the Voiceless

From reporters bringing us stories of people in difficult situations to social media allowing one person's thoughts to go viral and spread across the world, mass media can lift up an individual voice that would otherwise have gone unheard.

The Cons of Mass Media

It Can Empower the Already Powerful

While mass media can create opportunities for anyone to share their story, the vast majority of our mass media is bought. And because it's bought, those with money can deeply influence what we see and hear. This gives the rich-and those connected to the rich-a far louder voice than the rest of us. At its best, this is unfair. At its worst, it's a way for a tiny minority to seize power over the vast majority.

It Can Be Used for Disinformation and Hate

How do you know what you're seeing or hearing from mass media is true? While some sources of information are far more trustworthy than others, mass media as a whole is vulnerable to propaganda and its lies. Totalitarian regimes have used mass media for nearly a century to control what their people believe. With the rise of the internet, even those in democracies can be easily exposed to media designed to drive us to hate or believe in lies.

It Can Homogenize Culture

Before mass media, art and culture were more localized, so they reflected diversity in how people spoke, dressed, and entertained themselves. Now, the entire world often sees and hears the same cultural influences. While diversity still clearly exists, there is the risk that mass media might reduce cultural variety, leaving us with less art and fewer inspirations.

It Can Overtake Personal Connections

We've all seen it or been a part of it: a group out to dinner where everyone spends much of the evening staring at their phones or gazing at a TV in the corner. As much as mass media can connect us with people all over the world, it can disconnect us from the people right in front of us.

How Can You Learn More About Mass Media?

If you're interested in mass media, there are plenty of opportunities to make this field a career. While some enter the field with a business degree, a communication degree may better prepare you for the full breadth of careers available in mass media. In particular, you should consider earning a BS in Communication. With a bachelor degree in communication, you can gain the knowledge you need to work in a wide variety of communication jobs.

You don't even have to give up your current job to earn your bachelor's degree. Numerous online universities offer communication degree programs, giving you the flexibility you need to complete your coursework from home and on a schedule that can let you continue working full time.

While it's true that mass media has its positives and negatives, it's also true that mass media isn't going away. If you want to put yourself in a position to succeed in this large and important field, there's no better choice than earning a BS in Communication.
Walden University is an accredited institution offering an online BS in Communication degree program. Expand your career options and earn your degree in a convenient, flexible format that fits your busy life.
*Federal Communications Commission, Broadcast Station Totals as of September 30, 2016, on the internet as a PDF at https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-341807A1.pdf.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
There are more than 32,000 broadcast radio and TV stations in the U.S.,* along with hundreds of cable TV and satellite radio stations. On top of that, we have daily newspapers, magazines targeting all kinds of readers, and, of course, the immeasurable breadth of the internet.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
You're being manipulated and don't even know it | Nate Pressner | TEDxYouth@Basel

# data[].attributes.body
http://www.thepeoplehistory.com/radio.html

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Incited by the President, Pro-Trump Rioters Violently Storm the Capitol

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Seething with anger, mostly unmasked, Donald Trump's supporters stormed and breached the U.S. Capitol on Wednesday

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Som en stor podcast nørd, har jeg flere gange undret mig over hvorfor jeg aldrig har hørt om hvem der opfandt podcasts. Derfor satte jeg mig for at finde svaret.

Hvem opfandt podcast?
Der er flere personer der skal have æren for at have opfundet podcasten. Dan Curry og Dave Winer er dem der har den største del af æren, mens Ben Hammersley og virksomheden Apple også har en del af æren.

Historien om hvem der opfandt podcasten er desværre ikke lige til. Men til gengæld er det en god historie om hvordan den teknologiske udvikling kan skabe nye rammer, som kan føre til et produkt som podcast.

Optakten

i 1890 blev radioen opfundet af Guglielmo Marconi. Derfra begyndte menesker i hele verdenen at komunikere igennem denne kanal.

Siden cirka 1930 begyndte man at lave radioprogrammer som vi kende dem idag. Før det var radio bare en måde at udsende nyheder til folket.

Der skete dog ikke den store udvikling inden for radio branchen før at internettet blev en ting som alle mennesker have tilgængeligt.

Internetet gav nemlig muligheden for at man kunne downloade ting ned på sin computer, hvilket aldrig har været en mulighed med radioen.

Den teknologiske udvikling gjorde det muligt for almindelige mennesker at optage deres egen lydfiler og ligge på internettet. Så det er meget svært at sige hvem der en lig opfandt podcast formatet.

Den første anerkendte podcast

I år 2004 tog Dan Curry og Dave Winer nogle store skridt, som af mange, gør dem til opfinderne af podcast.

Dave Winer udviklede den software, som lagde grundstenen for at man kunne downloade online radioprogrammer til sin Ipod. Dave Winer er derfor af mange anerkendt som ham der opfandt teknologien, som skabte podcasten.

Dan Curry er i dag kendt som "the Podfather" fordi hans show "Daily source code" skabte skabte så meget opmærksomhed, at folk blev opmærksomme på podcast branchen.

Dan Curry var i forvejen kendt fra hans tidligere arbejde som Video Jockey på MTV. Derfor fik hans program meget opmærksomhed og han nåede op på cirka 500.000 subscribers.

Mange giver disse 2 personer æren for at have opfundet podcasten og gjort den til det den er idag.

Hvem opfandt navnet podcast?

I år 2004 skrev Ben Hammersley med en artikel i "The guardian newspaper", hvor han foreslog navnet Podcast.

Det var dog mere tænkt som et navn til Ipod funktionen, som gjorde det muligt at afspille de typer formater, som man brugte til podcast.

Det endte dog med at formatet kom til at hedde podcast, hvilket Ben Hammersley for tilskrevet æren for.

Opfandt Apple podcasten?

Mange mennesker tror at det var apple og Steve Jobs der opfandt podcasten. Men Apple var ikke opfinderen af podcasten, men det var dem der gjorde det tilgængeligt for alle.

Nogle siger at det var en tilfældighed at nogle af Apples produkter gav mulighed for at downloade podcast formater i år 2004. Men i år 2005 udkom Itunes 4.9 hvor apple havde indbygget support til podcasts.

Apple var derfor i flere år det bedste sted at gå hend, hvis man ønskede at lytte til podcast.

Hvornår tog det virkelig fart med podcasting?

I 1996 begyndte nogle af de mange radioprogrammer og især shows, at ligge lydfilerne på nettet til gratis afbenyttelse. Det tog dog først rigtig fart da Napster gik live.

Napster var en af de første gratis software programmer der gjorde det muligt at dele og downloade alle former for lydfiler. Selv om folk mest brugte det til ulovligt at downloade musik, var der også mange der brugte programmet til at downloade podcasts.

I 1999 - 2000 udkom programmet PocketDj, som blev udviklet af Compaq. Programmet var designet til at kunne bruges som er personlig jukebox, men blev især brugt til at downloade podcasts.

I år 2000 lavede Dave Winer en stor opdatering, så det blev endnu nemmere for folk at downloade podcasts.

I år 2001 udkom Replay Radio, som var en radio program der ikke var live, men hvor man frit kunne downloade afsnit til sin computer. Det populære program, var med til at skubbe til radioprogrammernes tanke om podcasts.

Podcast branchen i dag

I dag har teknologien gjort at vi lytter til podcast på vores podcast apps, som alle gratis kan downloade på vores Smartphone.

Apple er stadig en stor spiller på markedet, hvor Itunes og "Apple podcast" stadig er nogle af de steder hvor flest lytter til podcast.

I dag er der dog andre store spillere, som forsøger at erobre det voksende podcast marked. Spotify har blandt andet opkøbt en virksomhed der distribuere podcast og virksomheden GImlet Media, som er den mest kendte virksomhed som producerer podcasts.

Man forventer derfor at Spotify bliver en rigtig stor spiller på podcast markedet i fremtiden.

De 5 mest downloadede podcasts i historien

Idag kan man ikke komme uden om podcast markedet. Der er podcast med flere milioner lyttere. Derfor har jeg lige lavet en lise med de 5 mest lyttede podcast:

Kilde: Samueldavies.com

Hvem er forgangs manden inden for podcast i dag?

Idag er der mange menesker der arbejder i store podcast virksomheder og gør meget for at rykke podcast branchen, men der er dog en der skiller sig ud.

Alex Blumberg må siges at være en institution inden for podcast branchen. Han Har været en del af "This American Life", Været med til at starte "Planet Money" fra starten og har nu starte podcastvirksomheden "Gimlet Media".

Alex Blumberg startede Gimlet ved at starte sin egen podcast "StartUp" som handlede om hvordan han opstartede virksomheden. Man følger ham, Gimlet og andre virksomheder gennem flere seasoner, frem til at han solgte virksomheden til Spotify.

Jeg vil anbefale podcasten Startup til alle da jeg mener at den ærlige tilgang og Alexes engegement virkelig viser at han er forgangsmanden idag.

Hvor mange lytter til podcast?

Lige nu er der der 700.000 aktive podcasts og mere en 29 millioner podcast episoder. Ifølge apple WWDC 2018 var tallene 550.00 og 18.5 millioner så podcast branchen vokser hurtigt. (Kilde: musicoomph.com )

Hvad betyder ordet podcast?

Ordet podcast er en sammentrækning af ipod og broadcasting. Senere har man dog ændret det til at betyde "Personal on demand casting.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Historien om hvem der opfandt podcast | PodcastGuiden

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Som en stor podcast nørd, har jeg flere gange undret mig over hvorfor jeg aldrig har hørt om hvem der opfandt podcasts. Derfor satte jeg mig for at finde svaret. Hvem opfandt podcast? Der er flere personer der skal have æren for at have opfundet podcasten.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The Social Dilemma | Official Trailer | Netflix

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
The president's preferred megaphone cited "the risk of further incitement of violence." It acted after Facebook, Snapchat, Twitch and other platforms placed limits on him.

Twitter locked President Trump's account on Friday after he posted tweets calling his supporters "patriots" and saying he would not attend the presidential inauguration. Credit... Twitter

OAKLAND, Calif. - Twitter said on Friday that it had permanently banned President Trump from its service "due to the risk of further incitement of violence," effectively cutting him off from his favorite megaphone for reaching the public and capping a series of actions by mainstream sites to limit his online reach.

Twitter said in a blog post that Mr. Trump's personal @realDonaldTrump account, which has more than 88 million followers, would be shut down immediately. The company said two tweets that Mr. Trump had posted on Friday - one calling his supporters "patriots" and another saying he would not go to the presidential inauguration on Jan. 20 - violated its rules against glorifying violence.

The tweets "were highly likely to encourage and inspire people to replicate the criminal acts that took place at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021," Twitter said, referring to the storming of the Capitol by a mob of Trump loyalists.

Within minutes, Mr. Trump's account on Twitter was no longer accessible. His posts were replaced with a label: "Account suspended."

Mr. Trump tried to evade the ban late Friday by using the @POTUS Twitter account, which belongs to sitting U.S. presidents, as well as other accounts to lash out at the company. But almost all of his messages were almost immediately removed by Twitter. The company forbids users to try avoiding a suspension with secondary accounts.

The moves were a forceful repudiation by Twitter of Mr. Trump, who had used the platform to build his base and spread his messages, which were often filled with falsehoods and threats. Mr. Trump regularly tweeted dozens of times a day, sending flurries of messages in the early morning or late evening. In his posts, he gave his live reactions to television news programs, boosted supporters and attacked his perceived enemies.

"Twitter's permanent suspension of Trump's Twitter account is long overdue," said Shannon McGregor, a senior researcher at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. "This is the key de-platforming for Trump. The inability to tweet cuts off his direct access to the press - and, by extension, the public."

In a statement late Friday, Mr. Trump said Twitter was trying to silence him. He said he was negotiating with other sites and promised a "big announcement soon," adding that he was looking at building "our own platform."

"Twitter is not about FREE SPEECH," Mr. Trump said. "They are all about promoting a Radical Left platform where some of the most vicious people in the world are allowed to speak freely."

A day earlier, Facebook had barred Mr. Trump for the rest of his term, and other digital platforms - including Snapchat, YouTube, Twitch and Reddit - also recently limited Mr. Trump on their services.

The actions were a stark illustration of the power of the social media companies and how they could act almost unilaterally when they chose. For years, Twitter, Facebook and other platforms had positioned themselves as defenders of free speech and had said the posts of world leaders like Mr. Trump should be allowed because they were newsworthy. The companies had rejected touching his account, even after they were assailed for allowing misinformation and falsehoods to flow.

Twitter decided to permanently ban Mr. Trump as it faced pressure from lawmakers, its own employees and many others, including Michelle Obama. Other politicians and world leaders also have posted incendiary tweets, raising questions of whether Twitter had started down a slippery slope and would have to take down other accounts.

On Friday, the company also permanently banned the accounts of several prominent Trump supporters who used the platform to spread conspiracy theories, including the lawyer Sidney Powell and President Trump's former national security adviser Michael T. Flynn. Rush Limbaugh, the conservative talk show host, also appeared to deactivate his account.

Donald Trump Jr., Mr. Trump's son, called Twitter's move against his father "absolute insanity" and said the tech companies were overreaching. "We are living Orwell's 1984," he tweeted.

"It is now time for Congress to repeal Section 230 and put Big Tech on the same legal footing as every other company in America," Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina said on Friday.

Mr. Trump had repeatedly told allies who raised the possibility that social media firms would bar him, "They'll never ban me."

In the White House, there was an extensive process for drafting official tweets. But at night and early in the morning, Mr. Trump composed his own tweets on his iPhone, often to the chagrin of advisers and Republican lawmakers who then spent hours or days dealing with the fallout.

"Without the tweets, I wouldn't be here," Mr. Trump told The Financial Times in April 2017.

In a meeting at the White House last year, Brad Parscale, Mr. Trump's campaign manager at the time, suggested that the president move over to Parler, an alternative social media site that has become popular with right-wing users. But Jared Kushner, the president's son-in-law and senior adviser, shot down the idea later, sharing Mr. Trump's confidence that Twitter wouldn't act, and it never happened, according to a person briefed on what took place.

While the White House still has official Twitter accounts like @POTUS and @WhiteHouse until the inauguration, Twitter has said it will facilitate the transfer of those accounts to the incoming Biden administration. Before the mob attack on Wednesday, Jack Dorsey, Twitter's chief executive, was involved in discussions about transferring those accounts, a person familiar with the discussions said.

The pushback against Mr. Trump online began on Wednesday after his loyalists, urged on by the president, breached the Capitol building. In the aftermath, Twitter temporarily locked Mr. Trump's account, followed by Facebook. At the time, Twitter said the risks of keeping his commentary live on its site had become too high.

The company said Mr. Trump could return to its platform if he deleted several tweets that contained falsehoods about the election or calls for violence, which violated its policies. One of the tweets was a video that Mr. Trump had posted after the police pushed the mob back where he told his supporters: "We love you. You're very special."

After Mr. Trump took those posts down, he was reinstated to the site on Thursday. Late on Thursday, he issued a conciliatory message, saying he was outraged by the violence and would facilitate a peaceful transition of power.

But Mr. Trumptweeted on Friday that his supporters were "American Patriots" who would possess a "GIANT VOICE long into the future." He also said he would not attend the inauguration on Jan. 20.

Twitter said those messages appeared to condone Wednesday's violence and were likely to stoke further violence. It added that the one about the inauguration offered the date as a target for attack.

"Plans for future armed protests have already begun proliferating on and off Twitter, including a proposed secondary attack on the U.S. Capitol and state capitol buildings on Jan. 17, 2021," Twitter said.

Inside Twitter, employees and executives have debated how to treat Mr. Trump's account. Mr. Dorsey has been vacationing on an island in French Polynesia this week, but called in to meetings, three people with knowledge of his location said. On Thursday, he sent an email to employees saying it was important for Twitter to remain consistent with its policies, including its policy of allowing a user to return after a temporary suspension, according to one person who received the email.

Hundreds of employees soon signed a petition asking the company to immediately remove Mr. Trump's account, three people familiar with the petition said. The petition was reported earlier by The Washington Post.

On Friday, Twitter held a meeting with employees, two people with knowledge of the event said. At the meeting, workers pressed executives on why they had not permanently barred Mr. Trump from the platform.

Mr. Dorsey and other managers, such as Vijaya Gadde, Twitter's head of legal and safety, said the company wanted to be consistent with its policies, which state that users can tweet again if they have deleted the messages that violated its rules.

But Mr. Dorsey also said he had "drawn a line in the sand" that the president could not cross for fear of losing his account privileges, the people with knowledge of the event said. Mr. Dorsey said Twitter would follow through on a ban if Mr. Trump crossed that line.

Emerson Brooking, a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said taking down Mr. Trump's Twitter account now was, in some ways, too late because the president had already spread so many conspiracy theories on the platform over the past few years.

"Removing Trump from Twitter does not fix our politics or bring millions of Americans back to reality," Mr. Brooking said. "But it does make it significantly harder for disinformation to enter the mainstream. And it makes it harder for Trump to reach his followers."

Beyond muting Mr. Trump's biggest megaphone, Twitter's decision could create headaches for the Trump administration when it comes to complying with the Presidential Records Act of 1978, which requires the preservation of presidential materials and communications.

Maggie Haberman, Katie Rosman and Maggie Astor contributed reporting.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Twitter Permanently Bans Trump, Capping Online Revolt

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The president's preferred megaphone cited "the risk of further incitement of violence." It acted after Facebook, Snapchat, Twitch and other platforms placed limits on him. OAKLAND, Calif.

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.abc247.dk/massekommunikation-2