# data[].attributes.body
The main differences between the 3 and 5 is that the 3 doesn't have any pizzazz and doesn't develop much nor delver into the bigger picture while the 5 is an upgraded version of the 3 but regurgitates the same idea over and over.

# data[].attributes.body
Essay 3 has a rather unclear understanding of the prompt. There is an inadequate amount of analysis, the claims made are not connected, and the author relies on  summary from the text as evidence. Essay 5 has an adequate amount of analysis and better control of their written English language. The main difference between the two prompts would be the amount of analysis used, the level of language, and the method used in referencing evidence from the text.
Amanda

# data[].attributes.body
The main difference between the 7 and 9 is that the seven is a device driven essay whereas the 9 is developed by a summary-like style with small bits of commentary in between.

# data[].attributes.body
The 3rd essay is not very clear on what the prompt is asking, no claim made, does not relate to the meaning of the work as a whole, the 5 was on track, had a claim, answered the prompt, but the writing was not very sophisticated .

# data[].attributes.body
Essay 7 makes an excellent usage of literary techniques and clear analysis in order to prove his/her claims. It is clear that the writer has grasper the deeper understanding in the prompt, but lacks the higher level elements of an essay that would of scored an 8 or a 9. Essay 9 demonstrates a high level of sophistication--- in the author's claims, textual evidence, structure of the essay, and language. The main difference between the two prompts is the level of language and diction, the degree of analysis, and the support for claims made in the essay (the text based evidence).
Amanda

# data[].attributes.body
The 7 is straight off devices, kept going into what the essay really is about. The 9 as well as creating the devices, it also goes into summary about what the piece had to offer.

# data[].attributes.body
I think I got a 6 because it has similarities between the 5 and 7 so it'll most likely be something in between.

# data[].attributes.body
I think I got a 5, I kept to my claim, as well as I continued to stay to the prompt, I just felt my language could have been more sophisticated.

# data[].attributes.body
The differences between the 3 essay and 5 essay is the 3 relied solely on summary and paraphrasing, while the 5 essay elaborated on the relationship between social norms and emotions that Smollett wanted to employ in the passage. Overall the 3 essay had irrelevant points and unconvincing statements while the 5 was slightly more convincing with more elaborate claims.

# data[].attributes.body
The main differences between essay 7 and 9 is even though essay 7 had clear and control writing ability, with adequate statements and details toward the text, essay 9 explores more into the interplay between emotions and social norms employed by Smollett. Furthermore essay 9  had more error free answers and more control of language to effortlessly answer/ analyze the essay's prompt.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe my predicted score will be a 5. Although my claims are not always supported with the best text based evidence and analysis, it is clear that they offer a deeper understanding of the prompt. My evidence is also based around references to summary or paraphrasing, which is common in lower level essays such as a 5. In my essay, I reveal a degree of control towards my prompt-- adequate, but lacking in higher level elements.
Amanda

# data[].attributes.body
The quality of the writing differentiates the 3 and 5. The 3 essay uses a lot of "show" and their claims were partial and unconnected. The 5 essay has a much controlled analysis and even though the writer also used show, he/she demonstrated better quality.

# data[].attributes.body
My score would be a 4 due to having an adequate analysis of the passage and how the relationship between emotion and social norms intertwine. But my misunderstanding of the passage did stop me from giving myself a 5, i had irrelevant and unconvincing claims throughout my essay, and did not correctly answer the essay's question.

# data[].attributes.body
While both essays were able to clearly answer the question, the main difference is their understanding and analysis of the passage. The 7 essay understood the satirical aspect of the prompt while the 9 essay further analyses the shift in the character's motivation towards their duel.

# data[].attributes.body
Essay 5 had a better understanding of the prompt, although a little repetitive and only based their claims solely on literary devices, they still provided evidence and analysis enough for that score. Essay 3 on the other hand, did not have a clear understanding of the passage and overall demonstrated inept writing.

# data[].attributes.body
I think I got a 4 or 5 because my writing style involves summary and analysis merged together and not much detail was used.

# data[].attributes.body
The main difference between essay 9 and 7 is that essay 9 went into deeper analysis of the prompt. They pointed out the humorous and ironic side of their conflict. On the other hand, essay seven had only an understating of it but did not analyze the passage as well as Essay 9.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe I received a 3 becuase I failed to tie my claims to the passage and because I used little to no analysis in my essay, which show no comprehension of the passage.

# data[].attributes.body
The main difference is in the writing, the 3 clearly is not adept enough and can't formulate complex thoughts in their writing, while the 5 does, they provide proper thought into their writing

# data[].attributes.body
The main difference between these is a deeper analysis on the subject matter, both answer the prompt but the 9 essay has the the complex understanding down while the 7 is still with its imperfections on the subject matter of the prompt

# data[].attributes.body
I believe I will receive a 5, the speed by which I went into writing probably made me miss out on detail and exploit deeper meanings to the text

# data[].attributes.body
I think I will get a 4 just because my analysis still needs to have a stronger point, and a 5 is what you earn when you your analysis is on point, and a 3 is just for someone who does not know what they are writing.