# data[].attributes.body
Not necessarily to surrender but to avoid the conflict would be the best way to guarantee peace.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree  because even if countries have a peace treaty or something similar there is no guarantee that peace will be kept. Countries could have disagreements and another war could start. Unless a country surrenders to another country and gives the other country power over them, there is always a chance that peace between two countries will not last.

# data[].attributes.body
A lot of the people in the audience have basic knowledge of the events he mentioned and can relate to it.

# data[].attributes.body
No We disagree with the statement because when you surrender you show that you're weak and that shows them they have more power over you .

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with this statement, because if the country surrenders, then the other country feels more powerful and sees more opportunity to attack.

# data[].attributes.body
No the only way to guarantee peace is not by surrendering because that shows a sign of weakness and it makes you seem like you ended on bad terms.

# data[].attributes.body
It makes it effective by providing past events that occurred. For example, in the passage it stated "The martyrs of history were not fools, and our honored dead who gave their lives to stop the advance of the Nazis didn't die in vain.".    In the passage it also stated "Moses have told the children of Israel to live in slavery under the pharaohs? Should Christ have refused the cross? Should the patriots at Concord Bridge have thrown down their guns and refused to fire the shot heard 'round the world?" Through saying this Reagan is showing how you will sometimes even have to self sacrifice to make it a brighter future.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, because it stops people suffering from the war and the damages it has caused.

# data[].attributes.body
If it means you have to lose some to gain some then yes. But most  of the time it involves a lot of dispute between two countries which one can gain and the other just loses.

# data[].attributes.body
Reagan uses Allusion in his speech. He alludes to the Bible. He also uses Rhetorical Questions.He asks, "And then what?" after saying what happens when they back down, but he doesn't expect the audience to actually answer his question.

# data[].attributes.body
Reagan alludes to Moses, Jesus, the patriots, and those opposing the Nazis specifically because most people have knowledge on all those events and people. By alluding to those people and events, it made his point clearer to the audience by using things well known to all.

# data[].attributes.body
Reagan used allusion to refer back to the stories from the bible, stories which most of the audience know. Reagan also uses hyperbole to reiterate that future generations would be affected by the decision that were made on that subject.

# data[].attributes.body
Reagan alludes to these people because people can relate to them or at least have some knowledge of them.

# data[].attributes.body
He's alludes to them because those are examples that may ensure the message comes across clearly. The point is well received because those examples may "tug at your heartstrings".

# data[].attributes.body
People already have knowledge of those figures and are more likely to relate to them.

# data[].attributes.body
He uses allusion in the speech because Reagan goes back to the bible. He also uses rhetorical questions "And then what".

# data[].attributes.body
He alluded to these things to compare the present day events to the events that these people went through. He wanted everyone to connect with what he was saying.

# data[].attributes.body
He mentions surrendering multiple times, which persuades the audience to keep fighting. He also points out that there are risks if we remain neutral or do not take action.

# data[].attributes.body
I think he alludes to them because they are references people have heard of and the things the people have done they can be related to.

# data[].attributes.body
His aggressiveness and allusions used make this speech very effective. "Or should Moses have told the children of Israel to live in slavery under the pharaohs?" & "Should Christ have refused the cross?" are good examples because lots of people know about the Bible.

# data[].attributes.body
He appeals to the audiences emotions by saying that voices do not speak for the rest of us, meaning not everyone has their own opinion and speak for themselves.

# data[].attributes.body
Allusion because it refereed to the bible.
Logos because he uses logic

# data[].attributes.body
Yes. That's the easy way out. But, with surrendering comes the conditions that it brings from whom you surrendered to.

# data[].attributes.body
He uses a lot of pathos to appeal to the reader's/listener's emotions. He also puts in a lot of allusions to compare what's currently happening in his time to the past or the bible.

# data[].attributes.body
Using allusions from the Bible makes it powerful. Saying why should we not give up. He uses a lot of pathos to appeal to the audience emotions .

# data[].attributes.body
The speech was effective because Reagan kept on referring to past history where we've hit obstacles. In order to stop the mass genocide of Jewish people in Europe, American soldiers had to fight and possibly die for their freedom.

# data[].attributes.body
These topics are something  a lot of people can relate to and take really serious. He is trying to prove a point through real situations.

# data[].attributes.body
He uses allusion by using "moses.. jesus..." this alludes to the bible. Hyperbole " we'll sentence.." he exaggerates by saying this because you can't really take the last step into thousand of year to darkness,its impossible.

# data[].attributes.body
He refers to past events that people are aware of such as the actions of the Nazi. He also uses a lot of logic on the causes and effects of surrendering

# data[].attributes.body
He uses multiple examples of pathos and allusion. By using allusion he can help the audience relate to the past events, and with pathos he uses their emotions and makes them feel empathy towards those before them.

# data[].attributes.body
It makes it more effective because he uses past event's and uses a lot of stories from the bible.

# data[].attributes.body
1. rhetorical question, it ads another prospective to the speech and how the reader interperates it.
2. Repetion, it makes sure the point trying to be made is made and understood.

# data[].attributes.body
He uses allusion by helping the audience relate to the past events
He also uses logos by using logic

# data[].attributes.body
He uses a lot of allusion because he refers to the bible and gives off events that once happened, he always uses pathos because he tries to get the audience under their emotions

# data[].attributes.body
He alludes to Moses, Jesus, the patriots at concord bridge to show how throughout history tough situations have occurred. Also people can relate to different events.