# data[].attributes.headline
Post in this column if you think the AGAINST side won.

# data[].attributes.subject
Post in this column if you think the AGAINST side won.

# data[].attributes.body
Use one of the sentence starters below:

Based on __________, I think the Against Side won this debate.

The most convincing argument the Against Side presented was...

The Against presented the strongest arguments in this debate. For example,... because...

# data[].attributes.headline
If you think the FOR side won, post in this column.

# data[].attributes.subject
If you think the FOR side won, post in this column.

# data[].attributes.body
Use one of the sentence starters below:

I think the For Side won this debate because...

The most convincing argument I heard from the For Side was...

I now share this point of view because...

# data[].attributes.headline
Post in this column if you think the AGAINST side won.

# data[].attributes.subject
Post in this column if you think the AGAINST side won.

# data[].attributes.body
Use one of the sentence starters below:

Based on __________, I think the Against Side won this debate.

The most convincing argument the Against Side presented was...

The Against presented the strongest arguments in this debate. For example,... because...

# data[].attributes.headline
If you think the FOR side won, post in this column.

# data[].attributes.subject
If you think the FOR side won, post in this column.

# data[].attributes.body
Use one of the sentence starters below:

I think the For Side won this debate because...

The most convincing argument I heard from the For Side was...

I now share this point of view because...

# data[].attributes.headline
Post in this column if you think the AGAINST side won.

# data[].attributes.subject
Post in this column if you think the AGAINST side won.

# data[].attributes.body
Use one of the sentence starters below:

Based on __________, I think the Against Side won this debate.

The most convincing argument the Against Side presented was...

The Against presented the strongest arguments in this debate. For example,... because...

# data[].attributes.headline
Post in this column if you think the AGAINST side won.

# data[].attributes.subject
Post in this column if you think the AGAINST side won.

# data[].attributes.body
Use one of the sentence starters below:

Based on __________, I think the Against Side won this debate.

The most convincing argument the Against Side presented was...

The Against presented the strongest arguments in this debate. For example,... because...

# data[].attributes.headline
If you think the FOR side won, post in this column.

# data[].attributes.subject
If you think the FOR side won, post in this column.

# data[].attributes.body
Use one of the sentence starters below:

I think the For Side won this debate because...

The most convincing argument I heard from the For Side was...

I now share this point of view because...

# data[].attributes.headline
If you think the FOR side won, post in this column.

# data[].attributes.subject
If you think the FOR side won, post in this column.

# data[].attributes.body
Use one of the sentence starters below:

I think the For Side won this debate because...

The most convincing argument I heard from the For Side was...

I now share this point of view because...

# data[].attributes.headline
Post in this column if you think the AGAINST side won.

# data[].attributes.subject
Post in this column if you think the AGAINST side won.

# data[].attributes.body
Use one of the sentence starters below:

Based on __________, I think the Against Side won this debate.

The most convincing argument the Against Side presented was...

The Against presented the strongest arguments in this debate. For example,... because...

# data[].attributes.headline
If you think the FOR side won, post in this column.

# data[].attributes.subject
If you think the FOR side won, post in this column.

# data[].attributes.body
Use one of the sentence starters below:

I think the For Side won this debate because...

The most convincing argument I heard from the For Side was...

I now share this point of view because...

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the con side won this debate

# data[].attributes.body
The most convincing argument the Against Side because they were more reasonable. While answering crossfires.

# data[].attributes.body
One: Some general feedback to this debate.
Good: I see direct rebuttals in this debate. There are direct responses to each argument and there were major clashes in this debate such as impacts of food inside and outside of school.
Bad: I want both sides to engage in more weighing of impact, especially in the final speech.

Con side, tell me why the health of children is the most important clash. Also, a major mistake you made in this debate includes how all your alternatives are not exclusive. Education and the push for athletics can happen on the pro world at the same time. Because the pro side did not rebut the second argument of economical benefits, re-mention this in the summary speech to make it a more definite win.

Pro, please tell me why healthy eating inside of school is the most important aspect. You could point out why the school should not be responsible for eating outside of school. Also, you guys dropped/did not response to the argument of economical benefits on the con side. Please address every argument.

Why I choose the con side for the win: Although there were a lot of issues inside the con case, they did point out the importance of backlash of only providing healthy food and therefore leading to children cramming junk food outside of school. The pro side did not point out that the school is not obligated to care about student eating outside of school, so therefore this argument remains victorious on the con's side.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the con side won the debate

# data[].attributes.body
Based on the reasoning they provided, i think the con side won the debate.

# data[].attributes.headline
Based on the research and data from the percentages of kids that are overweight are not from eating poorly, but instead on genetics.

# data[].attributes.subject
Based on the research and data from the percentages of kids that are overweight are not from eating poorly, but instead on genetics.

# data[].attributes.body
Based on the extensive reasoning and evidence that was provided, I think the Against Side won this debate.

The most convincing argument the Against Side presented was that these refugees take away opportunities from the native citizens.

The Against presented the strongest arguments in this debate.

# data[].attributes.body
I thought the argument of refugees facing possible persecution or exclusion plus the responsibility of a country to take care of its own citizens brought me to vote for the against side.
The argument of responsibility to take care of its own citizens was the strongest. Although the against side did not explicitly state that the responsibility a country holds to its citizens is more important than the moral obligation to provide refugees protection, they still hinted that the moral obligation to protect refugees should not be fulfilled due to the harms refugees might bring to the country.

# data[].attributes.body
Con side was able to show why people are still able to consume junk food outside of school.

# data[].attributes.headline
I think that the con side won because they were able to show every evidence that showed school shouldn't only provide healthy food.

# data[].attributes.subject
I think that the con side won because they were able to show every evidence that showed school shouldn't only provide healthy food.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that the con team won this debate, over several reasons.
1. Opposition was able to show significant impacts, (too costly, higher taxes, citizen hostility as well as lack of quality of life for both accepting countries and native countries) that went mostly unanswered by the proposition team.
2, the opposition team responded quite well to the proposition team's arguments. Yes, prop did have good use of pathos and emotional control, but I believe that the arguments made by opp was significantly more realistic as well as understanding of the stakeholders in this debate. They were able to stay humane whilst also prioritizing their own citizens over refugees.

# data[].attributes.body
Reason being that they gave a counter-plan that could "in theory" work and the argument about exclusion was also pretty strong. But, small note, the question about racism is highly irrelevant to the debate as a whole in my opinion

# data[].attributes.body
Con side was able to show why the detriments of refugees entering like diseases and was like mostly unresponded by pro

# data[].attributes.headline
I think this side won because their research and logic was really nice explained and I really liked they also thought about outside of the schools, not only the inside of the school

# data[].attributes.subject
I think this side won because their research and logic was really nice explained and I really liked they also thought about outside of the schools, not only the inside of the school

# data[].attributes.body
Based on speeches, I think the Against Side won this debate.The most convincing argument the Against Side presented was that there are stores outside of school that sell junk food and that it would be hard to control them.The Against presented the strongest arguments in this debate.

# data[].attributes.headline
The Con side provided good reasoning and logic throughout the debate and it was most prominent during the crossfire.

# data[].attributes.subject
The Con side provided good reasoning and logic throughout the debate and it was most prominent during the crossfire.

# data[].attributes.body
The most convincing argument the Against Side presented was that the government enforcing what the students eat outside of school is immoral.

# data[].attributes.body
Based on Piet's argument about creating super soldiers, I think the Against Side won this debate

# data[].attributes.body
I think that although there were a lot of strategic mistakes in this debate, I still give the win to the pro side. They proved to me and weighed the importance of eradicating diseases over the possible unethical usages of genetic editing.

# data[].attributes.headline
Based on arguments I think the Against Side won this debate.The most convincing argument the Against Side presented was that they said we would only use it for fixing medical conditions. The Against presented the strongest arguments in this debate. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Based on arguments I think the Against Side won this debate.The most convincing argument the Against Side presented was that they said we would only use it for fixing medical conditions. The Against presented the strongest arguments in this debate. 

# data[].attributes.body
b

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that the pro/for team won this debate.
One main reason for their victory is the fact that the opposition team made a contradiction with their MAIN arguments, thereby rendering them both invalid in the debate. Furthermore, though the proposition team did not directly engage with that contradiction, it was enough for me to accept their arguments based on the fact that they at least pointed it out. The opposition team said that genetic editing was acceptable, but at they same time they believed that the use of it would lead to super soldiers and other breaches of human rights.

# data[].attributes.headline
I think this team is going to win because their logic about creating your child, designing your child and about super soldiers were really heart biting so I love it 

# data[].attributes.subject
I think this team is going to win because their logic about creating your child, designing your child and about super soldiers were really heart biting so I love it 

# data[].attributes.body
I give the debate to prop because they were able to show how they can solve diseases and why thats the most important thing in the debate

# data[].attributes.body
They emphasised the importance of a scientific breakthrough to destroy diseases. And to figure out better ways to help the human species

# data[].attributes.body
The most convincing argument I heard from the For side was the chance of giving babies a disease-free life.

# data[].attributes.body
Based on how they were, I think the Against Side won this debate.

# data[].attributes.body
the best argument the con side made was that eating healthy foods isn't the only way to be healthy.

# data[].attributes.headline
I think that the con side won this debate

# data[].attributes.subject
I think that the con side won this debate

# data[].attributes.headline
I think the for side won this debate because they gave facts and percentages of economics rising.

# data[].attributes.subject
I think the for side won this debate because they gave facts and percentages of economics rising.

# data[].attributes.body
The pro side made a strong point on how designer babies would provide a way to stop diseases while the con side made a contradiction in their argument

# data[].attributes.headline
based on me,  I think the pro side won, they persuaded me that I need to be healthy and they were able to convince me of my action.

# data[].attributes.subject
based on me,  I think the pro side won, they persuaded me that I need to be healthy and they were able to convince me of my action.

# data[].attributes.body
Based on , I think the Against Side won this debate.

# data[].attributes.body
Based on one of the people in the pro side's inability to speak, i think this side won.

# data[].attributes.headline
Based on the weighing of the impacts, I think the Against Side won this debate.

# data[].attributes.subject
Based on the weighing of the impacts, I think the Against Side won this debate.

# data[].attributes.headline
Based on the debate I think that this side have won

# data[].attributes.subject
Based on the debate I think that this side have won

# data[].attributes.headline
They have demonstrated very passionate speech

# data[].attributes.subject
They have demonstrated very passionate speech

# data[].attributes.headline
Based on the arguments made in this debate, i think that the con side has won.

# data[].attributes.subject
Based on the arguments made in this debate, i think that the con side has won.

# data[].attributes.body
T

# data[].attributes.body
The Against presented the strongest arguments in this debate. For example, they had straight forward reasoning, and they had a solution. Because of that, I believe they won the debate

# data[].attributes.body
the con side presented better reasoning and counterclaims
t

# data[].attributes.body
Based on the argumentation and rebuttals, I think the Against Side won this debate.

# data[].attributes.body
Based on the fact that side against was able to prove that rehabilitation is already available, against side won

# data[].attributes.body
I think the opposition won this debate because they provided more evidence and had a better grasp on this subject.

# data[].attributes.body
The Con side won based on all the evidences they gave.

# data[].attributes.body
the two members of the con side spoke a relatively equal amount

# data[].attributes.body
Based on they reasoning and evidence on how lowering punishments will not change instead increase, I think the Against Side won this debate.

# data[].attributes.headline
you guys won because you guys had better evidence and you guys were able to reply back well

# data[].attributes.subject
you guys won because you guys had better evidence and you guys were able to reply back well

# data[].attributes.body
Based on the amount of reasoning and evidence they provided, I think the Against Side won this debate.

# data[].attributes.body
Based on the evidence, I think the Against Side won this debate.

# data[].attributes.body
Based on the reasoning and evidence given to prove that providing housing for the homeless will only lead to more substance abuse, I vote for the against team. I thought the against team could address a little more about the healthcare argument on the for side though.

# data[].attributes.body
Based on the evidence and reasoning, I think the against side won this debate

# data[].attributes.body
Based on their reasoning and evidence about how giving them money for housing they will use it for drugs, I think the Against Side won this debate.

# data[].attributes.headline
Based on the arguments provided in this debate, I think the Against Side won this debate.

# data[].attributes.subject
Based on the arguments provided in this debate, I think the Against Side won this debate.

# data[].attributes.headline
Based on the arguments and evidence concerning substance abuse, and their ability to counter the proposition's claims regarding affordable housing, I think the opposition won this debate.

# data[].attributes.subject
Based on the arguments and evidence concerning substance abuse, and their ability to counter the proposition's claims regarding affordable housing, I think the opposition won this debate.

# data[].attributes.headline
Based on arguments I think the Against Side won this debate.

# data[].attributes.subject
Based on arguments I think the Against Side won this debate.