# data[].attributes.body
The curious case of Benjamin Button

The book I’m going to compare with his film adaptation it’s “The curious case of Benjamin Button”, a classic that most of the people had seen at least once. I am 99% sure that you didn’t know that this film is based on a short book wrote in 1922.
This story begins with a baby who are born totally different that other babies that people had ever seen before, his name is Benjamin Button, a guy who grows in reverse. While the movie progresses, we watch how Benjamin face their fears and how he tries to live a normal life. But this adaptation is better than the original book?
Answering this question, film it’s totally better

# data[].attributes.body
I will hereby be talking about a most renowned book series and its TV adaptation. A Song of Ice and Fire, by George R.R. Martin, was adapted in 2011 to the HBO series A Game of Thrones. I am going to dabble in some aspects regarding both.

Let us start with the books, the ones who pulled it all off. George R.R. Martin, as a writer, is a pearl. His incredible prose—which we see evolve throughout the five books—can instantly render the reader rapt and let the pages fly. It forces the beholder into a suspense thirst which can be only sated by the end. His characters are amazing and relatable, as well as the settings—though imaginary—he contrives. The books are a masterpiece of imagination and fantasy (though they do not indulge in either.) Overall, the five books are so enjoyable that it leaves you lusting for more.

The TV series, now, is really something to commend. At first I was a bit skeptical about watching the series—I knew adaptations are most of the time detestable—but finally decided to give it a chance. And that was not a mistake. I immediately got captivated and mesmerized by HBO’s work and soon found myself halfway through Season 5. It manages wonderfully to sequester the audience.

# data[].attributes.headline
Deadly Hallows two movies vs Harry Potter book 7 / Gaby Villagran

# data[].attributes.subject
Deadly Hallows two movies vs Harry Potter book 7 / Gaby Villagran

# data[].attributes.body
I want to compare the Deadly Hallows of Harry Potter, book 7, and the 2 final movies of HP, as you may know this book was written by one of the most famous writers of the last Century, JK Rowling.

The film had to face with a lot of difficulties in presenting all the main scenes to make the audience aware of the feelings of the main characters but in order to do not last forever they choose the most representative ones and decide to divide the book in two parts. The seeking of the horrocruxes that Dumbledore delegate to Harry before he died, and the last duel. At the end I believe the film makes a really good job to not change the story. But I am totally conscious that is difficult to present all the emotions that are inside the story.

The book presents the interior troubles that the main character Harry is dealing with and why he is sometimes vulnerable, while the film passes through really smooth with the feelings and sometimes presents him as an angry and obsessed boy, but if you do not read the book you can not fully understand some of the decisions of the main actor.

I personally prefer first to read the book and then see the film so you can decide which is better.

# data[].attributes.body
(Alberto Arceo)

The title that I´m going to review it´s a movie of superheroes. Today I am going to review Captain America: Civil War, a film based on the Marvel comics with the name Civil War and produced by Marvel Studios.

The plot itself is not that difficult to understand. The government of the United States want all the identities of the superheroes to have more control over them, Tony Stark (Iron Man) is agreeing with this, but Steven Rogers (Captain America) is against.

In the film and in the comic the reason why the government want to do this is completely different. While in the movie this action happened because the series of action done in the movie Avengers: Age of Ultron, in the comics it happens because of an incident involving a group of rookie superheroes.

# data[].attributes.headline
James Whale’s Frankenstein vs Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein 

# data[].attributes.subject
James Whale’s Frankenstein vs Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein 

# data[].attributes.body
In cinema history, Frankenstein, directed by James Whale, is a referencial movie when it comes about petrifying Universal monster films, but is this monster the same as the one that Mary Shelley described on her modern prometheus in 1818? Today I am reviewing two versions of the same iconic monster, Frankenstein, both universally acclaimed.

It is really hard to find someone who hasn’t read (or at least heard) the outstanding and iconic book of Mary Shelley, Frankenstein. The plot engages you from the very start — a man in a ship meets a strange dying man who turns out to be a fabulous scientific who claims having created a demoniac creature.

- Elvin JH