# data[].attributes.headline
They would be able to sue them to up to four times the value of the items they stole. Robbery was not a crime.

# data[].attributes.subject
They would be able to sue them to up to four times the value of the items they stole. Robbery was not a crime.

# data[].attributes.body
Aidan Quinn

# data[].attributes.body
It wasn't a crime, but you could be sued multiple times for stealing

# data[].attributes.headline
For women in the Byzantine Empire at the time of Justinian's rule, they would have most of the same rights but would not be guaranteed equal treatment, or the acknowledgment of these rights.

# data[].attributes.subject
For women in the Byzantine Empire at the time of Justinian's rule, they would have most of the same rights but would not be guaranteed equal treatment, or the acknowledgment of these rights.

# data[].attributes.body
Aidan Quinn

# data[].attributes.body
The person could sue the robber up to four times the values of the stolen property. It also wasn't a crime.

# data[].attributes.body
Robbery was not a crime, and the victim could sue the robber for up to four times the value of their stolen property.

# data[].attributes.body
It was not a crime, but you could sue the robber up to four times the amount of items they stole.

# data[].attributes.body
It was not a crime, but the victim was allowed to sue the person up to 4 times the value of the stolen objects.

# data[].attributes.body
It wasn't justified as a crime, but they could sue the person four times the value of what the robber has stolen.

# data[].attributes.body
Woman had more rights than most other civilizations but not as much as the U.S. has for woman now.

# data[].attributes.body
THey sued the robber

# data[].attributes.headline
The failure to pay debt laws were almost identical to the U.S. bill of rights, and to some extent the women's rights laws are the same with one difference; women would not be guaranteed equal treatment.

# data[].attributes.subject
The failure to pay debt laws were almost identical to the U.S. bill of rights, and to some extent the women's rights laws are the same with one difference; women would not be guaranteed equal treatment.

# data[].attributes.body
Aidan Quinn

# data[].attributes.body
according to justinians code, robbery was not a crime, but the victim could sue them for 4 times the value of the property that was stolen.

# data[].attributes.body
Some rules yes but not all

# data[].attributes.body
Women had many rights and got a lot but still not 100% equal to mean.

# data[].attributes.body
The person who was stolen from could sue, up to four times as much as the robber stole. Theift still wasn't seen as a crime though.

# data[].attributes.body
Women in Justinian's time did have the same rights as men in the US. They could do many things that men could do.

# data[].attributes.body
Debt payment

# data[].attributes.body
The victim could sue the robber for up to four times the values of the stolen property,

# data[].attributes.body
They could sue the robber for four times the amount that was stolen.

# data[].attributes.body
They were able to sue the robber of up four times the value of what was stolen.

# data[].attributes.headline
Robbery was not a crime. The most they could do was sue them up to four times for the items that they stole.

# data[].attributes.subject
Robbery was not a crime. The most they could do was sue them up to four times for the items that they stole.

# data[].attributes.body
Elizabeth Santoro

# data[].attributes.body
It was not a crime, the victim was allowed to sue the person/robber up to four times of the value of the stolen things.

# data[].attributes.body
Inheritence because womwn could not

# data[].attributes.body
The robber could be sued for four times the value of the stolen item

# data[].attributes.body
The person who robbed them did not go to jail since it was not a crime but the person who was robbed could sue them for up too 4 times of the amount of the crime.

# data[].attributes.body
today because it is safer

# data[].attributes.body
Failure to pay debts is almost exactly the same word by word

# data[].attributes.body
The failure to pay debt law. Both of the laws say that if someone owes something the person can come and gain their debt back.

# data[].attributes.body
while women were allowed to own proerty, make wills and contracts, and make lawsuits, just like women in the U.S., but however, they do not have the same rights as men do, unlike the U.S.

# data[].attributes.body
robbery was not a crime and they could sue a robber up to 4 times.

# data[].attributes.body
It was not a guarantee, but women got about the same rights as men did.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes All women can own property, make contracts and wills, and bring a lawsuit. Men can do all of those as well

# data[].attributes.body
Failure to pay debts was the most similar to Justinian's laws. They're basically the same.

# data[].attributes.body
Women did still get a fair amount of rights but not as much as now.

# data[].attributes.body
They have most of the same rights but they are not equal too men during this time.

# data[].attributes.body
Men and Women mostly had the same set of rights but the women were not guaranteed the same treatment as men.

# data[].attributes.body
Women did have rights but not the same amount as the men.

# data[].attributes.body
They had the same rights as men but weren't treated the exact same

# data[].attributes.body
There was no jail or death penalty, the person who stole had to pay back 4 times the amount they stole.

# data[].attributes.body
Woman had the same rights as men such as owning property, making contacts and voting.

# data[].attributes.body
Women in the Byzantine Empire had many rights but not as many as the men.

# data[].attributes.body
women had rights like they could still own land but they didnt have as much rights as they do today

# data[].attributes.body
The laws about failure to pay debt were near identical to the laws regarding the same treason in the U.S.

# data[].attributes.body
Failure too pay debts is the same.

# data[].attributes.body
Failure to pay debts. Both of these places say that the people who owe something had to go to the person owing them to gain debt back.

# data[].attributes.body
Robbery wasn't a crime, (I can see why) but they can sue the person up to four times the value of the stolen property.

# data[].attributes.body
The victim could sue the robber up to 4 time depending on how many item the robber stole. Technically it is not a crime though.

# data[].attributes.body
not paying debts is the same as it is today

# data[].attributes.body
The debt laws if someone fails to pay debt and some of the woman laws being abke to make wills own land ect.

# data[].attributes.body
It's not crime but the robber can get sued up to 4 times what they stole.

# data[].attributes.body
The failure to pay debt

# data[].attributes.body
Wemon in the Byzantine empire, had similar rights but no quite as many freedoms and were still not guaranteed good treatment by men.

# data[].attributes.body
Debt payment

# data[].attributes.headline
All of these laws except for the failure to pay debt laws. The reason that only these are the same is because of how much the technology has advanced, now any random person can own a weapon capable of shooting through a wall, and killing someone with a single mechanism. The inheritance is different because they had different views on how women should've lived and how they should get things.

# data[].attributes.subject
All of these laws except for the failure to pay debt laws. The reason that only these are the same is because of how much the technology has advanced, now any random person can own a weapon capable of shooting through a wall, and killing someone with a single mechanism. The inheritance is different because they had different views on how women should've lived and how they should get things.

# data[].attributes.body
Aidan Quinn

# data[].attributes.body
Debt payment because the law is written the same word by word.

# data[].attributes.body
laws are safer today (even though not everyone follows them)
they are probably more fair and safe today

# data[].attributes.body
Robbing someone because it was not a crime in the byzantine empire.

# data[].attributes.body
Failure to pay debts, Justinian's laws and the US laws are exactly the same when it comes to this.

# data[].attributes.body
Inheritance is probably the most different because women couldn't inherit property.

# data[].attributes.body
Murder charges differed the most because in the U.S. you would either get a death penalty or a long sentence to prison, but in the Justinian code you would just be banished.

# data[].attributes.body
Inheritance is the most different because back then women were not allowed to inherit any property from their husband unless it was given by will but now it is different and they are allowed to.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, they could do almost anything a man could. Own land, own property, make a lawsuit.

# data[].attributes.body
while the laws regarding women had the most variation in terms of differences, robbery was not considered a crime, in contrast to the U.S. where robbery is considered a crime, and punishments varies from fines to jailtime.

# data[].attributes.body
Robbery. Justinian's laws say that robbery was not even a crime. In the U.S, you can get fined or get sentenced to go to prison, but Justinian's law just say that you can sue someone.

# data[].attributes.body
debt and inheritance were the most similar.

# data[].attributes.body
In Justinians time women have a lot of rights but they are still not completely equal.

# data[].attributes.body
The had many of the same rights of men but not all of them.

# data[].attributes.body
The laws are very similar but their is slight changes in the U.S.A's laws that make it safer.

# data[].attributes.body
I would say the United States just because of equal rights

# data[].attributes.body
Failure to pay debt is almost the exact same law as the U.S.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the laws today are better just because more people get the punishment they deserve and that causes more people to follow them.

# data[].attributes.body
No, mostly because the laws back then allowed things to pass that wouldn't pass here, in particular robbery, and also the fact that murderers were punished by banishment, not by inprisonment or death, essentially making them someone else's problem.

# data[].attributes.body
Women did get rights however not as much as we do now or under the Justinian's law.

# data[].attributes.body
Robery because it was not a crime and punishment is different.

# data[].attributes.headline
They would have most of the same rights (can own property, make contracts and wills, and bring a lawsuit) There would be some minor things that women still couldn't do though.

# data[].attributes.subject
They would have most of the same rights (can own property, make contracts and wills, and bring a lawsuit) There would be some minor things that women still couldn't do though.

# data[].attributes.body
Elizabeth Santoro

# data[].attributes.body
Laws are better today because they're safer. Also the person who committed the crime gets the punishment that they deserve.

# data[].attributes.body
Robbery because in Justinian's law Robbery was not a crime. The victim could sue the robber for up to four times the value of the stolen property now in the U.S. the law is Robbery is a crime and is punishable by a fine and/or a prison sentence.

# data[].attributes.body
Robbery was not a crime but for the bill of rights it is.

# data[].attributes.body
inheritance is the most different because then, women couldnt inherit anything but today women can inherit things.

# data[].attributes.body
The most similar law is definitely faliure to pay off debts. With nearly the exact same punishment.

# data[].attributes.body
All of them but failure to pay debt. This is because they all have changed over time like woman being able to Inherit land the difference for all has changed except the paying debt one.

# data[].attributes.body
Womans rights because All women can own property, make contracts and wills, and bring a lawsuit. And now we can do all of those still.

# data[].attributes.body
The debt payment, it is exactly word-for-word.

# data[].attributes.body
The Bill of Rights have more freedom for women and they are safer for us.

# data[].attributes.body
Murder

# data[].attributes.body
Women were not allowed to inherit property unless it was provided.

# data[].attributes.body
I think our laws today are better than Justinian's. We have worse punishments, and is the punishments are not harsh enough, people will do whatever they want and not follow the rules.

# data[].attributes.body
Inheritence because woman could not inherit things, but men can.

# data[].attributes.body
Robbery is not a crime, and if caught, they could get sued for up to 4 times the amount they stole.

# data[].attributes.body
Inheritance was the different law. Women could not inherit any property unless it was provided a will.

# data[].attributes.body
Todays laws because they are more fair to more people all people and are a lot safer.

# data[].attributes.body
They had most rights, but not as much as men.

# data[].attributes.body
Failure to pay debts was the most similar and had a very similar punishment.

# data[].attributes.body
Robbery, and murder. Robbery isn't a crime and murder isn't a banishment now.

# data[].attributes.body
No, the laws in the byzantine empire would let more things pass that should not be let go.

# data[].attributes.body
Failure to pay debt is almost the same.

# data[].attributes.body
Today because the treatment of woman is much better, and laws here are more justifiable.

# data[].attributes.body
If they fail to pay depts its exactly the same.

# data[].attributes.body
I say now, it's just as fair and women have more rights now then back then.

# data[].attributes.body
Robbery Justinian's law says that robbery is not even a crime. In the U.S robbery is punished by fine or prison sentence. In the Byzantine Empire the victim could sue the robber.