# data[].attributes.headline
Annamma stated that DisCrit is an intersectional approach committed to, "a counter-hegemonic and transformative intervention in knowledge production, activism, pedagogy, and non-oppressive coalitions". The author sees intersectionality as a tool to center the multiply marginalized instead of conflating or ignoring intergroup differences. What is a DisCrit Curriculum and what are its goals?​

# data[].attributes.subject
Annamma stated that DisCrit is an intersectional approach committed to, "a counter-hegemonic and transformative intervention in knowledge production, activism, pedagogy, and non-oppressive coalitions". The author sees intersectionality as a tool to center the multiply marginalized instead of conflating or ignoring intergroup differences. What is a DisCrit Curriculum and what are its goals?​

# data[].attributes.headline
 What was the author's purpose for using hashtags?​ (#GynnyaMcMillen, #ReneeDavis and #PaulCastaway (Native with Mental Health crisis), #AlfredOlango and #NatashaMcKenna (Black in Mental Health Crisis), #MelissaVentura and #AnthonyNuñez (Latinxin Mental Health)) ​

# data[].attributes.subject
 What was the author's purpose for using hashtags?​ (#GynnyaMcMillen, #ReneeDavis and #PaulCastaway (Native with Mental Health crisis), #AlfredOlango and #NatashaMcKenna (Black in Mental Health Crisis), #MelissaVentura and #AnthonyNuñez (Latinxin Mental Health)) ​

# data[].attributes.headline
 What specific methodology(ies) does Annamma use?  Why did she choose this/these methodologies to use for her research? How does Annamma's methodology reflect intersectionality?

# data[].attributes.subject
 What specific methodology(ies) does Annamma use?  Why did she choose this/these methodologies to use for her research? How does Annamma's methodology reflect intersectionality?

# data[].attributes.headline
What advantages/limitations does Annamma describe using the methodology she has chosen in this section?  How might these advantages/limitations influence her research? How was "objectivity" applied to critical phenomenology?

# data[].attributes.subject
What advantages/limitations does Annamma describe using the methodology she has chosen in this section?  How might these advantages/limitations influence her research? How was "objectivity" applied to critical phenomenology?

# data[].attributes.headline
Ewing (2018) recognizes that it is a school where she taught that was closed down and that the closing inspired her research. Researchers often draw on personal experiences and inspirations to shape their research, and while this can make them ideal research candidates in some instances, it could also make them biased.  To ensure our research is objective, it is important to answer several questions:

# data[].attributes.subject
Ewing (2018) recognizes that it is a school where she taught that was closed down and that the closing inspired her research. Researchers often draw on personal experiences and inspirations to shape their research, and while this can make them ideal research candidates in some instances, it could also make them biased.  To ensure our research is objective, it is important to answer several questions:

# data[].attributes.body
1.  In what ways does your experience equip you to effectively carry out your research?

2.  In what ways might your experience or personal views make you biased?

3.  What measures can you take to address potential biases?

4.  How might the way you present (e.g., accent, clothes, etc.) to participants shape their responses to your research questions?

# data[].attributes.headline
Ewing (2018) details how her participants’ responses reshaped her research direction. This seems to mirror the ways in which narrative inquiry frames researchers and participants as equal partners in research and gives participants more agency in the research process. This necessitates that researchers give attention to several considerations:

# data[].attributes.subject
Ewing (2018) details how her participants’ responses reshaped her research direction. This seems to mirror the ways in which narrative inquiry frames researchers and participants as equal partners in research and gives participants more agency in the research process. This necessitates that researchers give attention to several considerations:

# data[].attributes.body
1.  How much agency should researchers afford participants? Consider differences between qualitative and quantitative research.

2.  How can researchers foster participants’ autonomy?

3.  How can participant autonomy shape the research, either positively or negatively?

# data[].attributes.body
qualitative
ethnographic observations
Phenomenological interviews
existing data from school/ justice department
Methodological pluralism

# data[].attributes.body
To get to the heart of her subjects. So the reader really understands the complexity of each girls' situation and experience.

# data[].attributes.body
-With qualitative research there is more space to allow for the influence/experience of participants. There can be as much agency as you want.

-With quantitative research, the numbers are what they are and tell one story. There isn't as much agency or influence that's needed/wanted.

-Either way, researchers should be aware of their own biases.

# data[].attributes.body
Definition:
Summary: A DisCrit Curriculum would take this into account and arrange for it in such a way that all bodies may participate. Disabled girls of color, who are already stigmatized, require connections between what they are learning and how it relates to their life
Clarity in Goals:
1. Ensuring histories not erased.
2. Fostering student identities

# data[].attributes.body
Using various ways of collecting data ensures that each girl could fully participate. Data collection done in a way that showed how they were being impacted as dis/abled girls of color

# data[].attributes.body
-Leave it as open ended as possible.

-Be involved in their lives in a way that makes sense to them and to the researcher.

-Even when you have opinions, etc. keep it focused on the experiences and of the participants. Example: The researcher didn't use the school that she was involved with.

# data[].attributes.body
-There is nothing wrong with a participant being completely autonomous. You want them to tell you about their authentic and honest experience.

# data[].attributes.body
Objectivity not a concern: she showed the system and inequalities impacted  each girl.

advantage: maps and interviews, allowing the girls to express themselves in their own words
actively kept the focus on the girls but also, at times, her feelings on matters would come through

# data[].attributes.body
-Provides you with a perspective to get your started.

-Your experience tells you what questions you want to ask. It drives you and gives you power.

# data[].attributes.body
Highlighting and capturing attention with modern day use of social media.

# data[].attributes.body
-Everyone has a bias! You have to acknowledge it and do your best to capture the full picture.

-You're human - you're going to have a hypothesis that you believe is true. You just have to be honest with your results.

-Have others look over your work.

-Let the participants do the talking!

# data[].attributes.body
-Take a picture of the whole situation.

-Name the opposing views! Don't hide from it. State it and explain it.

-Have someone review your work.

# data[].attributes.body
-People are human, they look at you and make determinations based on how you look.

-Be open and honest. Be real.

-When it comes to your writing,The person who is reading may not necessarily know who you are and what you look like. You develop the narrative as a researcher.

# data[].attributes.body
Disability as meta curriculum: Ontologies, epistemologies, and transformative praxis. (Erevilles, Grace, Parekh).