# data[].attributes.body
ya yeet

# data[].attributes.body
i think that treaties are foods to be aten with versailleZ. broMStiCK)$(@)#*$%&$)#

# data[].attributes.body
8192300091 call me niggers

# data[].attributes.body
1In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

2The same was in the beginning with God.

3All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.

4In him was life; and the life was the light of men.

5And the light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not.

6There was a man sent from God, whose name was John.

7The same came for a witness, to bear witness of the Light, that all men through him might believe.

8He was not that Light, but was sent to bear witness of that Light.

9That was the true Light, which lighteth every man that cometh into the world.

10He was in the world, and the world was made by him, and the world knew him not.

11He came unto his own, and his own received him not.

12But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name:

13Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.

14And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.

15John bare witness of him, and cried, saying, This was he of whom I spake, He that cometh after me is preferred before me: for he was before me.

16And of his fulness have all we received, and grace for grace.

17For the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ.

18No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him.

19And this is the record of John, when the Jews sent priests and Levites from Jerusalem to ask him, Who art thou?

20And he confessed, and denied not; but confessed, I am not the Christ.

21And they asked him, What then? Art thou Elias? And he saith, I am not. Art thou that prophet? And he answered, No.

22Then said they unto him, Who art thou? that we may give an answer to them that sent us. What sayest thou of thyself?

23He said, I am the voice of one crying in the wilderness, Make straight the way of the Lord, as said the prophet Esaias.

24And they which were sent were of the Pharisees.

25And they asked him, and said unto him, Why baptizest thou then, if thou be not that Christ, nor Elias, neither that prophet?

26John answered them, saying, I baptize with water: but there standeth one among you, whom ye know not;

27He it is, who coming after me is preferred before me, whose shoe's latchet I am not worthy to unloose.

28These things were done in Bethabara beyond Jordan, where John was baptizing.

29The next day John seeth Jesus coming unto him, and saith, Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world.

30This is he of whom I said, After me cometh a man which is preferred before me: for he was before me.

31And I knew him not: but that he should be made manifest to Israel, therefore am I come baptizing with water.

32And John bare record, saying, I saw the Spirit descending from heaven like a dove, and it abode upon him.

33And I knew him not: but he that sent me to baptize with water, the same said unto me, Upon whom thou shalt see the Spirit descending, and remaining on him, the same is he which baptizeth with the Holy Ghost.

34And I saw, and bare record that this is the Son of God.

35Again the next day after John stood, and two of his disciples;

36And looking upon Jesus as he walked, he saith, Behold the Lamb of God!

37And the two disciples heard him speak, and they followed Jesus.

38Then Jesus turned, and saw them following, and saith unto them, What seek ye? They said unto him, Rabbi, (which is to say, being interpreted, Master,) where dwellest thou?

39He saith unto them, Come and see. They came and saw where he dwelt, and abode with him that day: for it was about the tenth hour.

40One of the two which heard John speak, and followed him, was Andrew, Simon Peter's brother.

41He first findeth his own brother Simon, and saith unto him, We have found the Messias, which is, being interpreted, the Christ.

42And he brought him to Jesus. And when Jesus beheld him, he said, Thou art Simon the son of Jona: thou shalt be called Cephas, which is by interpretation, A stone.

43The day following Jesus would go forth into Galilee, and findeth Philip, and saith unto him, Follow me.

44Now Philip was of Bethsaida, the city of Andrew and Peter.

45Philip findeth Nathanael, and saith unto him, We have found him, of whom Moses in the law, and the prophets, did write, Jesus of Nazareth, the son of Joseph.

46And Nathanael said unto him, Can there any good thing come out of Nazareth? Philip saith unto him, Come and see.

47Jesus saw Nathanael coming to him, and saith of him, Behold an Israelite indeed, in whom is no guile!

48Nathanael saith unto him, Whence knowest thou me? Jesus answered and said unto him, Before that Philip called thee, when thou wast under the fig tree, I saw thee.

49Nathanael answered and saith unto him, Rabbi, thou art the Son of God; thou art the King of Israel.

50Jesus answered and said unto him, Because I said unto thee, I saw thee under the fig tree, believest thou? thou shalt see greater things than these.

51And he saith unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Hereafter ye shall see heaven open, and the angels of God ascending and descending upon the Son of man.

# data[].attributes.body
5198882980 for a fun time

# data[].attributes.body
boonk

# data[].attributes.body
Yes and no

# data[].attributes.headline
hrgp qerohvoqh vqlsphdapewhdlj HE LJRGKJH KLJGHAKLJHG LAFIUAWFLUAHU GAIUujkhlgjkdfgjdufzg ld glkdjfadhrgiuaehrgl uerg luruserugaiu giurgoa uergouergiahbireh buhhsurg uersg erig aerglehrguhreg uru garlugla werualugau eruherguahrgo sfrghsruhlsdhoureho ss ouou ousegou . ugsugusehrtuhguergouseroigsojguregusdrgjsdfgouhsrd oughao eisrgosijfgkejrg sjerglskrjgoesrigpuhergu uer gaiup guresgu urgsruehgoseurgwhgurs fgsoergsuoeougOPAREUGSUGUESOoigo OIROI oio tihg sihoi oith     i rORGPO oror ROI ouOUoRGORHG OUi

# data[].attributes.subject
hrgp qerohvoqh vqlsphdapewhdlj HE LJRGKJH KLJGHAKLJHG LAFIUAWFLUAHU GAIUujkhlgjkdfgjdufzg ld glkdjfadhrgiuaehrgl uerg luruserugaiu giurgoa uergouergiahbireh buhhsurg uersg erig aerglehrguhreg uru garlugla werualugau eruherguahrgo sfrghsruhlsdhoureho ss ouou ousegou . ugsugusehrtuhguergouseroigsojguregusdrgjsdfgouhsrd oughao eisrgosijfgkejrg sjerglskrjgoesrigpuhergu uer gaiup guresgu urgsruehgoseurgwhgurs fgsoergsuoeougOPAREUGSUGUESOoigo OIROI oio tihg sihoi oith     i rORGPO oror ROI ouOUoRGORHG OUi

# data[].attributes.body
Germany was the one who started the first world war, despite that Germany had to pay 6600 million pounds of money for reparations, Germany should be responsible for their greed. Germany caused many soldiers to perish innocently. economy in most countries were also affected, many were umemployed because of it. the treaty was imposed so that Germany could be put down. While rebuilding their economy and their army, along with the treaty putting them down, Germany would think twice before being aggressive again. There was a treaty imposed to Russia and sure you would reconsider if the treaty was really not fair. Russia had to pay more than what Germany had to. Also Britain wasn't that harsh to Germany, if Britain would to be harsh, it would be the end of Germany. Britain only hope was that Germany would not turn communist so little terms were imposed to Germany. It was also fought in french soil so it was reasonable if France wanted a huge sum f

# data[].attributes.body
these homies got busted harder than my cuzzin carl like damn

# data[].attributes.body
. The terms of the Treaty of Versailles was too harsh on Germany. The terms caused total humiliation to Germany and the demilitarization left Germany vulnerable to attacks from neighboring countries such as France. Having Germany pay compensation for the damage caused in the war devastated Germany's economy 

# data[].attributes.headline
No. Germany wasn’t the only one involved in 

# data[].attributes.subject
No. Germany wasn’t the only one involved in 

# data[].attributes.body
tbh if the treaty of versailles was never signed would hitler have been such a sincerely inarticulate bumble

# data[].attributes.body
btw thanks for the help with homework

# data[].attributes.body
Germany didn't deserve to take the blame for sta

# data[].attributes.body
🌎 History

# data[].attributes.body
Germany was the one who started the first world war, despite that Germany had to pay 6600 million pounds of money for reparations, Germany should be responsible for their greed. Germany caused many soldiers to perish innocently. economy in most countries were also affected, many were umemployed because of it. the treaty was imposed so that Germany could be put down. While rebuilding their economy and their army, along with the treaty putting them down, Germany would think twice before being aggressive again. There was a treaty imposed to Russia and sure you would reconsider if the treaty was really not fair. Russia had to pay more than what Germany had to. Also Britain wasn't that harsh to Germany, if Britain would to be harsh, it would be the end of Germany. Britain only hope was that Germany would not turn communist so little terms were imposed to Germany. It was also fought in french soil so it was reasonable if France wanted a huge sum for reparations

However, it was not a fair treaty at all. In the first place, Germany wasn't even invite. Even though what Germany did was tragic, The major powers were taking advantage of Germany and sure they were harsh. Germany had to accept full blame when Germany wasn't the only country who was at fault. territories were split to the major powers and this caused massive damage to the economy the Germany tried to rebuild as they lost many resources such as the Saar Coal region. Along with the terrible economy difficulty they were facing, a huge sum of money was needed to compensate to France. The demilitarization caused the Germany to be vulnerable to nearby counties too.

# data[].attributes.body
Germany didn't deserve to take full blame as some other countries contributed to triggering the war and they weren't the only ones that damaged other countries. In some ways, the Big Three were taking advantage of the fact that Germany didn't really have any other option. Alsace-Lorraine was won fair and square and belonged to Germany after having fought France for a while. I don't see how Posen, where the best agricultural land happens to be, had anything to do with any of the Big Three other than them being a bit greedy.

On the other hand though, if Germany had won, they would probably have been as harsh, as demonstrated by the Brest-Litovsk Treaty in 1918. Also, Germany was the main factor that started the war. They did a lot, even most, of the damage, so they deserve to pay the largest sum if it were distributed between the other countries. Lastly, if they had wanted to prevent a war happening in a few years' time, they needed to be harsh and take precautions.

# data[].attributes.body
no it was not fair at all

# data[].attributes.body
No the although Germany started the war,it should not bear all consequences as the other nations had also joined to the war due to its alliances.Germany was also made to pay heavy prices for the war and had lost many things

# data[].attributes.body
germany had to lose their territories and had to compenstate to other allies over a short period of time.

# data[].attributes.body
The Germany had reduction in military which they could not defend themselves, so when other country attack Germany, they will suffer more economic lost and at the same time would not be able to pay the debt own making it unfair. Kk

# data[].attributes.body
No because it was unfair for germany to pay so much money to ally powers and the military power was very limited and wouldn't be able to defend itself from hostile forces

# data[].attributes.body
No. The terms of the Treaty of Versailles was too harsh on Germany. The terms caused total humiliation to Germany and the demilitarization left Germany vulnerable to attacks from neighboring countries such as France. Having Germany pay compensation for the damage caused in the war devastated Germany's economy further.

Yes. The terms of the Treaty of Versailles was fair.
Germany caused instability in Europe during WW1. The war caused many to die and caused the economy of many countries to fall due to the unemployment.

# data[].attributes.body
No I don't think so. It is not fair for Germany to take up all the blame for causing the World War I and to give up several of the land they had, as well as the unreasonable compensation given to the other allies. They were facing economic issues too, it is not fair to just put all the blame on them and demand that much from them.

# data[].attributes.body
because it's is not fair towards Germany as they had to take all the blame for causing the world. Germany had to face all the consequences where they lost everything they had and the other nations took what Germany had.

# data[].attributes.body
no because although germany initiated the war, they had to lose their territories & pay huge compensations to the different countries. it was not totally germanys fault because austria - hungary was the one who went full on. thus, the treaty of versailles is unfair.

# data[].attributes.body
it was unfair

# data[].attributes.body
no because germany has to pay a large amount of money within a short period of time. The other countries also took part in the war so germany should not be taking all the blame.

# data[].attributes.body
No because all the blame was given to Germany despite others countries having a part in the war and germany had to suffer major losses economically and politically without any military to defend itself and even compensate to the other countries.Hence the terms of the treaty was unfair to Germany

# data[].attributes.body
我觉得凡尔赛条约是不公平的。
I think that the Treaty of Versailles is not fair.

The Treaty of Versailles's terms cause Germany, and only Germany, to be at a loss. The treaty causes Germany to be required to pay harsh penalties such as "accepting complete blame for causing WW1" and having to pay "6'600 million Pounds" for reparations.

Germany

# data[].attributes.body
Germany have to be responsible for their greed for power. They have to pay a heavy price for it. They started the war casing all the losses fro themselves and other countries. The war would not have happened if not for Germany. Therefore I think that the Treaty of Versailles is fair.   [serene]

# data[].attributes.headline
No because although germany pushed austria hungary to start the war,it should have have heavy consequences as it was unfair for germany

# data[].attributes.subject
No because although germany pushed austria hungary to start the war,it should have have heavy consequences as it was unfair for germany

# data[].attributes.body
(Justine)

# data[].attributes.body
Because Germany took all of the blame despite other countries

# data[].attributes.body
Because Germany had to take all the blame for World War 1 even though Germany's allies were also involved. Germany had to pay a large sum of money even though the allies had also caused significant damage thus it was unfair for Germany. Tight limitations were placed on the Germany's armed forces ,it is unfair for Germany as they would not be able to defend themselves in times of trouble. This might start another war as the once high and mighty Germany had been humiliated and is now powerless.

# data[].attributes.headline
No because Germany had to take all the blame for causing the war but austria hungary also triggered the war. All the countries fought but only Germany has to pay large amounts of money for the damages caused in the war when other countries also had a part in damaging them so it is unfair

# data[].attributes.subject
No because Germany had to take all the blame for causing the war but austria hungary also triggered the war. All the countries fought but only Germany has to pay large amounts of money for the damages caused in the war when other countries also had a part in damaging them so it is unfair

# data[].attributes.body
No. It was

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, Germany had lost the war, so this is their punishment. Although they shouldn't take the full blame for the war, they are the losers, and they do not have the privilege of choosing their rights. The allied do not want the Germans to start another war, and so they have to take action to prevent this, it is not totally unfair in that the allied will of course do all they can. If Germany had won the war, they would have done a similar thing too. Germany are the losers, too bad for them HAHA

# data[].attributes.body
No, it is unfair because

# data[].attributes.body
Germany started world war 1 and should take complete blame for all the damages done and the number of casualties caused because it is only be responsible of germany to compensate the damages done.

# data[].attributes.body
this is because it is unfair that Germany is the only country that is suffering all the consequences when other countries participated

# data[].attributes.body
No because if a war sparks between Germany and any country, Germany would not be able to defend itself, that would not be fair as other countries also participated in the war

# data[].attributes.headline
No because Germany had to take all the blame for causing the 

# data[].attributes.subject
No because Germany had to take all the blame for causing the 

# data[].attributes.headline
No the treaty of versailles is not fair for Germany. 

# data[].attributes.subject
No the treaty of versailles is not fair for Germany. 

# data[].attributes.body
Germany had to give up a lot of its resources, and the changes implemented were very controlling, and they did not have a say in the treaty. The treaty did not go easy and was harsh on Germany. As such,the treaty was forcefully signed, and Germany did not have a chance in defending itself, and therefore the treaty was unfair for Germany.
((dyLAN🙌))

# data[].attributes.headline
(Biyu)                                                                                    No. Because if the other countries were to attack Germany, Germany would not be able to defend itself with the military it had. Also, it was very difficult for Germany to pay 6,600 million pounds to the allies in such a short amount of time as Germany's economy was not doing that well after the war. The treaty of Versailles did not give Germany a chance to recover from its losses. 

# data[].attributes.subject
(Biyu)                                                                                    No. Because if the other countries were to attack Germany, Germany would not be able to defend itself with the military it had. Also, it was very difficult for Germany to pay 6,600 million pounds to the allies in such a short amount of time as Germany's economy was not doing that well after the war. The treaty of Versailles did not give Germany a chance to recover from its losses. 

# data[].attributes.body
No. The treaty of Versailles was not fair.

Germany accepted all blame for World War 1 even though other central powers also had participated in the war.

Germany was forced to compensate for the war heavily, and their terms of the treaty was made to doom Germany in terms of their military and economy.

The terms of the the treaty forced Germany to lost many of their regions such as the Polish corridor and the Saar region. Combined with the fact that they were given a huge debt of $6600 million, it was made impossible for Germany to recover economically.

Germany could not even argue on their terms of the treaty. The treaty's terms were decided by the other Allied Powers that saw Germany as a threat. Thus, the treaty was unfair to Germany.

However, the treaty is also fair.

Germany started World War 1 and disrupted the peace in Europe. This is enough to justify the harsh terms of the Treaty against Germany.