# data[].attributes.body
What do you think you should have known earlier (about working with sources)?

# data[].attributes.body
What are the most common problems in your working process when using media? Are there solutions?

# data[].attributes.body
Which search engines/catalogues are better than others and why?

# data[].attributes.body
Which sources are often used but are problematic?

# data[].attributes.body
Is there any outstanding source that should be more widely known?

# data[].attributes.body
How do you think the academic community and universities could improve the process of using media? What are gaps ? Where do you see potential for progress?

# data[].attributes.body
Being taught how to clearly reference (different styles of referencing, when to quote, paraphrase...)

# data[].attributes.body
1)
- Finding and evaluating resources takes the major amount of time while doing research
- Critical perspective on credibility and authenticity of resources

2)
- Access (availability online and in library systems)
- Solution: nationwide network to enable student's access/ network among EMGS universities

3)
- jstor
- Google scholar
- University catalogue system

4)
- Google scholar
- Online newspapers
- Podcasts
- Documentary

5)
- Reports (OECD, UN etc.)
- Checking out library sections related to the topic (Which book is the next one to the one I found?)

6)
- Hybrid conduction of events/ presentations/ conferences to enable more students to join
- Accessibility of resources for everybody
- Usage of algorithms to find related media

# data[].attributes.body
Not knowing how to reference that media material correctly (if they don't have any recommended manner of being cited); Secondary referencing can also be tough. As a solution, using more reliable sources and asking professors for help/advice.
Each uni has different sorts of referencing, and so it would be super useful to have an introductory course to know how to properly carry it out.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Advanced search function in most of scholarly websites - facilitates the search profoundly

2. Style of referencing audio-video media (podcasts, videos, documentaries, etc) Solution - approve one style to facilitate the process.

3. Google Scholar, worldwidescience.org, refseek.com, researchgate.net, archive.org

4. News Articles - because they are biased and the material is too simplified

5. Archive.org - it is probably the archive of the internet itself and one can find practically anything

6. How - Provide access, share and talk about them.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Z-lib for textbooks, or some texts you don't know whether they will be useful
2. Lack of access to sources (high price)
On the other hand property rights violations
3. As mentioned by other groups - Google Scholar and using uni library later, or just Google it. Also if you have student status in more than 2 universities use access to journal that they both have

# data[].attributes.body
Online University Library Platforms, using Google Scholars, academia, jstor...

# data[].attributes.body
Random articles on the websites that do not reference the authors clearly

# data[].attributes.body
(Same as the ones we have used so far, which are the ones in Q3)

# data[].attributes.body
We had no classes dedicated to research design and thesis writing, or other related courses. It would be helpful to have that, since we all come from different disciplines and study fields and have different writing experience.