# data[].attributes.body
I think the big idea of the passage is that compulsory voting is good. We think this because it shows how many countries do it and how they deal with it

# data[].attributes.body
The big idea of this passage is that compulsory voting is good. This is because it shows all of the countries and what is going on in them with compulsory voting. Based on document A, the countries are doing okay with compulsory voting.

# data[].attributes.body
The big idea of document A is neutral. I know this because it can be bad or good. It is good because many countries have had it for a long time. The document is to argue against requiring people to vote is becuase there are a lot of penalties. This is why I think that this document is neutral.

# data[].attributes.body
I think document A is neutral because it shows how all the countries that have compulsory voting

# data[].attributes.body
We think voting in America should not be required. Because many people would get punished for not voting and our jails would be crowded.

# data[].attributes.body
We think that Document A is neutral. Because the document only states the facts not any opinions. For example, it only states the penalties, the year introduced and the country.

# data[].attributes.body
We think document A is for compulsory voting because it in some countries you could get consequences for not voting. We think document B is for

# data[].attributes.body
We think the big idea of document A is that compulsory voing could be either way in the U.S.A. This shows that this document is NEUTRAL because the document doesn't really state which side it is on. The big idea of document B is that compusory voting should be a thing in the U.S.A. because the document shows that younger people and less intelegent people don't vote. This shows the document is FOR compulsory voting.

# data[].attributes.body
We think document A is neutral l because it states how it can be for compulsory voting and against it. We think document B is neutral because it is just states the facts and isn't really on a side. The main idea document A is the penalty of not voting in a country. The main idea for document B is that no matter how educated you are doesn't make you vote anymore then you did before.

# data[].attributes.body
Doc A: The big idea about document A is they are showing the consequences for not voting. So it is for compulsory voting because it is forcing you to vote unless their is a consequence.

Doc B: The big idea about document B is it showing the percentage of the people voting and not voting.

# data[].attributes.body
The big idea of doc a is voting is neutral in are opinion i think it is to so i agree but in doc b it is totally agreeing with voting should not be compulsory.  doc a is neutral because in the doc it said that some countries have compulsory voting and some do not

# data[].attributes.body
Doc A. This document is neutral because it talks about the down sides and up sides of compulsory.
Doc B: This document is also neutral because its asks us to write about how we can argue for compulsory voting, but then it asks us to write how we can use the chart to argue against compulsory voting.

# data[].attributes.body
Doc A. The BIG idea for Document A is ageist compulsory voting. For example, The document shows the bad Punishments for countries if we don't vote and I think there trying to show that they don't like the idea's of unfair compulsory voting laws.

Doc B. The BIG idea of doc B is that voting is not compulsory. The graph shows that when age increases, the voting amount increases. There have been lots of votes over the last 36 years.

# data[].attributes.body
Doc A.    We think this document is  neutral because its not someone writing a doc its someone writing information. Also the writing is int on a curtain side there just giving information for the topic also, there questions are asking about both sides.
Doc B.   We think that doc B is against compulsory voting because its asking for examples on why the US shouldn't have compulsory voting.