# data[].attributes.body
1.https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2014/07/24/youve-probably-never-heard-of-one-of-the-worst-supreme-court-decisions/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.d215d0ea8480 Milliken v Bradley Washington post article
2.https://www.huduser.gov/portal/periodicals/cityscpe/vol7num1/ch7.pdf  housing activism strategies- good source
3.http://www.milwaukeeindependent.com/syndicated/the-struggle-for-fair-housing-continues-in-the-selma-of-the-north/  Great source for info about protests
4.https://www.naacp.org/civicengagement/ NAACP website, has their mission statement and what the organization is about
5.https://www.npr.org/2016/06/18/482630033/going-there-50-years-after-the-chicago-freedom-movement npr interview 50 years after the Chicago freedom movement, could be good for looking at the lasting effects of this movement
6.http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsgao&AN=edsgcl.15752030&site=eds-live
a good overview of the Chicago freedom movement
7.http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=978180&site=ehost-live&ebv=EB&ppid=pp_103 could be a good source for looking at the legal battles of the NAACP
8.http://www.naacpldf.org/history NAACP legal defense fund, includes a history of legal cases they have done
11.https://kinginstitute.stanford.edu/encyclopedia/chicago-campaign quick recap of housing movement, but includes what the ending deal consisted of. Check if reliable

# data[].attributes.body
•Mitchell, like Wilkins, White, and Johnson, appealed to reason and the intellect; King appealed to the conscience.
•the NAACP was highly revered by most older African Americans in the South as a beacon of hope in abysmal racial darkness-so much so that several states in the region attempted to put the NAACP out of business.
•Another drawback of the NAACP's legal program was that the impact of Brown was not as immediate as that of the bus boycott. The NAACP toiled for fourteen years to get a civil rights law passed, and even then its effect was hardly momentous.
•the NAACP, serving as a powerful legal instrument and political machine, that achieved the basic constitutional reforms that were required to accord full citizenship to African Americans.
•The sharp differences between the NAACP and the other civil rights leaders over the appropriate approach to attack housing segregation proved the wisdom of the NAACP
•Both the NAACP's humanitarian and constitutional philosophy and King's nonviolent methods were essential to achieving civil rights reform in the 1950s and 1960s

# data[].attributes.body
While Jackson acknowledged that Chicago was not a paradise for blacks, he refused to label it an immoral society and doubted whether protests--"a continuous dramatization"--of the city's failings would "help us solve" its problems.

# data[].attributes.body
source 10
Watson, Denton L. "Assessing the role of the NAACP in the civil rights movement." The Historian 55, no. 3 (1993): 453+. Academic OneFile (accessed September 20, 2018). http://link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/A13191881/AONE?u=mlin_m_cambsch&sid=AONE&xid=b7d3ced4.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Assessing the role of the NAACP in the civil rights movement

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
King's passing recognition of the NAACP's role in sustaining the boycott set the tone for most historical treatments of the civil rights movement. His egotistical excesses revealed in Stride toward Freedom were not lost on NAACP leaders, who regarded him as an upstart attracting media and competing for contributions.

# data[].attributes.body
Source 9
Ware, Gilbert. "Lobbying as a Means of Protest: The NAACP as an Agent of Equality." The Journal of Negro Education 33, no. 2 (1964): 103-10. doi:10.2307/2294575.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Lobbying as a Means of Protest: The NAACP as an Agent of Equality on JSTOR

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Gilbert Ware, Lobbying as a Means of Protest: The NAACP as an Agent of Equality, The Journal of Negro Education, Vol. 33, No. 2 (Spring, 1964), pp. 103-110

# data[].attributes.body
I Introduction
Housing discrimination is a civil rights issue that has, by most accounts, gotten worse since the civil rights era. In the late 60s, both the NAACP and the Chicago freedom movement were very active trying to create fair housing for African Americans. However, both groups never finished what they set out to do, and their efforts are often seen as failures. Despite their shortcomings, one of them was able to make more of a difference than the other.
Thesis:Activist groups like the NAACP that focused on creating legislation against discrimination had more of a long lasting and positive impact on fair housing than protest groups like the Chicago Freedom movement.

II Body paragraphs
a The civil rights movement often conjures up images of protesters lining the streets, lead by MLK or other activists leaders, but there is an entirely different side to protesting that is rarely in the limelight. For housing discrimination, that group was the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, or NAACP.
This paragraph establishes the work that the NAACP did in the late 60s that lead to the fair housing act. It talks about their victories, their losses, and what effect those have had on the way things are now. It also includes what people thought of them or think of them now.
Sources/quotes:

b comparison of the two methods

c Despite the continuing pervasiveness of housing segregation today, the NAACP and the Chicago Freedom Movement did create change that positively impacted the housing movement.
This paragraph focuses on what the longer lasting impact of these two groups was, including some commentary or opinions from today. Also looks at how the fair housing act failed and why that was, and the disappointment caused from it.

III Conclusion
Not every movement is going to have success. It is important to consider these two halves of the movement as a group, not as rivals. Despite which of them had more effect, they both have their role in what happened

# data[].attributes.body
Activist groups like the NAACP that focused on creating legislation against discrimination had more of a long lasting and positive impact on fair housing than protest groups like the Chicago Freedom movement.

# data[].attributes.headline
Working thesis and introduction sentences

# data[].attributes.subject
Working thesis and introduction sentences

# data[].attributes.body
Housing discrimination is a civil rights issue that has, by most accounts, gotten worse since the civil rights era. In the late 60s, both the NAACp and the Chicago freedom movement were very active trying to create fair housing for African Americans. However, both groups never finished what they set out to do, and their efforts are often seen as failures. But one of them able to make more of a difference than the other. Activist groups like the NAACP that focused on creating legislation against discrimination had more of a long lasting and positive impact on fair housing than protest groups like the Chicago Freedom movement.

# data[].attributes.body
•racial restrictive covenants
•national fair housing aliance
•community reinvestment act
•community redevelopment agency
•Chicago freedom movement/Chicago open housing movement
•NAACP youth council

# data[].attributes.body
Did the NAACP ever work with local activists?
yes

# data[].attributes.headline
notes on source 3 (most of notes in notebook)

# data[].attributes.subject
notes on source 3 (most of notes in notebook)

# data[].attributes.body
"Open housing activists in dozens of northern cities took to the streets during the mid-1960s to pressure state legislators and city councils to pass “fair housing” laws."
Attracted national media attention when counter-protesters came in
"By the early 1960s, Milwaukee civil rights advocates had already begun to push housing onto the public agenda. The state NAACP drafted model open housing legislation and organized a fourteen-day sit-in at the capitol in Madison, while liberal and civil rights groups publicized housing discrimination, circulated “Good Neighbor Pledges” to Milwaukee homeowners, and flooded newspapers with personal ads supporting fair housing."
Between 1960 and 1966, several civil rights campaigns began to raise national awareness
"A line of young black men wearing fatigues and grey sweatshirts emblazoned with the words “NAACP Commando” walked in formation between the marchers and police to maintain order and defend protesters." The NAACP youth council was itself doing protests, not just taking legal action
*stopped about halfway down

# data[].attributes.body
Rothstein doesn’t mention a lot of opposition to any of these events. What was the resistance like to discriminatory housing practices? How much of it were people aware of?

The NAACP is mentioned a few times in the book:

What work did the NAACP do to combat housing discrimination, specifically in the 70s after?

Were they in the public eye, or did they not get a lot of attention?

According to Rothstein, the de facto myth was perpetuated by a string of supreme court rulings starting in the 70s, and still continuing today.

Did the work that the NAACP did have an affect on how things are today?

What specific things did they prevent from happening?

Is housing discrimination something they are still working in today?

At what time were they most active? Why?

It seems like outright denial started showing up in the 70s, like the Milliken v Bradley case in 1974 that said perhaps it is unknowable why black people and white people lived in separate neighborhoods. Before there were laws saying something needed an explicit racial bias to be blocked, and people had to be more subtle than they had been.

What effect did the Milliken v Bradley case have on civil rights activists, or the NAACP?

Was the NAACP generally liked or opposed by the public?

# data[].attributes.body
1.What were some of the main actions of the NAACP against housing segregation?
2.Who were some groups that focused on protesting rather than legal action?
3.Have either of these groups had any success or long lasting effects?

# data[].attributes.body
1.protesters didn't have a lot of success making any change in housing segregation
2.The NAACP did have long-lasting success  because their court cases were able to set a precedent for future cases
3.overall

# data[].attributes.body
The NAACP focused mostly on legal action, while smaller groups or individual activists focused on protest and other forms of activism. How effective were each of these strategies ?