# data[].attributes.headline
Click the plus sign to add your evidence to correct group

# data[].attributes.subject
Click the plus sign to add your evidence to correct group

# data[].attributes.body
http://school.21cccs.org/mod/assign/view.php?id=351592

# data[].attributes.body
Can a state create state offenses for violation of federal immigration regulation?

How can this topic be argued as a federal power?

How can this topic be argued as a state power?

After your research, do you believe this is a state or federal? Why? Make sure to back up your argument with research

# data[].attributes.body
Use this!

# data[].attributes.body
http://www.citationmachine.net/

# data[].attributes.body
The ruling from the Supreme Court allows police to check a person's immigration status under the cause of "reasonable suspicion". However this brought up many problems being brought up that led to the problem of racial profiling.
http://www.cnn.com/2012/06/25/politics/scotus-arizona-law/

# data[].attributes.body
Their are five correct ways one can arrive to America : Permanent Residency, Residency through Family,  Residency through Employment, Residency through Investment, and Diversity Lottery according too immigration.findlaw.com

# data[].attributes.body
The state of Arizona attempted to pass a law targeting illegal immigration, however, the Supreme Court determined that the majority of this new legislation overlapped with federal power (Cohen & Mears 2012). According to CNN, which quotes a member of the Supreme Court, "'The National Government has significant power to regulate immigration," Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote in the majority opinion. "Arizona may have understandable frustrations with the problems caused by illegal immigration while that process continues, but the State may not pursue policies that undermine federal law' (Cohen & Mears, 2012)."

Works Cited
1) Cohen, Tom, and Bill Mears. “Supreme Court mostly rejects Arizona immigration law; gov says 'heart' remains - CNNPolitics.” CNN, Cable News Network, 26 June 2012, www.cnn.com/2012/06/25/politics/scotus-arizona-law/. Accessed 2 Oct. 2017.

# data[].attributes.body
The state of Arizona was concerned about their economy, since immigrants illegally. In response, the Arizona State Legislature enacted the Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act ("S.B. 1070").
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/11-182#top
https://www.azleg.gov/legtext/49leg/2r/bills/sb1070s.pdf

# data[].attributes.body
Supporters of the Arizona measure contend the federal government has failed to enforce existing immigration laws, leaving it to states to take their own steps to deal with mounting economic and social problems caused by illegal immigrants. The people felt that with this law being passed that the government was failing to enforce laws that were already put in place leaving it to the people to take matters into their own hands.
http://www.cnn.com/2012/06/25/politics/scotus-arizona-law/

# data[].attributes.body
The Arizona government placed a Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act (S.B. 1070) to address illegal immigration in the state. However the Federal government argues that the law was preempted by the federal law.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/11-182

# data[].attributes.body
It can be argued that the federal government has the power to create laws regarding immigration. Article I, Section 8, clause 4 of the U.S. Constitution states that the legislative branch of the federal government has the power to "establish an uniform rule of Naturalization." Justice Kennedy said of the Arizona v. United Sates case: "The Government of the United States has broad, undoubted power over the subject of immigration and the status of aliens. … This authority rests, in part, on the National Government’s constitutional power to 'establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization,' U. S. Const., Art. I, §8, cl. 4, and its inherent power as sovereign to control and conduct relations with foreign nations…."
Source: https://www.americanbar.org/publications/insights_on_law_andsociety/14/spring-2014/who-is-responsible-for-u-s--immigration-policy-.html

# data[].attributes.body
The state of Arizona maintains that it faced rampant illegal immigration, which increased crime and harmed Arizona’s economy. In response to this concern, in April 2010, the Arizona State Legislature enacted the Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act , which establishes or amends state immigration offenses and defines local police officers’ immigration law enforcement authority.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/11-182

# data[].attributes.headline
Federal regulation of the Immigration law 

# data[].attributes.subject
Federal regulation of the Immigration law 

# data[].attributes.body
The United States argues that the power to regulate immigration is exclusively federal. The United States maintains that exclusively federal regulation of immigration is necessary because nation’s relations with aliens residing in its territory are intertwined with the United States’ relationships with other nations, and that it is crucial that the country presents a single policy on immigration.  The United States contends that the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”), which thoroughly regulates the status of aliens, gave the Executive Branch the ability to exercise its full discretion.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/11-182